| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"hate feminism" |
| Date: |
09 Jun 2004 04:02:10 AM |
| Object: |
Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it - and if I want to
kill then I say simply it's not.
Doesn't that make sense? Well, it's as makes as much sense as
feminist/female logic, that is.
Alas, she refused to abort the foetus and King Pappy punched and
stomped on her stomach several times, causing a 'stiffybirth'.
http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9791287%255E1702,00.html
Poor anti-abortionist Ms Flick now suffers a permanent and significant
loss as a result of the attack. The offender broke the close physical
bond between the mother and the foetus.
Foetus: feed me proper, you *****, stop feeding me drugs N booze.
Mother: shut up you little fucker, I'll bring you up soon.
Foetus: ***** you, I'll ask King Pappy to kill me first.
Mother: I'll be the sole decision maker or breaker, foetus.
Foetus: ***** you, I'll die before you gestate, be sure of it.
.
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond - go back to the old days |
23 Jun 2004 08:16:51 PM |
|
|
In article <40DA0798.1080608@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Flower Power wrote:
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2jt7ipF15cd9tU2@uni-berlin.de...
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:45:25 -0500, "Flower Power"
<SaveTheWhales@thisNG.edu> wrote:
It's a known fact almost all criminals and social
misfits come from broken homes, dysfunctional homes, were
unplanned/unwanted, were raised on welfare, were resented, neglected and
abused in many ways.....
Close, but no cupie doll.
It's known that most criminals were raised without their biological
father present. The rest of what you said is just noise.
========================
Lets repeat this one more time. It's a known fact almost all criminals and
social
misfits come from broken homes (NO FATHER PRESENT), dysfunctional homes
(FATHERS BEAT THE MOTHER, DRANK, ETC.), were *unplanned/unwanted,* were
raised on welfare (POOR, SHABBY & HUNGRY), were resented, neglected and
abused in many ways.....
What you claim is pure *****.
You got that screwed up again. Must be a word processing error:
It's a known fact almost all criminals and social misfits come from
broken homes (NO BIOLOGICAL FATHER PRESENT), dysfunctional homes
(MOTHERS BEAT THE KIDS, DRANK, ETC.), were *unplanned/unwanted (*****
MOTHER GOT KNOCKED UP) ,* were raised on welfare (POOR, SHABBY &
HUNGRY), were resented, neglected and abused in many ways.....
There, it's all fixed.
Any couple that can't negotiate settlement after snogging, ought to have
children removed from BOTH of their custody.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond - go back to the old days |
23 Jun 2004 06:19:51 AM |
|
|
On 22 Jun 2004 21:23:31 -0700, (Mark) wrote:
Juggling both work & homelife in a marriage is a true test of
success.
Men have done that since the beginning of time.
--
num tibi mentireris?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond - go back to the old days |
23 Jun 2004 04:41:21 PM |
|
|
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2jt7b7F15cd9tU1@uni-berlin.de...
On 22 Jun 2004 21:23:31 -0700, (Mark) wrote:
Juggling both work & homelife in a marriage is a true test of
success.
Men have done that since the beginning of time.
================================
So have women.
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
22 Jun 2004 09:53:26 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:44:59 +1200,
"Hate Feminism [One of the only Loons in Usenet who
is DUMB enough to **admit** that he's a bigot in every
posts, with the inane alias he chose for himself] wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Since those women are intelligent enough to recognize that nothing
of greater significance than gametes (sperm and ova) are being dealt
with, that makes your so-called "feminists" one HELL of a LOT smarter
than **you** are.
Feminists are ideologically driven bigots who define truth according
to what they want to hear.
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians. But you
**depend** upon quoting the few extremists you can find. That's ALL
that you've got!
<Lying crap flushed>
(BTW -- the ones that **choose** to gestate-to-term aren't saying
that those mere reproductive entities ARE human beings. They simply
are choosing to **enable** them, by being WILLING hosts, to BECOME
human beings.)
Reproductive-process entities : human beings :: acorns : oak trees.
Trees aren't even human beings, or even animals.
Analogies are lost on you, aren't they? (A fault common to
MOST people who are dull-witted enough to BE busybodyish bigots.)
SLANTED article, weitten by Anti-Choicers, describing the
gestation process, snipped. Practically everyone in here (except,
perhaps, for the most retarded of the Anti-Choicers) is familiar with
that process, and has no dispute with the process, itself.
And it has NOTHING to do with the subject at hand,
which is THIS:
PERSONHOOD begins at BIRTH.
THAT'S all that counts!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
22 Jun 2004 11:49:50 PM |
|
|
GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush! wrote:
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians.
ROFLMAO!!! How many times do you have to repeat that lie before it
becomes true?
--
When did we divide into sides?
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 01:49:20 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40D90BEE.6090708@hotmail.com...
GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!
wrote:
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians.
ROFLMAO!!! How many times do you have to repeat that lie before it
becomes true?
====================
Since you despise women so much I guess you'll turn to men..... :-)
You're limited to only the 2 sexes. No wait,... there are those
trans-gender folks. Men who have themselves turned into women. You'd love
one of those.
--
Flower Power.......
ANTI-Feminist definition: "Sick abusive controlling men" -->
adj. 1. A man who consistently supports
UNequal legal rights while opposing feminine equality.
2. Someone losing a debate with a feminist.
3. A woman who refuses to kowtow to ANTI-feminist propaganda.
Usually used as an ad-homonym attack because he has no reply (like Bob).
Translation: "You're wrong, but won't admit it."
Synonyms: terribly confused, defective brain, take the IQ-test, morons,
taking meds,
seek professional help, had one too many hits of crack, etc.
===============================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky KIng" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 08:03:07 AM |
|
|
In article <QJedndR-EJBrukTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net>,
SaveTheWomen@thisNG.edu says...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40D90BEE.6090708@hotmail.com...
GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!
wrote:
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians.
If that were true they would not want special laws and perks just for
them. They would be for a true ERA. They are not after equal rights.
ROFLMAO!!! How many times do you have to repeat that lie before it
becomes true?
====================
Since you despise women so much I guess you'll turn to men..... :-)
You're limited to only the 2 sexes. No wait,... there are those
trans-gender folks. Men who have themselves turned into women. You'd love
one of those.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 03:22:17 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:49:50 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush! wrote:
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians.
ROFLMAO!!! How many times do you have to repeat that lie before it
becomes true?
Doesn't he have to jump up and click his red shoes together or
something?
--
num tibi mentireris?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 08:59:31 AM |
|
|
Steenkin Man wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:49:50 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush! wrote:
MOST feminists are NOT bigots. They are egalitarians.
ROFLMAO!!! How many times do you have to repeat that lie before it
becomes true?
Doesn't he have to jump up and click his red shoes together or
something?
You do, but it doesn't work for the wicked FlowerPower witch of the west.
--
When did we divide into sides?
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 04:44:45 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40D98CC3.3080800@hotmail.com...
You do, but it doesn't work for the wicked FlowerPower witch of the west.
=================
Yes, I'm so wicked because I believe in CHOICE and equal rights for women!
Wow! How evil can a woman get? How dare any women be for CHOICE and equal
rights? Lets force all the women back into the dark ages to please the weak
minded, impotent control-freaks out there, eh?
LOL!!! :-)
--
Flower Power.......
ANTI-Feminist definition: "Sick abusive controlling men" -->
adj. 1. A man who consistently supports
UNequal legal rights while opposing feminine equality.
2. Someone losing a debate with a feminist.
3. A woman who refuses to kowtow to ANTI-feminist propaganda.
Usually used as an ad-homonym attack because he has no reply (like Bob).
Translation: "You're wrong, but won't admit it."
Synonyms: terribly confused, defective brain, take the IQ-test, morons,
taking meds,
seek professional help, had one too many hits of crack, etc.
===============================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elmo" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 05:25:27 PM |
|
|
In article <40D98CC3.3080800@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
What is wrong with that? And misandrist is not a real word.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 05:47:56 PM |
|
|
Elmo wrote:
In article <40D98CC3.3080800@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
What is wrong with that? And misandrist is not a real word.
1. The government and the legal system already is very biased for women
and against men. If you can't understand why making government more and
more oppressive to half the population while favoring the other half is
wrong then you are another misandrist bigot.
2. Yea, "misandrist" is a word that has been around for centuries
(check the OED), but if you are one you probably have ignored it.
Bob
--
When did we divide into sides?
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
23 Jun 2004 08:25:34 PM |
|
|
In article <40DA089C.3020901@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Elmo wrote:
In article <40D98CC3.3080800@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
What is wrong with that? And misandrist is not a real word.
1. The government and the legal system already is very biased for women
and against men. If you can't understand why making government more and
more oppressive to half the population while favoring the other half is
wrong then you are another misandrist bigot.
2. Yea, "misandrist" is a word that has been around for centuries
(check the OED), but if you are one you probably have ignored it.
Men are the architects of their own misery. Why would a man want an
unequal relationship? Why wouldn't a man want a relationship where his
wife earns and pays 50% of the frieght of the relationship and its
outcome?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
09 Jun 2004 08:52:16 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:02:10 +1200, hate feminism <kill@feminism.now>
in alt.abortion with message-id <40C6D212.84CC3170@feminism.now>
wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is;
No it isn't. It's your body and your decision as to whether to
complete or terminate your pregnancy. That's all.
if it's not then I can kill it - and if I want to
kill then I say simply it's not.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
09 Jun 2004 07:02:49 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:02:10 +1200, hate feminism <kill@feminism.now>
wrote:
[...]
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is;
Once it has been born.
[...]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
09 Jun 2004 06:44:51 AM |
|
|
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
09 Jun 2004 07:25:18 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
09 Jun 2004 09:31:14 PM |
|
|
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
The is no law anywhere that grants women any power to decide if
something is a human being. He is a liar and you're an idiot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 10:13:28 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:31:14 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
The is no law anywhere that grants women any power to decide if
something is a human being. He is a liar and you're an idiot.
Not too long ago there was a case in, I believe, Wales. A man hit a
pregnant female and she subsequently lost her baby. He was prosecuted
and jailed for manslaughter. The law must therefore have considered
that the baby was a living human.
If the same female had decided to have her baby killed in an abortion
clinic, she would not have been prosecuted. The law does not permit
the killing of humans, therefore her wishes - and her wishes alone -
determine the humanity of the baby.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 09:07:22 PM |
|
|
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2irc50Fq1ks5U1@uni-berlin.de...
If the same female had decided to have her baby killed in an abortion
clinic, she would not have been prosecuted. The law does not permit
the killing of humans, therefore her wishes - and her wishes alone -
determine the humanity of the baby.
=======================
So? It's her body and her fetus/zygote - not yours.
--
FP....
Do they also warn women of the dangers of term pregnancy and
birth?.......like:
http://www.indiaparenting.com/pregnancy/data/preg16_00.shtml
http://www.imnotsorry.net/
http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
The risk of death associated with childbirth is about 11 times as high as
that associated with abortion.27
http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00054602.htm
http://www.afterabortion.org/news/deaths_smj.html
====================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lawrence E. McKnight" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 07:45:05 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:13:28 +0100, Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:31:14 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
The is no law anywhere that grants women any power to decide if
something is a human being. He is a liar and you're an idiot.
Not too long ago there was a case in, I believe, Wales. A man hit a
pregnant female and she subsequently lost her baby. He was prosecuted
and jailed for manslaughter. The law must therefore have considered
that the baby was a living human.
Hardly. I don't know how the law in Wales is writtten, put in
California, PC 187 (which establishes fetal homicide as murder)
specifically mentions a fetus as being something other than a human
being.
If the same female had decided to have her baby killed in an abortion
clinic, she would not have been prosecuted. The law does not permit
the killing of humans, therefore her wishes - and her wishes alone -
determine the humanity of the baby.
-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 02:57:07 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:13:28 +0100, Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2irc50Fq1ks5U1@uni-berlin.de> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:31:14 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
The is no law anywhere that grants women any power to decide if
something is a human being. He is a liar and you're an idiot.
Not too long ago there was a case in, I believe, Wales. A man hit a
pregnant female and she subsequently lost her baby. He was prosecuted
and jailed for manslaughter. The law must therefore have considered
that the baby was a living human.
A particular law can define a fetus as a human being for a particular
purpose under defined circumstances. That does not effect it's status
under other circumstances involving other purposes.
If the same female had decided to have her baby killed in an abortion
clinic, she would not have been prosecuted. The law does not permit
the killing of humans, therefore her wishes - and her wishes alone -
determine the humanity of the baby.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 10:05:37 PM |
|
|
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:31:14 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:44:51 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
hate feminism <kill@feminism.now> wrote:
connor_a wrote:
How dare he brake the bond between mother and foetus... she can do
that herself ;-)
That's an interesting point.
The way things are now is as follows: It's a human being if I (the
woman) say it is; if it's not then I can kill it -
Why do you always resort to such assinine lying?
Is that really the best you've got?
Prove him to be a liar.
The is no law anywhere that grants women any power to decide if
something is a human being. He is a liar and you're an idiot.
Not too long ago there was a case in, I believe, Wales. A man hit a
pregnant female and she subsequently lost her baby. He was prosecuted
and jailed for manslaughter. The law must therefore have considered
that the baby was a living human.
Wrong again. The law "must" do nothing of the sort. The laws could
be written to make the killing of a cat be "manslaughter" but that
would no more make a cat into a human being than it makes a fetus into
a human being.
If the same female had decided to have her baby killed in an abortion
clinic, she would not have been prosecuted.
What's the difference between making love and rape?
See if you can figure it out.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: He broke the bond between mother and foetus |
10 Jun 2004 10:18:54 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
What's the difference between making love and rape?
See if you can figure it out.
Feminist definition: "rape," --> v. 1. What happened yesterday if
the woman feels emotionally down today. 2. sex which the woman did not
enjoy. (From the Kobe Bryant case) 3. His check bounced. 4. He left
her and she's pissed.
Feminist definition: "Rape Victim." --> n. a woman.
Feminist definition: "Rapist" --> n. a man.
--
When did we divide into sides?
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
