"The Reverend" <renngade@anglickcan.com.br> wrote in message
news:44e3f973.1979516@news.onetel.net.uk...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:43:53 -0400, "Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote:

<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:1155748345.760026.298560@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...

The Reverend wrote:

On 16 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700, "sheldon@liberman.com"
<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote:

Jim F. wrote:

"Sheldon Liberman" <sheldon@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:1155732459.546172.172070@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Jim F. wrote:

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:O3wEg.3883$zg.1140@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

"Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4kfa5jFbtih8U1@individual.net...

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:5ibEg.10224$eL2.3289@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

[Freakin stupid ding dongs and their followers. Zionist Jews
need to
expell these freaks of nature]

Expel them from what? Jews don't have a pope. And how
does a self-proclaimed goy like you get off on deciding
who and who isn't a Jew, anyway?

I didn't. I criticize who I want, what I want, and when I want.
If I
think
a group of Eskimos are in the wrong, I will call them on it.

But that would hardly give you the authority to tell the Eskimos
who is and who isn't a member of their tribe.

Jim, are you as vocal in opposition to the dimbulbs in here that
claim
that the Jews in Israel aren't Semitic, ie, not Jews?

I think that I have addressed the lack of scientific support for
Arthur Koestler's thesis that Ashkenazic Jews are the descendents
of the Khazars and so are not Semites, and I have addressed the
misuses of that thesis too (since Koestler did not think that the
validity of this thesis impinged in any way on the justifiability,
or lack thereof, of Zionism or the legitimacy of the state of
Israel).
Go check the Google archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&q=%22jim+f.%22+++khazars

That wasn't an accusation, Jim. You and idea discussed Koestler thesis
and the DNA evidence against it. But that was quite a while ago and
the
charges that Jews are semites didn't seem to ebb in the face of it. So
once again, I am asking, not accusing, "what have you done for me
lately?"

One thing I have learned about Jews is that they generally
don't
like
to
be critical of their own in the publics eye.

I don't know about that. Jews can go at each other pretty
vigorously
in public. Of course there is also some pressure among Jews not
to wash all their dirty linen in public, but I don't think that
is
unique
in Jews.

Being critical of other Jews in public, except in certain
circumstances, is considered a serious breach of Jewish law. Not
that
all Jews, or even most Jews, adhere to it, but it certainly unique
in
that respect.

I take it that you referring to the laws of lashon hara. As I am
sure
you're well aware, such laws are subject to interpretation,
otherwise
they could be taken as even excluding such things as performance
reviews of employees in a company, for instance. As I understand
it, excpeptions are considered to be permissible in situations where
criticism might help the one criticized to change her conduct,
or to help protect those adversely affected by her actions.

I am indeed speaking about loshan hara. The central theme here isn't
the manner in which they are interpreted, but in the uniqueness of
their very existence.

However, the exemptions for Loshan Hara pertain to situations where
not
to speak could create a worse situation for an innocent party, and
even
then there are guideline that must be adhered to. If, for instance,
you
know for a fact that someone is dishonest in business, you are
obligated to inform someone who is considering to business with that
person.

Since all jews are dishonest in business, how does this work in
practice?

You're even dishonest about dishonesty. That's only fair. You're
ignorant about your own ignorance.

If the phony reverend has ever spoken the truth on
any subject, it was purely by accident.

That's what jews do, Jimbo, you dumb shabbos goy *****.

Well, rev, I can't be both a shabbos goy and a Jew at the
same time.

"The Reverend" <renngade@anglickcan.com.br> wrote in message
news:44e3f973.1979516@news.onetel.net.uk...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:43:53 -0400, "Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote:

If the phony reverend has ever spoken the truth on
any subject, it was purely by accident.

That's what jews do, Jimbo, you dumb shabbos goy *****.

LMAO!!! Apparently Jims words were definately validated with this post of
yours Rev..

What a dork.

"The Reverend" <renngade@anglickcan.com.br> wrote in message
news:44e3f973.1979516@news.onetel.net.uk...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:43:53 -0400, "Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote:

If the phony reverend has ever spoken the truth on
any subject, it was purely by accident.

That's what jews do, Jimbo, you dumb shabbos goy *****.

LMAO!!! Apparently Jims words were definately validated with this post of
yours Rev.. Try paying attention to the thread next time.

What a dork.

NefeshBarYochai wrote:

You alos should know Rev as you are a Jew also. Welcome aboard. We'll
need to get you into treatment as soon as possible.

ooh, that hurt.

The Reverend wrote:

On 16 Aug 2006 10:12:25 -0700, "sheldon@liberman.com"
<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote:

The Reverend wrote:

On 16 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700, "sheldon@liberman.com"
<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote:

Jim F. wrote:

"Sheldon Liberman" <sheldon@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:1155732459.546172.172070@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Jim F. wrote:

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:O3wEg.3883$zg.1140@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

"Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4kfa5jFbtih8U1@individual.net...

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:5ibEg.10224$eL2.3289@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

[Freakin stupid ding dongs and their followers. Zionist

Jews need to

expell these freaks of nature]

Expel them from what? Jews don't have a pope. And how
does a self-proclaimed goy like you get off on deciding
who and who isn't a Jew, anyway?

I didn't. I criticize who I want, what I want, and when I

want. If I

think
a group of Eskimos are in the wrong, I will call them on

it.

But that would hardly give you the authority to tell the

Eskimos

who is and who isn't a member of their tribe.

Jim, are you as vocal in opposition to the dimbulbs in here

that claim

that the Jews in Israel aren't Semitic, ie, not Jews?

I think that I have addressed the lack of scientific support for
Arthur Koestler's thesis that Ashkenazic Jews are the

descendents

of the Khazars and so are not Semites, and I have addressed the
misuses of that thesis too (since Koestler did not think that

the

validity of this thesis impinged in any way on the

justifiability,

or lack thereof, of Zionism or the legitimacy of the state of

Israel).

Go check the Google archives:

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&q=%22jim+f.%22+++khazars

That wasn't an accusation, Jim. You and idea discussed Koestler

thesis

and the DNA evidence against it. But that was quite a while ago

and the

charges that Jews are semites didn't seem to ebb in the face of

it. So

once again, I am asking, not accusing, "what have you done for me
lately?"

One thing I have learned about Jews is that they generally

don't like

to
be critical of their own in the publics eye.

I don't know about that. Jews can go at each other pretty

vigorously

in public. Of course there is also some pressure among Jews

not

to wash all their dirty linen in public, but I don't think

that is unique

in Jews.

Being critical of other Jews in public, except in certain
circumstances, is considered a serious breach of Jewish law.

Not that

all Jews, or even most Jews, adhere to it, but it certainly

unique in

that respect.

I take it that you referring to the laws of lashon hara. As I am

sure

you're well aware, such laws are subject to interpretation,

otherwise

they could be taken as even excluding such things as performance
reviews of employees in a company, for instance. As I understand
it, excpeptions are considered to be permissible in situations

where

criticism might help the one criticized to change her conduct,
or to help protect those adversely affected by her actions.

I am indeed speaking about loshan hara. The central theme here

isn't

the manner in which they are interpreted, but in the uniqueness of
their very existence.

However, the exemptions for Loshan Hara pertain to situations

where not

to speak could create a worse situation for an innocent party, and

even

then there are guideline that must be adhered to. If, for

instance, you

know for a fact that someone is dishonest in business, you are
obligated to inform someone who is considering to business with

that

person.

Since all jews are dishonest in business, how does this work in
practice?

You're even dishonest about dishonesty. That's only fair. You're
ignorant about your own ignorance.

Why do you think G-d gave jews distinctive facial features Liberv-tz?
To enable others to identify them easily and avoid doing business with
them!

On 16 Aug 2006 10:36:57 -0700, "NefeshBarYochai" <tachnan@hotmail.com>
wrote:

You alos should know Rev as you are a Jew also. Welcome aboard. We'll
need to get you into treatment as soon as possible.

Hello Warren, you drug-fucked imbecile. LOL

The Reverend wrote:

On 16 Aug 2006 10:12:25 -0700, "sheldon@liberman.com"
<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote:

The Reverend wrote:

On 16 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700, "sheldon@liberman.com"
<sheldon@liberman.com> wrote:

Jim F. wrote:

"Sheldon Liberman" <sheldon@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:1155732459.546172.172070@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Jim F. wrote:

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:O3wEg.3883$zg.1140@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

"Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4kfa5jFbtih8U1@individual.net...

"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:5ibEg.10224$eL2.3289@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

[Freakin stupid ding dongs and their followers. Zionist Jews need to
expell these freaks of nature]

Expel them from what? Jews don't have a pope. And how
does a self-proclaimed goy like you get off on deciding
who and who isn't a Jew, anyway?

I didn't. I criticize who I want, what I want, and when I want. If I
think
a group of Eskimos are in the wrong, I will call them on it.

But that would hardly give you the authority to tell the Eskimos
who is and who isn't a member of their tribe.

Jim, are you as vocal in opposition to the dimbulbs in here that claim
that the Jews in Israel aren't Semitic, ie, not Jews?

I think that I have addressed the lack of scientific support for
Arthur Koestler's thesis that Ashkenazic Jews are the descendents
of the Khazars and so are not Semites, and I have addressed the
misuses of that thesis too (since Koestler did not think that the
validity of this thesis impinged in any way on the justifiability,
or lack thereof, of Zionism or the legitimacy of the state of Israel).
Go check the Google archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&q=%22jim+f.%22+++khazars

That wasn't an accusation, Jim. You and idea discussed Koestler thesis
and the DNA evidence against it. But that was quite a while ago and the
charges that Jews are semites didn't seem to ebb in the face of it. So
once again, I am asking, not accusing, "what have you done for me
lately?"

One thing I have learned about Jews is that they generally don't like
to
be critical of their own in the publics eye.

I don't know about that. Jews can go at each other pretty vigorously
in public. Of course there is also some pressure among Jews not
to wash all their dirty linen in public, but I don't think that is unique
in Jews.

Being critical of other Jews in public, except in certain
circumstances, is considered a serious breach of Jewish law. Not that
all Jews, or even most Jews, adhere to it, but it certainly unique in
that respect.

I take it that you referring to the laws of lashon hara. As I am sure
you're well aware, such laws are subject to interpretation, otherwise
they could be taken as even excluding such things as performance
reviews of employees in a company, for instance. As I understand
it, excpeptions are considered to be permissible in situations where
criticism might help the one criticized to change her conduct,
or to help protect those adversely affected by her actions.

I am indeed speaking about loshan hara. The central theme here isn't
the manner in which they are interpreted, but in the uniqueness of
their very existence.

However, the exemptions for Loshan Hara pertain to situations where not
to speak could create a worse situation for an innocent party, and even
then there are guideline that must be adhered to. If, for instance, you
know for a fact that someone is dishonest in business, you are
obligated to inform someone who is considering to business with that
person.

Since all jews are dishonest in business, how does this work in
practice?

You're even dishonest about dishonesty. That's only fair. You're
ignorant about your own ignorance.

Why do you think G-d gave jews distinctive facial features Liberv-tz?
To enable others to identify them easily and avoid doing business with
them!