Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy)



 Science > Abortion > Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Chris"
Date: 01 Apr 2004 03:45:22 PM
Object: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy)
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:tgcl609a8vpjtrah0o2d897dslliil64hs@4ax.com...

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:17:57 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) in alt.abortion with message-id <c4dgpk$l8m$1@bolt.sonic.net>
wrote:

Attila <Attila> wrote:

(Ray Fischer)


You
know exactly what I am saying


Yup. You expect people to obey your dictates just because you

think

you have some right to steal their money and spend how you see

fit.


I believe that is your liberal agenda.


No, you lying *****. YOU are the one demanding the right to

take

other people's money.


I expect other people to pay their bills


Where YOU assign what they owe.


That can be decided by others.


Your argument is and has been that you should get to assign other
people's liabilities.


No it has not.


Of course it has. You say men must pay.


No I did not. I always speak of custodial and non-custodial parents.


Heh. Which is the man usually?


I agree it is usually the man, but I do not want to get into the many
different reasons it is usually the man or the many exceptions and
reasons for the exceptions beyond the basic situation which I have
outlined.

Of course, because it discredits your position.


That is a matter for the courts to decide, and whether the court
system is fir or not is an entirely different discussion.


Why? Becaus eyou say they
are "responsible".


Generally parents are responsible for their children.


"The law is the law and may not be questioned".


Only in two places - court and the legislature.



When pressed, you say you don't want to discuss
why they should be "responsible". We're supposed to just accept your
decree.


No decree. Someone must be responsible and in our society it is the
parents.


Looks like a decree.


I am sure it does to you.


A child exists.


Non sequitur.

This requires participation of a male and a female.


Liar.


Reference please.


Sure. A woman does not need the participation of any man in order to
create a child. She needs some viable sperm. Nothing more. The man
that created the sperm need not be involved and may even have been
dead for years.


Yet a man must have participated to some degree for that sperm to
exist. It did not come from thin air - it had to originate with a man
somehow at sometime.

Just as the manufacturer of gunpowder MUST have participated to some degree
for the murder to exist; thus, the manufacturer is responsible for the
crime.



You are in effect insisting that a woman stranded alone on an island


Liar.


I see you trimmed my comment. It really doesn't matter.

.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy) 01 Apr 2004 07:14:02 PM
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:45:22 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <W50bc.34715$wl1.25789@fed1read06> wrote:


I agree it is usually the man, but I do not want to get into the many
different reasons it is usually the man or the many exceptions and
reasons for the exceptions beyond the basic situation which I have
outlined.


Of course, because it discredits your position.

Since my position makes no attempt to assign any 'blame' to anyone it
is difficult to see any validity in your comment.
However, your opinion does nothing to validate much of anything
anyway.


Yet a man must have participated to some degree for that sperm to
exist. It did not come from thin air - it had to originate with a man
somehow at sometime.


Just as the manufacturer of gunpowder MUST have participated to some degree
for the murder to exist; thus, the manufacturer is responsible for the
crime.

That is the attitude of gun control nuts. Personally I oppose gun
control. I support private ownership of any weapons a person can
afford with no limits short of WMD.
.
User: "Chris"

Title: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy) 01 Apr 2004 10:52:44 PM
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:bbfp60p7jsv154vc6o25hmd29f3vjcmoau@4ax.com...

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:45:22 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <W50bc.34715$wl1.25789@fed1read06> wrote:



I agree it is usually the man, but I do not want to get into the many
different reasons it is usually the man or the many exceptions and
reasons for the exceptions beyond the basic situation which I have
outlined.


Of course, because it discredits your position.


Since my position makes no attempt to assign any 'blame' to anyone it
is difficult to see any validity in your comment.

Non sequitur.


However, your opinion does nothing to validate much of anything
anyway.

My OPINION? What might that be?




Yet a man must have participated to some degree for that sperm to
exist. It did not come from thin air - it had to originate with a man
somehow at sometime.


Just as the manufacturer of gunpowder MUST have participated to some

degree

for the murder to exist; thus, the manufacturer is responsible for the
crime.


That is the attitude of gun control nuts. Personally I oppose gun
control. I support private ownership of any weapons a person can
afford with no limits short of WMD.

As do I; however, it looks as if my analogy has escaped you.


.
User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy) 02 Apr 2004 07:04:55 AM
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:52:44 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <Dm6bc.35504$wl1.6500@fed1read06> wrote:


"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:bbfp60p7jsv154vc6o25hmd29f3vjcmoau@4ax.com...

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:45:22 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <W50bc.34715$wl1.25789@fed1read06> wrote:



I agree it is usually the man, but I do not want to get into the many
different reasons it is usually the man or the many exceptions and
reasons for the exceptions beyond the basic situation which I have
outlined.


Of course, because it discredits your position.


Since my position makes no attempt to assign any 'blame' to anyone it
is difficult to see any validity in your comment.


Non sequitur.


However, your opinion does nothing to validate much of anything
anyway.


My OPINION? What might that be?

Excuse me. You have obviously mistaken me for someone who really
gives a *****.





Yet a man must have participated to some degree for that sperm to
exist. It did not come from thin air - it had to originate with a man
somehow at sometime.


Just as the manufacturer of gunpowder MUST have participated to some

degree

for the murder to exist; thus, the manufacturer is responsible for the
crime.


That is the attitude of gun control nuts. Personally I oppose gun
control. I support private ownership of any weapons a person can
afford with no limits short of WMD.


As do I; however, it looks as if my analogy has escaped you.

Not at all. Look up 'ignored'.
.
User: "Chris"

Title: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy) 03 Apr 2004 03:08:54 AM
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:ksoq60ln85a4su703pbbu4pesdsaqe0sdf@4ax.com...

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:52:44 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <Dm6bc.35504$wl1.6500@fed1read06> wrote:


"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:bbfp60p7jsv154vc6o25hmd29f3vjcmoau@4ax.com...

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:45:22 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <W50bc.34715$wl1.25789@fed1read06> wrote:



I agree it is usually the man, but I do not want to get into the

many

different reasons it is usually the man or the many exceptions and
reasons for the exceptions beyond the basic situation which I have
outlined.


Of course, because it discredits your position.


Since my position makes no attempt to assign any 'blame' to anyone it
is difficult to see any validity in your comment.


Non sequitur.


However, your opinion does nothing to validate much of anything
anyway.


My OPINION? What might that be?


Excuse me.

You'r excused. Again, what is this opinion that you speak of?

You have obviously mistaken me for someone who really
gives a *****.





Yet a man must have participated to some degree for that sperm to
exist. It did not come from thin air - it had to originate with a

man

somehow at sometime.


Just as the manufacturer of gunpowder MUST have participated to some

degree

for the murder to exist; thus, the manufacturer is responsible for the
crime.


That is the attitude of gun control nuts. Personally I oppose gun
control. I support private ownership of any weapons a person can
afford with no limits short of WMD.


As do I; however, it looks as if my analogy has escaped you.

Not at all. Look up 'ignored'.

I'm sorry, but it is unclear to me what you mean in your above statement.



.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy) 03 Apr 2004 07:12:25 AM
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:Ncvbc.37812$wl1.13750@fed1read06:

"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:ksoq60ln85a4su703pbbu4pesdsaqe0sdf@4ax.com...
I'm sorry, but it is unclear to me what you mean in your above statement.

it is abundantly clear that, whule your remark above was addressed to attila,
it could have been addressed to anyone whose post you responded to since you
appeared on usenet.
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy)
Re: Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman (Pro-Liar idiocy)
Eleventh Circuit Court: Forced abortion on woman - legal!
Frederal Court Rebukes Bush-Appointed Lawyer For Jailing Democrat Woman On Trumpted-Up Charges (GOP=Corruption)
Re: Roe Appeal to be Heard by Federal Court
Pryor Seated on Court of Appeals
court ruling shows pro-abort desperation
The next U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court v 10 Commandments
Supreme Court Replacement: Conservative v Liberal
Roy Moore for the Supreme Court!
Slavery Is wrong/Killing Babies (Abortion) Is wrong, the Supreme Court Is Wrong in Both Cases.
The court found that Indiana's Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was constitutional, and that the plaintiffs' equal protection rights were not violated by the denial of marriage licenses
Supreme Court rejects McCorvey appeal
RRR Cult Pushing its Adherents to Poison the U.S. Supreme Court -- for Most of 21st Century
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER