In article <bc5vk2h3thnsn3r93afhd7aciqcoi4o5jk@4ax.com>,
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 6 Nov 2006 11:46:10 -0800, "MP" <m_p@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Save Da World wrote:
jsavard@ecn.ab.ca wrote:
Save Da World wrote:
When men start having bablies, THEN they can make rules on abortion
That's like saying that the issue of Negro slavery should have been
left up to only the people who owned cotton plantations.
A more accurate anology: That the issue of Negro slavery should have
been left up to the slaves
No, since slaveowners had the option to free their slaves, it was them
and not government imposing slavery. Government was 'pro-choice' on
slavery (with the arguable exception of fugitive slave laws, on which
the existence of slavery has not been shown to have critically
depended).
Can I play? If pro-lifers like to see themselves as abolitionists
vis-a-vis slavery, then their exceptions to abortion are kind of like
abolishing all slavery, except in a few counties in Mississippi and
certainly not favoring the abolition of slavery if the "life" of the
plantation depended on it.
priceless.
.
