| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Deuteros" |
| Date: |
02 Sep 2005 08:28:43 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in
news:Xns96C4E6D084A68ta2eene2@216.196.97.131:
"Dana" <whoya@whoya.com> wrote in
news:11hfgq04edqgda3@corp.supernews.com:
"Irie" <Irie@IrieEpistemology.com> wrote in message
news:cgPRe.103817$Ep.35821@lakeread02...
What is happening in the Gulf Cost is a fucking disgrace.
Why are you calling nature a disgrace.
Hell junior, hurricanes happen, and have been for eons.
All the more inexcusable that we should not be
preparing for them.
Let's see, the city is below sea level, protected
by a few fragile levees that are crumbling, but hey,
let's send all the upgrade money to Iraq to rebuild
ITS infrastructure.
Why should someone, such as myself, who does not live in Louisiana be taxed
so that New Orleans can build a bigger wall for itself? Protecting New
Orleans from a hurricane was a Louisiana issue. Recent events are evidence of
what happens when states rely too much on their sugar daddy Uncle Sam.
.
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 08:50:13 AM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:WWXSe.254$am.252@news01.roc.ny...
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids anything ending with a question
mark. Louise is not only EXTREMELY stupid and a leech attached to keegan's
*****, she's also a coward - just like her host.
They all follow each other Frank. barnes, keegan, louise, fischer, and
adam. If you noticed, I do not capitalize their names because that is my
way of showing disrespect towards them. Those five are the absolute worse
and do not deserve any respect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 09:01:04 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:50:13 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:WWXSe.254$am.252@news01.roc.ny...
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids anything ending with a question
mark. Louise is not only EXTREMELY stupid and a leech attached to keegan's
*****, she's also a coward - just like her host.
They all follow each other Frank.
You were duped, too. I revel in the stupidity of you and Dwyer.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 09:37:51 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:WWXSe.254$am.252@news01.roc.ny...
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids anything ending with a question
mark. Louise is not only EXTREMELY stupid and a leech attached to keegan's
*****, she's also a coward - just like her host.
They all follow each other Frank. barnes, keegan, louise, fischer, and
adam. If you noticed, I do not capitalize their names because that is my
way of showing disrespect towards them. Those five are the absolute worse
and do not deserve any respect.
I've never had a problem with Barnes. He and I have had some good
discussions on a few topics. He doesn't sling random insults (at me), so
I return the courtesy. He seems intelligent and capable of reasonable
discourse.
Ray is civil when he wants to be.
Don't think I've ever actually engaged Adam.
keegan is simply a childish hack with no redeemable qualities or value,
as evidenced by the countless people from all walks of life who have
derided, ridiculed, and demeaned him over the last 15 years.
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite who treats others based on how
keegan treats them. She's completely co-dependent, which is pretty damn
pathetic on usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 09:49:38 AM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:3LYSe.262$am.167@news01.roc.ny...
osprey wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:WWXSe.254$am.252@news01.roc.ny...
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for
one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids anything ending with a question
mark. Louise is not only EXTREMELY stupid and a leech attached to
keegan's *****, she's also a coward - just like her host.
They all follow each other Frank. barnes, keegan, louise, fischer, and
adam. If you noticed, I do not capitalize their names because that is my
way of showing disrespect towards them. Those five are the absolute
worse and do not deserve any respect.
I've never had a problem with Barnes. He and I have had some good
discussions on a few topics. He doesn't sling random insults (at me), so I
return the courtesy.
Well Frank, that's good. I did try with him a long time ago. If he would
just stop his lying and grow up a bit, I could probably have some good
conversations with him. I have read some of his post, if he wouldn't act
like such an a-hole, he would probably see that in some of them I agree with
what he is saying. It's just a shame he doesn't want to stop the lying.
He seems intelligent and capable of reasonable
discourse.
Yes, in some areas. I still don't believe for one minute he was ever an
officer in the Air Force, or a police officer, or a lawyer. But he does seem
intelligent in some areas.
Ray is civil when he wants to be.
Don't think I've ever actually engaged Adam.
keegan is simply a childish hack with no redeemable qualities or value, as
evidenced by the countless people from all walks of life who have derided,
ridiculed, and demeaned him over the last 15 years.
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite who treats others based on how
keegan treats them. She's completely co-dependent, which is pretty damn
pathetic on usenet.
I absolutely agree.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 05:03:31 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:3LYSe.262$am.167@news01.roc.ny:
[...]
I've never had a problem with Barnes. He and I have had some good
discussions on a few topics. He doesn't sling random insults (at me),
so I return the courtesy. He seems intelligent and capable of
reasonable discourse.
Ray is civil when he wants to be.
Don't think I've ever actually engaged Adam.
keegan is simply a childish hack with no redeemable qualities or
value, as evidenced by the countless people from all walks of life who
have derided, ridiculed, and demeaned him over the last 15 years.
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite who treats others based on
how keegan treats them. She's completely co-dependent, which is pretty
damn pathetic on usenet.
christ, now you sound like osprey.
give it up. you got caught forging. then you got caught lying. then you
got caught msirepresenting.
those actions fairly depict your character.
"That's not a forgery, stupid" moaned forger Frank Dwyer as
he tried to explain why he manufactured text and falsely
attributed it to me. <4Y8Kd.2254$Ty.1665@news02.roc.ny>
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 05:09:54 PM |
|
|
On 5 Sep 2005 22:03:31 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<...
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's an osprey suck up.
give it up. you got caught forging. then you got caught lying. then you
got caught msirepresenting.
those actions fairly depict your character.
"That's not a forgery, stupid" moaned forger Frank Dwyer as
he tried to explain why he manufactured text and falsely
attributed it to me. <4Y8Kd.2254$Ty.1665@news02.roc.ny>
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:24:45 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in
news:0hgph11eqv05b77r80cel8rjmd35mi3blb@4ax.com:
On 5 Sep 2005 22:03:31 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<...
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's an osprey suck up.
i think he'd embarassed of his similarities to osprey. but his jealousy has
taken over his ability to reason
give it up. you got caught forging. then you got caught lying. then you
got caught msirepresenting.
those actions fairly depict your character.
"That's not a forgery, stupid" moaned forger Frank Dwyer as
he tried to explain why he manufactured text and falsely
attributed it to me. <4Y8Kd.2254$Ty.1665@news02.roc.ny>
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 02:58:11 AM |
|
|
On 5 Sep 2005 23:24:45 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in
news:0hgph11eqv05b77r80cel8rjmd35mi3blb@4ax.com:
On 5 Sep 2005 22:03:31 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<...
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's an osprey suck up.
i think he'd embarassed of his similarities to osprey. but his jealousy has
taken over his ability to reason
<smirk>
Yes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 03:20:41 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:37:51 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
<clip>
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite...
I don't have a lot of respect for parasitic cop-rejects or dudes who
impersonate and forge people. In fact osprey has forged by
impersonating as Adam and flasifying text under that name. You suck up
to one of the worst. For that and the rest of your crap you get
exactly what you deserve from this poster.
There has always been soft feelings in my heart for you the day you
told this newsgroup that you took responsibility for a child who came
into your life out of nowhere. No matter what a forging and
unlikeable ***** you are, what you've done for your child is
commendable.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:27:37 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:37:51 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
<clip>
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite...
I don't have a lot of respect for parasitic cop-rejects or dudes who
impersonate and forge people. In fact osprey has forged by
impersonating as Adam and flasifying text under that name. You suck up
to one of the worst.
If someone sees you as a parasite, that doesn't mean they are sucking up
to your adversaries. It means they see you as a parasite.
For that and the rest of your crap you get
exactly what you deserve from this poster.
Meanwhile, I'll base my interaction *with you* on my interaction *with you*.
There has always been soft feelings in my heart for you the day you
told this newsgroup that you took responsibility for a child who came
into your life out of nowhere. No matter what a forging and
unlikeable ***** you are, what you've done for your child is
commendable.
What makes me "unlikeable" to you, Louise, is the fact that you latched
right on to keegan's false accusations - the exact same false
accusations he has made hundreds of times against all variety of people
over the last 15 years - and I called you out on it. The reason I called
you out on it, and villify you for it to this day, is because I thought
you were above his childish antics. You proved me wrong on that one.
And you still haven't answered the question - do you believe keegan's
actions back in '94 constitute forgery?
Here's a surprise for you: I don't.
It isn't a forgery if you post under your own name, make any changes
obvious, point them out, and leave the thread intact.
keegan posted under his own name - so did I.
keegan made his one modification obvious - so did I.
keegan pointed out that he modified the quoted text - so did I.
keegan left the thread intact - so did I.
So I ask again: do you believe keegan's actions back in '94 constitute
forgery?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:31:51 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:Jv4Te.6365$cg.1021@news02.roc.ny:
And you still haven't answered the question - do you believe keegan's
actions back in '94 constitute forgery?
Here's a surprise for you: I don't.
It isn't a forgery if you post under your own name, make any changes
obvious, point them out, and leave the thread intact.
keegan posted under his own name - so did I.
keegan made his one modification obvious - so did I.
keegan pointed out that he modified the quoted text - so did I.
keegan left the thread intact - so did I.
So I ask again: do you believe keegan's actions back in '94 constitute
forgery?
no one sane believes the post you referenced was a forgery by me. anyone
who read the link you published, and the follow-up to it would know that.
you can't say the same about your text alterations.
you attributed words to me which i never wrote. that is forgery. you are a
characterless coward to make any attempt to justify your behavior when you
should be asking for the newsgroups forgiveness.
you are the scum of usenet
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 08:21:27 AM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:Jv4Te.6365$cg.1021@news02.roc.ny:
What makes me "unlikeable" to you, Louise, is the fact that you
latched right on to keegan's false accusations
"false allegations??"
naturally you'll support that allegation, right?
or will you run away like yoru mirror image, coward bobby?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 02:15:37 PM |
|
|
On 6 Sep 2005 13:21:27 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:Jv4Te.6365$cg.1021@news02.roc.ny:
What makes me "unlikeable" to you, Louise, is the fact that you
latched right on to keegan's false accusations
"false allegations??"
naturally you'll support that allegation, right?
or will you run away like yoru mirror image, coward bobby?
I'll bet his crazed jealousy of you is getting the better of him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 03:18:11 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in
news:0mqrh1t7h0n1bipt1g00vut4qkvmn49o7l@4ax.com:
On 6 Sep 2005 13:21:27 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:Jv4Te.6365$cg.1021@news02.roc.ny:
What makes me "unlikeable" to you, Louise, is the fact that you
latched right on to keegan's false accusations
"false allegations??"
naturally you'll support that allegation, right?
or will you run away like yoru mirror image, coward bobby?
I'll bet his crazed jealousy of you is getting the better of him.
this appears to be frank's cue to disappear again.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 02:57:36 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:27:37 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:37:51 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
<clip>
"Louise" is nothing more than a parasite...
I don't have a lot of respect for parasitic cop-rejects or dudes who
impersonate and forge people. In fact osprey has forged by
impersonating as Adam and flasifying text under that name. You suck up
to one of the worst.
If someone sees you as a parasite, that doesn't mean they are sucking up
to your adversaries. It means they see you as a parasite.
For that and the rest of your crap you get
exactly what you deserve from this poster.
Meanwhile, I'll base my interaction *with you* on my interaction *with you*.
<smirk>
The emotion behind your replies haven't anything to do with me and
everything to do with the fact you choose to be hostile.
There has always been soft feelings in my heart for you the day you
told this newsgroup that you took responsibility for a child who came
into your life out of nowhere. No matter what a forging and
unlikeable ***** you are, what you've done for your child is
commendable.
What makes me "unlikeable" to you, Louise,
Quite frankly, I don't care.
is the fact that you latched
right on to keegan's false accusations...
I can understand why it'd be difficult for you to accept that more
than one person has a similar opinion of you--it would satisify your
over-nlown ego.
<cmip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 05:00:54 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in
news:WWXSe.254$am.252@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote: <clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a
forger because you have written posts under your adversaries'
names, for one. You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're
actually providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids anything ending with a
question mark. Louise is not only EXTREMELY stupid and a leech
attached to keegan's *****, she's also a coward - just like her host.
christ, now you sound like osprey.
give it up. you got caught forging. then you got caught lying. then you
got caught msirepresenting.
those actions fairly depict your character.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 05:10:39 PM |
|
|
On 5 Sep 2005 22:00:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<clip>
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's jealous because I am not a leech attached to his fat *****.
:-)
give it up. you got caught forging. then you got caught lying. then you
got caught msirepresenting.
those actions fairly depict your character.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:29:22 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 5 Sep 2005 22:00:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<clip>
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's jealous because I am not a leech attached to his fat *****.
At least you admit you are a leech.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:33:16 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:lx4Te.6367$cg.2484
@news02.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 5 Sep 2005 22:00:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<clip>
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's jealous because I am not a leech attached to his fat *****.
At least you admit you are a leech.
you demean yourself when you keep lying.
in Message-ID: <iJvpd.5261$gs2.223@news01.roc.ny>, frank made up text and
attributed it to me. he became a forger just like some of the usenet
scumbags of the past.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 02:59:19 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:29:22 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 5 Sep 2005 22:00:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
<clip>
christ, now you sound like osprey.
He's jealous because I am not a leech attached to his fat *****.
At least you admit you are a leech.
<smirk>
I made no such admission but a comment to propel you to make a stupid
one.
Heh.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 08:55:05 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:42:14 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids...
It seems you "overlooked" a little detail in the second article down
on that page.
Heh.
Now who's avoiding whom?
<smirk>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 09:39:55 AM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:42:14 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 4 Sep 2005 20:12:42 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in news:%lDSe.164$am.73
@news01.roc.ny:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
i see you're so mad that i spanked you for forging that you're actually
providing a reference to a forgery.
that's pretty sleazy, even for a sleazebag like you.
I love when they use us to shoot themselves in the foot.
Note that the dumb ***** completely avoids...
It seems you "overlooked" a little detail in the second article down
on that page.
Heh.
Now who's avoiding whom?
You're avoiding the question, coward.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 03:22:13 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:39:55 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
[...]
Now who's avoiding whom?
You're avoiding
Coward. I'll bet you're too embarassed to look CAREFULLY at that
particular post.
<smirk>
[...]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
05 Sep 2005 06:28:17 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:39:55 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
[...]
Now who's avoiding whom?
You're avoiding
Coward. I'll bet you're too embarassed to look CAREFULLY at that
particular post.
Do you believe keegan's actions back in '94 constitute forgery?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
06 Sep 2005 02:58:46 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:28:17 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:39:55 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
[...]
Now who's avoiding whom?
You're avoiding
Coward. I'll bet you're too embarassed to look CAREFULLY at that
particular post.
Do you believe keegan's actions back in '94 constitute forgery?
Ah, so you didn't read that URL carefully.
<smirk>
I suggest you do. Soonest.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
04 Sep 2005 12:33:58 PM |
|
|
In article <%lDSe.164$am.73@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Osprey says this is acceptable. As he says, "You don't have a
copyright on your name out here."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
04 Sep 2005 12:40:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:33:58 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <%lDSe.164$am.73@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Osprey says this is acceptable. As he says, "You don't have a
copyright on your name out here."
<smile>
Osprey (and frank, too) wonders why he is so disrespected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
04 Sep 2005 01:16:08 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:33:58 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <%lDSe.164$am.73@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Osprey says this is acceptable. As he says, "You don't have a
copyright on your name out here."
<smile>
Osprey (and frank, too) wonders why he is so disrespected.
Louise pretends to know what I wonder about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
04 Sep 2005 01:22:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:16:08 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:33:58 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <%lDSe.164$am.73@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Osprey says this is acceptable. As he says, "You don't have a
copyright on your name out here."
<smile>
Osprey (and frank, too) wonders why he is so disrespected.
Louise pretends
<clip>
It's you, child, who's pretended...even forged.
<smiles>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Okay, Time to Vent |
04 Sep 2005 12:02:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:17:31 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 3 Sep 2005 11:09:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
So how is it that keegan can cut up a sentence to make it appear
different and you say he isn't a forger?
Nobody is calling you a forger for "snipping." We call you a forger
because you have written posts under your adversaries' names, for one.
You've also completely changed the text.
Like this?
http://tinyurl.com/cazg2
<smirk>
Keegan's NEVER posted under somebody else's name pretending to be that
person.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: Okay, Time to Vent
Re: My Baby too precious to abort Abort (kill), Your baby not precious so okay to abort (kill) says the PRO-CHOICE
For the GOP, It's Okay to Smuggle Drugs As Long As You're Killing Iranians
Re: I'm a shabbos goy and I'm okay
Okay, let's have some discussion from Pro-Life Bush-bashers, shall we? :)
Creationist Henry Morris: God Made Black People Stupid (Therefore Okay to Enslave Them)
Re: Bill to grant haredi women okay to remarry - YETNEWS
Re: Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You
| ***** Cheney: It's Okay For Me to Work For Terrorists, But Not You
NeoCon Ideology: Gay Sex Wrong, Forcible Sodomy Okay
LOL! Bill O'Lielly Surrenders on War on Christ-Myth: "Happy Holidays is Okay"
Re: some say homosexuality is okay cuz it's found in nature. whatabout pedophilia and bestiality--or interspecism?
AZ GOP Lawmaker Arrested for DUI, Osprey Pretends Eveything is Okay
Groups Who Think It's Okay to Spy on Its Own People
US Army to AWOL Soldiers: Okay, You Can Go Now (GOP, The Party of Treason)
|
|
|
