The Re''vrand wrote:

On 30 Aug 2006 14:15:19 -0700, "ur_droll" <Chex@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

The Re''vrand wrote:

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:48:19 GMT,

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba <pumba@muizenberg.org.za> wrote:

ur_droll wrote:

On 29-Aug-2006, "Ed" <nesorde@comcast.net> wrote:

"Keith E." <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in message

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:42:40 GMT,

On 28-Aug-2006, "Ed" <nesorde@comcast.net> wrote:

<

More like, none, because no records show that he had any Jewish
antecedents.
Susan

I was going by the "rumor" that one of his great-great parents was
Jewish.

Ah, okay.

Okay? OFUCKINGKAY?!? He doesn't have to prove his statements?

Hey, genius, I said it was a RUMOR. Do I need to prove rumors?

And to clarfiy for Mr. Hissy Fit - when you admit something is a rumor,
you are already saying that you can;t vreify it and you don't expect
your statement to have the same consideration a proven fact has.

much like the rumor that during the times of the rumored holocaust a
prisoner spot check revealed that a jew was found to have balls......

Isn;t (sic) it nice when they admit, right up front, that they have no actual
refutation, just projectionary filth?

You appear to be attempting "refutation" of the authenticity of genuine
rumors despite having only recently argued that stated rumors do not
require proof..... this is obviously a sign of the deep seated
insecurity that you share with yer fellow subhumans.... what a
typically hypocritical pathetic jew ***** you turned out to be.

Isn't it nice when all that wannabe jews have is lies and innuendo?

their religion is based soley on exactly that

These sorts of fictitious claims are obviously hogwash and simply don't
warrant a serious effort to attempt verification.....

Translation: facts bother bigots.

Re-translation: Suzy is fact-resistant.

quite obviously
the balls in question belonged to a german soldier and were found in
the jews mouth.

ooh, Colin, you're trying waaaaay too hard to offend.

But you see what I mean about projectionism?
It's all too obvious where he fantasizes the balls were:

http://www.brucemulkey.com/archives/2006/05/antigay_zeal_gr.html

What fantasy?.... this is a well known rumor that is based soley on
fact and was in evidence before my existence.

Yer flip floping all over the place

Now what does quack mulkey say about anti-paedo zeal, you th*ck Irish
*****?

you need to dial it back a bit if you really want to get people riled up.

you should know - a small ***** is often all that is needed.

Or, rather, will have to do when it's all he has.

A sexual slur? Well, there's something new.

Subhumans are actually very easy to manipulate.... as are all other
common animals.

she was masturbating when she posted her reply.

She types with one finger, hence the multiple typos. Her other hand
is always rubbing what's left of her circumcised *****.

Yes... I saw her scratching her top lip earlier and watched in horror
as a snotty looking fluid leaked from the base of the protrusion over
her lip and oozed out