james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in
news:Xns95E18CAFA945Fta2eene@216.196.97.131:

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1105989773.440894.187110@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
There was no WMD's.

Except for the ones Bush lied about.


Mitchell Holman

"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found
biological laboratories. They're illegal. They're
against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so
far discovered two. For those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons,
they're wrong, we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding the trailers for making
gas balloons sold to Iraq by the British.

no sane person doubts that bush repeatedly lied.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/18/content_1474832.htm

"BAGHDAD, May 17 (Xinhuanet) -- A roadside bomb containing sarin nerve
agent exploded near a US military convoy, but there were no casualties,
a senior US military spokesman said Monday."

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1106064658.508057.129160@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Mitchell Holman wrote:

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1105989773.440894.187110@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Ray Fischer wrote:

Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:

Bill wrote:

Note that the critics of this message side step the real

issue

and

instead

engage in character assassinations.

Ritter was right. There were NO weapons of mass

and

we

have

wasted 1370 American lives with over 10,,, seriously

plus

over $200

BILLION of tax payer dollars on an unjustified war.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/18/content_1474832.htm

"BAGHDAD, May 17 (Xinhuanet) -- A roadside bomb containing

sarin

nerve

agent exploded near a US military convoy, but there were no

casualties,

a senior US military spokesman said Monday."

Some weapon of "mass destruction" that didn't kill a single
person from a few feet away. Some old shell that was a dud

from

some

previous war.

It was used improperly. If you wrongfully aim a pistol at

sdomeone

and pull the trigger while the safety is ON, it is still a

Very impressive. Oooo. Scary. That sure is proof that

was

about to invade an conquer the United States.

"Your Honor, my client's possession of a pistol does not

his

parole

There was no "pistol", lunatic. No WMD.

Still dismissing that sarin artillery shell I see. You are a lot
like creationists who dismiss fossils.

There was no WMD's.

Except for the ones Bush lied about.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/18/content_1474832.htm

"BAGHDAD, May 17 (Xinhuanet) -- A roadside bomb containing sarin

agent exploded near a US military convoy, but there were no

a senior US military spokesman said Monday."

So Rumsfeld lied.

"It turns out that we have not found weapons of mass
destruction. Why the intelligence proved wrong I'm not in
a position to say, but the world is a lot better off with
Saddam Hussein in jail." - Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld, Oct. 4, 2004.

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote...

Spartakus wrote:

When the Aum Shinryoko cult attacked the Tokyo subway in 1995, they
released 6 liters of sarin (that's slightly more than 1.5 gallons) into

an

closed environment, crowded with hundreds of thousands of people.
A lot of people got sick, but only 12 died.

There was about a gallon of sarin in the artillery shell, and it had
lost most of its potency - its "use by" date had expired years ago.
The
only thing that happened was that a couple of soldiers got sick. I
think
you are exaggerating the threat here ever so slightly.

That shows how much you know about sarin artillery shells.
Sarin artillery shells contain two chemicals which mix to form sarin
gas. It was designed to mix the chemicals when fired from a gun. This
shell was used as a roadside bomb.

So what? According to the reports, the condition of the shell indicated
that
it was *decades* old, along with the chemicals it contained. I repeat; I
think you are exaggerating the "threat" here ever so slightly.

Of course, the ceasefire agreement absolutely prohibited the
possession of any number of sarin artillery shells.

So we raped and pillaged a country (killing tens of thousands of its
citizens) over a frigging artillery shell?

It must be easy being a neocon - you can be wrong 100% of the time and
never
have to make sense.

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote...

Spartakus wrote:

When the Aum Shinryoko cult attacked the Tokyo subway in 1995,

released 6 liters of sarin (that's slightly more than 1.5

an

closed environment, crowded with hundreds of thousands of people.
A lot of people got sick, but only 12 died.

There was about a gallon of sarin in the artillery shell, and it

lost most of its potency - its "use by" date had expired years

only thing that happened was that a couple of soldiers got sick.

you are exaggerating the threat here ever so slightly.

That shows how much you know about sarin artillery shells.
Sarin artillery shells contain two chemicals which mix to form

gas. It was designed to mix the chemicals when fired from a gun.

shell was used as a roadside bomb.

So what? According to the reports, the condition of the shell

it was *decades* old, along with the chemicals it contained. I

think you are exaggerating the "threat" here ever so slightly.

Of course, the ceasefire agreement absolutely prohibited the
possession of any number of sarin artillery shells.

So we raped and pillaged a country (killing tens of thousands of its
citizens) over a frigging artillery shell?

In article <1106064764.372941.256620@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
mejercit@hotmail.com says...

Still dismissing that sarin artillery shell I see.

Still trying to pretend that a single shell that could have come

anywhere and didn't even seriously injure a single person when it
exploded was an imminent threat to the US.

I do not care whether or not that shell was an imminent threat to
the US.

Why not?