Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<t7f9fvclibflnva2jshrjppgmmqnk8d7ae@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 11:59:20 -0700,
(Robert Winn)
wrote:
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<s3p8fvkta2pbv6k9ua5t639isnec57tgn3@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 03:22:46 -0700,
(Robert Winn)
wrote:
So what are you saying now, Satan? You know that the number is wrong
because you had it mis-translated at some time? I do not care. Go
bother someone else with your irrelevancies.
So now the numbers are a mis-translation and irrelevant? What else in
the bible do you consider irrelevant?
Anything that does not pertain to the salvation of mankind.
That would pretty much include the entire bible.
Anything in the Bible that testifies of Christ pertains to the salvation of mankind.
Let's get back to the subject that you've conveniently tap-danced
around; Explain how only two bears can kill forty two children.
We are all done with that one.
No, we are *not* done.
If you want to believe that bears
cannot kill children, then go ahead and believe it.
HELLLOOOO? McFLYYYYY? Anyone home?
It is not about bears killing children in general. it is about TWO
bears killing FORTY TWO children.
If the numbers are irrelevant, as you say, then so is the rest of the
bible.
I am not going to
try to convince you. I am not going to tell you it is dangerous to
feed slices of bread to bears. Learn from your own experience.
How much do I have to fear from bears if I make fun of a bald guy?
Well,since you do not believe bears can harm children, obviously you
feel that as an adult you are fairly safe also. I am not going to try
to advise you concerning bears. You seem to me to believe that you
know everything there is to know, not just about bears but everything
else as well.
Robert B. Winn
.
