Re: just Google: late term abortion statistics



 Science > Abortion > Re: just Google: late term abortion statistics

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "james g. keegan jr."
Date: 02 Aug 2006 07:15:32 AM
Object: Re: just Google: late term abortion statistics
In article <1154483940.374539.55840@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

There is no evidence that you're interested in protecting any lives.


Everything that I've been saying here is about protecting the
lives of viable foetuses.

All of your arguments are about forcing women to do as you say.


None of my arguments are about forcing women. I'm for choice
until the time of probable viability; and for the life of the viable
foetus after that.

Your claim that i want to subjugate women is simply your false spin.
I don't care what they do until they have a viable foetus inside them.
At that point there are two lives to consider, and the helpless one
is the one that most needs protection by law.

so, in the end, you validate the claim that you want to subjugate
women.
i'm curious, why do you continue to deny that?
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER