Science > Abortion > Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"dpr" |
| Date: |
25 Oct 2003 09:29:16 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
"Major Grubert" <air@tight.garage> wrote in message
news:3F9B2CDF.3E4D9D07@tight.garage...
Maverick wrote:
Why is it that people are OK with the cop out of abortion when they
should
have been more responsible and more seriously considered the possible
consequences of intercourse in the first place?
There are too many unwanted pregnancies in this country.
What do we do about it?
Unless you are capable of getting pregnant, it's not an issue you have
much
of a stake in.
Actually it takes two to make a pregnancy, so he does have a stake in it.
(No pun intended).
But he raises a good question, what happened to responsible action from both
parties. I.E. the lady should be on the pill if she does not want any
children yet, the guy should at least have a rubber, or at least have the
responsibility of not releasing in her. Come on there are better ways of
birth control than abortion.
.
|
|
| User: "Ann" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 05:21:56 PM |
|
|
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 07:53:58 PM |
|
|
"Ann" <mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> writes:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
What happens if you use contraception and it fails? (Contraceptives still
aren't 100% effective, even in this day and age.)
--PLH, descendant of the Lockhart on the Lee clan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Moorehead Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 11:29:19 AM |
|
|
Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkwuaqi0uh.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Ann" <mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> writes:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
What happens if you use contraception and it fails? (Contraceptives still
aren't 100% effective, even in this day and age.)
If one is worried about becoming pregnant and can't or won't be able
to care for a child if a pregnancy occurs, why not simply engage in
non-vaginal sex? There are lots of ways to get your freak on these
days - you don't have to go straight to the cootch!
MJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 12:46:57 PM |
|
|
"Moorehead Johnson" <moorehead_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b752db1f.0310280929.76078a8c@posting.google.com...
Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:<szkwuaqi0uh.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Ann" <mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> writes:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
What happens if you use contraception and it fails? (Contraceptives
still
aren't 100% effective, even in this day and age.)
If one is worried about becoming pregnant and can't or won't be able
to care for a child if a pregnancy occurs, why not simply engage in
non-vaginal sex? There are lots of ways to get your freak on these
days - you don't have to go straight to the cootch!
MJ
That is correct. There are methods known by man for thousands of years to
prevent pregancy, yet these pro-aborts don't realize that.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
29 Oct 2003 10:02:48 AM |
|
|
(Moorehead Johnson) writes:
Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkwuaqi0uh.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Ann" <mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> writes:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
What happens if you use contraception and it fails? (Contraceptives still
aren't 100% effective, even in this day and age.)
If one is worried about becoming pregnant and can't or won't be able
to care for a child if a pregnancy occurs, why not simply engage in
non-vaginal sex? There are lots of ways to get your freak on these
days - you don't have to go straight to the cootch!
That appears to be all you're interested in. I guess you'll have to settle
for East 7th, in that case...if you're lucky.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 05:39:38 PM |
|
|
"Ann" <mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bnk9eo$e12$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
thats all it takes!!
For some reason they don't get that
Ann Hunter
Scotland
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 05:55:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:21:56 -0000, "Ann"
<mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 06:03:33 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fa4af23.33623212@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:21:56 -0000, "Ann"
<mail@robann.freeservenospam.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible.
Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it. If no contraceptions
available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when in fact it's a
cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
LOL!
You haven't a clue!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 06:15:26 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:03:33 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Were you born with a Busybody Gene?
(BTW, the *sex* was NO one else's business, either!)
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 06:26:37 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fa6b3a7.34779347@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:03:33 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy. Do it right
the first time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 10:04:55 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:26:37 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 10:10:50 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3faae87b.48304957@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:26:37 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, it is indeed a cop-out to
irresponsible behavior. Except in the cases of rape there is no other way
to define it. Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 10:41:29 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:10:50 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
...it is indeed a cop-out to irresponsible behavior. Except
in the cases of rape there is no other way to define it.
I'll repeat what I just told you about that in another post.
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions, when
done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is absolutely NO
one else's business. And most especially, they are not the business of
mindless busybodies like you and your fellow Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 10:46:40 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fb1f13c.50546977@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:10:50 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
Your denial is illogical, and act of denial and irresponsible in itself.
Pathetic, your actions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 10:59:39 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:46:40 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions, when
done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is absolutely NO
one else's business. And most especially, they are not the business of
mindless busybodies like you and your fellow Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 11:22:31 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fb5f64d.51843377@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:46:40 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable,
life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy,
whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one else's
business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of doing things
right the first time.
Have a nice day.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 11:42:07 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:22:31 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used, unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy, whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one
else's business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
In my last post, I **ASKED** you ---
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions, when
done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is absolutely NO
one else's business. And most especially, they are not the business of
mindless busybodies like you and your fellow Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
And you OMITTED it **again**, and then responded with THIS piece
of utter TRIPE ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of
doing things right the first time.
Have a nice day.
Yep. just as I thought.
You're nothing but a pathetic loser.
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 11:56:34 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fb8ff76.54189082@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:22:31 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree.
Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used,
unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to
do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable,
life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy, whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one
else's business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
In my last post, I **ASKED** you ---
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they
are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions, when
done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is
absolutely NO
one else's business. And most especially, they are not the business
of
mindless busybodies like you and your fellow Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
And you OMITTED it **again**, and then responded with THIS piece
of utter TRIPE ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of
doing things right the first time.
Have a nice day.
Yep. just as I thought.
You're nothing but a pathetic loser.
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the very basic
premise of getting it right the first time, of individual responsibility, of
prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Nicholson" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
02 Nov 2003 04:21:30 PM |
|
|
On 10/28/03 12:56 AM, in article mynnb.46917$e01.122623@attbi_s02, "Plonk!"
<Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fb8ff76.54189082@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:22:31 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree.
Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used,
unless
pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contraceptives fail,
or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs, abortion is the
enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can immdiatelycure it, when
chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to
do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable,
life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy, whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one
else's business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
In my last post, I **ASKED** you ---
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they
are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions, when
done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is
absolutely NO
one else's business. And most especially, they are not the business
of
mindless busybodies like you and your fellow Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
And you OMITTED it **again**, and then responded with THIS piece
of utter TRIPE ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of
doing things right the first time.
Have a nice day.
Yep. just as I thought.
You're nothing but a pathetic loser.
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the very basic
premise of getting it right the first time, of individual responsibility, of
prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
The quest for perfection is nonsensical for a species prone to making errors
and having emotions.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 12:17:30 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:56:34 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
"Craig Chilton" < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree. Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used,
unless pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contra-
ceptives fail, or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs,
abortion is the enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can
immediately cure it, when chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to
do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable, life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy, whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one
else's business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
In my last post, I **ASKED** you ---
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible" in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if they are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions,
when done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is
absolutely NO one else's business. And most especially, they are
not the business of mindless busybodies like you and your fellow
Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
And you OMITTED it **again**, and then responded with THIS
piece of utter TRIPE ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of
doing things right the first time.
Have a nice day.
Yep. just as I thought.
You're nothing but a pathetic loser.
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the very
basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual responsibility,
of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
And to show how REALLY stupid your statement just now was, recall
what I said at the TOP of this post:
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used,
unless pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contra-
ceptives fail, or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs,
abortion is the enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can
immediately cure it, when chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to
do.
Do you make a HABIT of **LYING** about people?
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 12:21:25 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fc00524.55643837@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:56:34 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ann <mail@robann.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
I am just new here, my first attempt. I totally agree.
Be
responsible. Don't cause a pregnancy if you don't want it.
If no contraceptions available, cross your legs and say NO
Ann Hunter
Scotland
Sensible advice. Contraception should always be used,
unless pregnancy is desired. However -- when the contra-
ceptives fail, or an unwanted pregnancy otherwise occurs,
abortion is the enormously-beneficial REMEDY that can
immediately cure it, when chosen.
And that, TOO, is usually a very **responsible** thing to
do.
Wow, you always try to pass off abortion as a remedy, when
in fact it's a cop-out to irresponsible behavior to begin
with.
Abortion IS nothing more than a valuable,
life-options-restoring
REMEDY. And that's ALL that it is. And just like any other
remedy, whether or not a person chooses to access it it NO one
else's business.
Remedy my *****. Quit trying to define a cop-out as a remedy.
It is nothing BUT a remedy. A very VALUABLE remedy. And
whatever reason any woman has for choosing it, it is absolutely
NONE of your business whatsoever, nor that of anyone else.
NONE!!!
Why are you such a BUSYBODY?
Busybodyism is the epitome of IDIOCY.
If all the busybodies in the world were CURED overnight of
that mental defect, it probably would SOLVE 90% of the world's
problems **that** quickly.
There is no excuse for busybodyism.
No fuckhead, abortion is not a remedy, ....
Yes it is. That is ALL that it is.
No butthead, it's a cop-out to individual responsibility.
In my last post, I **ASKED** you ---
Just WHAT PART of the following were you too DENSE
to understand? ---
You can take your "responsibility" fetish and stick where the
sun
never shines. Whether or not a person's actions are "responsible"
in
YOUR opinion (or, for that matter, in any one else's opinion, if
they are
stupid enough to HOLD such opinions) is worth exactly 5 cents, when
combined with a nickel.
A person's PERSONAL and PRIVATE behavior and decisions,
when done such that no overt harm is done to their neighbors, is
absolutely NO one else's business. And most especially, they are
not the business of mindless busybodies like you and your fellow
Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Deny it all you want but you'll be lying in your attempt.
I never lie in my posts. I have *never*, EVER, seen so much as
even ONE single relevant FACT that argues against safe and legal
abortion-upon-request, for ANY reason that the woman may have.
And you OMITTED it **again**, and then responded with THIS
piece of utter TRIPE ---
You're an idiot who doesn't wish to recognize the validity of
doing things right the first time.
Have a nice day.
Yep. just as I thought.
You're nothing but a pathetic loser.
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the very
basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility,
of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT a remedy, it is
indeed a cop-out. Why are you ignoring abstinence?
And your aspirin analogy is still irrelevent and inappropriate.
Idiot. You want a crutch, that's the bottom line.
Pathetic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 12:59:11 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:21:25 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
[ ... ]
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the
very basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility, of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT a remedy,...
Yes, it is. That's ALL that it is. Just like aspirin and Band-Aids.
It is indeed a cop-out.
No it isn't. but even if it WERE, a woman's accessing it is
absolutely NONE of your business, nor is it that of anyone else.
I keep pointing that out to you, and you keep letting it SAIL
right over your head like a total moron.
NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!!! Get it? NONE!!!
Why are you ignoring abstinence?
Abstinence??? ROTFL!!!!
CLUE: No one's gonna miss out on participating in the world's
greatest form of recreation just because some WHINEY and busy-
bodyish LOONS get bent out of shape for NO good reason about it,
of if a woman chooses to obtain a REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy.
And your aspirin analogy is still irrelevent and inappropriate.
TOTALLY relevant and appropriate. JUSY like aspirin, abortion is
nothing more than the REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy, for all
women who choose it.
Idiot. You want a crutch, that's the bottom line.
Yeah. Like having a broken arm set is a "crutch" for a skiing
accident. You are a JOKE!!!
Pathetic.
You certainly ARE!!!
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 08:23:03 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fc210f1.58664927@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:21:25 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the
very basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility, of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT a
remedy,...
Yes, it is. That's ALL that it is. Just like aspirin and Band-Aids.
Nope. Getting a headache is not like getting pregnant, unless of course you
are banging your head against a wall, then such an analogy to abortion would
be appropriate. But an innocent headache and the taking of aspirin is NOT a
legitimate analogy.
It is indeed a cop-out.
No it isn't. but even if it WERE, a woman's accessing it is
absolutely NONE of your business, nor is it that of anyone else.
I keep pointing that out to you, and you keep letting it SAIL
right over your head like a total moron.
NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!!! Get it? NONE!!!
Why are you ignoring abstinence?
Abstinence??? ROTFL!!!!
CLUE: No one's gonna miss out on participating in the world's
greatest form of recreation just because some WHINEY and busy-
bodyish LOONS get bent out of shape for NO good reason about it,
of if a woman chooses to obtain a REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy.
And your aspirin analogy is still irrelevent and inappropriate.
TOTALLY relevant and appropriate. JUSY like aspirin, abortion is
nothing more than the REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy, for all
women who choose it.
Trying to define abortion when used as a method of birth control as a
*remedy* is inappropriate.
You're the type that points a finger at anyone but yourself when it comes to
responsibility. "Oh it was HIS/HER fault."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 10:06:58 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:23:03 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
[ ... ]
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the
very basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility, of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHINING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT a
remedy,...
Yes, it is. That's ALL that it is. Just like aspirin and Band-Aids.
Nope. Getting a headache is not like getting pregnant, unless of course you
are banging your head against a wall, then such an analogy to abortion would
be appropriate. But an innocent headache and the taking of aspirin is NOT a
legitimate analogy.
Yes, it is. 100% legitimate. They BOTH are **REMEDIES** for their
respective medical consitions. And THAT is all that I was pointing out.
for anyone to criticize ANY remedy, or, far worse, seek to DENY one to
a person, is utterly asinine.
It is indeed a cop-out.
No it isn't. but even if it WERE, a woman's accessing it is
absolutely NONE of your business, nor is it that of anyone else.
I keep pointing that out to you, and you keep letting it SAIL
right over your head like a total moron.
NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!!! Get it? NONE!!!
The KEY point that you are too STUPID to understand:
NONE of your business!!
Why are you ignoring abstinence?
Abstinence??? ROTFL!!!!
CLUE: No one's gonna miss out on participating in the world's
greatest form of recreation just because some WHINEY and busy-
bodyish LOONS get bent out of shape for NO good reason about it,
of if a woman chooses to obtain a REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy.
And your aspirin analogy is still irrelevent and inappropriate.
TOTALLY relevant and appropriate. JUSY like aspirin, abortion is
nothing more than the REMEDY for an unwanted pregnancy, for all
women who choose it.
Trying to define abortion when used as a method of birth control as a
*remedy* is inappropriate.
In your very intolerant and totally MINDLESS **opinion.** Which
is worth less than a front-row-seat ticket to a rat fight. Accessing
abortion is NONE of your business. (And in any case, NO one uses
such an expensive and uncorfortable method as birth control. it is a
REMEDY for unwanted pregnancy, WHEN it occurs.)
You're the type that points a finger at anyone but yourself when it
comes to responsibility. "Oh it was HIS/HER fault."
I don't point fingers at ANYBODY for ANYTHING that has to do
with their own personal and private matters. Unlike you, I DON'T
have a busybodyish and sociopathic "responsibility" fetish.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 10:47:58 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fc49178.91572942@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:23:03 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the
very basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility, of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHINING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT a
remedy,...
Yes, it is. That's ALL that it is. Just like aspirin and
Band-Aids.
Nope. Getting a headache is not like getting pregnant, unless of
course you
are banging your head against a wall, then such an analogy to abortion
would
be appropriate. But an innocent headache and the taking of aspirin is
NOT a
legitimate analogy.
Yes, it is. 100% legitimate. They BOTH are **REMEDIES** for their
respective medical consitions. And THAT is all that I was pointing out.
for anyone to criticize ANY remedy, or, far worse, seek to DENY one to
a person, is utterly asinine.
No butthead, taking aspirin to relieve an innocent headache is NOT like
getting an abortion to *relieve* an unwanted pregancy. Do you folks make
these outlandish and illogical analogies just for the sake of making them?
Is this all the better you can do? You have nothing.
Getting a headache (unless bashing your head against a wall or the like) is
not in itself an irresponsible act and in most cases is something
unavoidable.
Getting pregnant on the other had, can be a direct result to irresponsible
sexual behavior and in most cases IS completely avoidable. You see, even if
you bash your head up against the wall wearing a bicycle helmet, you still
might get a headache.
Lucifer logic: Oh wow, I'm going to play mumbly peg with this knife,
because I know there's some band-aids in the medicine cabinet.
or
I'm going to go ahead and smoke even though I know it can lead to lung
cancer, because I know I can have surgery later to *remedy* the black spots
I've acquired.
Have a nice day.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
28 Oct 2003 10:10:32 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:47:58 GMT,
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Plonk!" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
[ ... ]
And you wouldn't know a FACT if you tripped over it.
So in other words you will never acknowledge or accept the
very basic premise of getting it right the first time, of individual
responsibility, of prevention as opposed to remedy.
How predictable.
Bullcrap!! I have ALWAYS been an advocate of Safe Sex/
contraception. Prevention of ANY malady is **always** better than
having to seek a remedy. However, that is NO reason to denigrate
a valuable remedy when such needs to be accessed. That would
be the equivalent, in stupidity, of WHINING because a person chooses
to take an aspirin!
Get it through your thick skull you idiot. Abortion is NOT
a remedy,...
Yes, it is. That's ALL that it is. Just like aspirin and
Band-Aids.
Nope. Getting a headache is not like getting pregnant, unless
of course you are banging your head against a wall, then such
an analogy to abortion would be appropriate. But an innocent
headache and the taking of aspirin is NOT a legitimate analogy.
Yes, it is. 100% legitimate. They BOTH are **REMEDIES** for their
respective medical consitions. And THAT is all that I was pointing out.
for anyone to criticize ANY remedy, or, far worse, seek to DENY one to
a person, is utterly asinine.
No butthead, taking aspirin to relieve an innocent headache is NOT like
getting an abortion to *relieve* an unwanted pregancy. Do you folks make
these outlandish and illogical analogies just for the sake of making them?
Is this all the better you can do? You have nothing.
Bullcrap! What you just said is as utterly stupid as it would be for
you to claim that aspirin tablets and heart bypass surgery can't BOTH
be remedies. ANYTHING that corrects *any* UNWANTED medical
condition is a REMEDY for that unwanted condition. (Are you REALLY
too thick-headed to see something that is so very OBVIOUS???)
Getting a headache (unless bashing your head against a wall or the
like) is not in itself an irresponsible act and in most cases is something
unavoidable.
Getting pregnant on the other had, can be a direct result to
irresponsible sexual behavior and in most cases IS completely
avoidable.
There you go again, with that silly and inane (not to mention totally
busybodyish **responsibility fetish** of yours. What a couple chooses to
do with respect to private, consensual sex is NO one else's business but
THEIRS. If they screw up (no pun intended) and an unwanted pregnancy
results, it's NO biggie, since society *guarantees* that the safe and
legal CURE for that is readily accessible.
YOU can regard that unwanted pregnancy to be a result of
"irresponsibility" in that narrow mind of yours if you want, but it makes
you a very shallow and mean-spirited busybofy. What they do in private,
and how they handle it, is absolutely NONE of your business. None,
whatsoever.
<silly attempts at pointless analogies... already
generically debunked... snipped.>
Have a nice day.
Any day that sees Anti-Choicers exposed for the total fools
that they are is ALWAYS a nice day. It's the most fun I've had
since I tormented segregationists over THEIR equally hateful
agenda, 40 years ago!
(I still remember my FAVORITE way to expose *their* hypocrisy.
When any segregationist claimed to be a Christian, I'd simply ask him,
"How can you possibly consider yourself to be a Christian when you
discriminate against your neighbors over an insignificant characteristic,
and make them worship in separate churches?" That REALLY got
their goat! (LOL!!!!) )
I kinda miss those people, for that reason. But NOT their extinct
agenda. Any more than I'll miss Anti-Choice after IT'S extinct.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
26 Oct 2003 01:23:17 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 18:29:16 -0800,
"dpr" wrote:
Come on there are better ways of birth control than abortion.
Of course there are. *Prevention* is always better than needing
a REMEDY.
On the other hand, I've never yet heard of any woman selecting
abortion as their contraceptive of choice. Abortion ALWAYS is
accessed only AFTER the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed
pregnancy already was a reality.
And THEN, this enormously-beneficial remedy immediately puts
the woman's life back on track by UNDOING that situation, and
RESTORES her well-being and full range of future opportunities
to PRE-ill-timed-pregnany levels.
As such a hugely-valuable remedy, it assists women in this
manner at the rate of no less than a BILLION over any given
18-year-long period, worldwide.
And that makes it one of the world's MOST beneficial remedies!
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 09:01:14 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f9e6626.1926552@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 18:29:16 -0800,
"dpr" wrote:
Come on there are better ways of birth control than abortion.
Of course there are. *Prevention* is always better than needing
a REMEDY.
On the other hand, I've never yet heard of any woman selecting
abortion as their contraceptive of choice. Abortion ALWAYS is
accessed only AFTER the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed
pregnancy already was a reality.
And THEN, this enormously-beneficial remedy immediately puts
the woman's life back on track by UNDOING that situation, and
RESTORES her well-being and full range of future opportunities
to PRE-ill-timed-pregnany levels.
As such a hugely-valuable remedy, it assists women in this
manner at the rate of no less than a BILLION over any given
18-year-long period, worldwide.
And that makes it one of the world's MOST beneficial remedies!
Barf......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 12:27:32 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:01:14 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"dpr" wrote:
Come on there are better ways of birth control than abortion.
Of course there are. *Prevention* is always better than needing
a REMEDY.
On the other hand, I've never yet heard of any woman selecting
abortion as their contraceptive of choice. Abortion ALWAYS is
accessed only AFTER the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed
pregnancy already was a reality.
And THEN, this enormously-beneficial remedy immediately puts
the woman's life back on track by UNDOING that situation, and
RESTORES her well-being and full range of future opportunities
to PRE-ill-timed-pregnany levels.
As such a hugely-valuable remedy, it assists women in this
manner at the rate of no less than a BILLION over any given
18-year-long period, worldwide.
And that makes it one of the world's MOST beneficial remedies!
Barf......
Something that YOUR hateful and bigoted ilk WALLOWS in.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Plonk!" |
|
| Title: Re: Should abortion be used as a means of birth control? |
27 Oct 2003 12:43:59 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f9d6244.13941209@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:01:14 GMT,
"Plonk!" <Plonk!@liberalismisstupid.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"dpr" wrote:
Come on there are better ways of birth control than abortion.
Of course there are. *Prevention* is always better than needing
a REMEDY.
On the other hand, I've never yet heard of any woman selecting
abortion as their contraceptive of choice. Abortion ALWAYS is
accessed only AFTER the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed
pregnancy already was a reality.
And THEN, this enormously-beneficial remedy immediately puts
the woman's life back on track by UNDOING that situation, and
RESTORES her well-being and full range of future opportunities
to PRE-ill-timed-pregnany levels.
As such a hugely-valuable remedy, it assists women in this
manner at the rate of no less than a BILLION over any given
18-year-long period, worldwide.
And that makes it one of the world's MOST beneficial remedies!
Barf......
Something that YOUR hateful and bigoted ilk WALLOWS in.
Oh, NO hate in YOUR response now is there....
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
