| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Lane Lewis" |
| Date: |
28 Jun 2003 09:26:45 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
"Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" <Tom_Shelly_White_God@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:4pasfvo7gtr3l34v6ujjdt0ate2gnnkrde@4ax.com...
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Note to creationist, this evidence also refutes the notion that we are all
descended from Noah also.
Genetic Evidence (book)
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey - Spencer Wells
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R3F052415
Fossil Evidence (June 03)
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/12/1055220667712.html
Watch the quick time movie #6 (Genetic variation)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/genome/program.html#
Note that the original Africans that journeyed out of Africa had a certain
amount of variation among themselves as any two or more people do. As far as
I can see your mile long list is a reflection of that along with any
variation that
was gained through mutation in the last 60,000 years.
Also there must of been Africans that remained in Africa that were similar
to those that left and they did not go through many of the changes that the
others did but of course changed nonetheless.
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
.
|
|
| User: "Professor White" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 03:01:31 AM |
|
|
In article <F7sLa.203621$4y6.3143882@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
"Lane Lewis" <lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" <Tom_Shelly_White_God@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:4pasfvo7gtr3l34v6ujjdt0ate2gnnkrde@4ax.com...
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
So what? "African" today isn't the same as "African" 30K+ years ago.
Perfesser WHite
Note to creationist, this evidence also refutes the notion that we are all
descended from Noah also.
Genetic Evidence (book)
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey - Spencer Wells
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R3F052415
Fossil Evidence (June 03)
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/12/1055220667712.html
Watch the quick time movie #6 (Genetic variation)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/genome/program.html#
Note that the original Africans that journeyed out of Africa had a certain
amount of variation among themselves as any two or more people do. As far as
I can see your mile long list is a reflection of that along with any
variation that
was gained through mutation in the last 60,000 years.
Also there must of been Africans that remained in Africa that were similar
to those that left and they did not go through many of the changes that the
others did but of course changed nonetheless.
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 12:40:18 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:26:45 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Let's stick with the debate:
You claimed that the 'out of Africa' theory was an UNDENIABLE FACT.
Those are your words.
Here's proof from noted scientists of our day that proves that it is a
matter or debate and controversy in the scientific world, thereby
proving you wrong.
Now you have made a new claim:
And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Therefore you now have the burden of going through each and evey one
of the 'evidence' that I posted and prove it incorrect or
superannuated by another report that directly mentions the findings
that I posted. (and remember, all I have to do is find more links and
reports, you will have to refute each and every one of them directly
to support your claim)
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/genetic_study_shakes_up_out_of_a.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news235.htm
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s231690.htm
Here's a good one from newarchaeology that reports on the disagreement
and debate among scientists over the 'out of Africa' theory and the
Eurasia theory:
http://www.newarchaeology.com/articles/emergence.htm
I hope this experience has taught you a lesson to choose your words
carefully and not make such broad sweeping claims. You need to
carefully question your beliefs and make sure you can back them up
when challenged.
The 'out of Africa' theory is not undeniable as you claimed and as
clearly evidenced by the recent scientific reports I posted above.
Visit the official Tom Shelly, White God website at:
http://members.odinsrage.com/tomshelly/
Tom Shelly, Legendary White God
Purveyor of Truth, Destroyer of whiggers
Proud Recipient
alt.flame.niggers Most Hated Racist, 2002 & 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lane Lewis" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 03:22:18 PM |
|
|
"Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" <Tom_Shelly_White_God@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:eg8ufvsknqufe5fep5guvl99sd006jg90k@4ax.com...
Let's stick with the debate:
You claimed that the 'out of Africa' theory was an UNDENIABLE FACT.
Those are your words.
Here's proof from noted scientists of our day that proves that it is a
matter or debate and controversy in the scientific world, thereby
proving you wrong.
Your posting old news that has been refuted, you must now find a
scientist that still believes in the multiregional theory in light of the
recent findings.
There comes a time when the evidence is so striking that the debate comes
to an end, that time is now in the Out of Africa Theory. Recent genetic
evidence shows that we are indeed so similar in DNA that the difference is
only one tenth of one percent, this alone cast tremendous doubt on the
multiregional theory. Combine that with the genetic markers that link us to
recent Africans and the multiregional theory is in big trouble. But the
problem is that some scientist wanted fossil evidence also before they
abandoned their old theory so the Out of Africa scientist went back out into
the fields to find it. They found exactly what was predicted by the theory
and the evidence came three fold with three almost complete skulls. So we
now have the evidence and not one scientist has even tried to refute any of
it.
The evidence
Similar DNA - All humans DNA is practically identical (five times closer
than the average two chimps)
Genetic markers - We are linked with African's that lived 60,000 years ago
Fossils - from 120,000 and 160,000 years ago
So you will not find a scientist now that still clings to the
Multi-regional Theory, all you will find are old links that no longer apply.
Lane
Genetic Evidence
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey - Spencer Wells
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R3F052415
Fossil Evidence
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/12/1055220667712.html
Watch the quick time movie #6 (Genetic variation)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/genome/program.html#
snip
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 04:09:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:22:18 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
Your posting old news that has been refuted, you must now find a
scientist that still believes in the multiregional theory in light of the
recent findings.
No problem:
THE UPCOMING HUMILIATION OF LANE:
Lane, claims that we all come from Africa and that this is
'undeniable'.
I proved that many scientists do not agree with this theory and that
it is a matter of controversy in the scientific community.
He is now claiming that due to recent findings (over the last few
months), that all scientists now agree that the 'out of Africa' theory
is undeniable and proved:
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Note to creationist, this evidence also refutes the notion that we are all
descended from Noah also.
Genetic Evidence (book)
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey - Spencer Wells
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R3F052415
Link to a book for sale, nothing more.
Fossil Evidence (June 03)
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/12/1055220667712.html
Quote from first link:
""""The fossils boost the theory that our species arose in Africa,
says Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley, whose team
made the discovery"""""
Notice how it says 'boosts the theory' and not proves the theory?
Quote from second link proves that the matter is still a matter of
controversy even after the recent findings proving that his claim that
it is undeniable is wrong:
"""""The opposing school of thought, the multi-region theory, holds
that Homo sapiens evolved simultaneously in Africa, Europe and
Asia."""""
Note that the original Africans that journeyed out of Africa had a certain
amount of variation among themselves as any two or more people do. As far as
I can see your mile long list is a reflection of that along with any
variation that
was gained through mutation in the last 60,000 years.
Also there must of been Africans that remained in Africa that were similar
to those that left and they did not go through many of the changes that the
others did but of course changed nonetheless.
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
Here's an article on Dr. Begun:
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
Here's a copy of the email I just sent to Dr. Begun:
Dr. Begun,
I know you're a busy man but I have a quick question to settle a long
argument.
Since the recent discoveries of new fossiles and DNA information, do
you still consider the 'out of Africa' theory of man's origins to be a
matter of controversy and debate? In other words, do you consider the
'out of Africa' theory 'undeniable'?
I do hope you will find the time to just send me a quick note and
reply.
Thank you,
Tom
hahah
And over the next week, I will send out other emails and phone calls
to the other Doctors who disputed the 'out of Africa' theory.
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/genetic_study_shakes_up_out_of_a.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news235.htm
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s231690.htm
http://216.167.111.80/20021221/fob1.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2601635.stm
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00062D52-ABB0-1C72-9EB7809EC588F2D7
http://www.discover.com/aug_02/featafrica.html
Here's a good one from newarchaeology that reports on the disagreement
and debate among scientists over the 'out of Africa' theory and the
Eurasia theory and another one that reports on the disagreements:
http://www.newarchaeology.com/articles/emergence.htm
http://www.txtwriter.com/Onscience/Articles/humanevolution.html
All I have to do is get one reply to prove you wrong. It may take a
week or even a few weeks but I'm sure one of these guys will email me
back.
hahaha
Are you sweating yet? What will your new dodge be?
haha
I'm sure you'll come up with some new excuse or dodge, liberals always
do.
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 04:00:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:26:45 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
Here's a copy of the email I just sent to Dr. Begun:
Dr. Begun,
I know you're a busy man but I have a quick question to settle a long
argument.
Since the recent discoveries of new fossiles and DNA information, do
you still consider the 'out of Africa' theory of man's origins to be a
matter of controversy and debate? In other words, do you consider the
'out of Africa' theory 'undeniable'?
I do hope you will find the time to just send me a quick note and
reply.
Thank you,
Tom
hahah
And over the next week, I will send out other emails and phone calls
to the other Doctors who disputed the 'out of Africa' theory.
All I have to do is get one reply to prove you wrong....
hahaha
Are you sweating yet? What will your new dodge be?
haha
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
| User: "Checkmate" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
01 Jul 2003 02:29:34 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:00:38 -0700, Tom Shelly, Legendary White God put forth
the notion that...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:26:45 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
Here's a copy of the email I just sent to Dr. Begun:
Dr. Begun,
I know you're a busy man but I have a quick question to settle a long
argument.
Since the recent discoveries of new fossiles and DNA information, do
you still consider the 'out of Africa' theory of man's origins to be a
matter of controversy and debate? In other words, do you consider the
'out of Africa' theory 'undeniable'?
I do hope you will find the time to just send me a quick note and
reply.
Thank you,
Tom
Why didn't you use your *complete* sig, Tom? Were you afraid he'd give you
all the attention you deserve, which is about as long as it takes to send your
"scientific inquiry" to the ***** can?
hahah
Heheh...
And over the next week, I will send out other emails and phone calls
to the other Doctors who disputed the 'out of Africa' theory.
All I have to do is get one reply to prove you wrong....
hahaha
Are you sweating yet? What will your new dodge be?
haha
Tom Shelly, White God
--
Checkmate
Copyright 2003
all rights reserved
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 04:00:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:26:45 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
No problem, Lane.
Remember that University of Toronto anthropologist? I just emailed
him and am waiting for his reply. I will post it for you when I get
it. I talked to another professor there by phone who stated that Dr.
Begun had not changed his mind and that the matter is still a matter
of controversy.
Why don't you call them and ask yourself? haha
According to your new logic and dodge, all I have to do is find one or
two scientists who still are not convinced the 'out of Africa' theory
is true since your big Ethiopian fossil discovery? No problem.
( I wonder what you new excuse and dodge will be when I get a hold of
one of these guys? hahahah)
Department of Anthropology
University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
Phone: (416) 978-3295
Fax: (416) 978-3217
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
29 Jun 2003 04:00:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:26:45 GMT, "Lane Lewis"
<lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
No problem.
It's easy to prove that your claim that the 'out of Africa' theory is
undeniable is wrong:
RACIST WIN # 3
Lane claims this as fact:
The fact that you are an ape and
an African one at that is undeniable. Next lesson will be how the Homo
sapiens ( your ancestors) left Africa and conquered the world within the
last 60,000 years.
Lane
Notice how he posted 'undeniable'. That means that there is no
controversy and that all agree.
Is this true? Nope:
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
It seems that the origins of man and the 'out of Africa' theory is a
matter of debate in the scientific community and there are scientists
on both sides of the issue and new finds are being made all the time.
So is it 'undeniable"? Of course not. He can post all the links
supporting his theory that we all come from Africa and I can post an
equal number of links saying that we come from Europe and this alone
proves him wrong for the simple reason that he claimed it was
'undeniable'.
He claims it to be an "undeniable" fact and I proved him wrong by
showing that it's a matter of controversy. One could correctly state
that 'many scientists believe' that we come from Africa just as I
could correctly post that 'many scientists believe that we all come
from Europe' and we would both be correct. But remember, being the
whigger that he is, he just had to claim it was 'undeniable'.
Even after he read the report from the University of Toronto scientist
above, he still makes the claim:
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Notice how he claims, "prove beyond a doubt"?
Well...let's just prove him wrong again with these links:
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/genetic_study_shakes_up_out_of_a.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news235.htm
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s231690.htm
http://216.167.111.80/20021221/fob1.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2601635.stm
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00062D52-ABB0-1C72-9EB7809EC588F2D7
http://www.discover.com/aug_02/featafrica.html
Here's a good one from newarchaeology that reports on the disagreement
and debate among scientists over the 'out of Africa' theory and the
Eurasia theory and another one that reports on the disagreements:
http://www.newarchaeology.com/articles/emergence.htm
http://www.txtwriter.com/Onscience/Articles/humanevolution.html
With all the evidence in front of him proving that the 'out of Africa'
theory is not undeniable and indeed a matter of great controversy,
Lane continues to claim it is a proven fact. At this point, it's
safe to say that not only is he a liar and has no credibility but that
he is a complete fool.
Visit the official Tom Shelly, White God website at:
http://members.odinsrage.com/tomshelly/
Tom Shelly, Legendary White God
Purveyor of Truth, Destroyer of whiggers
Proud Recipient
alt.flame.niggers Most Hated Racist, 2002 & 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
30 Jun 2003 08:12:51 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:08:42 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
Only a win if you think that assertion is proof. (No proof in any of
your posts yet that scientists TODAY cling to multiregionalism. No
one cares if they did last year.)
No problem
The links that he posted as his proof have direct quotes that say that
the evidence they just found only supports their theory and does not
prove it.
And in one of his recent reports that he posted, the writer admitted
that there are 'two schools of thought' in the scientific community.
Furthermore, I have sent out emails to the scientists in the links I
posted asking whether they still believe the 'out of Africa' theory is
a matter of debate right now. When I get a reply, which may take
awhile as Universities are on break, I will post it and personally
send him the Professor's email as my proof.
Any thing else?
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
01 Jul 2003 08:54:04 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:08:01 -0700, Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
wrote:
Tom,
When you emailed those professors, did you sign it "Tom Shelly, Legendary
White God?" If so, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to reply.
No, I used another email which I will send to Lane for verification
when they reply.
Are you agreeing with him?
Funny how since I started sending out emails and making phone calls to
the professors, support for his position is dwindling.
haha
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
| User: "03:15:38 GMT" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Website |
02 Jul 2003 10:57:31 AM |
|
|
"Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" <Tom_Shelly_White_God@yahoo.com> did
this:
Funny how since I started sending out emails and making phone calls to
the professors, support for his position is dwindling.
On the other hand, support for the "Tom Shelly is a net.kook" theory
is increasing by leaps and bounds.
--
Ari <fun.no@all.at>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Win # 3 |
29 Jun 2003 12:40:39 PM |
|
|
RACIST WIN # 3
Lane claims this as fact:
The fact that you are an ape and
an African one at that is undeniable. Next lesson will be how the Homo
sapiens ( your ancestors) left Africa and conquered the world within the
last 60,000 years.
Lane
Notice how he posted 'undeniable'. That means that there is no
controversy and that all agree.
Is this true? Nope:
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
It seems that the origins of man and the 'out of Africa' theory is a
matter of debate in the scientific community and there are scientists
on both sides of the issue and new finds are being made all the time.
So is it 'undeniable"? Of course not. He can post all the links
supporting his theory that we all come from Africa and I can post an
equal number of links saying that we come from Europe and this alone
proves him wrong for the simple reason that he claimed it was
'undeniable'.
He claims it to be an "undeniable" fact and I proved him wrong by
showing that it's a matter of controversy. One could correctly state
that 'many scientists believe' that we come from Africa just as I
could correctly post that 'many scientists believe that we all come
from Europe' and we would both be correct. But remember, being the
whigger that he is, he just had to claim it was 'undeniable'.
Even after he read the report from the University of Toronto scientist
above, he still makes the claim:
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Notice how he claims, "prove beyond a doubt"?
Well...let's just prove him wrong again with these links:
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/genetic_study_shakes_up_out_of_a.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news235.htm
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s231690.htm
Here's a good one from newarchaeology that reports on the disagreement
and debate among scientists over the 'out of Africa' theory and the
Eurasia theory:
http://www.newarchaeology.com/articles/emergence.htm
With all the evidence in front of him proving that the 'out of Africa'
theory is not undeniable and indeed a matter of great controversy,
Lane continues to claim it is a proven fact. At this point, it's
safe to say that not only is he a liar and has no credibility but that
he is a complete fool.
Visit the official Tom Shelly, White God website at:
http://members.odinsrage.com/tomshelly/
Tom Shelly, Legendary White God
Purveyor of Truth, Destroyer of whiggers
Proud Recipient
alt.flame.niggers Most Hated Racist, 2002 & 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Newly updated Racist Win # 3 |
29 Jun 2003 08:03:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:40:39 -0700, "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God"
<Tom_Shelly_White_God@yahoo.com> posted in alt.atheism:
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
Nothing there about humans. (The oldest known fossil that could
possibly be called human is Sahelanthropus. It's 7 million years old
and it's African.)
--
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever.... This is a somewhat new kind of religion."
- Letter to Hans Muehsam March 30, 1954; Einstein Archive 38-434
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Shelly, Legendary White God" |
|
| Title: The upcoming humiliation of Lane |
29 Jun 2003 04:00:39 PM |
|
|
THE UPCOMING HUMILIATION OF LANE:
Lane, claims that we all come from Africa and that this is
'undeniable'.
I proved that many scientists do not agree with this theory and that
it is a matter of controversy in the scientific community.
He is now saying that due to recent findings (over the last few
months), that all scientists now agree that the 'out of Africa' theory
is undeniable and proved:
I'm reposting these links you asked for earlier but never commented on, they
prove beyond a doubt that you are indeed African. And your evidence for
otherwise is outdated and proven false.
Note to creationist, this evidence also refutes the notion that we are all
descended from Noah also.
Genetic Evidence (book)
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey - Spencer Wells
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R3F052415
Link to a book for sale, nothing more.
Fossil Evidence (June 03)
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/12/1055220667712.html
Quote from first link:
""""The fossils boost the theory that our species arose in Africa,
says Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley, whose team
made the discovery"""""
Notice how it says 'boosts the theory' and not proves the theory?
Quote from second link proves that the matter is still a matter of
controversy even after the recent findings proving that his claim that
it is undeniable is wrong:
"""""The opposing school of thought, the multi-region theory, holds
that Homo sapiens evolved simultaneously in Africa, Europe and
Asia."""""
Note that the original Africans that journeyed out of Africa had a certain
amount of variation among themselves as any two or more people do. As far as
I can see your mile long list is a reflection of that along with any
variation that
was gained through mutation in the last 60,000 years.
Also there must of been Africans that remained in Africa that were similar
to those that left and they did not go through many of the changes that the
others did but of course changed nonetheless.
Lane
Hope to hear from you on this.
Here's an article on Dr. Begun:
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
Here's a copy of the email I just sent to Dr. Begun:
Dr. Begun,
I know you're a busy man but I have a quick question to settle a long
argument.
Since the recent discoveries of new fossiles and DNA information, do
you still consider the 'out of Africa' theory of man's origins to be a
matter of controversy and debate? In other words, do you consider the
'out of Africa' theory 'undeniable'?
I do hope you will find the time to just send me a quick note and
reply.
Thank you,
Tom
hahah
And over the next week, I will send out other emails and phone calls
to the other Doctors who disputed the 'out of Africa' theory.
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/genetic_study_shakes_up_out_of_a.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news235.htm
http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/02/19/skulls020219
http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s231690.htm
http://216.167.111.80/20021221/fob1.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2601635.stm
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00062D52-ABB0-1C72-9EB7809EC588F2D7
http://www.discover.com/aug_02/featafrica.html
Here's a good one from newarchaeology that reports on the disagreement
and debate among scientists over the 'out of Africa' theory and the
Eurasia theory and another one that reports on the disagreements:
http://www.newarchaeology.com/articles/emergence.htm
http://www.txtwriter.com/Onscience/Articles/humanevolution.html
All I have to do is get one reply to prove you wrong. It may take a
week or even a few weeks but I'm sure one of these guys will email me
back.
hahaha
Are you sweating yet? What will your new dodge be?
haha
I'm sure you'll come up with some new excuse or dodge, liberals always
do.
Tom Shelly, White God
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
