Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll results



 Science > Abortion > Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll results

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Krisblake"
Date: 12 Jul 2003 05:25:39 PM
Object: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll results

Subject: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll
results
From: Omphalos


Date: 7/12/03 6:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <7fd4e501cbad25044f5d974f161da82d@free.teranews.com>

On Sat 12 Jul 2003 08:31:34a,
(Bethe57) wrote in
news:20030712083134.03463.00000202@mb-m16.news.cs.com:

On Fri 11 Jul 2003 09:29:44p,

(Ray Fischer)
wrote


You demand that women be forced to gestate and give birth. You insist
that women be forced to provide the use of their bodies to the fetus.
You treat women like slaves.


From: Omphalos



You insist that women should be able to slaughter their children.


Let me ask this..............do you, Omphalos, believe that women, who
find themselves pregnant, regardless of how they got that way (rape,
incest etc...), MUST carry to term and give birth?


Allowing abortion for cases of rape or incest effectively blames the
preborn for another's (i.e. the father) crime.

So you'd subject your thirteen year old daughter to a forced pregnancy,
regardless of her being cruelly, sexually, and violently assaulted?
**Krisblake**
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest pollresults 12 Jul 2003 09:57:34 PM
Krisblake wrote:


Subject: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll
results
From: Omphalos


Date: 7/12/03 6:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <7fd4e501cbad25044f5d974f161da82d@free.teranews.com>

On Sat 12 Jul 2003 08:31:34a,
(Bethe57) wrote in
news:20030712083134.03463.00000202@mb-m16.news.cs.com:

On Fri 11 Jul 2003 09:29:44p,

(Ray Fischer)
wrote


You demand that women be forced to gestate and give birth. You insist
that women be forced to provide the use of their bodies to the fetus.
You treat women like slaves.


From: Omphalos



You insist that women should be able to slaughter their children.


Let me ask this..............do you, Omphalos, believe that women, who
find themselves pregnant, regardless of how they got that way (rape,
incest etc...), MUST carry to term and give birth?


Allowing abortion for cases of rape or incest effectively blames the
preborn for another's (i.e. the father) crime.


So you'd subject your thirteen year old daughter to a forced pregnancy,
regardless of her being cruelly, sexually, and violently assaulted?
**Krisblake**

Who said that? Going by the behavior of abortion clinics (documented at
http://www.childpredators.com) pro-lifers are just ensuring that these
girls won't be victimized again - this time by an abortionist - without
them knowing about it.
Claims about "forcing pregnancy" is just your way of avoiding the
reality of this issue.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Anti-abortion extremismresults 13 Jul 2003 01:43:06 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote:

Krisblake wrote:

Omphalos


Allowing abortion for cases of rape or incest effectively blames the
preborn for another's (i.e. the father) crime.


So you'd subject your thirteen year old daughter to a forced pregnancy,
regardless of her being cruelly, sexually, and violently assaulted?
**Krisblake**


Who said that?

Can't you read attributions?

Going by the behavior of abortion clinics (documented at

Pro-lie propaganda and lies isn't documentation of anything.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.


User: "Dingleberry"

Title: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll results 13 Jul 2003 10:00:28 AM
krisblakemyluvs@aol.comnospam (Krisblake) wrote in message news:<20030712182539.03194.00000176@mb-m12.aol.com>...

Subject: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest poll
results
From: Omphalos


Date: 7/12/03 6:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <7fd4e501cbad25044f5d974f161da82d@free.teranews.com>

On Sat 12 Jul 2003 08:31:34a,
(Bethe57) wrote in
news:20030712083134.03463.00000202@mb-m16.news.cs.com:

On Fri 11 Jul 2003 09:29:44p,

(Ray Fischer)
wrote


You demand that women be forced to gestate and give birth. You insist
that women be forced to provide the use of their bodies to the fetus.
You treat women like slaves.


From: Omphalos



You insist that women should be able to slaughter their children.


Let me ask this..............do you, Omphalos, believe that women, who
find themselves pregnant, regardless of how they got that way (rape,
incest etc...), MUST carry to term and give birth?


Allowing abortion for cases of rape or incest effectively blames the
preborn for another's (i.e. the father) crime.


So you'd subject your thirteen year old daughter to a forced pregnancy,
regardless of her being cruelly, sexually, and violently assaulted?
**Krisblake**

What did the baby do to justify it being aborted? It had nothing to do
with the crime. If you were a product of rape, I'm sure you wouldn't
appriciate it very much if your mother decided you weren't worth as
much as any other baby. How the baby was conceived makes no difference
on the worth of the child.
The woman has been subjected to an ugly trauma, and she needs love,
support and help. But she has been the victim of one violent act.
Should we now ask her to be a party to a second violent act -that of
abortion? Unquestionably, many would return the violence of killing an
innocent baby for the violence of rape. But, before making this
decision, remember that most of the trauma has already occurred. She
has been raped. That trauma will live with her all her life. She's old
enough to know and have an opinion as to whether she carries a "baby"
or a "blob of protoplasm." Will she be able to live comfortably with
the memory that she "killed her developing baby"? Or would she
ultimately be more mature and more at peace with herself if she could
remember that, even though she became pregnant unwillingly, she
nevertheless solved her problem by being unselfish, by giving of
herself and of her love to an innocent baby, who had not asked to be
created, to deliver, perhaps to place for adoption, if she decides
that is what is best for her baby. Compare this memory with the woman
who can only look back and say, "I killed my baby."
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Anti-abortion extremism 13 Jul 2003 01:44:31 PM
Dingleberry <dingleberry@subdimension.com> wrote:

What did the baby do to justify it being aborted?

What does a rapist do to deserve being sent to prison?
[...]

The woman has been subjected to an ugly trauma, and she needs love,
support and help.

But you're certainly not going to offer anything like that.
It would be too inconvenient.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Omphalos"

Title: Re: Anti-abortion extremism 13 Jul 2003 02:38:18 PM
On Sun 13 Jul 2003 02:44:31p,
(Ray Fischer) wrote
in news:bes9ae$mp6$1@bolt.sonic.net:

Dingleberry <dingleberry@subdimension.com> wrote:

What did the baby do to justify it being aborted?


What does a rapist do to deserve being sent to prison?

[...]

The woman has been subjected to an ugly trauma, and she needs love,
support and help.


But you're certainly not going to offer anything like that.

It would be too inconvenient.

Prove it. If you, can't then you are a liar. Oh wait, we already knew
that.
--
__________
==\ /================================
===\ /==You know how dumb the average==
====\ /===guy is? Well half of everyone==
=====\ /======is even dumber than that=====
======\/====================================
http://31337.pl
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: Anti-abortion extremism 13 Jul 2003 04:09:10 PM
Omphalos <omphalos@xmsg.com> wrote in
news:4d2cee5f4e383a88b7fadcf378b0c426@free.teranews.com:

Prove it. If you, can't then you are a liar.

have you ever mentioned that to coward bobby heishman? he demands
that those he cccuses (falsely) prove their innocence.
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Anti-abortion extremism 18 Jul 2003 09:43:03 AM
Ray Fischer wrote:


Dingleberry <dingleberry@subdimension.com> wrote:

What did the baby do to justify it being aborted?


What does a rapist do to deserve being sent to prison?

"Pregnancy is rape. Sex is rape."
You should be eligible for a PhD in Women's Studies by now Fischer. Just
like all the other fat, retarded feminazi BITCHES.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Anti-abortion extremism 18 Jul 2003 11:04:25 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:


Dingleberry <dingleberry@subdimension.com> wrote:

What did the baby do to justify it being aborted?


What does a rapist do to deserve being sent to prison?


"Pregnancy is rape. Sex is rape."

You should be eligible for a PhD in Women's Studies by now Fischer.

And you should be almost eligible for the GED. If you study real hard
and get help from your fellow inmates.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Craig Chilton, Pro-Abortionist, grows panicky over latest pollresults 14 Jul 2003 04:57:05 AM
Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <377dfa5a.0307130203.5b5f6bc2@posting.google.com>,
dingleberry@subdimension.com says...

Allowing abortion for cases of rape or incest effectively blames the
preborn for another's (i.e. the father) crime.


So you'd subject your thirteen year old daughter to a forced pregnancy,
regardless of her being cruelly, sexually, and violently assaulted?
**Krisblake**


What did the baby do to justify it being aborted?


No babies are or can be aborted. It's physically impossible.

Rephrase the question: what did the fetus do to justify it being aborted?
You at least have a venomous hatred for innocent fetuses, going by the
numbers of them you are happy to see being killed - even if they're not
human beings.
Think about those poor innocent fetuses, Pat. Don't you have at least an
ounce of compassion for these poor little creatures:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Pro-liar hatred of childrenresults 14 Jul 2003 11:19:22 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote:

Pat Winstanley wrote:

No babies are or can be aborted. It's physically impossible.


Rephrase the question: what did the fetus do to justify it being aborted?

What do starving children do to merit you letting them die?

You at least have a venomous hatred for innocent fetuses,

Then you must have a venomous hatred for children, because while a
woman faces pain, injury,. and risk from childbirth, saving childen
would cost you only money and convenience.
Why do you hate children so badly?

going by the
numbers of them you are happy to see being killed -

10,000 you let die every day.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "MyTwoAngels"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 09:42:21 AM
wrote in message news:<3F13CE62.7070400@spam.com>...

Ray Fischer wrote:

<

> wrote:

Pat Winstanley wrote:



No babies are or can be aborted. It's physically impossible.


Rephrase the question: what did the fetus do to justify it being aborted?



What do starving children do to merit you letting them die?


You at least have a venomous hatred for innocent fetuses,



Then you must have a venomous hatred for children, because while a
woman faces pain, injury,. and risk from childbirth, saving childen
would cost you only money and convenience.

Why do you hate children so badly?

Why can't you say anything rational?]

What is your rationale behind wishing hardship upon pregnant woman and
innocent children?

Because the only way you can win -
nay: *avoid losing* - is by dragging the discussion down to the level of
meaningless idiocy?

So what's a few more women 'offed' and their deaths marked on your
belt?

going by the
numbers of them you are happy to see being killed -



10,000 you let die every day.

Abortion is all about convenience.

So isn't neglecting thousands of innocent children in need of your
assistance.

Thanks for admitting it.

I was just assuming that you're *on* the subject, for once.

.

User: "Pat Winstanley"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 09:43:48 AM
In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.

False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).
Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.
Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?
(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people as
men are).
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 09:30:22 PM
Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.


False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.

No one knows that. The government stopped publishing such figures years ago
because they were not reliable.
Despite this how can YOU be so sure of the truth, feminist? Becaue you're
willing to tell any lie when it suits your purposes?


Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?

You pretend to know what is not known.


(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people as
men are).

Women are more pro-life than men. How arrogant a view of yourselves
compared to other women the pro-abortion feminists must have. Whether you
like it or not, YOU don't speak for women, feminist.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 16 Jul 2003 11:19:28 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote:

Pat Winstanley wrote:

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.


No one knows that.

On the contrary, a great many people know that to be a fact.

The government stopped publishing such figures years ago
because they were not reliable.

Pro-liar propaganda. The figures continue to be provided each year.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 11:54:04 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F14B8BE.1CA9A790@spam.com...



Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.


False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.


No one knows that. The government stopped publishing such figures years

ago

because they were not reliable.

Despite this how can YOU be so sure of the truth, feminist? Becaue you're
willing to tell any lie when it suits your purposes?


Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?


You pretend to know what is not known.


(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people as
men are).


Women are more pro-life than men. How arrogant a view of yourselves
compared to other women the pro-abortion feminists must have. Whether you
like it or not, YOU don't speak for women, feminist.

........And you DAMN well don't speak for men, hypocrite.
Most MEN would have some balls, rather than hide behind anonymous addresses
and re-mailers. Granted, I no longer use my home address around here thanks
to the "bots" that troll the NG's looking for email addresses. But the
address I DO use is valid, and I do not hide behing a veil. That is the
hallmark of a coward that doesn't stand behind his word.
As many times as you managed to use the word "feminist" in your post, I
would conclude that you have a serious inferiority complex with regard to
women that speak their mind.
There's no love loss between me and Pat, so spare yourself the humiliation
of trying to label me.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
User: "Omphalos"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 16 Jul 2003 08:45:56 AM
On Wed 16 Jul 2003 12:54:04a, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahoo.com>
wrote in news:MT4Ra.89704$TJ.4784247@twister.austin.rr.com:

<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F14B8BE.1CA9A790@spam.com...

Pat Winstanley wrote:

In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.


False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.


No one knows that. The government stopped publishing such figures years
ago because they were not reliable.

Despite this how can YOU be so sure of the truth, feminist? Becaue
you're willing to tell any lie when it suits your purposes?


Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?


You pretend to know what is not known.


(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people as
men are).


Women are more pro-life than men. How arrogant a view of yourselves
compared to other women the pro-abortion feminists must have. Whether
you like it or not, YOU don't speak for women, feminist.


.......And you DAMN well don't speak for men, hypocrite.

Most MEN would have some balls, rather than hide behind anonymous
addresses and re-mailers. Granted, I no longer use my home address
around here thanks to the "bots" that troll the NG's looking for email
addresses. But the address I DO use is valid, and I do not hide behing a
veil. That is the hallmark of a coward that doesn't stand behind his
word.

What difference does it make? If you have something to say, post it to
this newsgroup. My email address is valid, although I never check it
because it's a spam trap.
--
__________
==\ /================================
===\ /==You know how dumb the average==
====\ /===guy is? Well half of everyone==
=====\ /======is even dumber than that=====
======\/====================================
http://31337.pl
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 18 Jul 2003 09:51:10 AM
The other Donald wrote:


<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F14B8BE.1CA9A790@spam.com...



Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.


False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.


No one knows that. The government stopped publishing such figures years

ago

because they were not reliable.

Despite this how can YOU be so sure of the truth, feminist? Becaue you're
willing to tell any lie when it suits your purposes?


Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?


You pretend to know what is not known.


(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people as
men are).


Women are more pro-life than men. How arrogant a view of yourselves
compared to other women the pro-abortion feminists must have. Whether you
like it or not, YOU don't speak for women, feminist.


.......And you DAMN well don't speak for men, hypocrite.

Most MEN would have some balls, rather than hide behind anonymous addresses
and re-mailers. Granted, I no longer use my home address around here thanks
to the "bots" that troll the NG's looking for email addresses. But the
address I DO use is valid, and I do not hide behing a veil. That is the
hallmark of a coward that doesn't stand behind his word.

As many times as you managed to use the word "feminist" in your post, I
would conclude that you have a serious inferiority complex with regard to
women that speak their mind.

There's no love loss between me and Pat, so spare yourself the humiliation
of trying to label me.

You can email me here:
555-im-an-idiot@funlane.happytown.com
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 18 Jul 2003 07:49:00 PM
<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F18095E.B0752749@spam.com...

The other Donald wrote:


<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F14B8BE.1CA9A790@spam.com...



Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com>,
omphalos@ign.com says...

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion than
childbirth.


False... in fact it is the other way round (as you have already been
shown).

Giving birth is about ten times more likely to kill a woman than an
abortion is.


No one knows that. The government stopped publishing such figures

years

ago

because they were not reliable.

Despite this how can YOU be so sure of the truth, feminist? Becaue

you're

willing to tell any lie when it suits your purposes?


Why do you lie about the risks to people's life?


You pretend to know what is not known.


(Ah... perhaps you don't accept that women are just as much people

as

men are).


Women are more pro-life than men. How arrogant a view of yourselves
compared to other women the pro-abortion feminists must have. Whether

you

like it or not, YOU don't speak for women, feminist.


.......And you DAMN well don't speak for men, hypocrite.

Most MEN would have some balls, rather than hide behind anonymous

addresses

and re-mailers. Granted, I no longer use my home address around here

thanks

to the "bots" that troll the NG's looking for email addresses. But the
address I DO use is valid, and I do not hide behing a veil. That is the
hallmark of a coward that doesn't stand behind his word.

As many times as you managed to use the word "feminist" in your post, I
would conclude that you have a serious inferiority complex with regard

to

women that speak their mind.

There's no love loss between me and Pat, so spare yourself the

humiliation

of trying to label me.


You can email me here:

555-im-an-idiot@funlane.happytown.com

Why would you have an email address calling yourself an idiot? Freudian
slip?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Standing behind my word with my own email address since 1967.
.





User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 10:06:24 AM
Omphalos <omphalos@ign.com> wrote in
news:72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com:

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion
than childbirth.

it will be interesting to see your follow-up post containing
statics from cerdible sources to document this assertion.
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: al owens a 18 Jul 2003 07:06:43 PM
(llaa1100) wrote in
news:7c811853.0307181027.36e92aa8@posting.google.com:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns93B970FA43DFAkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...

Omphalos <omphalos@ign.com> wrote in
news:72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com:

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion
than childbirth.



it will be interesting to see your follow-up post containing
statics from cerdible sources to document this assertion.


al owens a

having trouble speaking....?
.

User: "Bethe57"

Title: Re: Pro-liar hatred of children results 15 Jul 2003 02:22:07 PM

From: "james g. keegan jr."


Omphalos <omphalos@ign.com> wrote in
news:72387aa54fe3b020bee968cac5a48fc9@free.teranews.com:

In the U.S. a women is more likely to die from an abortion
than childbirth.



it will be interesting to see your follow-up post containing
statics from cerdible sources to document this assertion.

Yes, do tell............especially tell me, considering my experience with
childbirth and how close I came to losing my own life............I'll never be
convinced that childbirth is less dangerous than the abortion procedure......
Bethe Blasienz
Bryan, Texas
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Heishman tactic - lies and hatred 16 Jul 2003 11:21:27 PM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

mizzyandrea@aol.com (Mizzyandrea) wrote in message news:<20030716015418.29132.00000558@mb-m15.aol.com>...

Yes, do tell............especially tell me, considering my experience with
childbirth and how close I came to losing my own life............I'll never be
convinced that childbirth is less dangerous than the abortion procedure......
Bethe Blasienz
Bryan, Texas
*****************************************
according to the American College of Ob/Gyn, term pregnancy and childbirth is
11 times more likely to kill a woman than first trimester abortion.


So we see now the new tactic by the pro-aborts.

So we see the same old garbage from the resident liar. He cannot
argue against the truth ans so he spews hatred and lie after lie.

Scare women into

"Scare Americans into killing thousands upon thousands of innocent
people."
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Mizzyandrea"

Title: Re: Heishman tactic - lies and hatred 16 Jul 2003 11:30:29 PM
So we see the same old garbage from the resident liar. He cannot
argue against the truth ans so he spews hatred and lie after lie.
*****************************************
Isn't it amusing that the same people who promote lies about abortion-- like
the mythical PAS, and the breast cancer *****-- whine like whipped dogs
when we post the truth that pregnancy isn't exactly a walk in the park.
It's not a "scare tactic".......it's the TRUTH......a finding by ACOG.
Those imbeciles are so used to propaganda being promoted as "truth", they
don't recognize the truth when they read it.
.
User: "Osprey"

Title: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 17 Jul 2003 08:11:33 AM
"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030717003029.02307.00000048@mb-m21.aol.com...

So we see the same old garbage from the resident liar. He cannot
argue against the truth ans so he spews hatred and lie after lie.
*****************************************
Isn't it amusing that the same people who promote lies about abortion--

like

the mythical PAS, and the breast cancer *****-- whine like whipped

dogs

when we post the truth that pregnancy isn't exactly a walk in the park.

Whine like wimps?
The only whining that goes on is probably you when you are having one of
your ***** orgies
You take figures, and you take statements and you use them as scare tactics
to try and pressure women into becoming pro-choice.
The fact is, many women are pro-life, and more are becoming pro-life. And
you can't handle that. So now you want to scare women, most likely you are
targeting teen girls.

It's not a "scare tactic".......it's the TRUTH......a finding by ACOG.
Those imbeciles are so used to propaganda being promoted as "truth",

they

don't recognize the truth when they read it.

Truth is one thing
Distortion and scare tactics are another.
.
User: "Spartakus"

Title: Re: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 17 Jul 2003 12:10:16 PM
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote...

"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote...

So we see the same old garbage from the resident liar. He cannot
argue against the truth ans so he spews hatred and lie after lie.
*****************************************
Isn't it amusing that the same people who promote lies about
abortion--like the mythical PAS, and the breast cancer *****--
whine like whipped dogs when we post the truth that pregnancy
isn't exactly a walk in the park.

Whine like wimps?

The only whining that goes on is probably you when you are having one
of your ***** orgies

Please support your claim that Mizzyandrea participates in "*****
orgies", 'cause it looks like you've been caught in another one of
your many lies.
.
User: "Spartakus"

Title: Re: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 17 Jul 2003 04:39:14 PM
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote...

"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...

"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote...

"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote...

So we see the same old garbage from the resident liar. He cannot
argue against the truth ans so he spews hatred and lie after lie.
*****************************************
Isn't it amusing that the same people who promote lies about
abortion--like the mythical PAS, and the breast cancer *****--
whine like whipped dogs when we post the truth that pregnancy
isn't exactly a walk in the park.

Whine like wimps?

The only whining that goes on is probably you when you are having
one of your ***** orgies

Please support your claim that Mizzyandrea participates in "*****
orgies", 'cause it looks like you've been caught in another one of
your many lies.

Learn to read moron

As soon as you demand your pro-abort cohorts prove their claims.

You're lying again, Bobby. I don't have any "pro-abort cohorts".

Of course you turn the head the other way when you and others
make up BS claims

Any way, I am not going to point out where your reading error
is here. It is a shame though you can't pick it out though.

I'm only going on what I see on my display - the actual words you
wrote. If you're having problems getting across your intended meaning
without being misunderstood,
Learn to *write*, moron.
.

User: "Krisblake"

Title: Re: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 18 Jul 2003 05:45:25 AM
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:40:13 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:


"Patrick Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk4r1kihnw.fsf@fnord.io.com...

mizzyandrea@aol.com (Mizzyandrea) writes:

Please support your claim that Mizzyandrea participates in "*****
orgies", 'cause it looks like you've been caught in another one of
your many lies.


I think he WANTS me to be a ***** for him........ I've gotten some

strange

e-mail lately. Read this:


Dear Andrea, I beckon and beseach you, oh woman of darkness! How I

long

for the feel the sting of your riding crop against my ulcerated

*****.......

If only you would dig your stilleto heel into my groin until I cry and

beg

you for mercy.... The very thought of your urine flowing down my face

causes

my undersized member to quiver like a slug in the noon day sun. I know

that

I am not worthy of you, dearest lady........but if you could grant but

one

indulgence and smear your excrement in my face...... I would be your

slave

forever.<<<


I have no idea who sent it, but something about these anti-choicers'

posts

causes me to suspect a few of them. What do you think?


Entirely possible -- of course, I've had a couple of 'em rip off a

legitimate

Reuters story about the FBI arresting a pedophile suspect here, and then

cut

and paste my name into it to make it look like I'd been arrested (on a

date

when I was at work here, not 1200 miles away from where I was supposedly
arrested), and that was good enough for Bobby the Cop Reject


Aww, there goes Patty again making the Cop Reject claim again.

Tell us Pat, where was your evidence again?

ooops, there goes Pat, dissappearing again for a while.


to start making

noises about it being believable. He claimed it was a story that had run

in

"a Houston newspaper", but finally backed down from that when it was

pointed

out that no Houston paper with access to Reuters had such an article in

their

archives. As anti-abort loons go, though, Bobby is an extreme

lightweight.

Hey, you are a pedophile, why should anyone believe you...LOL

You are a cross-dresssing cop reject with no penis to speak of.
[...]
.
User: "Mizzyandrea"

Title: Re: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 18 Jul 2003 06:10:33 PM
You are a cross-dresssing cop reject with no penis to speak of.
*********************************
obvioiusly no brain, either
.
User: "Krisblake"

Title: Re: Pro-abortionist Mizzy's lies andd hatred 18 Jul 2003 08:41:32 PM
On 18 Jul 2003 23:10:33 GMT,
(Mizzyandrea) wrote:

You are a cross-dresssing cop reject with no penis to speak of.
*********************************
obvioiusly no brain, either

Well, it wasn't necessary to re-state the painfully obvious....
His words speak for themselves.
.



User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Heishman lying about people again 17 Jul 2003 10:05:24 PM
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message

The only whining that goes on is probably you when you are having one
of your ***** orgies


Please support your claim that Mizzyandrea participates in "*****
orgies", 'cause it looks like you've been caught in another one of
your many lies.


Learn to read moron

We can read quite well, *****. That's how we see you spewing every
disgusting lie you can come up with at everybody who shows you to be
an immoral little creep.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.











  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER