| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2004 02:55:55 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Democrats for BUSH |
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:24:22 -0500,
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Work Work Work" <WWW@aol.com> wrote:
It just shows everyone that most normal Americans
support BUSH and his policies.
My, you *are* a DELUDED one, aren't you?
They want a country with Family VALUES and a stop to
the deviants who want to turn America into a land of freaks.
Yep. And HATRED is **not** a family value.
So here's a solution to the problem you just described.
All you deviant and control-freakish RRR cult freaks need to
do is move up to Canada. Canadians are a good-hearted people,
with a great sense of humor. So you can give them something
NEW to laugh at!
Meanwhile, you'll be hearing us laugh at you all the way from down
here in the USA once we OUST Bush this fall, take our country back,
and once again have RESPECT for personal and private individual
liberties and rights.
"Hasta la vista, Warmonger-in-Thief!"
Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?
It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA. That's
one of the ways.
If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless
they were homo?
Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and egalitarian
country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one containing mindless and
hateful bigots, all else being equal.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
| User: "Tate Gerard" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
25 Jan 2004 06:26:42 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
"Hasta la vista, Warmonger-in-Thief!"
Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?
It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA. That's
one of the ways.
If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless
they were homo?
Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and egalitarian
country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one containing mindless and
hateful bigots, all else being equal.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
25 Jan 2004 12:45:52 PM |
|
|
<pedo group snipped>
Tate Gerard wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
<snip>
Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?
It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA. That's
one of the ways.
If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless they
were homo?
Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and egalitarian
country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one containing mindless and
hateful bigots, all else being equal.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
Really? Can you explain to us how Canada treating ALL of it's
citizens EQUALLY before the law by allowing any two consenting
adults to enter into a civil marriage contact demonstrates a lack of
caring about the rights of the citizens? TIA.
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
25 Jan 2004 12:37:29 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:26:42 -0500,
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Hasta la vista, Warmonger-in-Thief!"
Isn't [same-sex] marriage supposed to be legal in Canada?
It is. In many way, Canada is FAR advanced over the USA.
That's one of the ways.
If that is true why would anyone want to move there unless
they were homo?
Probably because living in a FAIR-minded, sensible, and
egalitarian country is ALWAYS preferable to living in one
containing mindless and hateful bigots, all else being equal.
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 06:56:30 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:37:29 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
-- Craig Chilton < >
Do you think leading in hiv statistics and many other diseases as well
as crippling the backbone of society by allowing deviates to marry
considered normal?
And then there's the fact that faggots eat ***** (rimming), have
unbridled promiscuity etc etc..
Oh sure, no harm done....
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 07:34:07 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:56:30 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
Do you think leading in hiv statistics and many other diseases
as well as crippling the backbone of society by allowing [gays]
to marry considered normal?
(1) HIV is spread by having unsafe sex, and by drug users sharing
needles. HETEROsexuals at at risk in both cases. And this is
NO argument that would support denying gays the right to marry
their same-sex partners. That would encourage more monogamy
among gays, which probably would REDUCE the spread of AIDS!
(2) Your homophobic bigotry (as evidenced by your hate-verbiage)
is duly noted, and your credibility accordingly destroyed.
(3) If gays marry, it would have NO adverse effect upon society.
to the contrary, that reflection of society's being a tolerant
one would ENHANCE society.
<Unbridled and ignorant bigotry and busybodyism snipped. Nothing lost.>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 08:21:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:34:07 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:56:30 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
Do you think leading in hiv statistics and many other diseases
as well as crippling the backbone of society by allowing [gays]
to marry considered normal?
(1) HIV is spread by having unsafe sex, and by drug users sharing
needles. HETEROsexuals at at risk in both cases. And this is
NO argument that would support denying gays the right to marry
their same-sex partners. That would encourage more monogamy
among gays, which probably would REDUCE the spread of AIDS!
Filthy faggots are known for their unbridled promiscuity, as if
letting them marry and pretend to be normal would actually stop them
from chasing their desires of depravity.
(2) Your homophobic bigotry (as evidenced by your hate-verbiage)
is duly noted, and your credibility accordingly destroyed.
You're not in control of this discussion *****.
The only one who gets their credibility destroyed are faggots and
those who love them (liberals), and I will be constantly reminding you
as well as demonstrating this to be fact with each reply I make to you
on usenet *****.
So noted.
(3) If gays marry, it would have NO adverse effect upon society.
to the contrary, that reflection of society's being a tolerant
one would ENHANCE society.
Yeah right *****, tell us another lie.
Filthy faggots constantly want to ***** and suck anything and
everything, their unbridled promiscuity will prevent them from being
normal or having their own children and knowing what it is like to be
in a loving relationship of trust and commitment.
And as the saying goes, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Poor filthy faggots.
<snip>
***** babble.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fletch F. Fletch" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 12:59:57 PM |
|
|
Nothing to add, I see. Off to the killfile.
Fletch
"James Riske" <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote in message
news:q38a109mvqdq6te3rq9hps5chqneqh13v9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:34:07 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:56:30 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
Do you think leading in hiv statistics and many other diseases
as well as crippling the backbone of society by allowing [gays]
to marry considered normal?
(1) HIV is spread by having unsafe sex, and by drug users sharing
needles. HETEROsexuals at at risk in both cases. And this is
NO argument that would support denying gays the right to marry
their same-sex partners. That would encourage more monogamy
among gays, which probably would REDUCE the spread of AIDS!
Filthy faggots are known for their unbridled promiscuity, as if
letting them marry and pretend to be normal would actually stop them
from chasing their desires of depravity.
(2) Your homophobic bigotry (as evidenced by your hate-verbiage)
is duly noted, and your credibility accordingly destroyed.
You're not in control of this discussion *****.
The only one who gets their credibility destroyed are faggots and
those who love them (liberals), and I will be constantly reminding you
as well as demonstrating this to be fact with each reply I make to you
on usenet *****.
So noted.
(3) If gays marry, it would have NO adverse effect upon society.
to the contrary, that reflection of society's being a tolerant
one would ENHANCE society.
Yeah right *****, tell us another lie.
Filthy faggots constantly want to ***** and suck anything and
everything, their unbridled promiscuity will prevent them from being
normal or having their own children and knowing what it is like to be
in a loving relationship of trust and commitment.
And as the saying goes, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Poor filthy faggots.
<snip>
***** babble.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for
his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 08:05:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:21:09 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
That is nonsense, any country that allows [homosexuals] to be
legally married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't
even care about its own citizens.
Uh-huh. Right. And so to validate that vacuous bit of
hate-mongering, do you feel like presenting so much as even
**one** relevant FACT that would serve as a good argument
to support the claim you just made? Note: FACT. Opinions
don't count. You've already DONE *that*.
Here. I'll help you. Answer this question:
If two same-sex people were allowed to marry, HOW would
that do *any* harm to *anyone*?
Do you think leading in hiv statistics and many other diseases
as well as crippling the backbone of society by allowing [gays]
to marry considered normal?
(1) HIV is spread by having unsafe sex, and by drug users sharing
needles. HETEROsexuals at at risk in both cases. And this is
NO argument that would support denying gays the right to marry
their same-sex partners. That would encourage more monogamy
among gays, which probably would REDUCE the spread of AIDS!
[Homosexuals] are known for their unbridled promiscuity, as if
letting them marry and pretend to be normal would actually stop them...
LOL!!!! And heterosexuals *aren't*?!? Ever heard of "one-night
stands?"
(2) Your homophobic bigotry (as evidenced by your hate-verbiage)
is duly noted, and your credibility accordingly destroyed.
You're not in control of this discussion [gay person].
First off, I'm not gay. I an a heterosexual person who is
FAIR-minded and egalitarian enough to stand up for people's
rights when profoundly-ignorant and bigoted LOSERS like you
seek to interfere with them.
No one "controls" discussions. However, from a debating
standpoint, the SENSIBLE people whose arguments are supported
by FACTS typically *win* them. But keep right on being a laughing-
stock, bigot. Great theater!
The only one who gets their credibility destroyed are [gay] and
those who [defend their rights -- egalitarians], and I will be constantly
reminding you as well as demonstrating this to be fact with each reply
I make to you on usenet...
The ONLY thing you are demonstrating in here is your idiocy and your
mindless hatefulness. You are nothing but a petty little jerk. And as I
said, a laughingstock.
(3) If gays marry, it would have NO adverse effect upon society.
to the contrary, that reflection of society's being a tolerant
one would ENHANCE society.
Yeah right ... tell us another lie.
I haven't told any yet. You've done nothing BUT lie. (And make a
total and constant fool of yourself.)
[Gays] constantly want to [have sex], ...
So do MOST people, given their druthers! :)
...their unbridled promiscuity...
Aww. "WAAaaaaaaa!!!" Not getting any, huh? Well, that's
perfectly understandable. What self-respecting girl would want
anything to do with a hateful ignoramus like you?
...will prevent them from being normal...
Heterosexuality is NORMAL for heteros. Homosexuality is
NORMAL for gays. Grow a brain. All you need is another
neuron in order to *double* the size of the one you have now.
...or having their own children...
Hmmm. Never heard of adoption, huh? In-vitro fertilization?
Surrogate motherhood?
...and knowing what it is like to be in a loving relationship of trust
and commitment.
I'm betting that MOST gay couples who would (and WILL, soon)
get married, know *infinitely* more about that that *you* EVER will.
<remaining utter idiocy snipped>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kay2619" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 10:51:48 AM |
|
|
Wow, JimmieBoy, your intelligence is showing. When logic fails, use
name-calling. Very, very classy; your family must be proud. You seem
really damaged; counseling could help you to start leading a normal
life. Until then, you're in the Killfile.
James Riske wrote:
(2) Your homophobic bigotry (as evidenced by your hate-verbiage)
is duly noted, and your credibility accordingly destroyed.
You're not in control of this discussion *****.
The only one who gets their credibility destroyed are faggots and
those who love them (liberals), and I will be constantly reminding you
as well as demonstrating this to be fact with each reply I make to you
on usenet *****.
So noted.
(3) If gays marry, it would have NO adverse effect upon society.
to the contrary, that reflection of society's being a tolerant
one would ENHANCE society.
Yeah right *****, tell us another lie.
Filthy faggots constantly want to ***** and suck anything and
everything, their unbridled promiscuity will prevent them from being
normal or having their own children and knowing what it is like to be
in a loving relationship of trust and commitment.
And as the saying goes, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Poor filthy faggots.
<snip>
***** babble.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laurence Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
25 Jan 2004 11:59:38 AM |
|
|
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
--
rgds
LAurence
.... Who is General Failure and why is he reading my drive?
begin Idiot driver of the week: K148 VPM
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: REPUBLICANS for KERRY |
04 Feb 2004 05:14:18 PM |
|
|
"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:4014040A.F53CDF17@iapetus.plus.com...
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Oh, he's just trying to yank your chain . . . he obviously has no idea what
he's talking about.
--Tock
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurence Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: REPUBLICANS for KERRY |
05 Feb 2004 06:22:27 AM |
|
|
wrote:
"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:4014040A.F53CDF17@iapetus.plus.com...
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Oh, he's just trying to yank your chain . . . he obviously has no idea what
he's talking about.
--Tock
Oh, that's obvious. It is fun showing him up every so often, though.
--
rgds
LAurence
.... Who is General Failure and why is he reading my drive?
begin Idiot driver of the week: K148 VPM
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: REPUBLICANS for KERRY |
05 Feb 2004 08:35:21 PM |
|
|
"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:40223583.9822A4E8@iapetus.plus.com...
tock@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:4014040A.F53CDF17@iapetus.plus.com...
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally
married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about
its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Oh, he's just trying to yank your chain . . . he obviously has no idea
what
he's talking about.
--Tock
Oh, that's obvious. It is fun showing him up every so often, though.
Ya . . . and it's fun posting in a thread called Republicans for Kerry,
right under a bunch of other posts labeled Democrats for Bush . . .
So much fun . . .
--Tock
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Newsreader" |
|
| Title: Re: REPUBLICANS for KERRY |
06 Feb 2004 12:18:20 PM |
|
|
There's a good pro-gay marriage article on http://ludicrosity.com/ this week
written by a Republican -- worth checking out if you're in the mood. It
seems to understand both sides pretty well.
J.N.
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:e1fUb.13028$im3.11288@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:4014040A.F53CDF17@iapetus.plus.com...
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married
is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Oh, he's just trying to yank your chain . . . he obviously has no idea
what
he's talking about.
--Tock
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 07:06:34 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
faggotry is not normal nor is it natural, nobody is born a *****.
Nobody wants to see two faggots walking around holding hands and
kissing on each other in public, it makes most normal people sick to
their stomache to see such a site.
If faggots are allowed to wed then they will be granted other rights,
next they will be able to sue others because they don't like them or
feel uncomfortable around them, it is normal to feel uncomfortable
around faggots.
Stay in the closet faggots, we don't need or want you and your kind.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Work Work Work" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 04:04:22 PM |
|
|
Amen to that.
So noted for all.
James Riske wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
faggotry is not normal nor is it natural, nobody is born a *****.
Nobody wants to see two faggots walking around holding hands and
kissing on each other in public, it makes most normal people sick to
their stomache to see such a site.
If faggots are allowed to wed then they will be granted other rights,
next they will be able to sue others because they don't like them or
feel uncomfortable around them, it is normal to feel uncomfortable
around faggots.
Stay in the closet faggots, we don't need or want you and your kind.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spam" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
27 Jan 2004 12:11:55 AM |
|
|
In article <4017ab50.27413070@netnews.mchsi.com>
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows [gays] to be legally
married is not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even
care about its own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness, etc.?
Just another step that [gays] need to feel accepted in society, ...
Yep. Just as blacks needed to be accepted by a mostly-white
society. NO person (unless they have hermit leanings) wants to be
ostracized or discriminated-against by society for any reason, much
less TRIVIAL ones... such as skin color, or one's personal and
private sex lives -- which are NO one else's business.
[Homosexuality] is not normal nor is it natural,...
Wrong. It is PERFECTLY normal for all having that sexual
orientation. And *most* of THEM are gracious enough NOT to go
around whining that *hetero*sexuality isn't "noemal" -- even though
for most of them, it ISN'T. Bigots are confined primarily to the
heterosexuals. As for being "natural," homosexuality is commonly
found in the animal world as well. I once had a cat that I'm pretty
sure was a lesbian. Another pet cat -- a male -- once tried coming
on to her, and she almost had him for lunch!! Pore male cat, who
was twice her size and had a full complement of claws and teeth,
ended up at the vet's for 3 days, recovering from multiple bites.
(She was declawed, and didn't have a scratch on her.)
Nobody is born [homosoexual].
Wrong. MOST of them *are*. No guy who is wildly attracted by girls
is gonna wake up some morning and say to himself, "Okay. Been there.
Done that. Guess i'll try being gay for awhile."
Nobody wants to see two [homosexuals] walking around holding
hands and kissing on each other in public, ...
Nobody *WANTS* to see two opposite-sex couples walking around
holding hands and kissing on each other in public. Any more than he
WANTS to see a person eating a burger. That's simply a commonplace
sight that people think nothing of. It'll BE that same way with same-sex
couples, TOO, in just a few more years.
It makes most normal people sick to their stomache...
Say. You wouldn't be Dan Quayle using an alias, would you?
...to see such a site.
"Website?" "Building site?"
There's nothing wrong with making typos... but *here* we see
some more evidence of the bone-IGNORANCE of people who
are dumb enough to be hate-filled and control-freakish homo-
phobes/RRR cultists/Anti-Choicers.
(BTW... only **bigots** are bothered by what you described.)
If [gays] are allowed to wed then they will be granted other rights,
next they will be able to sue others because they don't like them or
feel uncomfortable around them,...
Paranoiac. Any rights that the are "granted" will be the SAME
rights that heterosexuals have enjoyed all along; freedom from
mindless discrimination on the part of petty and ignorant malcontents.
(And, BTW, when's the last time you heard of a black person being
able to sue a white person merely because he "felt uncomfortable"
in the presence of the white person?)
It is normal to feel uncomfortable around [homosexuals].
If you are a childishly small-minded bigot, perhaps.
Stay in the closet [gays], we don't need or want you and your kind.
LOL!!!! That's the *equivalent* of a coin collecter saying, "Stay in
the closet, stamp collectors, we don't need or want you and your kind."
And **every bit** as STUPID.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
test
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 09:44:42 AM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
faggotry is not normal nor is it natural,
Homosexuality *is* natural as it occurs in nature. What is
unnatural is the computer you are using - the foundations of which
were invented by a GAY MAN - as computers do not occur in nature.
If you are so offended by unnatural things, take your computer
outside and smash it with a hammer so as to remove this unnatural
thing from your life.
<snip>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 07:09:42 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500, James Riske
<james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.'
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 08:12:49 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:09:42 -0500, Krisblake
<bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:06:34 -0500, James Riske
<james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:59:38 +0000, Laurence Taylor
<see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
Tate Gerard wrote:
That is nonsense, any country that allows homos to be legally married is
not sensible or fair-minded and obviously doesn't even care about its
own citizens.
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple applying for
legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows of
faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.']
Yes, thanks.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
26 Jan 2004 07:19:02 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:12:49 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.']
Yes, thanks.
Obviously, you are oblivious to the significance of the quotation
marks that enclosed that word. (MORE proof that you are
nothing but an IGNORANT bigot. As all bigots are. No intelligent
person would want ANY association with such mindless bigotry.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
27 Jan 2004 07:29:56 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:19:02 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:12:49 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness etc?
Just another step that faggots need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.']
Yes, thanks.
Obviously, you are oblivious to the significance of the quotation
marks that enclosed that word. (MORE proof that you are
nothing but an IGNORANT bigot. As all bigots are. No intelligent
person would want ANY association with such mindless bigotry.)
Poor stupid subliterate faggots, your fellow coward didn't define the
quotation, perhaps you and your fellow coward should enrole in some
remedial grammar courses.
Poor feckless faggots....
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
27 Jan 2004 07:47:27 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:29:56 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness etc?
Just another step that [gays] need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.'
Yes, thanks.
Obviously, you are oblivious to the significance of the quotation
marks that enclosed that word. (MORE proof that you are
nothing but an IGNORANT bigot. As all bigots are. No intelligent
person would want ANY association with such mindless bigotry.)
Poor stupid subliterate...
... Anti-Gay-Rights, ignorant **bigots**.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske james_riske@mail15_dot_com" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
28 Jan 2004 07:04:14 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:47:27 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:29:56 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness etc?
Just another step that [gays] need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.'
Yes, thanks.
Obviously, you are oblivious to the significance of the quotation
marks that enclosed that word. (MORE proof that you are
nothing but an IGNORANT bigot. As all bigots are. No intelligent
person would want ANY association with such mindless bigotry.)
Poor stupid subliterate...
... Anti-Gay-Rights, ignorant **bigots**.
Poor stupid filthy *****, it chopped my post because it couldn't
handle the fact that it was humiliated.
So noted.
--
"Now I want you to remember that no ***** ever won a war by dying for his country.
You won it by making the other poor dumb ***** die for his country."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
28 Jan 2004 08:02:15 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:04:14 -0500,
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
James Riske <james_riske@mail15_dot_com> wrote:
Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com> wrote:
How exactly is anyone inconvenienced by a same-sex couple
applying for legal recognition of their relationship, and taking vows
of faithfulness etc?
Just another step that [gays] need to feel accepted in society,
'Intelligent.'
Yes, thanks.
Obviously, you are oblivious to the significance of the quotation
marks that enclosed that word. (MORE proof that you are
nothing but an IGNORANT bigot. As all bigots are. No intelligent
person would want ANY association with such mindless bigotry.)
Poor stupid subliterate...
... Anti-Gay-Rights, ignorant **bigots**.
Poor stupid filthy...
... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight ALLY
of the gay community in its justifiable quest for EQUAL rights,
but obviously can't handle the fact that millions of SENSIBLE
and FAIR-minded **straight** people regard his hateful, bone-
ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be lower than moldy snake turds.
ROTFL!!!! What a tool.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Secret Squirrel" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
30 Jan 2004 12:19:09 PM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in
news:4017bec7.30383559@netnews.mchsi.com:
... bigot. His lying garbage snipped because he
can't
understand plain English. Was told that I was a straight
ALLY of the gay community in its justifiable quest for
EQUAL rights, but obviously can't handle the fact that
millions of SENSIBLE and FAIR-minded **straight** people
regard his hateful, bone- ignorant, and bigoted ilk to be
lower than moldy snake turds.
ROTFL!!!! What a tool.
I see that you've had the very dubious "pleasure" of
meeting one James Riske. Currently he's been hanging
around the gay and boylover groups.
Don't worry, his SOP is to call anyone who disagrees
with him, or who agrees with us, a "pedo" or a "*****",
irrespective of their real sexual orientation or sexual
activity. I suppose that speaks volumes about his own
insecurity. He's been suspected of creating sockpuppets
(Worky, Die!, etc) to support his hate. I guess that like
a misbehaving kid, his whole life must have been spent
trying desperately to get the attention of someone,
*anyone*.
One last thing--he's an equal opportunity hater. He's
been a frequent player on the alt.flame groups. Google
him, and you'll see what I mean. Don't eat lunch beforehand,
though.
Best to you,
Secret Squirrel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQBmegT/rA6+b3AyhAQGJiQf+MQy9gfFmPYPLYlhplob9pc5A/PfdLUEA
Jdb2tt0/QlphyKcVm8/rB6XREdvTh8tfa4QYnUmiIGbl2dUjg2anwxV3Ik0GZ2m5
FSJY+KhCIeQ1PmIk8q5PHiBCGJuRJFi4QfyHsbI++iChMaeelYCBTi3aqWeTtvyx
BzHPU5g8elXqEm5ACA3XWtuIiBptLQ+q4kgUgRTcaakRJ5uz41pFVvs00cklxv4I
27pUB0e5kUrX23AHDYka2COEb+QUbwocAAxleKQxvJTc2IFYu0vexUivPikTUajU
/gQCWt9+PAsZV2uz/6KG2J7n1AxAL73nxdvGBHyC1/FAe5HsFoQVpQ==
=I4Lb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
13 Feb 2004 05:25:29 PM |
|
|
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
15 Feb 2004 05:28:55 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns948EBB648964Ekeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.17...
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?
****** Walk the streets, go to a night club - talk to your friends and
family. Providing you are not gay, you will hear the contempt, normal people
have for the gay community!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Democrats for BUSH |
15 Feb 2004 02:21:50 PM |
|
|
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0ojp0$4i0$6@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns948EBB648964Ekeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.17...
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an
abomination!
really? can you cite the peer reviewed publication you are quoting?
****** Walk the streets, go to a night club - talk to your friends and
family. Providing you are not gay, you will hear the contempt, normal
people have for the gay community!
your failure to provide evidence to support your claim when called on to do
so suggests to me, and i suspect to others, that it is a false claim.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans for KERRY |
13 Feb 2004 10:01:25 PM |
|
|
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in
news:c0j4a0$j8r$15@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:
****** 90% of the adult population, think of 'gays' as an abomination!
Maybe in your part of town. In my part of town, 90% think of gays as
"peachy keen!" And I'm sure that if you and I were locked in a room for an
afternoon, I could convert you to my way of thinking . . .
--Tock
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
