| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Robert Winn" |
| Date: |
24 Jun 2003 08:08:28 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Jesus loves you |
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert Winn)
wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and Democrats
created this scheme with our tax dollars for the purpose of keeping
third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer money
to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems. Political
parties are still financing their election expenses with public
revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one word
of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans or
Democrats if they gained more popular support.
Robert b. Winn
.
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus loves you |
25 Jun 2003 09:00:30 AM |
|
|
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306241708.7c89e562@posting.google.com>...
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert Winn)
wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and Democrats
created this scheme with our tax dollars for the purpose of keeping
third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer money
to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems. Political
parties are still financing their election expenses with public
revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one word
of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans or
Democrats if they gained more popular support.
"In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer
money to finance presidential campaigns." That'd be pretty much the
opposite of what you said. You also said you were giving up your
internet account. Apparently you say the opposite of what you mean.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus loves you |
26 Jun 2003 10:31:17 AM |
|
|
(JessHC) wrote in message news:<d58e3ac.0306250600.12c34387@posting.google.com>...
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306241708.7c89e562@posting.google.com>...
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert Winn)
wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and Democrats
created this scheme with our tax dollars for the purpose of keeping
third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer money
to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems. Political
parties are still financing their election expenses with public
revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one word
of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans or
Democrats if they gained more popular support.
"In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer
money to finance presidential campaigns." That'd be pretty much the
opposite of what you said. You also said you were giving up your
internet account. Apparently you say the opposite of what you mean.
Well, it does not seem like I am giving up my internet account fast
enough to make you happy.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus loves you |
26 Jun 2003 11:21:48 AM |
|
|
(Robert Winn) wrote in
news:a3e03753.0306260731.1f0befc6@posting.google.com:
jesshc@phantomemail.com (JessHC) wrote in message
news:<d58e3ac.0306250600.12c34387@posting.google.com>...
(Robert Winn) wrote in message
news:<a3e03753.0306241708.7c89e562@posting.google.com>...
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert
Winn) wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and
Democrats created this scheme with our tax dollars for the
purpose of keeping third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of
taxpayer money to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems.
Political parties are still financing their election expenses
with public revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one
word of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans
or Democrats if they gained more popular support.
"In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer
money to finance presidential campaigns." That'd be pretty much the
opposite of what you said. You also said you were giving up your
internet account. Apparently you say the opposite of what you mean.
Well, it does not seem like I am giving up my internet account fast
enough to make you happy.
Robert B. winn
Be sure to take your meds after you leave here, looney toon. We won't be
able to remind you any more. Maybe your clown friend jc or those
mysterious voices in your head will remind you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus loves you |
26 Jun 2003 10:16:59 PM |
|
|
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306260731.1f0befc6@posting.google.com>...
jesshc@phantomemail.com (JessHC) wrote in message news:<d58e3ac.0306250600.12c34387@posting.google.com>...
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306241708.7c89e562@posting.google.com>...
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert Winn)
wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and Democrats
created this scheme with our tax dollars for the purpose of keeping
third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer money
to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems. Political
parties are still financing their election expenses with public
revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one word
of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans or
Democrats if they gained more popular support.
"In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer
money to finance presidential campaigns." That'd be pretty much the
opposite of what you said. You also said you were giving up your
internet account. Apparently you say the opposite of what you mean.
Well, it does not seem like I am giving up my internet account fast
enough to make you happy.
Robert B. winn
Well, I wouldn't expect you to give up your internet account too
quickly. Afterall, those starving children wouldn't suffer as much if
you gave it up quickly. Instead, you would rather make them suffer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus loves you |
27 Jun 2003 10:04:36 AM |
|
|
(Pr0r3p) wrote in message news:<b41296b4.0306261916.a4cd07b@posting.google.com>...
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306260731.1f0befc6@posting.google.com>...
jesshc@phantomemail.com (JessHC) wrote in message news:<d58e3ac.0306250600.12c34387@posting.google.com>...
(Robert Winn) wrote in message news:<a3e03753.0306241708.7c89e562@posting.google.com>...
Varicose Brain <lacruiser@aol.com> wrote in message news:<use9fvsjdn4uk1q18fndiugu07idbv8dmm@4ax.com>...
On 21 Jun 2003 12:05:16 -0700, (Robert Winn)
wrote:
You really can't read, can you? Let me re-post it for you...
The Libertarian party has never even earned enough votes to be
eligible for federal campaign funds. The Republicans and Democrats
created this scheme with our tax dollars for the purpose of keeping
third parties out of the picture.
In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer money
to finance presidential campaigns.
Well, they did not oppose it very eloquently, it seems. Political
parties are still financing their election expenses with public
revenues.
This above spewage you wrote just shows that you didn't read one word
of what I posted.
Well, political parties by their nature stuff money in their own
pockets. The Libertarians would be no different from Republicans or
Democrats if they gained more popular support.
"In fact, the Libertarian party has *opposed* the use of taxpayer
money to finance presidential campaigns." That'd be pretty much the
opposite of what you said. You also said you were giving up your
internet account. Apparently you say the opposite of what you mean.
Well, it does not seem like I am giving up my internet account fast
enough to make you happy.
Robert B. winn
Well, I wouldn't expect you to give up your internet account too
quickly. Afterall, those starving children wouldn't suffer as much if
you gave it up quickly. Instead, you would rather make them suffer.
I think you are the one making them suffer.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
