On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:40:42 GMT,
Dorothy <Zuukie@Comcast_nospam_.net> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:
Dorothy <Zuukie@Comcast_nospam_.net> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:
Pro-lie *****. The National
Cancer Institute has concluded that
there is NO link between abortion
and breast cancer.
As I said in other posts, the abortion
movement is just a small part of a much
larger agenda.
Snicker. Yeah, it's all part of a
vast, UN-controlled conspiracy to
decimate the population of the US
and make it easier to take over.
Snicker all you want. The information
is posted for the time being. Try
researching the the eugenics movement
from its early years. But then again
you are content with believing whatever
propaganda is fed to you by the eugenics
movement.
Oh, the tired old "birth control is
eugenics" crap the anti-abortion websites
are spoon-feeding you.
Have you actually done research on "the early
eugenics movement", or are you just parroting
stuff from anti-abortion websites?
The fact is that the Birth Control movement
and the eugenics movement did at one time
cross paths. Margaret Sanger was a *fringe*
eugenicist.
What *put her on the fringe* was her insistence
that:
[1] Governments should not control reproduction.
Reproduction should be controlled by the
individuals who are doing, or not doing, the
reproduction.
[2] Problems with hereditary are universal, and
not more likely to occur in one race than in
another.
By separating herself from these concepts of
the *mainstream eugenics movement*, Margaret
Sanger and her Birth Control League were not
considered "eugenicists" by *real eugenicists*.
Its taken a lot of work forging quotes and
misattributing passages, but the anti-abortion
movement finally has enough fake evidence to
overcome Margaret Sanger's stated opposition
to these primary precepts of the Mainstream
Eugenicists of the early part of the 20th
Century. And so the anti-abortion websites
can claim, with all the confidence faked
evidence can provide, that Margaret Sanger
and the Birth Control League, against all
opinions of mainstream eugenicists of the
time, were "mainstream eugenicists".
I've gone back and read the actual magazines
of the "Birth Control Review", edited by
MArgaret Sanger until 1929, and all of the
quotes claiming Margaret was a "racist" or
a "mainstream eugenicist" were either made-up,
misquoted, or misattributed.
Not everyone can be reached by
forcing them to exercise the
intelligence they were given.
From what I've seen you write, you could be
the poster child for that statement.
.
