Science > Abortion > Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
28 Jul 2003 08:34:09 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:26:09 GMT,
Erik Trammel <trammel@rogers.com> wrote:
Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think
Bush Right In Invading Iraq
"American's," huh?
Using the possessive form when plural is intended is
solid evidence of the writer's ignorance.
As for that percentage -- IF you were right -- it just supports the
old adage about its being possible to fool some of the people all of
the time... and all of the people some of the time... but never all of
the people all of the time.
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Hopefully, by Nov., 2004, when its time to OUST that clown, at
least TWO-thirds of Americans will see through him. And vote
accordingly.
THEN, we can proceed to REVERSE and UNDO the damage
done by Shrub during the previous 4 years.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K" |
|
| Title: Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
29 Jul 2003 06:55:57 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f25cd1b.4105433@netnews.mchsi.com...
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Christian morality is not applicable to international politics. Besides,
his war-mongering, deception of the US populace and the world, and Invasion
of Iraq were for a noble reason: To free the people of Iraq from tyranny.
However they will have to pay (us) for the reconstruction of their country
with their own oil money, since we are spending four billion dollars per
month keeping them safe from Saddam and his henchmen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
29 Jul 2003 11:01:56 AM |
|
|
Mark K <self@server.net> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Christian morality is not applicable to international politics. Besides,
his war-mongering, deception of the US populace and the world, and Invasion
of Iraq were for a noble reason: To free the people of Iraq from tyranny.
Maybe not. We've been given so many differing reasons for the
invasion that it's obvious that Bush is lying.
And killing thousands of people for their own good really isn't a very
moral reaosn for invasion.
However they will have to pay (us) for the reconstruction of their country
with their own oil money,
That's known as "stealing".
since we are spending four billion dollars per
month keeping them safe from Saddam and his henchmen.
"I'll steal your car but you're going to have to pay me for gas
and insurance."
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
29 Jul 2003 02:08:21 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3f25cd1b.4105433@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:26:09 GMT,
Erik Trammel <trammel@rogers.com> wrote:
Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think
Bush Right In Invading Iraq
"American's," huh?
Using the possessive form when plural is intended is
solid evidence of the writer's ignorance.
Hm, apostrophe misuse is a common error. Remind us to remind you of
yours.
As for that percentage -- IF you were right -- it just supports the
old adage about its being possible to fool some of the people all of
the time... and all of the people some of the time... but never all of
the people all of the time.
Does that apply to abortion, too?
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Or...not.
(PS: Try "ineptitude," it's a better term.)
Hm, it seems one can't go wrong picking winners in politics to back
anything that Craig opposes.
It's become reflexive for me.
Hopefully, by Nov., 2004, when its time to OUST that clown, at
least TWO-thirds of Americans will see through him. And vote
accordingly.
Hm, who's going to be the better choice, Craig? Do tell.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
29 Jul 2003 06:08:32 PM |
|
|
On 29 Jul 2003 00:08:21 -0700,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Erik Trammel <trammel@rogers.com> wrote:
Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think
Bush Right In Invading Iraq
"American's," huh?
Using the possessive form when plural is intended is
solid evidence of the writer's ignorance.
Hm, apostrophe misuse is a common error. Remind us to remind
you of yours.
In the case of "its" and "it's," the usual rules don't apply. So
THAT can commonly occur among grammatically-literate people.
But NOT the sort of thing we just saw above, which is SELDOM
a typo, and USUALLY an indicator of grammatical ignorance.
A lesser example, which CAN be a typo (unless done repeatedly)
can be seen in spelling, when a person demonstrates they can't
spell "lose," by spelling it, "loose."
As for that percentage -- IF you were right -- it just supports the
old adage about its being possible to fool some of the people all of
the time... and all of the people some of the time... but never all of
the people all of the time.
Does that apply to abortion, too?
Obviously, since a significant minority of people are deluded enough
to actually believe that there is anything wrong with a harmless, and
hugely-beneficial, remedy.
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Or...not.
If not, that serves as a substantial indictment of them (and probably
provides more evidence that half of the population has IQs under 100).
There nothing wrong with having a below-average IQ -- but it's hard
to comprehend that any more than a relative handful of folks who are
exceptions to the rule would have a high one AND be control-freakish
enough to be a Bush supporter. There's probably no way to ever
determine the average IQ of Bush supporters vs. those who want
no part of him, but if that were possible, I'll bet we'd find that the
average IQ of the latter group was significantly higher.
(PS: Try "ineptitude," it's a better term.)
Either one is valid.
Hm, it seems one can't go wrong picking winners in politics to back
anything that Craig opposes.
Not if they enjoy supporting losers who don't defend personal
individual liberties, and the right to privacy. And hateful people who
have no qualms at trying to impose immense hardship upon millions of
women by FORCING them to gestate when they have no desire to.
It's become reflexive for me.
Why is THAT no surprise to us. It appears that there is VERY little
chance that you will ever become a fair-minded egalitarian, and supporter
of ALL individual liberties.
Hopefully, by Nov., 2004, when its time to OUST that clown, at
least TWO-thirds of Americans will see through him. And vote
accordingly.
Hm, who's going to be the better choice, Craig? Do tell.
It would be hard to imagine anyone being WORSE than Shrub.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think Bush Right In Invading Iraq |
31 Jul 2003 02:20:01 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3f27fe22.1658765@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 29 Jul 2003 00:08:21 -0700,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Erik Trammel <trammel@rogers.com> wrote:
Re: Sixty-Eight Per Cent Of American's Still Think
Bush Right In Invading Iraq
"American's," huh?
Using the possessive form when plural is intended is
solid evidence of the writer's ignorance.
Hm, apostrophe misuse is a common error. Remind us to remind
you of yours.
In the case of "its" and "it's," the usual rules don't apply.
What rules are you speaking of?
So
THAT can commonly occur among grammatically-literate people.
But NOT the sort of thing we just saw above, which is SELDOM
a typo, and USUALLY an indicator of grammatical ignorance.
So? A lot of people are grammatically ignorant, including CEOs of
companies. They have more important things to worry about.
I'd rather a person stick an apostrophe where it doesn't go than not
understand the words that I'm using.
As for that percentage -- IF you were right -- it just supports the
old adage about its being possible to fool some of the people all of
the time... and all of the people some of the time... but never all of
the people all of the time.
Does that apply to abortion, too?
Obviously,
So that's a good reason why not everyone supports abortion.
since a significant minority
What's a significant minority? I thought you were saying something
before about your agenda not being under any threat etc etc.
One-third of Americans were NEVER fooled by our Warmonger-
in-Thief... and as time goes on, more will wake up to his dishonesty
and ineptness.
Or...not.
If not, that serves as a substantial indictment of them (and probably
provides more evidence that half of the population has IQs under 100).
Really, where is your evidence of such a thing?
Everyone knows that conservatives tend to be successful white collar
people, and people in higher tax brackets as well as people with
families. They are the types that vote for George Bush.
In contrast, single people, homosexuals, and the poor vote for
Democrats.
There nothing wrong with having a below-average IQ --
Well, it's nice to see you have high self esteem despite having done
nothing to earn it.
but it's hard
to comprehend that any more than a relative handful of folks who are
exceptions to the rule would have a high one AND be control-freakish
enough to be a Bush supporter.
Gee, Craig, there seems to be a lot about the real world you can't
comprehend.
There's probably no way to ever
determine the average IQ of Bush supporters vs. those who want
no part of him,
It can be extrapolated conservatives are intelligent and creative
people.
but if that were possible, I'll bet we'd find that the
average IQ of the latter group was significantly higher.
No you wouldn't.
(PS: Try "ineptitude," it's a better term.)
Either one is valid.
Not if you want to sound literate.
Hm, it seems one can't go wrong picking winners in politics to back
anything that Craig opposes.
Not if they enjoy supporting losers
George Bush won. Then there was a war in Iraq. We won that too.
You were wrong about all of those things.
So whatever you generally think is going to happen, a smart person
will bet on the opposite and be correct.
It's become reflexive for me.
Why is THAT no surprise to us.
Indeed. It's why I always turn out to be right.
It appears that there is VERY little
chance that you will ever become a fair-minded egalitarian,
Egalitarian, no. I already have a mind for what is truly fair.
Unfortunately, it's not what you think.
and supporter
of ALL individual liberties.
What liberties are you talking about?
Hopefully, by Nov., 2004, when its time to OUST that clown, at
least TWO-thirds of Americans will see through him. And vote
accordingly.
Hm, who's going to be the better choice, Craig? Do tell.
It would be hard to imagine anyone being WORSE than Shrub.
Gore.
But that's not what I was asking. Who is going to be a better choice
next year in the presidential race? Please tell me so I can not pick
that person.
--S
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
