In article <ePv6b.10452$Gw7.9189@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>,
"Northern California Native"
<GOnorcalnativeSPAM@YOURSELFsbcglobal.net> wrote:
All pro-life people must endeavor to heed the call to serve on juries.
Especially critical, of course, is service on juries where other pro-life
activists are on trial for a variety of charges relating to saving unborn
children, from "blocking access" to an Abortion Mill, to justifiably killing
an Aborticidal Lunatic fraudulently called a "doctor."
And just how does one get on one of these juries?
When a pro-life activist is seated on a jury, the ancient right of "jury
nullification" must be practiced. If a fellow (although probably unknown to
oneself) activist is being tried for one or more "crimes" defined by the
Abortion-endorsing government, the jury member must remember that he or she
may judge both the facts of the case AND the merits (or lack thereof) of the
law allegedly violated itself. The judge will tell you that you may not do
this. That is irrelevant, as the authority of a jury to "nullify" unjust
law predates the United States of America, and, remains guaranteed by the
Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution.
You don't know what you are talking about. There is no such "guarantee."
You must remember to keep your
conscience and reasoning to yourself as best as you can.
Why? Afraid the less psychotic people will discover you for who you
really are?
Pro-life activists know that abortion is a heinous evil, regardless of what
politicians, other lawyers, and the Abortion Movement lunatics say.
Pro-life activists seated on a jury may and must follow their conscience
regarding the facts presented AND the righteousness and relevance of the
legal statute itself.
Paul Hill would be alive today if one pro-life activist practicing jury
nullification sat on his jury.
No he wouldn't. The jury would have hung, the taxpayers would pay a
little more money, there would have been a new trial without the lunatic
pro-lifer, and Hill would still be roasting in Hell where he is now.
Did you really believe one juror voting not guilty would help cause Hill
to be found not guilty?
Fully Informed Jury Association:
http://www.fija.org/
You may want to read that information a little closer. You have it
wrong. Further, what if the reverse happens and the ProChoicers vote to
string up a ProLifer for illegal parking?
.