(Citizen Bob actual) wrote in
news:459cfe90.160120046@news-server.houston.rr.com:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:40:58 +0000 (UTC), Deuteros <deuteros@xrs.net>
wrote:
Do you have any evidence to support that claim? How do you know they
were civilans and not terrorist supporters?
How do you know they were terrorist supporters and not civilains?
Civilians who are not supporters would not be in the presence of
terrorists.
Are you asserting that a terrorist *never* comes in contact with
non-terrorists?
Anyway, if the terrorists do use civilians as human shields, the guilt
is on them, not us.
Wrong. Your willingness to sacrifice innocent civilians in exchange for
one "bad guy" makes you no better than the terrorists we're supposedly
fighting.
Are we now assuming guilt before proven innocent?
Straw man.
If there is a gun fight going on ourside your apartment won't you get
out of the apartment before they blow it up?
Who would be blowing it up? Why would they be blowing it up?
I was referring to your example of the FBI blowing up an apartment.
You don't know who those people were.
Neither do you. I have the odds in my favor
No you don't because you can't prove anything about them.
You have the burden of explaining why innocent civilians were around
terrorists.
Physically being near a terrorist is not a crime. Unless you're George
Bush, or yourself, I suppose.
.
