Science > Abortion > Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Karen H Jarvis" |
| Date: |
14 Oct 2003 06:07:48 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T. Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>, Robert T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through college, young
man.
How sad that you feel you were brain washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up, David. Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face will be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e, except after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling, be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what "threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
.
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
14 Oct 2003 10:08:54 PM |
|
|
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T. Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>, Robert T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through college, young
man.
How sad that you feel you were brain washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up, David. Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face will be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e, except after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling, be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what "threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
15 Oct 2003 07:06:39 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020032008541069%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T. Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com>
wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>, Robert
T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through college,
young
man.
How sad that you feel you were brain
washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a
conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up, David.
Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face will
be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my
inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would
never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e, except
after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling, be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what
"threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
Bring your questions to court liar, like you said you were going to do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
15 Oct 2003 10:15:03 AM |
|
|
In article <3rqdnYTDDun9pRCiRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020032008541069%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T. Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com>
wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>, Robert
T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through college,
young
man.
How sad that you feel you were brain
washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a
conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up, David.
Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face will
be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my
inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would
never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e, except
after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling, be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what
"threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
Bring your questions to court liar, like you said you were going to do.
I never said that. I said I was going to have you disciplined. You
seem to feel the Attorney General, like you, lacks any pride in your
profession. I don't believe it. She didn't get to the highest law
enforcement position in the state through the incompetance you seem to
place in her. She isn't the buffoon you make her out to be. When she
sees the evidence of your indiscretions, she will take action. I can't
believe your opinion of her desire for quality law enforcement is so
low. So keep crowing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
15 Oct 2003 10:27:44 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:151020030815033079%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3rqdnYTDDun9pRCiRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020032008541069%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H
Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com>
wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>,
Robert
T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through
college,
young
man.
How sad that you feel you were
brain
washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of
my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult
for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a
conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up,
David.
Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face
will
be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my
inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at
David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would
never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too
funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e,
except
after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling,
be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what
"threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation
of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at
some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
Bring your questions to court liar, like you said you were going to do.
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
16 Oct 2003 01:40:42 AM |
|
|
In article <L7-dnSrSZJsd-hCiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:151020030815033079%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3rqdnYTDDun9pRCiRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020032008541069%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H
Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article <rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson" <rtsimpson2003@excite.com>
wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>,
Robert
T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through
college,
young
man.
How sad that you feel you were
brain
washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority of
my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is difficult
for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a
conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up,
David.
Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my face
will
be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by my
inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed at
David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I would
never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too
funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e,
except
after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their spelling,
be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what
"threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten" means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation
of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at
some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
Bring your questions to court liar, like you said you were going to do.
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
16 Oct 2003 07:03:52 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:151020032340425545%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <L7-dnSrSZJsd-hCiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:151020030815033079%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3rqdnYTDDun9pRCiRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020032008541069%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ac0pov0h7eug34jom0qev4hicjebmdc62f@4ax.com>, Karen H
Jarvis
<now@new.home> wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote: ...
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030826121273%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Hzmdnd9au4sljxGiU-KYjw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030809341394%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <YFmdnRkLQcWvjRGiU-KYiA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:141020030752008146%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <gemdncUMU-PtdRaiU-KYuA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:131020031940489513%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <3F8B5DC5.137D@excite.com>, Robert T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
David Barnes wrote:
In article
<rJOcnduCgpu2zBaiU-KYgg@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com>
wrote in
message
news:3F8B489F.3F53@excite.com...
David Barnes wrote:
In article <3F8B34F3.7F3D@excite.com>,
Robert
T.
Simpson
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:
Made it all the way through
college,
young
man.
How sad that you feel you were
brain
washed.
Better
luck next
time, I
guess.
Brainwashed by who? The majority
of
my
professors
were
liberals.
Of course they were. It is
difficult
for
someone
who is
educated
and
being paid a poor salary to be a
conservative.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Keep it up,
David.
Your
libs
and
pro-aborts
get more hilarious by the day!
Not real bright, are you?
If I keep laughing at you like this, my
face
will
be
bright
from
the
light reflecting off the tears caused by
my
inability
to
stop
laughing.
I can't tell you the laughs I have enjoyed
at
David
Barnes
expense.
(Because it never happened...)
Beleive me, if it wasn't for his comedy I
would
never
have
taken
him
off
the
kill file list I had. But he is just too
funny.
The word is "believe." Try this "I before e,
except
after
c."
If you're going to judge people by their
spelling,
be
prepared
to be
judged by your own standard.
I'm a liberal - I don't judge.
Liar
David,
You have threatened myself and my family.
No I haven't, dim bulb. You just don't understand what
"threatened"
means.
Yes you have,
Now do something you coward
Perhaps you need to prove you understand what "threaten"
means.
You said I emailed you. Yet you refuse to show the IP
headers
Not at all. And I want to be clear one more time.
I WILL POST THE EMAIL
Then post it and shut up.
Replacing the part that cowardly Robert Heishman
snipped..........
I WILL POST THE EMAIL WITH HEADERS WHEN YOU HONESTLY ANSWER
THESE
QUESTIONS:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an
investigation
of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at
some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged
investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read
your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the
State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away
from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
Thanks, Karen. :-)
It is bad enough that he does things like this, but he does them
while
calling OTHERS a coward. Go figure.
Bring your questions to court liar, like you said you were going to
do.
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
16 Oct 2003 09:56:57 AM |
|
|
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused of
being a cross dresser?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
16 Oct 2003 12:11:14 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
16 Oct 2003 10:26:35 PM |
|
|
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 08:27:06 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know, and
then we will talk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 10:10:47 AM |
|
|
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know, and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 03:41:16 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know, and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 07:41:32 PM |
|
|
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know, and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you. Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 08:13:21 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020031741329980%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you
to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been
accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know,
and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will
include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you
tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you.
Try that in court
Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
Those questions will be answered in a court room only.
As well as all your post regarding disrespect towards law enforcements, all
your claims that you have made about me, a lot of it will come out.
Now get back to work little boy and do what you said you are going to do.
Oh, and be ready to provide your email that you said I sent you. That will
be brought up as well and shown that you lied
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
17 Oct 2003 09:38:35 PM |
|
|
In article <lNGdnYeh7rk4Dg2iRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020031741329980%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you
to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been
accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know,
and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will
include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you
tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you.
Try that in court
I don't need to. You said it HERE.
Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
Those questions will be answered in a court room only.
You need more legal help. Requests for Admission are REQUIRED. If you
refuse to answer, they assume it is TRUE.
As well as all your post regarding disrespect towards law enforcements,
Idiot - so what? TELL US WHAT YOU THINK THAT MEANS.
all
your claims that you have made about me, a lot of it will come out.
Of your pants...
Now get back to work little boy and do what you said you are going to do.
Oh, and be ready to provide your email that you said I sent you. That will
be brought up as well and shown that you lied
Idiot. That is irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
18 Oct 2003 01:33:27 AM |
|
|
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<171020031938359797%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <lNGdnYeh7rk4Dg2iRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020031741329980%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for you
to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been
accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me know,
and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will
include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you
tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you.
Try that in court
I don't need to. You said it HERE.
I didn't admit to anything, but go ahead and try it.
Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
Those questions will be answered in a court room only.
You need more legal help. Requests for Admission are REQUIRED. If you
refuse to answer, they assume it is TRUE.
As I said, you have your chance. Make your move
But a lot of things are going to come out, including many of your
comments.
As well as all your post regarding disrespect towards law enforcements,
Idiot - so what? TELL US WHAT YOU THINK THAT MEANS.
In court David, in court. Not here. Not any more, you have talked
too much. Time for you to walk the walk.
all
your claims that you have made about me, a lot of it will come out.
Of your pants...
Now get back to work little boy and do what you said you are going to do.
Oh, and be ready to provide your email that you said I sent you. That will
be brought up as well and shown that you lied
Idiot. That is irrelevant.
Nope, be prepared to cough it up.
Or you could retract and admit you lied about it here and have it on
record.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
18 Oct 2003 03:29:03 AM |
|
|
In article <8912d58d.0310172233.4d53efb3@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<171020031938359797%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <lNGdnYeh7rk4Dg2iRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020031741329980%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue for
you
to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has been
accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let me
know,
and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It will
include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just write
her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't
discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives. And
it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which
wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly advised you
of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then
present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful, you
tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is
immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General and
her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you
communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you.
Try that in court
I don't need to. You said it HERE.
I didn't admit to anything, but go ahead and try it.
Running again?
Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
Those questions will be answered in a court room only.
You need more legal help. Requests for Admission are REQUIRED. If you
refuse to answer, they assume it is TRUE.
As I said, you have your chance. Make your move
But a lot of things are going to come out, including many of your
comments.
So what? I'll bet you can't find ONE thing that I have ever said that
was illegal or exposes me to liability. YOU on the other hand are
screwed.
As well as all your post regarding disrespect towards law enforcements,
Idiot - so what? TELL US WHAT YOU THINK THAT MEANS.
In court David, in court. Not here. Not any more, you have talked
too much. Time for you to walk the walk.
Coward.
all
your claims that you have made about me, a lot of it will come out.
Of your pants...
Now get back to work little boy and do what you said you are going to do.
Oh, and be ready to provide your email that you said I sent you. That will
be brought up as well and shown that you lied
Idiot. That is irrelevant.
Nope, be prepared to cough it up.
Barnes: Objection!
Judge: Sustained.
Or you could retract and admit you lied about it here and have it on
record.
Tell me what it is you claim I lied about. (Not the email, I hope. I
have it and you know it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Study Finds Fox News Viewers Most Likely To Have Misperceptions About Iraq Invasion |
18 Oct 2003 08:00:13 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:181020030129033596%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0310172233.4d53efb3@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<171020031938359797%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <lNGdnYeh7rk4Dg2iRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020031741329980%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <TdWdnaXTffB8zg2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:171020030810472927%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <QP6dnWJwPYq9cxKiRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020032026350926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <atednYkysJWjTBOiRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:161020030756572110%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <iZWdnQn-tuWpFBOiRVn-gw@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I never said that.
Liar
I said I was going to have you disciplined.
Then do something and shut up about it.
Timing.
ROFL
Grow up and be a man
Stop obsessing about "being a man." That is an issue
for
you
to
resolve within yourself. Aren't you the one who has
been
accused
of
being a cross dresser?
Do what you claimed you were going to do coward
Timing, my boy - timing.
Yea right, sure David. Well when you get to your timing let
me
know,
and
then we will talk.
I see. Believe me, when I turn you in it will be complete
with
examples involving myself, Patrick Humphrey and other. It
will
include
the law, case decisions, and official opinions, and it will
include
well supported argument.
The AG is an attorney. She expects a brief. I can't just
write
her a
letter. She will expect me to give her more. And you won't
discover
when I sent it until you hear from her or her representatives.
And
it
will be truthful. Sorry - no defamation for you.
You have violated the law. You can't claim ignorance, which
wouldn't
be a defense even if you did, because I have repeatedly
advised you
of
these laws and you repeatedly violate them. You don't seem to
understand that when you make things up about people and then
present
those lies here, as a law enforcement officer with the State
of
Delaware, you have included Delaware in your lies. When you
violate
federal copyright laws after being warned that it is unlawful,
you
tell
the world that the law enforcement of the State of Delaware is
immune
from obeying the laws. And when you mock the Attorney General
and
her
desire for a professional law enforcement institution, you
communicate
the message that the AG and the State of Delaware don't care
about
having sub-standard law enforcement.
Ok David, what ever you say little boy
I finally got an admission out of you.
Try that in court
I don't need to. You said it HERE.
I didn't admit to anything, but go ahead and try it.
Running again?
Now answer these questions and
we will be on our way:
Those questions will be answered in a court room only.
You need more legal help. Requests for Admission are REQUIRED. If
you
refuse to answer, they assume it is TRUE.
As I said, you have your chance. Make your move
But a lot of things are going to come out, including many of your
comments.
So what? I'll bet you can't find ONE thing that I have ever said that
was illegal or exposes me to liability. YOU on the other hand are
screwed.
Actually yes I do have a few comments. Including your comment saying I
applied for the police force and was denied.
That comes out too.
I am waiting for you David Barnes, to make your move. You are doing nothing
but wasting time.
As well as all your post regarding disrespect towards law
enforcements,
Idiot - so what? TELL US WHAT YOU THINK THAT MEANS.
In court David, in court. Not here. Not any more, you have talked
too much. Time for you to walk the walk.
Coward.
I am calling you on it David, saying lets go to court.
all
your claims that you have made about me, a lot of it will come out.
Of your pants...
Now get back to work little boy and do what you said you are going
to do.
Oh, and be ready to provide your email that you said I sent you.
That will
be brought up as well and shown that you lied
Idiot. That is irrelevant.
Nope, be prepared to cough it up.
Barnes: Objection!
Judge: Sustained.
Lets find out
Or you could retract and admit you lied about it here and have it on
record.
Tell me what it is you claim I lied about. (Not the email, I hope. I
have it and you know it.)
Show it
You can't because you don't.
Lets take it to court, where a judge can see for himself or herself.
David
make your move
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
