| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Xomicron" |
| Date: |
27 Jun 2004 09:06:18 PM |
| Object: |
Re: My take on Michael Moore |
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
.
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 02:01:05 AM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tammy" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 08:38:04 AM |
|
|
(osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 10:18:31 AM |
|
|
(Tammy) wrote in
news:c7bd5687.0406280538.5d91f912@posting.google.com:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911,
and it is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented and easily referenced for anyone who is curious.
Feel free to disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are
real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real. Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his
facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which
is the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are
made public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq,
and cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some
reason he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So,
he's going to criticize whatever Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he
does a documentary saying Bush shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N.
Korea, we'd probably be watching a Moore documentary about Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction and how Bush should have gone in there
instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Moore basically takes a handful of soldiers who said and did some bad
things and tries to portray them as what the American soldiers are all
about in the war on terror.
And then, at the end of the film, after he rapes our soldiers' honor,
integrity, and courage, he slaps up a written message on the screen that
lasts for a few seconds and claims that he dedicates this vicious movie to
those who died on 9/11 and the soldiers who have lost their lives in the
war. As if that would nullify what he and his movie had just done to
them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ærchie" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 11:14:49 AM |
|
|
Twas brillig and a slithy tove named Xomicron didst gyre and gimble in
the wabe while reciting:
BuffyToU@yahoo.com (Tammy) wrote in
news:c7bd5687.0406280538.5d91f912@posting.google.com:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911,
and it is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented and easily referenced for anyone who is curious.
Feel free to disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are
real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real. Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his
facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which
is the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are
made public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq,
and cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some
reason he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So,
he's going to criticize whatever Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he
does a documentary saying Bush shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N.
Korea, we'd probably be watching a Moore documentary about Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction and how Bush should have gone in there
instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Moore basically takes a handful of soldiers who said and did some bad
things and tries to portray them as what the American soldiers are all
about in the war on terror.
And then, at the end of the film, after he rapes our soldiers' honor,
integrity, and courage, he slaps up a written message on the screen that
lasts for a few seconds and claims that he dedicates this vicious movie to
those who died on 9/11 and the soldiers who have lost their lives in the
war. As if that would nullify what he and his movie had just done to
them.
Have you seen the movie?
Ærchie
--
A fantatic is someone who redoubles his effort when he's forgotten his aim.
Santayana
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 09:17:01 AM |
|
|
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 02:25:45 PM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 02:30:28 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0406281125.4763978a@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
That is correct.
My choice. If you want to be one of Michael Moores little sheep, go for it.
I love watching you sheep flock.
Meanwhile, Bush is seven points above Kerry now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 02:46:18 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:30:28 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0406281125.4763978a@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
That is correct.
So why are you moaning about a film which you have not seen?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 03:10:55 PM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:eat0e05e7repv64kg8tidbu9ue02l1vtrs@4ax.com...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:30:28 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0406281125.4763978a@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit
911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel
free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his
facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are
made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see
the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in
Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for
some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying
Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and
how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going
to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying
that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like
he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states
that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by
the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with
his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch
them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
That is correct.
So why are you moaning about a film which you have not seen?
I have seen enough from others who have pointed out his flaws and the parts
he cut out.
I am not interested in seeing a left wing slanted film from a anti-American
like Michael Moore.
I seen enough of the fat slob make a fool of himself at the Academy awards a
year ago.
You can go and follow the rest of the sheep and bow down to him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 03:54:06 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:10:55 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:eat0e05e7repv64kg8tidbu9ue02l1vtrs@4ax.com...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:30:28 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0406281125.4763978a@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit
911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel
free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his
facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are
made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see
the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in
Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for
some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying
Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and
how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going
to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying
that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like
he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states
that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by
the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with
his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch
them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
That is correct.
So why are you moaning about a film which you have not seen?
I have seen enough from others who have pointed out his flaws...
See the movie, sheep.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 04:02:06 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:54:06 -0400, Somesappywriter
<sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:10:55 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:eat0e05e7repv64kg8tidbu9ue02l1vtrs@4ax.com...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:30:28 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0406281125.4763978a@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit
911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel
free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his
facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are
made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see
the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in
Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for
some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying
Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and
how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going
to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying
that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like
he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states
that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by
the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with
his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch
them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Or ever plans on seeing.
That is correct.
So why are you moaning about a film which you have not seen?
I have seen enough from others who have pointed out his flaws...
See the movie, sheep.
He never will, for exactly the same reason that he will not
acknowledge as even possibly truthful any source that criticizes Bush
or his policies - he's not got the integrity to admit when he's wrong.
The irony here is this is the same guy that was bitching at others for
not accepting others' views when the Iraq invasion was just starting -
and yet he feels it's appropriate to criticize a film he's never seen
and won't have the courage to go and see.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tammy" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 01:17:46 PM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911, and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts. Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject, which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq, and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
28 Jun 2004 02:24:39 PM |
|
|
"Tammy" <> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
On 28 Jun 2004 06:38:04 -0700, (Tammy) wrote:
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0406272301.751e7f01@posting.google.com>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2k9copF19lldhU1@uni-berlin.de>...
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in news:C8yDc.123841$Sw.32901@attbi_s51:
Xomicron wrote:
Jack Cackburn <jcack@yoohoo.com> wrote in
news:2k6vdfdf18h5mbU1@uni-berlin.de:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:hirDc.187243$Ly.143254@attbi_s01:
Xomicron wrote:
mlw <mlw@nospam.no> wrote in
news:yFlDc.158965$3x.32598@attbi_s54:
Xomicron wrote:
Michael Moore is a fat media *****.
Say what you like, he has a great hit with Fahrenheit 911,
and it
is a great movie.
Unlike the dolts on FOX "news," he has all the facts
documented
and easily referenced for anyone who is curious. Feel free
to
disagree with his conclusions, but his facts are real.
Michael Moore isn't in the facts business.
Regardless, the facts in Fahrenheit 911 are documented and
real.
Typical, attack the person when you can't attack his facts.
Coward.
Moore is selective with his facts to distort the truth.
Except when the truth is all a matter of public record.
People who agree with Moore are ignorant of the truth.
Another personal attack at the people instead of the subject,
which is
the facts in Fahrenheit 911 were real and documented. You just
can't
handle when the truths this administration wants to hide are made
public.
Guys like Michael Moore are too busy pushing an agenda to see the
big
picture. He doesn't give a squat about anyone's son dying in Iraq,
and
cares less about the Iraqi people. He hates Bush because for some
reason
he hates anything remotely capitalistic/free
enterprise/conservative and
sees Bush as the embodiment of that. So, he's going to criticize
whatever
Bush does. If Bush invades Iraq, he does a documentary saying Bush
shouldn't have. If Bush had invaded N. Korea, we'd probably be
watching a
Moore documentary about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and how
Bush
should have gone in there instead.
How about the fact that one of the Senators he interviewed, he cut
out
the part where the Senator told him he had a nephew that was going to
Afganistan to fight.
I can't remember this Senators name, but I remember him saying that
Michael Moore cut out the parts he didn't like or didn't want to
hear.
His film is SLANTED WAY too far too the left.
Liberals, being desperate right now, are clinging on to Moore like he
is Jesus Christ himself.
Michael Moore never stated that his movie is unbiased, he states that
the movie is accurate. There is a difference. Moore presents
information which he believes is underreported or not-reported by the
mainstream press. The right wing has numerous outlets for reporting
their side of the story, the left does not. Michael Moore presents
facts that he believes proves his arguments. You may disagree with his
interpretation, but the facts are accurate. It is hard to say that
Bush never said this, or rice never said that, when you can watch them
making the statements for themselves.
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds making a
fat Canadian rich.
Many of you liberals really are under mind control..it is just totally
amazing how you guys will latch on to anyone who wants to say something
about Republicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 07:06:44 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's seeing it?
Many of you liberals really are under mind control..it is just totally
amazing how you guys will latch on to anyone who wants to say something
about Republicans.
What's sadly amazing is the assumptions you'll make about anyone who's not as
afflicted as you are, Cop Reject. So, tell me: when did *I* see the movie
you're obsessed with at the moment? After all, you're the resident
mind-reader...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 08:05:34 AM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...you follow him
if you want too.
Baaa...baaa..baaaa.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 03:52:28 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's seeing
it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...you follow him
if you want too.
Since I've never said what I think about him, what's your problem, Cop Reject?
(Besides the obvious, of course.)
Baaa...baaa..baaaa.
Sorry, but sheep are your fetish...post it to the appropriate newsgroup,
please.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 08:12:30 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 08:16:55 AM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental Policy
am I supposed to be breaking that would
put my career at risk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elmo" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 10:53:38 AM |
|
|
In article <zLSdnaS4BcvT9nzdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental Policy
am I supposed to be breaking that would
put my career at risk.
Why don't you start by explaining where she said Departmental Policy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 12:20:03 PM |
|
|
"Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
news:290620040853386191%anto@sales.com...
In article <zLSdnaS4BcvT9nzdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit
that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know
who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental
Policy
am I supposed to be breaking that would
put my career at risk.
Why don't you start by explaining where she said Departmental Policy?
Why don't you just start by explaining where I supposably "jeopardized" my
job.
She claimed I jeopardized my job, but yet she can't prove it or show how.
Neither can your hero David Barnes.
Which if you watch carefully he is running from being able to back up his
statements.
Would you care to hold your hero and help him?
LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 10:55:34 PM |
|
|
In article <iZudnZM5_bTWOXzdRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
news:290620040853386191%anto@sales.com...
In article <zLSdnaS4BcvT9nzdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit
that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know
who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental
Policy
am I supposed to be breaking that would
put my career at risk.
Why don't you start by explaining where she said Departmental Policy?
Why don't you just start by explaining where I supposably "jeopardized" my
job.
She claimed I jeopardized my job, but yet she can't prove it or show how.
Neither can your hero David Barnes.
Which if you watch carefully he is running from being able to back up his
statements.
Would you care to hold your hero and help him?
Does it bother you at all to try to trick others into talking to you?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 02:21:22 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:20:03 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
news:290620040853386191%anto@sales.com...
In article <zLSdnaS4BcvT9nzdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to admit
that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know
who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental
Policy
am I supposed to be breaking that would
put my career at risk.
Why don't you start by explaining where she said Departmental Policy?
Why don't you just start by explaining where I supposably "jeopardized" my
job.
Elmo didn't say you are jeopardizing your job by being a fool. I did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: My take on Michael Moore |
29 Jun 2004 02:28:33 PM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:3ce3e05kjjii500gm5m04c850nh23h2ojt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:20:03 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
news:290620040853386191%anto@sales.com...
In article <zLSdnaS4BcvT9nzdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:5lq2e0ph0k82r8mvgdshof7orlo5orh7lj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:05:34 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwu1q4lgr.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Tammy" <BuffyToU@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7bd5687.0406281017.72ffa473@posting.google.com...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<12a0e09nn47m2oe7a5v93cu8ujingdg5s7@4ax.com>...
[...]
Osprey is whining about a movie he's never seen.
Probably afraid that he will change his mind and have to
admit
that
he
was wrong. It is hard for people when they suddenly realize
that
they
have been supporting traitors.
Actually I like watching all you sheep run to his movie in
herds
making a
fat Canadian rich.
Really? Since you refuse to see the movie, how would you know
who's
seeing it?
I refuse to be one of the sheep that follows Michael Moore...
But you follow Limbaugh and a number of other jerks with your
tongue
hanging out.
Actually no, I haven't listened to Limbaugh in years...occasionally
if I
catch him I may..but it has been a long time.
You are just a total loser in all your guesses.
Oh yea, by the way..you ran away from my asking you what Departmental
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
