| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2004 02:55:55 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Democrats for BUSH |
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:24:22 -0500,
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Work Work Work" <WWW@aol.com> wrote:
It just shows everyone that most normal Americans
support BUSH and his policies.
My, you *are* a DELUDED one, aren't you?
They want a country with Family VALUES and a stop to
the deviants who want to turn America into a land of freaks.
Yep. And HATRED is **not** a family value.
So here's a solution to the problem you just described.
All you deviant and control-freakish RRR cult freaks need to
do is move up to Canada. Canadians are a good-hearted people,
with a great sense of humor. So you can give them something
NEW to laugh at!
Meanwhile, you'll be hearing us laugh at you all the way from down
here in the USA once we OUST Bush this fall, take our country back,
and once again have RESPECT for personal and private individual
liberties and rights.
"Hasta la vista, Warmonger-in-Thief!"
Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?
It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA. That's
one of the ways.
If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless
they were homo?
Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and egalitarian
country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one containing mindless and
hateful bigots, all else being equal.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 05:35:29 AM |
|
|
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:p4hXb.21837$R71.6514@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room for
an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
--Tock
****** Tock, if you are a fag, you will move around in fag circles and hear
only approving talk! As to converting me, we can't meet, so maybe private
email would suffice? Take the duplicate out of my email address.
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
16 Feb 2004 07:43:55 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:35:29 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> in
alt.abortion with message-id <c0ojp2$4i0$7@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net> wrote:
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Nonsense. It simply proves there is a lot left to learn.
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
Utter garbage. There is no 'god's law'.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
18 Feb 2004 11:29:02 AM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:v6i130ljmh4j26mscijumrdl9ssoi9hjkh@4ax.com...
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Nonsense. It simply proves there is a lot left to learn.
****** A lot left to learn? Yes, but someone knows already - I see millions
of people all around me!
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to
comply
with God's Law!**
Utter garbage. There is no 'god's law'.
****** You made a statement, show cause!
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
18 Feb 2004 11:58:33 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:29:02 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:v6i130ljmh4j26mscijumrdl9ssoi9hjkh@4ax.com...
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Nonsense. It simply proves there is a lot left to learn.
****** A lot left to learn? Yes, but someone knows already - I see millions
of people all around me!
Have you heard? They built a virus from scratch.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
18 Feb 2004 04:49:34 PM |
|
|
Warnock wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:v6i130ljmh4j26mscijumrdl9ssoi9hjkh@4ax.com...
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Nonsense. It simply proves there is a lot left to learn.
****** A lot left to learn? Yes, but someone knows already - I see millions
of people all around me!
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to
comply
with God's Law!**
Utter garbage. There is no 'god's law'.
****** You made a statement, show cause!
You made the statement. You show cause first.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 09:16:06 AM |
|
|
wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
--
"Suppose we've chosen the wrong god. Every time we
go to church we're just making him madder and madder"
--Homer Simpson
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 12:37:29 PM |
|
|
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
What you have just done above was shown bigotry, intolerance, and I
might even say some selfishness..maybe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eerie Smilodon of Unusual Size & Typing Ability" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
03 Apr 2004 07:57:21 PM |
|
|
(osprey) spewed forth most vilely from the
darkest depths of
chaosnews:8912d58d.0402141037.329305bb@posting.google.com:
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
Then stop peeping, ya' freak.
--
"If I have to die--"[let it be as a blonde].
--Track of the Moonbeast.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
03 Apr 2004 08:16:05 PM |
|
|
"Eerie Smilodon of Unusual Size & Typing Ability" <at@at.org> wrote in
message news:Xns94C0B6E6952C2refusetoactcom@68.6.19.6...
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) spewed forth most vilely from the
darkest depths of
chaosnews:8912d58d.0402141037.329305bb@posting.google.com:
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
Then stop peeping, ya' freak.
Stop showing pervert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eerie Smilodon of Unusual Size & Typing Ability" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
03 Apr 2004 10:02:40 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> spewed forth most vilely from the
darkest depths of chaosnews:r7ydnXF9pP2S8vLd4p2dnA@comcast.com:
"Eerie Smilodon of Unusual Size & Typing Ability" <at@at.org>
wrote in message
news:Xns94C0B6E6952C2refusetoactcom@68.6.19.6...
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) spewed forth most vilely from
the darkest depths of
chaosnews:8912d58d.0402141037.329305bb@posting.google.com:
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
Then stop peeping, ya' freak.
Stop showing pervert
oh, i should be so lucky...
--
"If I have to die--"[let it be as a blonde].
--Track of the Moonbeast.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earle Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
03 Apr 2004 09:44:10 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns94C0B6E6952C2refusetoactcom@68.6.19.6>,
"Eerie Smilodon of Unusual Size & Typing Ability" <at@at.org>
wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) spewed forth most vilely from the
darkest depths of
chaosnews:8912d58d.0402141037.329305bb@posting.google.com:
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
*
Your best strategy then is to refuse to perform the act.
As for deciding for others, that is not your job.
earle
*
"Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be
ashamed of, no vice, no degradation; it cannot be classified as an
illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function...
Many highly respectable individuals of ancient and modern times have
been homosexuals, several of the greatest men among them (Plato,
Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc.). It is a great injustice to
persecute homosexuality as a crime -- and a cruelty, too."
--Sigmund Freud
"To undertake to convert a fully developed homosexual into a
heterosexual does not offer much more prospect for success than the
reverse, except that for good practical reasons the latter is never
attempted."
--Sigmund Freud
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 12:52:09 PM |
|
|
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
What you have just done above was shown bigotry, intolerance, and I
might even say some selfishness..maybe.
---
"A man's ethical behavior should be based
effectually on sympathy, education, and social
ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man
would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be
restrained by fear of punishment and hope of
reward after death."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 05:23:44 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
What you have just done above was shown bigotry, intolerance, and I
might even say some selfishness..maybe.
---
"A man's ethical behavior should be based
effectually on sympathy, education, and social
ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man
would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be
restrained by fear of punishment and hope of
reward after death."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 06:26:30 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
---
"A man's ethical behavior should be based
effectually on sympathy, education, and social
ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man
would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be
restrained by fear of punishment and hope of
reward after death."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 08:27:36 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k2ft20tbolgoiitjkddakjptbr8if57rkh@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of
gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a
room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few
were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
You are a liar
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
Answer the question?
Do you support a persons right to pray in school or do you support laws that
restrict persons from praying in school or anything religous in school?
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
Amazing that you have the gall to keep going with your lies
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
14 Feb 2004 09:40:51 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:27:36 -0500, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k2ft20tbolgoiitjkddakjptbr8if57rkh@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of
gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a
room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few
were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
You are a liar
Back it up, Bobby. Let's see you show where I'm trying to take
someone's rights away.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
Answer the question?
Do you support a persons right to pray in school or do you support laws that
restrict persons from praying in school or anything religous in school?
Bobby, is there such a 'right'? If there isn't, then it's a moot
point, isn't it? Why are you so unable to answer the simplest of
questions?
Frankly, I don't care what religious whatever kids get up to as long
as it's not disruptive. If it is, the school has a right (and a duty)
to stop it. If the school is being unduly fervent, then the student
has the right of appeal.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
Amazing that you have the gall to keep going with your lies
You keep saying that and yet you can't point any out.
---
"A man's ethical behavior should be based
effectually on sympathy, education, and social
ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man
would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be
restrained by fear of punishment and hope of
reward after death."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 01:12:59 AM |
|
|
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<16qt20tnv4602p6t7a7g7ink9g7u87g4q5@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:27:36 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k2ft20tbolgoiitjkddakjptbr8if57rkh@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of
gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a
room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few
were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
You are a liar
Back it up, Bobby. Let's see you show where I'm trying to take
someone's rights away.
puh-lease
You accuse me of fantasizing about children, and run away when I
called you a liar on that. And you got the gall to ask people to back
things up. You are such a coward.
I don't want to take anyone's rights away. I totally support civil
unions for homosexuals, and I would support them having the same
benefits as a married man and woman.
Marriage is for man and woman
I have no problem with homosexuals having the same rights with a civil
union.
Now run along Adam, you once again have failed.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
Answer the question?
Do you support a persons right to pray in school or do you support laws that
restrict persons from praying in school or anything religous in school?
Bobby, is there such a 'right'?
Adam running away.
If there isn't, then it's a moot
point, isn't it? Why are you so unable to answer the simplest of
questions?
Frankly, I don't care what religious whatever kids get up to as long
as it's not disruptive. If it is, the school has a right (and a duty)
to stop it. If the school is being unduly fervent, then the student
has the right of appeal.
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
Amazing that you have the gall to keep going with your lies
You keep saying that and yet you can't point any out.
I have but you run away too many times.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 01:30:24 AM |
|
|
In article <8912d58d.0402142312.45868612@posting.google.com>, osprey
<> wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:<16qt20tnv4602p6t7a7g7ink9g7u87g4q5@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:27:36 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k2ft20tbolgoiitjkddakjptbr8if57rkh@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of
gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a
room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few
were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
You are a liar
Back it up, Bobby. Let's see you show where I'm trying to take
someone's rights away.
puh-lease
You accuse me of fantasizing about children, and run away when I
called you a liar on that. And you got the gall to ask people to back
things up. You are such a coward.
LOL! Look who's talking.
I don't want to take anyone's rights away. I totally support civil
unions for homosexuals, and I would support them having the same
benefits as a married man and woman.
Marraige is a constitutional right, dipshit.
Marriage is for man and woman
I have no problem with homosexuals having the same rights with a civil
union.
I am sure they appreciate it.
Now run along Adam, you once again have failed.
You are such a pathetic *****...
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with
them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she
is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
Answer the question?
Do you support a persons right to pray in school or do you support laws
that
restrict persons from praying in school or anything religous in school?
Bobby, is there such a 'right'?
Adam running away.
It is you who is afraid to answer, then others are "running away."
LOL! Is that the way it is at the prison?
If there isn't, then it's a moot
point, isn't it? Why are you so unable to answer the simplest of
questions?
Frankly, I don't care what religious whatever kids get up to as long
as it's not disruptive. If it is, the school has a right (and a duty)
to stop it. If the school is being unduly fervent, then the student
has the right of appeal.
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
You don't even know what that means.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
Amazing that you have the gall to keep going with your lies
You keep saying that and yet you can't point any out.
I have run away too many times.
True.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 01:37:59 AM |
|
|
On 14 Feb 2004 23:12:59 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<16qt20tnv4602p6t7a7g7ink9g7u87g4q5@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:27:36 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k2ft20tbolgoiitjkddakjptbr8if57rkh@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:23:44 -0500, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sfrs20hd322p25fm4eb5jat5beintilq2g@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 10:37:29 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of
gays
as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a
room
for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.
I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few
were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.
Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.
Thus you have just displayed bigotry.
You are partial to a group.
Look up what that word means, Bobby. Learn the difference between
partial and 'strongly partial'.
Stop trying to make excuses for your own bigotry
Already told you I'm not a bigot, Bobby. *I'm* not the one getting on
board with taking others' rights away.
You are a liar
Back it up, Bobby. Let's see you show where I'm trying to take
someone's rights away.
puh-lease
You accuse me of fantasizing about children, and run away when I
called you a liar on that. And you got the gall to ask people to back
things up. You are such a coward.
Ran away? You flatter yourself. It's in the record, Bobby.
You were the one constructing scenarios involving sex with children.
I don't want to take anyone's rights away. I totally support civil
unions for homosexuals, and I would support them having the same
benefits as a married man and woman.
Marriage is for man and woman
I have no problem with homosexuals having the same rights with a civil
union.
Now run along Adam, you once again have failed.
Look up 'equal protection'. See if you can figure out how your
'solution' is a failure before it gets off the ground.
I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.
I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.
If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.
But you want to use homosexuality as an excuse to deny rights to
people.
Do you support a persons right to pray in school?
Is there such a right?
Answer the question?
Do you support a persons right to pray in school or do you support laws that
restrict persons from praying in school or anything religous in school?
Bobby, is there such a 'right'?
Adam running away.
Answer the question, you tit. Did you even notice my answer below?
Now, is there any *right* to pray in school at any time, or not?
If there isn't, then it's a moot
point, isn't it? Why are you so unable to answer the simplest of
questions?
Well?
Frankly, I don't care what religious whatever kids get up to as long
as it's not disruptive. If it is, the school has a right (and a duty)
to stop it. If the school is being unduly fervent, then the student
has the right of appeal.
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
The school has every right (and the duty) to halt disruptive conduct.
Seems you've thus far failed to actually comprehend the Constitution.
Or do you actually think that shouting 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre as
a joke is also protected speech?
Of course, being called bigoted by a homophobe such as yourself is
hardly something that'll keep me up at night.
No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.
But we don't have to accept your attempts to strip rights away.
And I don't have to accept your lies
Amazing that you have the gall (or perhaps stupidity) to keep on with
the fiction that I'm lying about you wanting to take others' rights
away, even after you admitted it.
Amazing that you have the gall to keep going with your lies
You keep saying that and yet you can't point any out.
I have but you run away too many times.
Funny, every time I ask you claim I'm running away, but I never see
any proof...
---
"A man's ethical behavior should be based
effectually on sympathy, education, and social
ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man
would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be
restrained by fear of punishment and hope of
reward after death."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 09:54:06 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
[snip]
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
What a fool.
-=-=-
.... Enkidu
AA# 2165
"I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time
to say it. I've been an atheist for years and years,
but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable
to say that one is an atheist, because it assumed
knowledge that one didn't have. Somehow it was better
to say one was a humanist or agnostic. I don't have the
evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so
strongly suspect that he doesn't that I don't want to
waste my time."
-- Isaac Asimov
* TagZilla 0.049
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
18 Feb 2004 08:40:59 AM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:mCMXb.17862$IF1.2937@fed1read01...
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
****** The children are entitled to religion, however, they can't just take
over.
-=-=-
... Enkidu
AA# 2165
"I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time
to say it. I've been an atheist for years and years,
but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable
to say that one is an atheist, because it assumed
knowledge that one didn't have. Somehow it was better
to say one was a humanist or agnostic. I don't have the
evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so
strongly suspect that he doesn't that I don't want to
waste my time."
-- Isaac Asimov
* TagZilla 0.049
****** Change back to theism, and stand a chance!!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 05:26:43 PM |
|
|
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<mCMXb.17862$IF1.2937@fed1read01>...
osprey wrote:
[snip]
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
What a fool.
-=-=-
Your statement is about as idiotic as someone saying that all
homosexuals dance around in leather and whip each other on the streets
in public.
You are religiousophic!!!
Get real, and let me know when you get over your fear of God and those
who believe in God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 05:39:11 PM |
|
|
On 15 Feb 2004 15:26:43 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<mCMXb.17862$IF1.2937@fed1read01>...
osprey wrote:
[snip]
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
What a fool.
-=-=-
Your statement is about as idiotic as someone saying that all
homosexuals dance around in leather and whip each other on the streets
in public.
You are religiousophic!!!
Get real, and let me know when you get over your fear of God and those
who believe in God.
Why do you lie? Nobody fears the non-existent. However you
in-your-face jerks are a very real threat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 06:28:54 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:bn0030tkhehb7ieh3go3s7qbbe8ldli080@4ax.com...
On 15 Feb 2004 15:26:43 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<mCMXb.17862$IF1.2937@fed1read01>...
osprey wrote:
[snip]
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless
of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
What a fool.
-=-=-
Your statement is about as idiotic as someone saying that all
homosexuals dance around in leather and whip each other on the streets
in public.
You are religiousophic!!!
Get real, and let me know when you get over your fear of God and those
who believe in God.
Why do you lie? Nobody fears the non-existent.
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God, you wouldn't make such outrageous statements about
religious people.
However you
in-your-face jerks are a very real threat.
Not at all, the real threat is what you will face when your time comes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 08:01:09 PM |
|
|
In article <1cidnbJ_4Ng5k63dRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:bn0030tkhehb7ieh3go3s7qbbe8ldli080@4ax.com...
On 15 Feb 2004 15:26:43 -0800, (osprey) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:<mCMXb.17862$IF1.2937@fed1read01>...
osprey wrote:
[snip]
You want to take away a persons freedom of speech by restricting them
to where they can and can't pray.
How bigoted of you.
So you'd let each kid stand up in class whenever he wants, and pray as
loud as he wants, whenever he wants, as often as he wants, regardless
of
the rights of the other students to learn a little American history or
algebra?
What a fool.
-=-=-
Your statement is about as idiotic as someone saying that all
homosexuals dance around in leather and whip each other on the streets
in public.
You are religiousophic!!!
Get real, and let me know when you get over your fear of God and those
who believe in God.
Why do you lie? Nobody fears the non-existent.
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God, you wouldn't make such outrageous statements about
religious people.
Yeah - that makes a lot of sense.
However you
in-your-face jerks are a very real threat.
Not at all, the real threat is what you will face when your time comes.
Here is what is wrong with the religious. Their conduct isn't dictated
by an inner desire to be good, but by fear of God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
18 Feb 2004 08:45:35 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:150220041801092594%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
You are religiousophic!!!
Get real, and let me know when you get over your fear of God and
those
who believe in God.
Why do you lie? Nobody fears the non-existent.
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God, you wouldn't make such outrageous statements
about
religious people.
Yeah - that makes a lot of sense.
However you
in-your-face jerks are a very real threat.
Not at all, the real threat is what you will face when your time comes.
Here is what is wrong with the religious. Their conduct isn't dictated
by an inner desire to be good, but by fear of God.
****** That's your unsupported opinion!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
15 Feb 2004 09:26:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:54 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God,
Atheists don't believe in your imaginary sky-pixie, Einstein.
you wouldn't make such outrageous statements about
religious people.
One doesn't have to believe in a God to fear the actions of those who
do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
16 Feb 2004 08:29:57 AM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:o0e030dbauaji2tldqkql68fs9h0nccdgi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:54 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God,
Atheists don't believe in your imaginary sky-pixie, Einstein.
So you know 100% that we have no soul that lives on after death?
Absolutley positive? Can you prove it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shawn \Me\ Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
16 Feb 2004 02:22:21 PM |
|
|
In article <u4WdnagVr7U2Tq3dRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:o0e030dbauaji2tldqkql68fs9h0nccdgi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:54 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God,
Atheists don't believe in your imaginary sky-pixie, Einstein.
So you know 100% that we have no soul that lives on after death?
Absolutley positive? Can you prove it?
I can't. Can you prove that there is a soul that lives on after death?
If not, then you fail to understand the distinction between fact and
faith.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
16 Feb 2004 10:16:25 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:29:57 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id <u4WdnagVr7U2Tq3dRVn-sA@comcast.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:o0e030dbauaji2tldqkql68fs9h0nccdgi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:54 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Sure you do, you just want to play your game and deny it.
If you didn't fear God,
Atheists don't believe in your imaginary sky-pixie, Einstein.
So you know 100% that we have no soul that lives on after death?
Absolutley positive? Can you prove it?
Can you prove a soul exists?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
