On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:27:11 GMT, Craig Chilton
<xanadu222_@mchsi.com> spake thusly:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:37:56 GMT,
PHONY-pastor Dave <news-group-mail@tampa-bay.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
PHONY-Pastor Dave spewed nonsensical TRIPE:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
The real issue is this: Should a man over 18 be looking
at a underaged girl in that way?
Why not? Totally harmless.
<STUPIDITY-flush. Leaving you with
*nothing*. As usual, PHONY-pastor.>
Let me remind you dumbass, that you left the evidence
of your perversion in your response.
There's nothing "perverted" about ANY male of ANY age
enjoying the sight of a cute & sexily scantily-clad (or nude, for
that matter; there are lots of perfectly legal nude beaches
around the world) girl or woman of ANY age beyond puberty.
But *you* clearly are one of the DUMBEST and klutziest
prudes in Usenet, Wacko.
Thank you for admitting that you like to look at nude
young girls.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!
Given that by "young," we're talking about girls OLDER than
puberty, that is true of pretty much EVERY normal heterosexual
male on the planet, with the exception of a relative handful of
religious-fanatic RETARDS like you, who comprise the Abnormal
ones.
You said, "ALL TEENS". So now you are saying that all male
heterosexuals are perverts, like you, who like young girls,
13 & up.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
1st Century Church of Christ
All those who wish to pretend
to be Christians, while promoting
anti-Biblical doctrines, will be
called on their heresy.
.
