| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
19 Jul 2004 09:35:24 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Those in-breeds. |
(EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk7jt2qkpy.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
(EvilZak) writes:
Given that you crossposted your original witterings to
alt.appalachian, this suggests that you have this particular area in
mind. Now, Ok, even a non American like me has heard the jokes about
that part of the world, but it doesn't mean they are true, or anything
other than what the more oversensitive would call "hate speech" ie
tribal discrimination of some kind.
"J Young" (among its other numerous identities) is just trying to upset one
person who's a native of Appalachian Kentucky -- me. All he's accomplished is
to demonstrate his ignorance of that particular American subculture.
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials, it is an issue that should be
addressed. Pat likes to divert attention away from issues he doesn't
like, so he turns the topic into one of personal attacks. Assholes
like Kris Blake fall for his *****; people with sense don't.
.
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
19 Jul 2004 09:47:14 PM |
|
|
(J Young) writes:
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk7jt2qkpy.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) writes:
Given that you crossposted your original witterings to
alt.appalachian, this suggests that you have this particular area in
mind. Now, Ok, even a non American like me has heard the jokes about
that part of the world, but it doesn't mean they are true, or anything
other than what the more oversensitive would call "hate speech" ie
tribal discrimination of some kind.
"J Young" (among its other numerous identities) is just trying to upset
one person who's a native of Appalachian Kentucky -- me. All he's
accomplished is to demonstrate his ignorance of that particular American
subculture.
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials, it is an issue that should be
addressed. Pat likes to divert attention away from issues he doesn't
like, so he turns the topic into one of personal attacks. Assholes
like Kris Blake fall for his *****; people with sense don't.
It exists? No dispute there. You're the one wanting people to believe it's
standard practice in the part of the world I'm a native of, and that's where
you run off the road and into the ditch again. (Nice illustration of doing
what you claim others are doing, as well. As long as you're allowed out long
enough to post, we'll never be lacking for cheap entertainment in this
newsgroup.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "EvilZak" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
19 Jul 2004 01:12:22 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in message news:<9c2d0f9a.0407190635.4f49cf64@posting.google.com>...
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials, it is an issue that should be
addressed.
The idea of particular areas being present-day centres of inbreeding
does not hold water. Nowhere's that isolated any more. While incest is
a bad thing, there are far more pressing problems in the world at the
moment affecting many, many more people.
Besides, you do not demonstrate any particular empathy for humankind
in any of your postings, so it's very difficult to percieve your
alleged concern as anything other than self-obsessed religious
***** anyway.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
19 Jul 2004 09:48:37 PM |
|
|
(EvilZak) writes:
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote in message news:<9c2d0f9a.0407190635.4f49cf64@posting.google.com>...
(EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials, it is an issue that should be
addressed.
The idea of particular areas being present-day centres of inbreeding
does not hold water. Nowhere's that isolated any more. While incest is
a bad thing, there are far more pressing problems in the world at the
moment affecting many, many more people.
Besides, you do not demonstrate any particular empathy for humankind
in any of your postings, so it's very difficult to percieve your
alleged concern as anything other than self-obsessed religious
***** anyway.
"J Young" is showing more frequent signs of frustration at his inability to
command respect, 'twould appear...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
19 Jul 2004 05:53:21 PM |
|
|
(EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407191012.140febb7@posting.google.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote in message news:<9c2d0f9a.0407190635.4f49cf64@posting.google.com>...
(EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials, it is an issue that should be
addressed.
The idea of particular areas being present-day centres of inbreeding
does not hold water. Nowhere's that isolated any more. While incest is
a bad thing, there are far more pressing problems in the world at the
moment affecting many, many more people.
Besides, you do not demonstrate any particular empathy for humankind
in any of your postings, so it's very difficult to percieve your
alleged concern as anything other than self-obsessed religious
***** anyway.
You give yourself away. Show me where I advocate religion in any of
my posts. I do believe in many of the morals and values taught by many
religious denominations but nowhere will you find religion in anything
I post. I do not empathize with those who choose to kill their
children, born or pre-born. No one in USENET has more empathy for the
woman who struggles with the hardships of child birth and child
rearing. I have always been a champion of funding for the sick and
disabled; even those that may not be presently affecting great numbers
of people.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
20 Jul 2004 06:01:09 AM |
|
|
On 19 Jul 2004 07:35:24 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk7jt2qkpy.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) writes:
Given that you crossposted your original witterings to
alt.appalachian, this suggests that you have this particular area in
mind. Now, Ok, even a non American like me has heard the jokes about
that part of the world, but it doesn't mean they are true, or anything
other than what the more oversensitive would call "hate speech" ie
tribal discrimination of some kind.
"J Young" (among its other numerous identities) is just trying to upset one
person who's a native of Appalachian Kentucky -- me. All he's accomplished is
to demonstrate his ignorance of that particular American subculture.
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials...
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
20 Jul 2004 06:06:08 PM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 19 Jul 2004 07:35:24 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) wrote in message news:<1e57ec88.0407180715.7d436cd8@posting.google.com>...
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk7jt2qkpy.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk (EvilZak) writes:
Given that you crossposted your original witterings to
alt.appalachian, this suggests that you have this particular area in
mind. Now, Ok, even a non American like me has heard the jokes about
that part of the world, but it doesn't mean they are true, or anything
other than what the more oversensitive would call "hate speech" ie
tribal discrimination of some kind.
"J Young" (among its other numerous identities) is just trying to upset
one person who's a native of Appalachian Kentucky -- me. All he's
accomplished is to demonstrate his ignorance of that particular American
subculture.
Fair enough. Every country has its areas generally referred to by the
impolite as hotbeds of incest: these are usually rural and isolated
and, centuries ago, there probably was a higher incidence of
inbreeding there than elsewhere. (Over here it's the Fen country, East
Anglia and Norfolk). But as I said to Jonnyboy, it's not exactly
common these days.
Not common does not mean not at all. It does exist and despite
asswipes like Rice Pattie denials...
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
It's not like he's the only one being denied.
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
The nerve of me, being more normal than "J Young" will ever be able to fathom
in a thousand lifetimes...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
23 Jul 2004 06:26:18 PM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
23 Jul 2004 07:29:33 PM |
|
|
(J Young) writes:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
So much for your "business", I guess...how many criminals did you recruit this
time?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
23 Jul 2004 08:34:29 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0407231526.3443e10b@posting.google.com:
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
we know which one you want to be, don't we honey?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
23 Jul 2004 07:33:21 PM |
|
|
In article <9c2d0f9a.0407231526.3443e10b@posting.google.com>,
(J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
It's already apparent to the rest of us which you would be. *winks
knowingly*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
24 Jul 2004 05:01:59 AM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
24 Jul 2004 10:37:35 PM |
|
|
: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/24/2004 6:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9rc4g0l1h8lfiestjnngt6ba8518h3luia@4ax.com>
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter < > wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Are you ready for your walk?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
24 Jul 2004 11:55:59 PM |
|
|
(J Young) writes:
: Somesappywriter
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter < > wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Are you ready for your walk?
You *could* choose to get over the botched job of spaying you that the vet
did, you know.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
25 Jul 2004 05:23:25 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jul 2004 03:37:35 GMT, (J Young) wrote:
: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/24/2004 6:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9rc4g0l1h8lfiestjnngt6ba8518h3luia@4ax.com>
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter < > wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Are you ready for your walk?
I am ready to walk you, IBengettinshiton. (get that tail out from
between your legs, coward.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
25 Jul 2004 07:54:16 PM |
|
|
om: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/25/2004 6:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <hf27g0t3ul034o9tgmhqgdapgsbr421eea@4ax.com>
On 25 Jul 2004 03:37:35 GMT, (J Young) wrote:
: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/24/2004 6:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9rc4g0l1h8lfiestjnngt6ba8518h3luia@4ax.com>
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter < > wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Are you ready for your walk?
I am ready to walk you, IBengettinshiton. (get that tail out from
between your legs, coward.)
If it's pointing straight at you, it may not be a tail. Also, if you're being
***** on, wash your nasty self.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Those in-breeds. |
26 Jul 2004 07:06:16 PM |
|
|
On 26 Jul 2004 00:54:16 GMT, (J Young) wrote:
om: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/25/2004 6:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <hf27g0t3ul034o9tgmhqgdapgsbr421eea@4ax.com>
On 25 Jul 2004 03:37:35 GMT, (J Young) wrote:
: Somesappywriter
Date: 7/24/2004 6:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9rc4g0l1h8lfiestjnngt6ba8518h3luia@4ax.com>
On 23 Jul 2004 16:26:18 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter < > wrote in message
news:<qoupf0l3e2cgqhf4f2p1kt5tpsaso3hfib@4ax.com>...
[........]
Awww, are you miffed because "Rice Pattie" consistenly denies you
access to his *****? ;-)
Forget it, jerk -- he's a happily married individual.
What I find interesting is that if Pat and I were a couple of homo's,
you already seem to know which one of us would be the "butch" and
which one would be the "*****".
Do you have your dog collar and leash ready?
Are you ready for your walk?
I am ready to walk you, IBengettinshiton. (get that tail out from
between your legs, coward.)
If it's pointing straight at you, it may not be a tail.
Then get it out of my way, or else I'll pull a Lorena Bobbit.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
