Science > Abortion > Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
| Date: |
07 Jul 2004 10:46:38 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:39:55 GMT,
Ignorant Bigot, "Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
Brent Norman <nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ignorant Bigot, "Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Bigot, "Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind.
Wrong. They serve precisely the SAME purpose in the "scheme
of mankind" that everyone else does.
Why?
Because TRIVIALITIES -- such as a person's race, ethnicity,
sexual orientation, handedness, hair color, etc., etc. -- have
absolutely NOTHING to do with a person's talents, work ethic,
ambition, and capabilities.
Only social retards as dumb as YOU and you fellow mindless
bigots are, wouldn't be able to figure that out.
Segregationists and homophobes: 2 identically-sociopathic
groups of losers, separated only by 4 decades of time. SAME
abject stupidity.
How characteristic of the under-educated homosexual that
appears to be the norm in APH today; unable to offer a logical
argument he resorts to name calling.
Of course, you stripped the most important point from that post ...
( ...which I've restored, above, in its original context... )
... in order to only answer the part you have a hope in hell of
answering. Here it is for your convenience, the portion that came
before:
" Wrong. They serve precisely the SAME purpose in the "scheme
of mankind" that everyone else does.
WRONG! Homosexuals serve NO USEFUL PURPOSE in the
scheme of mankind.
That is as patently a STUPID thing to say as it would be if you
were to have said the same thing about all left-handed people. Or
people who happen to be brunettes. (You really LOVE to make a
complete ***** of yourself, don't you?)
Where homosexuality to disappear from the earth in the next instant
mankind would not be effected in any way. You are superfluous, an
excess, a perversion an unneeded mistake.
Wrong again. Homosexuality is simply a variation of NORMALCY.
Just as handedness and hair color is. However, bigots like you have
to LEARN to be hateful sociopaths and bottom-feeders of society.
Making you and your ilk a TRUE perversion. And since you contri-
bute nothing but negativity to society, if all bigotry were to end
overnight, the bigots would become exponentially-BETTER people,
and society as a whole would be enormously ENHANCED.
As I pointed out before, homosexuals:
...serve precisely the SAME purpose in the "scheme of
mankind" that everyone else does.
Why?
Because TRIVIALITIES -- such as a person's race, ethnicity,
sexual orientation, handedness, hair color, etc., etc. -- have
absolutely NOTHING do do with a person's talents, work ethic,
ambition, and capabilities."
You include a behavioral characteristic, sexual orientation, in with
immutable ones and try to claim that they are all the same. Another
homosexual LIE.
Wrong, loser. Since I'm not gay, I can't be telling a "homosex-
ual lie." But that's fine, because i have YET to ever SEE a "homo-
sexual lie." Unless it is the sort of lies that morons like *you* so
desperately tell ABOUT homosexuals. (And make total schmucks
of yourselfves in the process.)
Do you regard your OWN sexual orientation to be immutable?
Could YOU, realistically speaking, change to become homosex-
ual? If you're honest, you'll admit that your sexual orientation IS
pragmatically immutable. And guess what? The SAME is true for
the homosexuals. So do yourself a great big favor and grow up!
Stop being a complete JERK over TRIVIALITIES that are abso-
lutely **none** of your business. Do something CONSTRUCTIVE
with your time. Being a moronic and hateful assh*le benefits NO
one. Least of all yourself, butcause all that gets you is being
laughed-at by all SENSIBLE people.
Do you have no honor at all?
ALL egalitarians are honorable people. That goes right along
with BEING a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian who RESPECTS
the personal liberties of others, and DEFENDS them against mindless
and hateful attacks by loathsome bigots.
Is the "right" to engage in homosexuality promiscuity so
important to you that you must exhibit dishonorable
behavior in your frantic defense of the indefensible?
(1) Being DEDICATED to defending the personal of liberties
is not a "frantic" action. It is a carefully-deliberated
and well-organized action.
(2) In case you hadn't noticed, the RIGHT of all of-age
consenting adults in America, regardless of their sexual
orientation, to share sex in private, any way that they
choose, became officially the LAW OF THE LAND just
over a year ago, in America. You moronic busybodies
LOST your nonsensical battle to be total schmucks in
that regard, BIG-time!
(3) The only thing that's "dishonorable" in this post is YOUR
clear-cut proof of your own socially-retardedness and
ignorant bigotry. You are totally without excuse.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
| User: "Jude & Sandra" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 AM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
[snip]
| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
bars
| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
pedophile
| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
molested,... by
| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
saying?
| >
| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| ===========
| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you because
you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody that did
that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the two
(hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at least
penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY was
saying above.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 10:03:49 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 01:20:03 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brent Norman" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 01:53:48 PM |
|
|
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually sexually
abuse girls and young women.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 03:56:45 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:53:48 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - furtherproof |
16 Jul 2004 03:59:15 AM |
|
|
"Johnathan A." wrote:
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
If this is true, then every straight man would like to have the
opportunity to have sex with a young girl.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = tyranny.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 04:18:31 PM |
|
|
In article <87e06e8acccb27926089d06d2e885353@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:53:48 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
I'm impressed by YOUR expertise in the area.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 07:56:31 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:18:31 GMT, Bob's Boyfriend
<together@wyoming.com> wrote:
In article <87e06e8acccb27926089d06d2e885353@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:53:48 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a 'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
I'm impressed by YOUR expertise in the area.
I think most of us know or have seen reputable reports about
instances of homosexual achieving positions of leadership in youth
organization and then using those positions as a means of raping
children. You have never seen such a report? Would you like for me to
post a couple FYI?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brent Norman" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 10:21:52 PM |
|
|
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:543657ee1214cb625df31875781e6888@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:18:31 GMT, Bob's Boyfriend
<together@wyoming.com> wrote:
In article <87e06e8acccb27926089d06d2e885353@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:53:48 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in
message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile
belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think
all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and
murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the
pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT
what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is
STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate
you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to
anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between
the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that
at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he
REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a
'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the
Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you
are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there
are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to
suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a
distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just
as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually
sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
I'm impressed by YOUR expertise in the area.
I think most of us know or have seen reputable reports about
instances of homosexual achieving positions of leadership in youth
organization and then using those positions as a means of raping
children. You have never seen such a report? Would you like for me to
post a couple FYI?
Funny how most of these "homosexuals" were married or otherwise in
opposite-sex sexual relationships, and not very many of them had any
interest in other homosexual men. Go ahead, post some of your reports.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 11:21:34 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:21:52 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:543657ee1214cb625df31875781e6888@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:18:31 GMT, Bob's Boyfriend
<together@wyoming.com> wrote:
In article <87e06e8acccb27926089d06d2e885353@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:53:48 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:a7087c18720e87d03dd7f74b436ca9f6@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:03:49 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:25:46 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Jude & Sandra" <Judsan@somewhere.usa> wrote:
|
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:ec24f056d694pnbscceludv07eqp3l5pq1@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in
message
| > >| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in
alt.politics.homosexuality
| > >| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > >| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile
belongs
behind
| bars
| > >| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think
all the
| pedophile
| > >| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also
| molested,... by
| > >| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and
murder all
| > >| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the
pervert
is
| > >| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT
what
you're
| saying?
| > >| >
| > >| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| > >| ===========
| > >| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is
STRAIGHT
and
| > >| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
| >
| > Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
| > paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile
activities?
|
| So, I believe, that they can JUSTIFY their hatred. "I can hate
you
because
| you rape little boys." Who wouldn't react with disgust to
anybody
that did
| that? It's a little scary to think that his distinction between
the
two
| (hetero vs. homo pedos) has deteriorated to the rationale that
at
least
| penis/vagina sex is "normal." let's hope THAT wasn't what he
REALLY
was
| saying above.
That is how these bigots justify their hatred against gays. Most
sensible people realist that there is no such person as a
'homosexual
paedophile' or a 'heterosexual paedophile'. A paedophile molests
children regardless of their adult sexual activities/attraction.
A pedophile will usually focus on children below the age of
pubescence. The boys and young men abused by homosexual males
are most often in their early teens. For example those in the
Catholic
church who were sexually abuse by homosexual priest or those in BSA
troops abused by homosexual males leaders.
Ah, but the BSA bans homosexuals from their ranks, so the people you
are
describing must not be homosexuals.
You, and those like you, can lie, deny and make every attempt to
suppress the truth but the truth remains; Among homosexuals there
are
a high number who HOMOSEXUALY (not as pedophiles) sexually
abuse boys and young men.
You and those like you, can lie, deny, and make every attempt to
suppress
the truth, but the truth remains; among homosexuals, there is a
distinct
minority who homosexualy [sic] sexually abuse boys and young men, just
as
there is a distinct minority of heterosexuals who heterosexually
sexually
abuse girls and young women.
Are truly naive enough to think that every homosexual would be honest
about his desire to have sex with young boys if it meant removing the
wouldn't have the opportunity? Don't kid yourself and you can't kid
anyone else.
I'm impressed by YOUR expertise in the area.
I think most of us know or have seen reputable reports about
instances of homosexual achieving positions of leadership in youth
organization and then using those positions as a means of raping
children. You have never seen such a report? Would you like for me to
post a couple FYI?
Funny how most of these "homosexuals" were married or otherwise in
opposite-sex sexual relationships, and not very many of them had any
interest in other homosexual men. Go ahead, post some of your reports.
Oh! I see, you're saying that men who like to get it on with other
males in their teens are not TRUE homosexuals. Tell us won't you, just
exactly what are they are and how you know that "most of them were
married?"
BTW - The SCOTUS agreed with the BSA that homosexual could be refused
participation as youth leaders. My! I wonder why...could it be that
the wisdom of the court saw the danger in such a relationship?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mary" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 11:37:05 PM |
|
|
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:d061a857c702ec919806409b59853abf@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:21:52 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
BTW - The SCOTUS agreed with the BSA that homosexual could be refused
participation as youth leaders. My! I wonder why...could it be that
the wisdom of the court saw the danger in such a relationship?
Don't despair Johnathan A., perhaps you will still be able to join the Girl
Scouts, but please don't eat the Brownies!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude & Sandra" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
22 Jul 2004 08:40:14 AM |
|
|
"Mary" <Mary@aol.com> wrote in message
news:RFJIc.64395$MB3.51875@attbi_s04...
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:d061a857c702ec919806409b59853abf@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:21:52 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
BTW - The SCOTUS agreed with the BSA that homosexual could be refused
participation as youth leaders. My! I wonder why...could it be that
the wisdom of the court saw the danger in such a relationship?
Don't despair Johnathan A., perhaps you will still be able to join the
Girl
Scouts, but please don't eat the Brownies!
lol... now THAT'S funny.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
13 Jul 2004 01:08:48 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:37:05 GMT, "Mary" <Mary@aol.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:d061a857c702ec919806409b59853abf@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:21:52 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
BTW - The SCOTUS agreed with the BSA that homosexual could be refused
participation as youth leaders. My! I wonder why...could it be that
the wisdom of the court saw the danger in such a relationship?
Don't despair Johnathan A., perhaps you will still be able to join the Girl
Scouts, but please don't eat the Brownies!
That would be more in your taste, sweets, or are you simply fag hag
groupie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mary" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
13 Jul 2004 01:47:22 PM |
|
|
<Wild Bill Taylor> wrote in message
news:4fe7b42a0d1e7a527f0f920256b4ea94@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:37:05 GMT, "Mary" <Mary@aol.com> wrote:
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:d061a857c702ec919806409b59853abf@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:21:52 GMT, "Brent Norman"
<nelliganemile@hotmail.com> wrote:
BTW - The SCOTUS agreed with the BSA that homosexual could be refused
participation as youth leaders. My! I wonder why...could it be that
the wisdom of the court saw the danger in such a relationship?
Don't despair Johnathan A., perhaps you will still be able to join the
Girl
Scouts, but please don't eat the Brownies!
That would be more in your taste, sweets, or are you simply fag hag
groupie?
I bet you love the taste of a ***** spewing ***** into your mouth the first
thing in the morning, don't ya! hahahahaha
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Qinff" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
13 Jul 2004 01:40:17 AM |
|
|
*****!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mary" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
13 Jul 2004 01:49:11 PM |
|
|
"Qinff" <Qinff@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ltLIc.19766$ju1.2500@nwrddc04.gnilink.net...
*****!
Keep your father off of the streets at night and out of the bus station
men's room, he's been caught stealing peeks and attempting to fondle the
"big" boys! :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 12:26:32 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:49:39 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
[snip]
| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind bars
| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the pedophile
| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also molested,... by
| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're saying?
| >
| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| ===========
| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
Because his post are going to a homosexual newsgroup and involve
homosexuals who sexually abuse young males?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mary" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 03:44:31 PM |
|
|
"Johnathan A." <japple@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ef9a5e666f38c3afbaa3ab95d6ef1e0d@news.teranews.com...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:49:39 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
Because his post are going to a homosexual newsgroup and involve
homosexuals who sexually abuse young males?
Is that what happened to you Jeff, you daddy molested you?
John
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 12:46:50 AM |
|
|
In article <ef9a5e666f38c3afbaa3ab95d6ef1e0d@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:49:39 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
[snip]
| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
| > >| bars
| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| > >| pedophile
| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also molested,...
| > >| by
| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
| > >| saying?
| >
| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| ===========
| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
Because his post are going to a homosexual newsgroup and involve
homosexuals who sexually abuse young males?
That is a serious accusation. Fill us in. Who is abusing whom?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnathan A." |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - further proof |
12 Jul 2004 09:25:29 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:46:50 GMT, Bob's Boyfriend
<together@wyoming.com> wrote:
In article <ef9a5e666f38c3afbaa3ab95d6ef1e0d@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:49:39 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
[snip]
| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
| > >| bars
| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| > >| pedophile
| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also molested,...
| > >| by
| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
| > >| saying?
| >
| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| ===========
| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
Because his post are going to a homosexual newsgroup and involve
homosexuals who sexually abuse young males?
That is a serious accusation. Fill us in. Who is abusing whom?
Ah! The typical homo -- He jumps on his horse named "conclusions" and
rides off in all directions.
***
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BENTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO OBTAIN BAIL
STATE OF ARKANSAS
PLAINTIFF
VS
DAVIS DON CARPENTER
DEFENDANT
W/M, DOB: 08-02-61
&
JOSHUA MACAVE BROWN
DEFENDANT
W/M, DOB: 6-7-77
FACTS CONSTITUTING PROBABLE CAUSE
Comes now Detective Sergeant Terry Woodside of the Rogers Police
Department Criminal Investigation Division, and under oath doth state:
After extensive investigation, on September 26, 1999, the
Defendant, Joshua Macave Brown, DOB: 6-7-77, was arrested on the
charges of Capital Murder, Class Y Felony, and Rape, Class Y Felony (6
COUNTS). Defendant Davis Don Carpenter, DOB: 8-2-61, was arrested on
September 26th, 1999 at approximately 7:45 p.m., on the charges of
Capital Murder, Class Y Felony, and Rape, Class Y Felony (6 COUNTS).
The records of the Rogers Police Department reflect that on
Sunday, September 26th, 1999, at 0453 hours, Patrolman Ian Smith and
Patrolman Jason Curry responded to 1207 West Sunset Drive to assist an
ambulance crew of the Rogers Fire Department regarding a call for
medical assistance. Upon their arrival, Davis Don Carpenter, 38 years
of age, and a resident of 1207 West Sunset Drive contacted them.
Carpenter seemed very upset and repeatedly said, “He’s not breathing”.
Carpenter let the officers into the apartment and to the northwest
bedroom. Another male subject, Joshua (Josh) Brown, 22 years of age,
was standing in the hallway, completely naked, holding a flashlight
and a telephone. The officers observed a young, naked male subject,
later identified as Jesse Dirkhising (aka: Jesse Yates), thirteen
years of age (DOB: 5-24-86), on the floor in the middle of the room,
next to a mattress. Dirkhising’s genitals and abdomen were covered
with what appeared to be feces. Dirkhising’s mouth was blue, he had a
weak pulse, but he did not appear to be breathing. Patrolman Smith
also observed that Dirkhising had masking or duct tape wrapped around
his right hand. When Josh Brown was asked about the tape, he replied
that they were just playing a game. An empty prescription bottle was
observed on the mattress. In addition, Patrolman Smith observed some
pills and a razor blade on a mirror at the front entrance, which
appeared to be controlled substances and drug paraphernalia.
Rogers Fire Department Paramedics transported Dirkhising to St.
Mary’s Hospital emergency room, where he was pronounced dead at 0532
hours.
During preliminary questioning at the scene, Josh Brown assaulted
Corporal Rick Simmons, and was placed under arrest. While being
questioned by Detective Martha Armstrong after being Mirandized, Josh
Brown stated that he was Davis Carpenter’s lover. Brown also said
that he (Brown) and Dirkhising frequently tie each other up, although
not for sexual purposes. Brown stated that on this occasion he snuck
up on Dirkhising, tied his hands behind his back, placed a pair of
underwear in Dirkhising’s mouth and secured them with a bandana and
duct tape. He placed a bandana over Dirkhising’s eyes and secured it
in place with duct tape. He then placed a tee shirt over Dirkhising’s
head, and checked to ensure that Dirkhising’s nostrils were not
covered. He placed belts around Dirkhising’s knees and ankles to hold
his legs together. Brown then untied Dirkhising’s wrists and secured
them to opposite sides of the mattress. He positioned Dirkhising on
his stomach, placing pillows under his stomach. Brown then proceeded
to penetrate Dirkhising’s ***** with various items, including three (3)
fingers of his hand, his penis, a cucumber, a sausage, a banana and a
douche bottle. Brown stated at one point he prepared and administered
an enema for the victim, using his own urine as the liquid. Brown
then positioned a cucumber so that it was slightly penetrating
Dirkhising’s *****, and secured it with tape. He then went to the
kitchen, where he ate a sandwich before returning to the bedroom.
Upon his return, he found that Dirkhising was apparently not
breathing. Brown pulled the tee shirt off Dirkhising’s head, cut the
tape and bandanas away, removed the underwear from Dirkhising’s mouth
and contacted Carpenter. Brown also guessed Dirkhising to be thirteen
or fourteen years old.
Carpenter told officers that Brown woke him up and told him there
was a problem with Dirkhising. Carpenter found Dirkhising lying on
the bedroom floor with his hands bound with tape. He cut the tape and
attempted to administer CPR before calling 9-1-1.
Det. Jarod Mason interviewed Paula McVey, the grandmother of Jesse
Dirkhising (aka: Jesse Yates). Ms. McVey stated that Davis Carpenter
was a friend of Jesse Dirkhising’s mother and stepfather, who live in
Prairie Grove. She stated that for the last two or three months,
Dirkhising had been coming from Prairie Grove to Rogers to stay with
Carpenter on the weekends. She related that she was under the
impression that Dirkhising had been earning money during those
weekends by working for Carpenter at the hairstyling shop where
Carpenter worked. She stated that Carpenter had a younger male lover
who lived with him.
A search warrant for 1207 West Sunset Drive, Davis Carpenter’s
residence, was executed by detectives of the Rogers Police Department.
During the search of the residence, Detectives recovered numerous
small green pills, from the living room and bedroom, various bottles
of prescription medicine, including the controlled substance
amitryptiline, a known heavy sedative commonly used to treat
depression. Also located in the living room, were a mirror with
several of the green pills, and a small quantity of off white colored
powder suspected to be methamphetaminc. Numerous items of evidence
were recovered from the bedroom, including two cucumbers, one of which
was covered with what appeared to be petroleum jelly, the other having
what appeared to be fecal matter on it. Also located in the bedroom
was a tube-shaped sausage, as well as a crushed banana. A plastic
disposable douche bottle with the applicator secured in place with
duct tape was found amongst numerous items used in bondage. The
bondage items included numerous belts, large quantities of duct tape
and strapping tape, handcuffs, nylon rope, what appeared to be a
rubber jumprope, and electrical cord. Detectives located a mass of
items which included used duct tape, what appeared to be a shirt, a
pair of men’s brief underwear, and a bandana, which, according to a
statement by Defendant Josh Brown, were used to gag and blindfold the
victim during the rape. Numerous containers of petroleum jelly were
found throughout the residence.
In the living room, detectives discovered a computer and related
equipment that was still running. When the monitor was turned on, a
program entitled “Medical Drug Reference 4.0” was running on the
computer.
The search also revealed a piece of paper on which a note was
written to “Baby.” (Investigation has revealed that Carpenter refers
to Brown as “Baby.”) In the upper right hand of the note are listed
three types of prescription pills. The text of the note refers to
making a male (“him”) take “those pills.” It then refers to
positioning pillows beneath the male in a certain way. A different
portion of the same piece of paper says to tell “him” not to fight or
else for the next “14 hours” he will be sexually assaulted.
The search also revealed another note, addressed to an unnamed
person, which refers to a piece of meat being inserted in that
person’s *****. The note also refers to “Davis” engaging in sexual
intercourse with “you blindfolded on pills.” There is also a note
addressed to “Baby” that refers to “duct tape in place.”
The search further revealed a hand-drawn diagram depicting a
person on a bed. There are notations that refer to pillows, “tape all
the way around,” “face down,” the buttocks of the person “raised app.
2 feet.” Another note was found in the kitchen area addressed to
“baby”, and states “could cause serious damage-back to 3” sticking out
and duct tape in place.”
The search also revealed a five-page letter addressed “Hey Baby.”
The letter is signed by “Davie.” In the letter, “Davie” describes
seeing “Baby’s” “little 10 year old blond *****” at her bus stop in
the morning. “Davie” graphically describes how he can envision “Baby”
engaging in various sexual acts with her.
The search also revealed handwritten texts on a legal pad. In those
texts, the writer describes a man making a “fine crushed white powder”
from “the small oddly purple colored pill.” The writer describes him
cutting the pill in ¼ sections so that he would have “enough to do
this again in 4 hours or so, if he needed (or wanted!).” He then
describes the man giving a nine year old girl a glass of milk with the
pill powder mixed in. The writer then writes of the man laughing out
loud “knowing in 20 minutes the pill dust he’d added would render her
helpless and drunk…” He then describes in detail the man having the
girl first masturbate and then perform oral sex on him.
Also found on the kitchen table was a receipt from the Price
Cutter Food Warehouse dated September 26, 1999, at ‘0307’ hours.
Items purchased on the receipt included tape for $3.18, “Eckrich” for
$2.50, two cucumbers for $1.00 and “meat dept.” for $2.61. A package
containing one sausage was found in the refrigerator and was labeled
“Eckrich.” The sausage found in the package was consistent in
appearance with the sausage found in the bedroom.
A detailed interview was conducted at the Rogers Police Department
with defendant Josh Brown on September 27th, 1999 by Detective
Sergeant Hayes Minor. Brown told Sgt. Minor that he and the victim
had been sexually involved for approximately two months. Brown
described the sexual acts as “games” and “playing: with the victim.
He said that the morning of the victim’s death, he had performed anal
sex on the victim for the first time. In sex acts up until this
point, Brown said his penis had never penetrated the victim’s *****.
Brown told Sgt. Minor that on this occasion he used his fingers, his
penis, a cucumber, a sausage, a banana and a douche bottle to anally
penetrate the victim while the victim was immobile due to the
bindings.
Brown was questioned about Carpenter’s involvement during the rape
and told Sgt. Minor that Carpenter stood in the doorway of the
bedroom, naked, and watched Brown and the victim while he (Carpenter)
masturbated. Brown was also asked about the notes that were found in
the residence. When asked about the note found in the kitchen
addressed to “Baby” and stating “Could cause serious damage-back to 3”
sticking out and duct tape in place”, Brown stated that as he was
using the cucumber to penetrate the victim’s *****, Carpenter stood in
the doorway trying to get his (Brown’s) attention without having to
speak. When Brown walked to Carpenter, Carpenter showed him the note
indicating that he should not put the entire cucumber in the victim’s
***** as it may harm him. Brown stated he returned to the victim and
duct taped the cucumber in place as it penetrated the victim’s *****
approximately one half inch.
Brown was also shown the diagram that depicts a person bound to a
bed, much the same way Brown described the victim. He stated that the
drawing was completed by Carpenter on a much earlier date. When asked
about Carpenter’s knowledge of Brown’s and the victim’s sexual
activities, Brown stated that Carpenter had walked in on the two in
the past. After that occasion, Brown stated that he and Carpenter
talked about Carpenter watching as the victim and Brown participated
in sexual acts.
Brown was also questioned about the receipt he found in the
residence from the Price Cutter Food Warehouse dated September 26th,
1999, at 0307 hours. Brown told Sgt. Minor that Carpenter had gone to
the store alone and purchased the items, some of which were used
during the rape of the victim.
On September 27th, 1999, an autopsy was conducted on the victim by
the Arkansas State Medical Examiner. Preliminary results of the
autopsy indicate the victim died of “positional asphyxia.”
A check of Davis Carpenter’s prior record shows no known prior
convictions at this time. During conversations held with Det. Sgt.
Minor, Carpenter stated that he had lived in 26 different states, and
knew people in all 50 states. Carpenter apparently has limited family
in Springdale, Arkansas, but has lived out of state on numerous
occasions. Further investigation revealed that in the past two years,
Carpenter and Brown have lived in at least three different states,
including Florida. A records check of Joshua Brown reveals no known
prior convictions. Joshua Brown also has no known ties to the
Northwest Arkansas area.
Based on the seriousness of the offense, the substantial
likelihood of conviction, the nature of the penalty that may be
imposed, and the substantial risk of flight, the State joins me in
requesting that the Defendants, Davis Don Carpenter, DOB:08-02-61, and
Joshua Macave Brown, DOB: 6-7-77, be held without bond for the
offenses of Capital Murder, Class Y Felony, Arkansas Code Annotated
5-10-101; and Rape, Class Y Felony (6 COUNTS), Arkansas Code Annotated
5-14-103.
Det. Sgt. Terry Woodside
Rogers Police Department
212 West Elm Street
Rogers, Arkansas 72756
STATE OF ARKANSAS
COUNTY OF BENTON
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of September, 1999
Kathryn McMath
NOTARY PUBLIC
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals serve no purpose in the scheme of mankind - furtherproof |
12 Jul 2004 09:36:31 AM |
|
|
Johnathan A. wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:46:50 GMT, Bob's Boyfriend
<together@wyoming.com> wrote:
In article <ef9a5e666f38c3afbaa3ab95d6ef1e0d@news.teranews.com>,
Johnathan A. <japple@privacy.net> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:49:39 GMT, Jeff North
<jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:26:36 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:4281f0ldjm1qci8l0mtiro27o1890egla9@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:13:37 -0500, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| > "Flower Power" <WomansChoice@thisNG.com> wrote:
[snip]
| > >| $ I'm not a homosexual. I'm saying *ANY* pedophile belongs behind
| > >| bars
| > >| whether he's gay or straight. What makes you think all the
| > >| pedophile
| > >| priests were homosexuals? Many little girls were also molested,...
| > >| by
| > >| straight-pedophile priests.
| > >| What are YOU saying? That we should round up and murder all
| > >| homosexuals because a few of them are pedophiles?
| > >| Are you saying that pedophilia is OK as long as the pervert is
| > >| *straight* and only attacking little girls? Is THAT what you're
| > >| saying?
| >
| > But...but...but....penis/vagina sex is "normal".
| ===========
| Evidently Jonathan believes as long as the pedophile is STRAIGHT and
| rapes/sodomizes little girls it's ok. I wonder why....???
Why do you think that Jonathan and his ilk focus on male/boy
paeodphile activities and trivialise male/girl paedophile activities?
Because his post are going to a homosexual newsgroup and involve
homosexuals who sexually abuse young males?
That is a serious accusation. Fill us in. Who is abusing whom?
Ah! The typical homo -- He jumps on his horse named "conclusions" and
rides off in all directions.
What does this court case have to do with anything? Just curious.
***
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BENTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO OBTAIN BAIL
STATE OF ARKANSAS
PLAINTIFF
VS
DAVIS DON CARPENTER
DEFENDANT
W/M, DOB: 08-02-61
&
JOSHUA MACAVE BROWN
DEFENDANT
W/M, DOB: 6-7-77
FACTS CONSTITUTING PROBABLE CAUSE
Comes now Detective Sergeant Terry Woodside of the Rogers Police
Department Criminal Investigation Division, and under oath doth state:
After extensive investigation, on September 26, 1999, the
Defendant, Joshua Macave Brown, DOB: 6-7-77, was arrested on the
charges of Capital Murder, Class Y Felony, and Rape, Class Y Felony (6
COUNTS). Defendant Davis Don Carpenter, DOB: 8-2-61, was arrested on
September 26th, 1999 at approximately 7:45 p.m., on the charges of
Capital Murder, Class Y Felony, and Rape, Class Y Felony (6 COUNTS).
The records of the Rogers Police Department reflect that on
Sunday, September 26th, 1999, at 0453 hours, Patrolman Ian Smith and
Patrolman Jason Curry responded to 1207 West Sunset Drive to assist an
ambulance crew of the Rogers Fire Department regarding a call for
medical assistance. Upon their arrival, Davis Don Carpenter, 38 years
of age, and a resident of 1207 West Sunset Drive contacted them.
Carpenter seemed very upset and repeatedly said, “He’s not breathing”.
Carpenter let the officers into the apartment and to the northwest
bedroom. Another male subject, Joshua (Josh) Brown, 22 years of age,
was standing in the hallway, completely naked, holding a flashlight
and a telephone. The officers observed a young, naked male subject,
later identified as Jesse Dirkhising (aka: Jesse Yates), thirteen
years of age (DOB: 5-24-86), on the floor in the middle of the room,
next to a mattress. Dirkhising’s genitals and abdomen were covered
with what appeared to be feces. Dirkhising’s mouth was blue, he had a
weak pulse, but he did not appear to be breathing. Patrolman Smith
also observed that Dirkhising had masking or duct tape wrapped around
his right hand. When Josh Brown was asked about the tape, he replied
that they were just playing a game. An empty prescription bottle was
observed on the mattress. In addition, Patrolman Smith observed some
pills and a razor blade on a mirror at the front entrance, which
appeared to be controlled substances and drug paraphernalia.
Rogers Fire Department Paramedics transported Dirkhising to St.
Mary’s Hospital emergency room, where he was pronounced dead at 0532
hours.
During preliminary questioning at the scene, Josh Brown assaulted
Corporal Rick Simmons, and was placed under arrest. While being
questioned by Detective Martha Armstrong after being Mirandized, Josh
Brown stated that he was Davis Carpenter’s lover. Brown also said
that he (Brown) and Dirkhising frequently tie each other up, although
not for sexual purposes. Brown stated that on this occasion he snuck
up on Dirkhising, tied his hands behind his back, placed a pair of
underwear in Dirkhising’s mouth and secured them with a bandana and
duct tape. He placed a bandana over Dirkhising’s eyes and secured it
in place with duct tape. He then placed a tee shirt over Dirkhising’s
head, and checked to ensure that Dirkhising’s nostrils were not
covered. He placed belts around Dirkhising’s knees and ankles to hold
his legs together. Brown then untied Dirkhising’s wrists and secured
them to opposite sides of the mattress. He positioned Dirkhising on
his stomach, placing pillows under his stomach. Brown then proceeded
to penetrate Dirkhising’s ***** with various items, including three (3)
fingers of his hand, his penis, a cucumber, a sausage, a banana and a
douche bottle. Brown stated at one point he prepared and administered
an enema for the victim, using his own urine as the liquid. Brown
then positioned a cucumber so that it was slightly penetrating
Dirkhising’s *****, and secured it with tape. He then went to the
kitchen, where he ate a sandwich before returning to the bedroom.
Upon his return, he found that Dirkhising was apparently not
breathing. Brown pulled the tee shirt off Dirkhising’s head, cut the
tape and bandanas away, removed the underwear from Dirkhising’s mouth
and contacted Carpenter. Brown also guessed Dirkhising to be thirteen
or fourteen years old.
Carpenter told officers that Brown woke him up and told him there
was a problem with Dirkhising. Carpenter found Dirkhising lying on
the bedroom floor with his hands bound with tape. He cut the tape and
attempted to administer CPR before calling 9-1-1.
Det. Jarod Mason interviewed Paula McVey, the grandmother of Jesse
Dirkhising (aka: Jesse Yates). Ms. McVey stated that Davis Carpenter
was a friend of Jesse Dirkhising’s mother and stepfather, who live in
Prairie Grove. She stated that for the last two or three months,
Dirkhising had been coming from Prairie Grove to Rogers to stay with
Carpenter on the weekends. She related that she was under the
impression that Dirkhising had been earning money during those
weekends by working for Carpenter at the hairstyling shop where
Carpenter worked. She stated that Carpenter had a younger male lover
who lived with him.
A search warrant for 1207 West Sunset Drive, Davis Carpenter’s
residence, was executed by detectives of the Rogers Police Department.
During the search of the residence, Detectives recovered numerous
small green pills, from the living room and bedroom, various bottles
of prescription medicine, including the controlled substance
amitryptiline, a known heavy sedative commonly used to treat
depression. Also located in the living room, were a mirror with
several of the green pills, and a small quantity of off white colored
powder suspected to be methamphetaminc. Numerous items of evidence
were recovered from the bedroom, including two cucumbers, one of which
was covered with what appeared to be petroleum jelly, the other having
what appeared to be fecal matter on it. Also located in the bedroom
was a tube-shaped sausage, as well as a crushed banana. A plastic
disposable douche bottle with the applicator secured in place with
duct tape was found amongst numerous items used in bondage. The
bondage items included numerous belts, large quantities of duct tape
and strapping tape, handcuffs, nylon rope, what appeared to be a
rubber jumprope, and electrical cord. Detectives located a mass of
items which included used duct tape, what appeared to be a shirt, a
pair of men’s brief underwear, and a bandana, which, according to a
statement by Defendant Josh Brown, were used to gag and blindfold the
victim during the rape. Numerous containers of petroleum jelly were
found throughout the residence.
In the living room, detectives discovered a computer and related
equipment that was still running. When the monitor was turned on, a
program entitled “Medical Drug Reference 4.0” was running on the
computer.
The search also revealed a piece of paper on which a note was
written to “Baby.” (Investigation has revealed that Carpenter refers
to Brown as “Baby.”) In the upper right hand of the note are listed
three types of prescription pills. The text of the note refers to
making a male (“him”) take “those pills.” It then refers to
positioning pillows beneath the male in a certain way. A different
portion of the same piece of paper says to tell “him” not to fight or
else for the next “14 hours” he will be sexually assaulted.
The search also revealed another note, addressed to an unnamed
person, which refers to a piece of meat being inserted in that
person’s *****. The note also refers to “Davis” engaging in sexual
intercourse with “you blindfolded on pills.” There is also a note
addressed to “Baby” that refers to “duct tape in place.”
The search further revealed a hand-drawn diagram depicting a
person on a bed. There are notations that refer to pillows, “tape all
the way around,” “face down,” the buttocks of the person “raised app.
2 feet.” Another note was found in the kitchen area addressed to
“baby”, and states “could cause serious damage-back to 3” sticking out
and duct tape in place.”
The search also revealed a five-page letter addressed “Hey Baby.”
The letter is signed by “Davie.” In the letter, “Davie” describes
seeing | | | | |