On 27 Dec 2006 03:36:22 -0800, "dsharavii@hotmail.com"
<dsharavii@hotmail.com> wrote:
Mirelle wrote:
Does It Matter What You Call It?
Genocide or Erasure of Palestinians
By KATHLEEN and BILL CHRISTISON
dsharavi@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly it matters what one calls it. Genocide is a crime under
international law pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide adopted in 1948 in the wake of the
Holocause. "Erasure" isn't a crime.
As Kathleen and Bil Christison have been personally castigated as
historical revisionists and liars by historians such as Benny Morris,
their rant about semantics and the usual candards constitute irrelevant
fluff. In any case, the Christison cackle fails to provide support for
Mirelle's claims that there has been "GENOCIDE in Gaza Commited by
Israel" and that Israel is effecting "a continuing massacre and
GENOCIDE in Gaza". Certainly, the Christisons' kerfuffle fails to
answer the question directed to Mirelle, which is:
How does the exponential increase in the Palestine Arab population,
from 600,000 in 1949 to over 7,000,000 today, qualify as "genocide"?
Deborah
1man4all wrote:
If the definition of "genocide" is elimination of *all* people
belonging to a certain ethnic or religious group, why people keep
calling what's happening in Darfur a "genocide," when there are quite a
few Darfurians left and the number of dead is based on sampling
"clocks" [full page ads in Wash. Post] and not actual count?
Misuse of the word. Why do some people, largely ignorant Jew haters,
keep touting some imaginary "Palestinian Genocide", despite the
increase in the Palestine Arab population from 600,000 in 1949 to over
7,000,000 today? How does such an exponential increase qualify as
"genocide"?
Debwhorah
How can the survival of so many jews after World War II (all seeking
reparations) qualify what happened as a "holocaust", ***** Nyob?
.