| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Murdoc" |
| Date: |
03 Apr 2004 12:15:46 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're willing
to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e. murder):
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop lying
that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or foetus she
is carrying is not a 'basic human right', either.
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
03 Apr 2004 04:29:28 AM |
|
|
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're willing
to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e. murder):
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop lying
that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or foetus...
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
03 Apr 2004 05:53:49 AM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're willing
to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e. murder):
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop lying
that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or foetus...
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her unborn
foetus.
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
03 Apr 2004 06:11:23 AM |
|
|
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're willing
to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e. murder):
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop lying
that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or foetus...
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her unborn
foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
04 Apr 2004 04:43:42 PM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means [ killing her embryo/foetus ].
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawrence E. McKnight" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 06:55:35 PM |
|
|
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means [ killing her embryo/foetus ].
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
Well, when one of those cases doesn't get tossed out of court, it is
usually because the 'victim' did much more than 'whatever it takes'.
Feel free to post any counterexamples.
-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
04 Apr 2004 04:53:15 PM |
|
|
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of Anti"
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
04 Apr 2004 05:47:07 PM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Smith QIM" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
04 Apr 2004 11:46:50 PM |
|
|
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion. If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Tom
.
|
|
|
| User: "Turin" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 05:54:28 PM |
|
|
(Tom Smith QIM) wrote in message news:<51bb0c1b.0404042046.5329ce6d@posting.google.com>...
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion. If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Tom
Yo, Tom. Looks like your halo needs a new battery again.... :D
- - -
One of millions of angry men:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_First/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_Politics/
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 12:14:35 AM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - Tom Smith QIM of the Cyborg Race wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges the victim (the person whose house was being robbed)
with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate.
If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Hmm, therefore we wouldn't be born. Therefore we wouldn't be posting in
this newsgroup. Therefore you wouldn't decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore we would be born. Therefore we would be posting in the
newsgroups. Therefore you would decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore ...
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Turin" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 05:59:14 PM |
|
|
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<xn0dgnzx83627w000@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - Tom Smith QIM of the Cyborg Race wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges the victim (the person whose house was being robbed)
with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate.
If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Hmm, therefore we wouldn't be born. Therefore we wouldn't be posting in
this newsgroup. Therefore you wouldn't decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore we would be born. Therefore we would be posting in the
newsgroups. Therefore you would decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore ...
hahaha...nice comeback for old simple-***** Tom.
I'm sure that's got him thinking hard now....
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 11:48:51 AM |
|
|
Murdoc <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - Tom Smith QIM of the Cyborg Race wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges the victim (the person whose house was being robbed)
with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate.
Welcome to the pro-freedom vs. pro-lie debate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 04:01:39 PM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - Ray Fischer of the Cyborg Race wrote:
Murdoc <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - Tom Smith QIM of the Cyborg Race wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> > >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> > > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> > wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> > news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels
wrote: >> > > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir
Jessy of >> > Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> > > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> > > stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo or >> > foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to
kill >> > > her >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your
house >> > with the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you
have the >> > right to do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even
if it means >> > killing the person). Hmm, so why are there so many
cases where the >> > robber charges the victim (the person whose
house was being robbed) >> > with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate.
Welcome to the pro-freedom vs. pro-lie debate.
"Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate."
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lawrence E. McKnight" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 06:57:03 PM |
|
|
On 5 Apr 2004 05:14:35 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - Tom Smith QIM of the Cyborg Race wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges the victim (the person whose house was being robbed)
with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the pro-death v pro-life debate.
If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Hmm, therefore we wouldn't be born. Therefore we wouldn't be posting in
this newsgroup. Therefore you wouldn't decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore we would be born. Therefore we would be posting in the
newsgroups. Therefore you would decide to go back and abort us.
Therefore ...
In the many-universes theory, he would be in a universe which didn't
contain you. Hmm....
-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 04:30:28 AM |
|
|
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>...
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy of
Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what you're
willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided ideology (i.e.
murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please stop
lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo or
foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill her
unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have the
fundamental right to govern what happen within her body, even if it
means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house with
the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the right to
do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means killing the
person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the robber charges
the victim (the person whose house was being robbed) with assault?
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-Choice vs. Pro-Choicr aguement. ;-)
If I
believed in abortion, I would want to go back in time and have both of
you aborted.
Pity. Then you'd have anybody to talk to, idiot. :-(
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 05:55:57 AM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >> Captian's
Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote: >>
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy
of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo
or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to >> do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the >> person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges >> the victim (the person whose house was being
robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] aguement. ;-)
Indeed.
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 06:27:13 AM |
|
|
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >> Captian's
Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote: >>
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message
news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate Feminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir Jessy
of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder. Please
stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the embryo
or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to kill
her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does have
the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within her body,
even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your house
with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you have the
right to >> do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even if it means
killing the >> person). Hmm, so why are there so many cases where the
robber charges >> the victim (the person whose house was being
robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-Choice vs. Pro-Choice arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 04:01:41 PM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >> Captian's
Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote: >>
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir
Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo >> or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to
kill >> her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does
have >> the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within
her body, >> even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your
house >> with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you
have the >> right to >> do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even
if it means >> killing the >> person). Hmm, so why are there so many
cases where the >> robber charges >> the victim (the person whose
house was being >> robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
Who are you referring to, 2Angels? Certainly not me, as I do not post
here as 'Murdick'.
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
05 Apr 2004 09:00:14 PM |
|
|
On 5 Apr 2004 21:01:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >> Captian's
Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote: >>
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800, (Tom
Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir
Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at what
you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your misguided
ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo >> or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to
kill >> her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does
have >> the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within
her body, >> even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your
house >> with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm, you
have the >> right to >> do whatever it takes to defend yourself (even
if it means >> killing the >> person). Hmm, so why are there so many
cases where the >> robber charges >> the victim (the person whose
house was being >> robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
Who are you referring to, 2Angels?
To whom are you responding. Murdick?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
06 Apr 2004 02:45:24 AM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 21:01:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >>
Captian's >> >> Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800,
(Tom >> >> Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir
Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at
what >> >> you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your
misguided >> >> ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo >> or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to
kill >> her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does
have >> the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within
her body, >> even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your
house >> with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm,
you >> have the >> right to >> do whatever it takes to defend
yourself (even >> if it means >> killing the >> person). Hmm, so why
are there so many >> cases where the >> robber charges >> the victim
(the person whose >> house was being >> robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
Who are you referring to, 2Angels?
To whom are you responding. Murdick?
"Who are you referring to, MyTwoAngels? Certainly not me, as I do not
post
here as 'Murdick'."
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
06 Apr 2004 06:02:06 AM |
|
|
On 6 Apr 2004 07:45:24 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 21:01:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith QIM)
wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >>
Captian's >> >> Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800,
(Tom >> >> Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >> MyTwoAngels
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800, "Sir
Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >> <evilincorporated@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at
what >> >> you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your
misguided >> >> ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo >> or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a woman to
kill >> her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she does
have >> the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what happen within
her body, >> even if it >> > >> means terminating her pregnancy.
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into your
house >> with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you harm,
you >> have the >> right to >> do whatever it takes to defend
yourself (even >> if it means >> killing the >> person). Hmm, so why
are there so many >> cases where the >> robber charges >> the victim
(the person whose >> house was being >> robbed) with assault? >>
It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is your response?
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about abortion.
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
Who are you referring to, 2Angels?
To whom are you responding. Murdick?
"Who are you referring to, MyTwoAngels
You, MurDOC.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murdoc" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
06 Apr 2004 05:59:17 PM |
|
|
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 6 Apr 2004 07:45:24 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 21:01:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> >> wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >>
Captian's >> >> Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the
Cyborg >> >> Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800,
>> (Tom >> >> Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >>
MyTwoAngels >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800,
"Sir >> >> Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >>
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at
what >> >> you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your
misguided >> >> ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or condoned murder.
Please >> stop >> lying >> >> that I >> > do.
That's not what it looks like to me.
It's murder one.
Legal abortion is NOT murder. Period.
The choice for a woman to intentionally kill the
embryo >> or >> foetus... >>
It his her intetion to terminate the pregnancy.
It is not, however, a basic human right for a
woman to >> >> kill >> her >> > >> > unborn foetus.
That is because no such right exists; however, she
does >> >> have >> the >> > >> fundamental right to govern what
happen within >> >> her body, >> even if it >> > >> means terminating
her pregnancy. >> >> >> >> >
[...]
No relevant response to what I wrote, above?
So, therefore, using that logic: If someone breaks into
your >> >> house >> with >> the intent of robbing you and causing you
harm, >> you >> have the >> right to >> do whatever it takes to defend
yourself (even >> if it means >> killing the >> person). Hmm, so
why >> are there so many >> cases where the >> robber charges >> the
victim >> (the person whose >> house was being >> robbed) with
assault? >> >> >> >> >> It's a simple situation, 2Angels. What is
your response? >> >> >> >
My response is that I see two idiots arguing about
abortion. >> >> >>
Welcome to the Anti-[Life] vs. Pro-[Life] arguement.
Indeed.
I am glad you agree, Murdick. ;-)
Who are you referring to, 2Angels?
To whom are you responding. Murdick?
"Who are you referring to, MyTwoAngels
You, MurDOC.
Then who is 'Murdick'? Another one of your imaginary friends?
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a
compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism = Abortion = Feminism |
06 Apr 2004 07:18:58 PM |
|
|
On 6 Apr 2004 22:59:17 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 6 Apr 2004 07:45:24 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 6/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 21:01:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004 10:55:57 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com>
wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race wrote:
On 4 Apr 2004 21:46:50 -0700, (Tom Smith
QIM) >> >> >> wrote:
"Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<xn0dgnplg3eu8c002@news.bri.connect.com.au>... >>
Captian's >> >> Log: 5/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg Race
wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > On 4 Apr 2004 21:43:42 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> >> > >
On 3 Apr 2004 11:53:49 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> > >>
Captian's Log: 3/04/04 - MyTwoAngels of the Cyborg
Race >> >> wrote: >> > >> >
On 3 Apr 2004 06:15:46 GMT, "Murdoc"
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>
Captian's Log: 31/03/04 - MyTwoAngels of the
Cyborg >> >> Race >> >> wrote: >> >> >
On 31 Mar 2004 00:02:30 -0800,
>> (Tom >> >> Smith >> QIM) >> >> wrote:
Hate Feminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in
message >> >> news:<406A0F55.5E2F0448@now.org>... >>
MyTwoAngels >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:27:47 +1200, Hate
Feminism >> >> > >> >> >> >> > <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
MyTwoAngels wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:28:41 -0800,
"Sir >> >> Jessy >> of >> Anti" >> >> >> >> > >>
<evilincorporated@yahoo.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >>
[Nothing of use]
Enough said.
You're certainly a women-firster. Look at
what >> >> you're >> > >> willing >> >> to justify >> > >for your
misguided >> >> ideology (i.e. >> > >> murder): >> >> >> >
I have never supported or c | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
