Xomicron wrote:

Daniel Horn <Daniel@Horn.uk> wrote in news:4062CD47.26206DC@Horn.uk:

Osprey wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:02be29d2ed419a3670bf860a21d118b5@news.teranews.com...

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:33:47 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:

Adam H. wrote:

Why? Because he funded those using terror tactics?

Yep.

That makes Bush a terrorist.

So what are you going to do about it?

When did that become my job?

He asked you a question Adam.
As citizens it is all of our duties to work together against
terrorism. What do you want to do if you claim Bush is a terrorist?

terrorist

\Ter"ror*ist\, n. [F. terroriste.] One who governs by terrorism or
intimidation; specifically, an agent or partisan of the revolutionary
tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France. --Burke.

"If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the
people, the only alternative left to the people would be the
constitutional process."
George Bush 1-20-04


Translation: If judges insist on giving equal rights and following
the law, the only alternative left to the people would be the
destruction of the Constitution.

The courts already spat on the Constitution when they gave themselves
the power to be the ultimate authority on what the Constitution says.
The Courts were not meant to have as much power as they do today.

You sure did not mind it when they Supremely selected Bush.