| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
25 Jun 2003 05:32:36 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
On 24 Jun 2003 17:40:08 -0700,
Marie A. wrote:
[ ... ]
Note to Newbies: A "liar" in this newsgroup has officially been
defined as anyone who doesn't agree with Keegan, Fischer, Spartakus,
Chilton, Winstanley, Humphrey and about five other infallible
pro-abortionists in here.
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know. I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
SO MUCH for any credibility YOU might ever have had with any newbie
who's intelligent!
Pro-CHOICERS **abound** in the USA, and outnumber those who
disagree with abortion by a consistent 2-1 ratio. Pro-Choicers are just
that: We ensure that ALL women will NEVER again be FORCED to
gestate to term against their will. NEVER a return to such involuntary
servitude. NEVER a return to 2nd-class-citizen status. EVER. They will
ALWAYS be free to CHOOSE between carrying-to-term and safe& legal
abortion-on-request.
ANTI-Choicers like you are hateful losers and malcontents who seek
to leave women with NO choice but to gestate.
Guess what, loser? It's NOT gonna happen. Ever.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:35:48 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f1079de.10840735@netnews.mchsi.com...
On 24 Jun 2003 17:40:08 -0700,
Marie A. wrote:
[ ... ]
Note to Newbies: A "liar" in this newsgroup has officially been
defined as anyone who doesn't agree with Keegan, Fischer, Spartakus,
Chilton, Winstanley, Humphrey and about five other infallible
pro-abortionists in here.
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know. I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
The term has also been defined, and NEVER..and I mean NEVER has anyone ever
proven that pro-abortionist means
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
Pro-abortionist means a person who supports a woman's right to have an
abortion
Simple as that.
The definition has been clearly shown.
Now my challenge to anyone, not just you Craig, but ANYONE
and I have challenged Pat to this too and she like everyone else has NEVER
been able to accept this challenge
Prove that pro-abortion means
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:52:32 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:35:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f1079de.10840735@netnews.mchsi.com...
On 24 Jun 2003 17:40:08 -0700,
Marie A. wrote:
[ ... ]
Note to Newbies: A "liar" in this newsgroup has officially been
defined as anyone who doesn't agree with Keegan, Fischer, Spartakus,
Chilton, Winstanley, Humphrey and about five other infallible
pro-abortionists in here.
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know. I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
The term has also been defined, and NEVER..and I mean NEVER has anyone ever
proven that pro-abortionist means
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
And neither have you EVER proven that pro-choice means 'approving of
all choices ever made" - and yet you persist in telling us that's what
it means.
So I suggest you take your little screed about what words mean, fold
it until it's all sharp corners, and then pound it up your *****.
Until you learn to be something less than a total hypocrite, you don't
get to criticize how others use words.
[snip Bobby's frothing]
---
"The Church says the Earth is Flat,
But I know that it is Round,
For I have seen the Shadow on the Moon,
And I have more Faith in a Shadow
Than in the Church."
Ferdinand Magellan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:39:29 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know. I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
pro-: favoring : supporting : championing
Mirriam-Webster Dictionary
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice, anti-abortion,
and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing everybody that you're a
lying sleazebag.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:49:51 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bddmd1$ml0$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL
of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an
idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know.
I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
pro-: favoring : supporting : championing
Mirriam-Webster Dictionary
duh
no kidding
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice, anti-abortion,
and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing everybody that you're a
lying sleazebag.
ROFL
Ray you are a riot, especially when you get fustrated..:o)
You still can't prove that the term pro-abortion means what Pat and Craig
claim. Meanwhile I have proven with the use of a dictionary it doesn't mean
that. It means a person favors and/or supports the right to choose
legalized abortion. It means a person favors and/or supports a woman's
right to CHOOSE legalized abortion.
I am pro-choice in the sense that I favor everyones right to any legal
choice. Unlike you, I don't just single that choice out for abortion
I am anti-abortion because I will never support the choice of abortion
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:51:46 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bddmd1$ml0$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone ALL
of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an
idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I know.
I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
pro-: favoring : supporting : championing
Mirriam-Webster Dictionary
duh
no kidding
Therefore you promote and favor abortion.
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice, anti-abortion,
and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing everybody that you're a
lying sleazebag.
ROFL
Ray you are a riot, especially when you get fustrated..:o)
You still can't prove that the term pro-abortion means what Pat and Craig
claim.
Did just above. Someone who FAVORS abortion.
Someone like you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 10:00:19 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bddn42$nim$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bddmd1$ml0$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let alone
ALL
of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and an
idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I
know.
I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an abortion"
pro-: favoring : supporting : championing
Mirriam-Webster Dictionary
duh
no kidding
Therefore you promote and favor abortion.
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice, anti-abortion,
and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing everybody that you're a
lying sleazebag.
ROFL
Ray you are a riot, especially when you get fustrated..:o)
You still can't prove that the term pro-abortion means what Pat and Craig
claim.
Did just above. Someone who FAVORS abortion.
favors AND/OR supports the RIGHT TO CHOOSE abortion
Nowhere does ANY definition EVER SAY that pro-abortion means the person
FAVORS ALL WOMEN ABORT
Someone like you.
And you continue lying
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 10:59:23 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bddqa7$rdn$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
By calling ANY of those people "pro-abortionists" -- let
alone
ALL
of
them -- you have just PROVEN **yourself** to be BOTH a liar and
an
idiot.
Since there's no such thing as a "pro-abortionist," as far as I
know.
I
have never met a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman
to
get an abortion. And I'm betting that you haven't, either.
Pro-abortionist does not mean, never has meant, and never will mean
"a person who seeks to force every pregnant woman to get an
abortion"
pro-: favoring : supporting : championing
Mirriam-Webster Dictionary
duh
no kidding
Therefore you promote and favor abortion.
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice, anti-abortion,
and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing everybody that you're
a
lying sleazebag.
ROFL
Ray you are a riot, especially when you get fustrated..:o)
You still can't prove that the term pro-abortion means what Pat and
Craig
claim.
Did just above. Someone who FAVORS abortion.
favors AND/OR supports the RIGHT TO CHOOSE abortion
Stop lying, Heishman. There is nothing about "right to choose" in the
definition I posted.
Your definition does NOT state a pro-abortion favors all women to abort.
Again and again we see you lie by creating your own definitions and
insisting that they're true.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
25 Jun 2003 09:42:48 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:bddmd1$ml0$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
The term pro-abortionist exist, it is real, and it does apply.
And you are still the only person to describe himself as being
pro-abortion.
freaks like coward bobby always have an obsessive need to control
That you also describe yourself as being pro-choice,
anti-abortion, and anti-choice goes a long way to convincing
everybody that you're a lying sleazebag.
i think those things made more people mock coward bobby; they
already knew he was a lying sleazebag.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marie A." |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
28 Jun 2003 06:55:39 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3f1079de.10840735@netnews.mchsi.com>...
who's intelligent!
Pro-CHOICERS **abound** in the USA, and outnumber those who
disagree with abortion by a consistent 2-1 ratio. Pro-Choicers are just
that: We ensure that ALL women will NEVER again be FORCED to
gestate to term against their will. NEVER a return to such involuntary
servitude. NEVER a return to 2nd-class-citizen status. EVER. They will
ALWAYS be free to CHOOSE between carrying-to-term and safe& legal
abortion-on-request.
I agree, Chilton. You won me over. That's why starting tomorrow I am
going to adopt a pro-choice position regarding a woman's right to
drown her three day old child. I have always been against this
business of women having to nurse and care for these demanding little
parasites against their will. Frankly, I view this as nothing less
than involuntary servitude; it makes her a second class citizen. I
mean, what gives here? Are we still in the 16th century or something?
Who do these people think they are telling her what she can do with
her own body? Think of it! A little parasite demanding her milk and 24
hour attention. God-Almighty!
Now, mind you, I am not pro-murder, but I'll be damned if women don't
have the right to make a choice here. Chilton, your impressive logic
and flawless argumentation have won me over. I am now officially a
pro-choicer! (Marie)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
28 Jun 2003 08:37:38 PM |
|
|
(Marie A.) wrote in
news:1dc521ed.0306281555.31adbf43@posting.google.com:
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<3f1079de.10840735@netnews.mchsi.com>... who's intelligent!
Pro-CHOICERS **abound** in the USA, and outnumber those who
disagree with abortion by a consistent 2-1 ratio. Pro-Choicers are
just that: We ensure that ALL women will NEVER again be FORCED to
gestate to term against their will. NEVER a return to such
involuntary servitude. NEVER a return to 2nd-class-citizen status.
EVER. They will ALWAYS be free to CHOOSE between carrying-to-term
and safe& legal abortion-on-request.
I agree, Chilton. You won me over. That's why starting tomorrow I am
going to adopt a pro-choice position regarding a woman's right to
drown her three day old child. I have always been against this
business of women having to nurse and care for these demanding little
parasites against their will. Frankly, I view this as nothing less
than involuntary servitude; it makes her a second class citizen. I
mean, what gives here? Are we still in the 16th century or something?
Who do these people think they are telling her what she can do with
her own body? Think of it! A little parasite demanding her milk and 24
hour attention. God-Almighty!
Now, mind you, I am not pro-murder, but I'll be damned if women don't
have the right to make a choice here. Chilton, your impressive logic
and flawless argumentation have won me over. I am now officially a
pro-choicer! (Marie)
The tirade you posted above makes you officically an idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
28 Jun 2003 09:16:15 PM |
|
|
Bob <sd@sd.net> wrote in news:Xns93A8BD76265D2SD@68.6.19.6:
LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com (Marie A.) wrote in
news:1dc521ed.0306281555.31adbf43@posting.google.com:
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<3f1079de.10840735@netnews.mchsi.com>... who's
intelligent!
Pro-CHOICERS **abound** in the USA, and outnumber those
who
disagree with abortion by a consistent 2-1 ratio.
Pro-Choicers are just that: We ensure that ALL women will
NEVER again be FORCED to gestate to term against their will.
NEVER a return to such involuntary servitude. NEVER a
return to 2nd-class-citizen status. EVER. They will ALWAYS
be free to CHOOSE between carrying-to-term and safe& legal
abortion-on-request.
I agree, Chilton. You won me over. That's why starting
tomorrow I am going to adopt a pro-choice position regarding
a woman's right to drown her three day old child. I have
always been against this business of women having to nurse
and care for these demanding little parasites against their
will. Frankly, I view this as nothing less than involuntary
servitude; it makes her a second class citizen. I mean, what
gives here? Are we still in the 16th century or something?
Who do these people think they are telling her what she can
do with her own body? Think of it! A little parasite
demanding her milk and 24 hour attention. God-Almighty!
Now, mind you, I am not pro-murder, but I'll be damned if
women don't have the right to make a choice here. Chilton,
your impressive logic and flawless argumentation have won me
over. I am now officially a pro-choicer! (Marie)
The tirade you posted above makes you officically an idiot.
not at all; it was an idiot far earlier than the above tirade.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
28 Jun 2003 11:43:28 PM |
|
|
Marie A. <LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com> wrote:
I agree, Chilton. You won me over. That's why starting tomorrow I am
going to adopt a pro-choice position regarding a woman's right to
drown her three day old child.
Hatred and murder seem to be all that you understand.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr Humphrey, I have a question |
28 Jun 2003 10:09:57 PM |
|
|
On 28 Jun 2003 16:55:39 -0700,
Marie A. wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
[ ... ]
Pro-CHOICERS **abound** in the USA, and outnumber those who
disagree with abortion by a consistent 2-1 ratio. Pro-Choicers are just
that: We ensure that ALL women will NEVER again be FORCED to
gestate to term against their will. NEVER a return to such involuntary
servitude. NEVER a return to 2nd-class-citizen status. EVER. They will
ALWAYS be free to CHOOSE between carrying-to-term and safe& legal
abortion-on-request.
I agree, Chilton. You won me over. That's why starting tomorrow I
am going to adopt a pro-choice position regarding a woman's right to
drown her three day old child. I have always been against this
business of women having to nurse and care for these demanding little
parasites against their will. Frankly, I view this as nothing less
than involuntary servitude; it makes her a second class citizen. I
mean, what gives here? Are we still in the 16th century or something?
Who do these people think they are telling her what she can do with
her own body? Think of it! A little parasite demanding her milk and 24
hour attention. God-Almighty!
Actually, as bone-IGNORANT as you have proven yourself to be,
NOTHING you do or say would surprise me. NOR would it have any
credibility.
Now, mind you, I am not pro-murder, but I'll be damned if women don't
have the right to make a choice here. Chilton, your impressive logic
and flawless argumentation have won me over. I am now officially a
pro-choicer! (Marie)
Nope. You're still just what you've been all along.
A complete idiot.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
