Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher



 Science > Abortion > Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Stephen"
Date: 16 Jul 2003 02:17:58 PM
Object: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher
"Pat Winstanley" <wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.197f803f1b5d901798a4be@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

In article <3f146d9e$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>,

says...

Subject: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher
From: "Stephen" <

>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion


"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030714221727.14728.00000393@mb-m07.aol.com...

Try telling that to the majority of men who feel a fatherly love for

their

unborn child. Like my own father who had a still-born son before my

mother

gave birth to me.
**********************************************
oooh booo hooo hooo...............
it doesn't matter what wouldbe daddy feels............ he's not a

father

until

there's a child and there's no child until there's a birth. ........

And if

all there is is still births, then there is never a "father"


You know what, ***** you. Just take your sad fucking existence and go

crawl

under a rock the ***** away from me. You really do fucking sicken me. You
have absolutely no concept of the word compassion...Your words are

complete

and utter poison.


Why are you swearing Stephen?

Because she's an inconsiderate rat.
.

User: "Mizzyandrea"

Title: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher 16 Jul 2003 03:50:33 PM
Because she's an inconsiderate rat.
***************************
OH because I don't get all mealy mouthed and emotional over WADS of
tissue?.......well, hush my mouth and call me quiet.........you dumb *****!
There are REAL (born) kids in this world with needs that aren't being
met.......and selfish pricks like you want MORE kids born!
.

User: "Pat Winstanley"

Title: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher 18 Jul 2003 05:48:23 PM
In article <3f170b51_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>,
says...


"Pat Winstanley" <wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1980e0eac318710e98a4cd@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

In article <3f15a5c9_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>,

says...

Subject: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher
From: "Stephen" <

>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion


"Pat Winstanley" <wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.197f803f1b5d901798a4be@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

In article <3f146d9e$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>,


says...

Subject: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher
From: "Stephen" <

>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion


"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030714221727.14728.00000393@mb-m07.aol.com...

Try telling that to the majority of men who feel a fatherly love

for

their

unborn child. Like my own father who had a still-born son before

my

mother

gave birth to me.
**********************************************
oooh booo hooo hooo...............
it doesn't matter what wouldbe daddy feels............ he's not a

father

until

there's a child and there's no child until there's a birth.

........

And if

all there is is still births, then there is never a "father"


You know what, ***** you. Just take your sad fucking existence and go

crawl

under a rock the ***** away from me. You really do fucking sicken me.

You

have absolutely no concept of the word compassion...Your words are

complete

and utter poison.


Why are you swearing Stephen?


Because she's an inconsiderate rat.


Why are you swearing, Stephen?


'Rat' isn't swearing, a rat is a rodent.



Correction... I was not referring to your reference to rats but to your
effing and blinding. Why were you swearing above? That's not a very
*Christian* thing to do, now is it....
.
User: "Mizzyandrea"

Title: Re: Pat Winstanley needs a refresher 18 Jul 2003 05:58:15 PM
Correction... I was not referring to your reference to rats but to your
effing and blinding. Why were you swearing above? That's not a very
*Christian* thing to do, now is it....
***************************************
being an intolerant ***** isn't a very 'xtian' thing either........... or so
I'm told.......yet he is
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER