"Andrew" <aclover@1value.com> wrote in message
news:B1EQD21737810.8269444444@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
In article <3f0ffa74.4994587@netnews.mchsi.com>
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:28:49 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Rene" <Rene "Libs r Dumb_As Rocks" Steuben@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ZixOa.4889$sY2.3654@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:y2oOa.57434$hV.3304561@twister.austin.rr.com...
"Marie A." <LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1dc521ed.0307071504.17ab2743@posting.google.com...
Pat Winstanley <ng_wisy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<MPG.19710f62d4c75a2298a3d7@News.CIS.DFN.DE>...
Nor does it prove they are in favour of people being raped.
Your
strawman (you do like chucking out strawmen when you can't
respond
to
a
request, don't you) does not work as an avoidance factor in
this NG.
Clerarly you are incapable of producing a posting where Craig
claims
to
be "pro-abortion".
Cockroach Marie stuck her thumb up her ***** and pulled out the
following:
Neither can we find anyone on death row who admits to being a
murderer.
You've now said this one time too many for me to pass up. It is a
'red
herring' and ultimately irrelevant.
In what way is it a 'red herring'?
***** examples and anecdotal stories that have nothing to do with
the
subject at hand. They are used to divert attention or imply importance
where
there is none.
Marie claims that Craig is "pro-abortion" and we've told her to prove
it.
She is stating that he won't admit it and tried to use an analogy that
people on death row don't admit they're murderers. She can't prove the
former and relied on this example to justify her lack of evidence, and
I've
now shown her to be full of ***** on the example.
Definition and examples:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Zzzz.
Loser
.
