Re: Democrats for BUSH



 Science > Abortion > Re: Democrats for BUSH

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 7 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Craig Chilton"
Date: 24 Jan 2004 02:55:55 PM
Object: Re: Democrats for BUSH
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:24:22 -0500,
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Work Work Work" <WWW@aol.com> wrote:

It just shows everyone that most normal Americans
support BUSH and his policies.

My, you *are* a DELUDED one, aren't you?

They want a country with Family VALUES and a stop to
the deviants who want to turn America into a land of freaks.

Yep. And HATRED is **not** a family value.

So here's a solution to the problem you just described.

All you deviant and control-freakish RRR cult freaks need to
do is move up to Canada. Canadians are a good-hearted people,
with a great sense of humor. So you can give them something
NEW to laugh at!

Meanwhile, you'll be hearing us laugh at you all the way from down
here in the USA once we OUST Bush this fall, take our country back,
and once again have RESPECT for personal and private individual
liberties and rights.

"Hasta la vista, Warmonger-in-Thief!"

Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?

It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA. That's
one of the ways.

If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless
they were homo?

Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and egalitarian
country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one containing mindless and
hateful bigots, all else being equal.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.

User: "Warnock"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 24 Feb 2004 02:48:23 PM
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RBC_b.24635$4S6.5190@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...

I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.


That's just because you don't know how to do it right, honey . . .
Take a class, watch a few videos, see how the experts do it, and you'll
catch on . . .
--Tock

****** No ***** on my *****, thank you!!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall
surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
.
User: "satyr"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 25 Feb 2004 12:03:14 AM
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:48:23 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:


<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RBC_b.24635$4S6.5190@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...


I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.


That's just because you don't know how to do it right, honey . . .
Take a class, watch a few videos, see how the experts do it, and you'll
catch on . . .
--Tock


****** No ***** on my *****, thank you!!

Did he say anything about there being ***** on *your* *****?

**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****

Has God ever breathed life into any dead bodies or created any perfect
animals?
Scientists did recently build a polio virus from scratch, does that
count?

Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall
surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

How many laws in Leviticus did you break today?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.

User: "Happy Thoughts"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 24 Feb 2004 09:31:17 PM
Warnock wrote:

<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message

I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.


That's just because you don't know how to do it right, honey . . .
Take a class, watch a few videos, see how the experts do it, and you'll
catch on . . .


****** No ***** on my *****, thank you!!

Never had anal sex with a woman, eh? Too bad! Your sex life is
probably extremely boring. Let me guess: missionary position only, right?
--
"Nothing less will do" (gay marriage)
and other gay-friendly items:
www.SmartAssProducts.com
.


User: "Jon Young"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 05:11:35 PM
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<c0lqpc$9d5$1@bolt.sonic.net>...


Why do you care? Are you such an insecure little boy that you have to
care about how two other people have sex?

No doubt any little boy (your words) should be insecure when in the
company of a pervert or baby-killer advocate like you.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 06:56:03 PM
Jon Young <jdyoung1@volcanomail.com> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<c0lqpc$9d5$1@bolt.sonic.net>...


Why do you care? Are you such an insecure little boy that you have to
care about how two other people have sex?


No doubt any little boy (your words) should be insecure when in the
company of a pervert or baby-killer advocate like you.

Ah yes, the usual fanatical screeching that almost inevitably results
when the bigot can no longer justify his hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.


User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 04:24:51 PM
osprey wrote:

Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message

news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...


tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:


"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:



****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!




Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room

for an

afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .


I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.

I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.

Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.




Thus you have just displayed bigotry.

Nope. Gays have no problem with me and my family. Evangelical
Christians , by definition, do have a prlblem with me and the way I
raise my kids. I'd take the neighbor who respects my beliefs over the
one that thinks I'm fodder for hell, and worse for raising my kids as I
see fit, rather than as they see fit.

You are partial to a group.

Who isn't?

I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.

I'd rather you didn't care one way or the other what they did in the
privacy of your home. They feel that way about you.

I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.

You *know* a lot about God's will. People like you scare me, because
you can justify *any* action by invoking God's name. Don't like
abortion? Shoot a doctor for Christ! Hate fags? Beat 'em and leave
them to die, crucified to a barbed wire fence. It's what God wants, right?

If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.

I'd rather not live next to someone who hates me, my life, my choices,
my children, no.

No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.

If only you Christians would do that, we'd all get along fine.

What you have just done above was shown bigotry, intolerance, and I
might even say some selfishness..maybe.

Look in a mirror. I'd never tell you you were evil. Christians have
told me that I am evil.
Enkidu
--
"Suppose we've chosen the wrong god. Every time we
go to church we're just making him madder and madder"
--Homer Simpson
.
User: "Osprey"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 05:26:55 PM
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:HexXb.16863$IF1.9473@fed1read01...

osprey wrote:

Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message

news:<LYqXb.16803$IF1.10239@fed1read01>...


tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:


"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:



****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an

abomination!




Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room

for an

afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .


I lived in North Park (San Diego) after I got married. Had many
neighbors who were gay. Met a lot of gay men and women, literally
hundreds. Never met one who wasn't considerate, well educated,
thoughtful, and considerate.

I've also met hundreds of bible-thumping born-agains. Quite a few were
intolerant, bigoted, selfish, uneducated people.

Given the choice, I'd rather a gay couple moved next door over an
evangelist any day.




Thus you have just displayed bigotry.


Nope.

Yep
Gays have no problem with me and my family. Evangelical

Christians , by definition, do have a prlblem with me and the way I
raise my kids. I'd take the neighbor who respects my beliefs over the
one that thinks I'm fodder for hell, and worse for raising my kids as I
see fit, rather than as they see fit.

You are partial to a group.


Who isn't?

Exactly, which is what I mean by all of us have some form of bigotry in us.
Be it in a small manner, or extreme.
What seperates people is how they act out.


I too know many gay people, and I have absolutely no problem with them
as a person.
I don't hate the homosexual, I hate the act.


I'd rather you didn't care one way or the other what they did in the
privacy of your home. They feel that way about you.

I don't care, and I don't ask.

I know that it is wrong, I know it is not normal, and I also know in
the eyes of God it is one of the worst sins a person can do.


You *know* a lot about God's will. People like you scare me, because
you can justify *any* action by invoking God's name. Don't like
abortion? Shoot a doctor for Christ!

Get real ok, I don't shoot any doctors and I certainly don't endores anyone
else doing so either.
Hate fags? Beat 'em and leave

them to die, crucified to a barbed wire fence.

You are trying to classify and group people. I don't support that either,
nor would I ever participate in
any such act.

It's what God wants, right?

I certainly dont think so


If you were tolerant, you would not bash a person because he or she is
religious and views homosexuality as a sin.


I'd rather not live next to someone who hates me, my life, my choices,
my children, no.

No one said you had to agree either. You can simply accept the fact
that not everyone is going to think like you.


If only you Christians would do that, we'd all get along fine.

You are classifying again


What you have just done above was shown bigotry, intolerance, and I
might even say some selfishness..maybe.


Look in a mirror. I'd never tell you you were evil. Christians have
told me that I am evil.

Not all Christians are the same.


Enkidu

--
"Suppose we've chosen the wrong god. Every time we
go to church we're just making him madder and madder"
--Homer Simpson

.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 07:00:49 PM
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message

osprey wrote:

You are partial to a group.


Who isn't?


Exactly, which is what I mean by all of us have some form of bigotry in us.

Heishman, you're a stupid *****, as usual. Not only are you dumber
than a rock, you're such an ***** that you'll lie rather than educate
yourself.
Since you obviously are too stupid or too lazy to look up the word in
a dictionary, I'll do it for you.
Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her
own opinions and prejudices
www.m-w.com
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Warnock"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 18 Feb 2004 11:23:52 AM
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:c0mgc0$bkd$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Exactly, which is what I mean by all of us have some form of bigotry in

us.


Heishman, you're a stupid *****, as usual. Not only are you dumber
than a rock, you're such an ***** that you'll lie rather than educate
yourself.

Since you obviously are too stupid or too lazy to look up the word in
a dictionary, I'll do it for you.

Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her
own opinions and prejudices

www.m-w.com

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

****** Thanks Ray, that makes you the biggest bigot on the newsgroups!
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 18 Feb 2004 09:41:20 PM
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:c0mgc0$bkd$1@bolt.sonic.net...


Exactly, which is what I mean by all of us have some form of bigotry in

us.


Heishman, you're a stupid *****, as usual. Not only are you dumber
than a rock, you're such an ***** that you'll lie rather than educate
yourself.

Since you obviously are too stupid or too lazy to look up the word in
a dictionary, I'll do it for you.

Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her
own opinions and prejudices

www.m-w.com


****** Thanks Ray, that makes you the biggest bigot on the newsgroups!

I ten years I have yet to come across one single person who could
justify being anti-abortion. I have come across exactly one who
could be civil. The vast majority of you have been lying, selfish,
arrogant, hypocritical, immoral, assholes.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.


User: "David Barnes"

Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY 14 Feb 2004 08:15:11 PM
In article <c0mgc0$bkd$1@bolt.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:

Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message

osprey wrote:


You are partial to a group.


Who isn't?


Exactly, which is what I mean by all of us have some form of bigotry in us.


Heishman, you're a stupid *****, as usual. Not only are you dumber
than a rock, you're such an ***** that you'll lie rather than educate
yourself.

Since you obviously are too stupid or too lazy to look up the word in
a dictionary, I'll do it for you.

Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her
own opinions and prejudices

He made some transition from my point about being prejudice to bigotry.
Osprey is amazing. He is uneducated, cowardly, stupid, and a bigot.
It is that combination that produce his idiotic comments.
.




User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 13 Feb 2004 06:40:46 PM
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:25:29 +0000 didst james g. keegan jr.
speak thusly:

"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:

****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!



really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?

He can't even cite an opinion poll as there are none that show such
opinion as prevailing. Or even all that significant...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.

User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 14 Feb 2004 03:00:42 PM
In talk.abortion, james g. keegan jr.
<keegan@nycap.rr.com>
wrote
on 13 Feb 2004 23:25:29 GMT
<Xns948EBB648964Ekeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.17>:

"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:

****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!



really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?

I'd suggest Usenet but I'm not sure we're his peers... :-)
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.

User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 13 Feb 2004 06:43:06 PM
On 13 Feb 2004 23:25:29 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:

****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!



really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?

Or explain why television programs depicting homosexuals in a positive
light are so popular.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.

User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 30 Jan 2004 01:34:53 PM
On 30 Jan 2004 18:19:09 -0000,
Secret Squirrel <ssquirrel@nottheremailer.net> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.

ROTFL!!!! What a tool.

I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.

Yeah. Possibly the biggest **idiot** I've ever run across
in my eight years in Usenet. Dumber than a sack of moldy
rat turds, and ten times as bigoted.

Don't worry, his SOP is to call anyone who disagrees
with him, or who agrees with us, a "pedo" or a "*****",
irrespective of their real sexual orientation or sexual
activity. I suppose that speaks volumes about his own
insecurity.

His inferiority complex must be light-years long. As in the
distance from here to the Andromeda galaxy.

He's been suspected of creating sockpuppets
(Worky, Die!, etc) to support his hate. I guess that like
a misbehaving kid, his whole life must have been spent
trying desperately to get the attention of someone,
*anyone*.

He must be one **ghastly** LOSER in the real world!

One last thing -- he's an equal opportunity hater. He's
been a frequent player on the alt.flame groups. Google
him, and you'll see what I mean. Don't eat lunch beforehand,
though.

Best to you,

Secret Squirrel

Thanks for the head's-up, Squirrel. You just confirmed
most of my suspicions about him.
.
User: "Secret Squirrel"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 01 Feb 2004 07:42:13 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in
news:4023afac.10414606@netnews.mchsi.com:

On 30 Jan 2004 18:19:09 -0000,
Secret Squirrel <ssquirrel@nottheremailer.net> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:


... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.

ROTFL!!!! What a tool.


I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.


Yeah. Possibly the biggest **idiot** I've ever run
across
in my eight years in Usenet. Dumber than a sack of moldy
rat turds, and ten times as bigoted.

Oh, but believe me, he's not the dumbest we've had. That
honor went to the Webtver Bob&Carole. Among other things,
Bob&Carole tried to mailbomb one of our participants, and
did it so incompetently that he ended up mailbombing himself.
The guy was so clueless it was incredible, if not funny,
a sort of Barney Fife on usenet.
We also had a self-professed "gay man"--Speedbyrd--who
wasn't too terribly bright either, but even he was light-
years ahead of Riske and Worky.
If you're going to troll a newsgroup, heck, at least be
funny and entertaining. Alt.support.boy-lovers has attracted
some of the stupidest trolls on usenet, wonder why?
Secret Squirrel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQBxBgT/rA6+b3AyhAQHBRQf/a1MCWX799zof8GWjBksVkS3dXrRIGt+A
W0X1i7OFWy//4IZm9tdosXkrP0PBbqdBpqGZGTwYV/5de/j0PdgTstHv7cBX930r
nswTpBMTC43XGrL+OVFQFWlyagd0XjFgv+ZZuwr9i2aFvrpgdo2FXlVvSC/K9pvI
fFH1OSimRygx/QB3v4GxDMoFwoGs7aLbV2JVvoKsUV8vEFl7mI/LwlUNEb8f/ZgY
JliszMlwli6Ugktnj3vS57dAA8HrVCRdiH5n/oZnkUEG70qeg6W6rtbzbGCoqmQ1
84WadjrX+kjXNWlKTA7LxRshjf5MfDH0e+2X4FyK1Dqq3Gw7FLk0kQ==
=dToF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Tate Gerard"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 30 Jan 2004 06:17:40 PM
Craig Chilton wrote:

On 30 Jan 2004 18:19:09 -0000,
Secret Squirrel <ssquirrel@nottheremailer.net> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:



... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.

ROTFL!!!! What a tool.



I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.



Yeah. Possibly the biggest **idiot** I've ever run across
in my eight years in Usenet. Dumber than a sack of moldy
rat turds, and ten times as bigoted.


Don't worry, his SOP is to call anyone who disagrees
with him, or who agrees with us, a "pedo" or a "*****",
irrespective of their real sexual orientation or sexual
activity. I suppose that speaks volumes about his own
insecurity.



His inferiority complex must be light-years long. As in the
distance from here to the Andromeda galaxy.


He's been suspected of creating sockpuppets
(Worky, Die!, etc) to support his hate. I guess that like
a misbehaving kid, his whole life must have been spent
trying desperately to get the attention of someone,
*anyone*.



He must be one **ghastly** LOSER in the real world!


One last thing -- he's an equal opportunity hater. He's
been a frequent player on the alt.flame groups. Google
him, and you'll see what I mean. Don't eat lunch beforehand,
though.

Best to you,

Secret Squirrel



Thanks for the head's-up, Squirrel. You just confirmed
most of my suspicions about him.

Why am I not surprised to see a homo chumming it up with a pedophile?
.
User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 31 Jan 2004 09:38:25 PM
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:17:40 -0500, Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
wrote:




Thanks for the head's-up, Squirrel. You just confirmed
most of my suspicions about him.


Why am I not surprised to see a homo chumming it up with a pedophile?

Exactly!
So noted.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.


User: "Work Work Work"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 30 Jan 2004 01:49:08 PM
Maybe you and pedophile Secret Squirrel can trade boy love videos
together .Looks like you are almost out of your pedophile closet.Since
James has knocked you on your ***** every time you have attempted to
debate him, it looks like you will need all the pedophiles in the world
to save your ***** *****.

Craig Chilton wrote:


On 30 Jan 2004 18:19:09 -0000,
Secret Squirrel <ssquirrel@nottheremailer.net> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:


... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.

ROTFL!!!! What a tool.


I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.


Yeah. Possibly the biggest **idiot** I've ever run across
in my eight years in Usenet. Dumber than a sack of moldy
rat turds, and ten times as bigoted.

Don't worry, his SOP is to call anyone who disagrees
with him, or who agrees with us, a "pedo" or a "*****",
irrespective of their real sexual orientation or sexual
activity. I suppose that speaks volumes about his own
insecurity.


His inferiority complex must be light-years long. As in the
distance from here to the Andromeda galaxy.

He's been suspected of creating sockpuppets
(Worky, Die!, etc) to support his hate. I guess that like
a misbehaving kid, his whole life must have been spent
trying desperately to get the attention of someone,
*anyone*.


He must be one **ghastly** LOSER in the real world!

One last thing -- he's an equal opportunity hater. He's
been a frequent player on the alt.flame groups. Google
him, and you'll see what I mean. Don't eat lunch beforehand,
though.

Best to you,

Secret Squirrel


Thanks for the head's-up, Squirrel. You just confirmed
most of my suspicions about him.

.

User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 31 Jan 2004 09:37:48 PM
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:34:53 GMT,
(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On 30 Jan 2004 18:19:09 -0000,
Secret Squirrel <ssquirrel@nottheremailer.net> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:


... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.

ROTFL!!!! What a tool.


I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.


Yeah. Possibly the biggest **idiot** I've ever run across
in my eight years in Usenet. Dumber than a sack of moldy
rat turds, and ten times as bigoted.

<snip>
Why am I not surprised to see a ***** taking sides with a known
anonymous pedophile "Secret Squirrel"....
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.


User: "Krisblake"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 26 Jan 2004 08:15:08 AM
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:12:49 -0500, James Riske
<james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:09:42 -0500, Krisblake
<bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500, James Riske
<james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:

Tate Gerard wrote:


That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.


How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?



Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,


'Intelligent.']



Yes...

Wait. Before you thank me, I have to tell you that I was being
sarcastic. You probably understood that, anyway, and thought you'd
flatter your own bigotry.
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 26 Jan 2004 07:22:55 PM
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:15:08 -0500,
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:

James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:

James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

[ ... ]

Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,

'Intelligent.']

Yes...

Wait. Before you thank me, I have to tell you that I was being
sarcastic. You probably understood that, anyway, and thought
you'd flatter your own bigotry.

Naw, Kris. He's a just bigot. And thus was probably 'WAY too
obtuse to figure that out. He probably took you literally.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.


User: "Len Sassaman"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 26 Jan 2004 07:40:04 PM
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004,
(Craig Chilton) wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:

Tate Gerard wrote:



That is nonsense, any country that allows [gays] to be legally
married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even
care about its own citizens.


How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness, etc.?


Just another step that [gays] need to feel accepted in society, ...


Yep. Just as blacks needed to be accepted by a mostly-white
society. NO person (unless they have hermit leanings) wants to be
ostracized or discriminated-against by society for any reason, much
less TRIVIAL ones... such as skin color, or one's personal and
private sex lives -- which are NO one else's business.

[Homosexuality] is not normal nor is it natural,...


Wrong. It is PERFECTLY normal for all having that sexual
orientation. And *most* of THEM are gracious enough NOT to go
around whining that *hetero*sexuality isn't "normal" -- even though
for most of them, it ISN'T. Bigots are confined primarily to the
heterosexuals.

Well: I think *hetero*sexuality is pretty disgusting
Mind you: have sex with a person of *another* gender!!! That's pretty
sick.
Next, they'll want it even more exotic or weird, and it'll be with an
animal or an alien.
Put my clean ***** in a dripping vagina? Why not copulate with a
4-winged octopus-like creature from Rigel IV!
-Yuk-
.
User: "Richard Christman"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 26 Jan 2004 08:39:28 PM
On 27 Jan 2004,
(Len Sassaman)
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004,

(Craig Chilton) wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

[Homosexuality] is not normal nor is it natural,...


Wrong. It is PERFECTLY normal for all having that sexual
orientation. And *most* of THEM are gracious enough NOT to go
around whining that *hetero*sexuality isn't "normal" -- even though
for most of them, it ISN'T. Bigots are confined primarily to the
heterosexuals.


Well: I think *hetero*sexuality is pretty disgusting
Mind you: have sex with a person of *another* gender!!! That's pretty
sick.
Next, they'll want it even more exotic or weird, and it'll be with an
animal or an alien.
Put my clean ***** in a dripping vagina? Why not copulate with a
4-winged octopus-like creature from Rigel IV!
-Yuk-

I don't think there is anything wrong, having sex with an animal or an
alien ... as long as they are *male* (*same-sex* as me).
Besides, I completely agree: nothing is more disgusting than having
intercourse with *another-sex* partner (reproductive in-marriage sex
being a peak in perversity)
Call me a romantic, but the psychological bond I will establish with a
*male* dog, a *male* duck, or your *male* alien will always be
stronger than whatever with a human *female*.
.

User: "Richard Christman"

Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH 26 Jan 2004 08:39:28 PM
On 27 Jan 2004,
(Len Sassaman)
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004,

(Craig Chilton) wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:

[Homosexuality] is not normal nor is it natural,...


Wrong. It is PERFECTLY normal for all having that sexual
orientation. And *most* of THEM are gracious enough NOT to go
around whining that *hetero*sexuality isn't "normal" -- even though
for most of them, it ISN'T. Bigots are confined primarily to the
heterosexuals.


Well: I think *hetero*sexuality is pretty disgusting
Mind you: have sex with a person of *another* gender!!! That's pretty
sick.
Next, they'll want it even more exotic or weird, and it'll be with an
animal or an alien.
Put my clean ***** in a dripping vagina? Why not copulate with a
4-winged octopus-like creature from Rigel IV!
-Yuk-

I don't think there is anything wrong, having sex with an animal or an
alien ... as long as they are *male* (*same-sex* as me).
Besides, I completely agree: nothing is more disgusting than having
intercourse with *another-sex* partner (reproductive in-marriage sex
being a peak in perversity)
Call me a romantic, but the psychological bond I will establish with a
*male* dog, a *male* duck, or your *male* alien will always be
stronger than whatever with a human *female*.
.



  Page 7 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.652     pg.362     pg.201     pg.112     pg.63     pg.36     pg.21     pg.13     pg.9     pg.7     pg.5     pg.3

OLDER