| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2007 02:44:24 PM |
| Object: |
Re: We're 'pro-life' we send our kids to die in Iraq! |
In article <4588e120$0$80132$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
So, once more we see that you don't care at all what the truth might
be.
"Ray, why do you figure it's a good thing to lie on
the net? Lots of people read here. It makes you look bad."
--Adrienne Regard <reg...@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
ray must have been projecting; behavior not uncommon for those who
support abortion restrictions as ray does.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: We're 'pro-life' we send our kids to die in Iraq! |
07 Jan 2007 03:21:02 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <4588e120$0$80132$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
So, once more we see that you don't care at all what the truth might
be.
ray must have been projecting; behavior not uncommon for those who
keegan is off on one of his obsessive smear campaigns and has been
repeatedly lying about my position. Just look at the number of
threads he starts just to attack me. He's so desperate that he's
resorting to using decade-old out-of-context quotes as if they mean
something and even copying my posts.
I am pro-choice. I always have been. There is a decade of posts from
me to prove that fact. Even words quoted by keegan prove that fact.
In a bizarre exmaple of insane dislogic, keegan claims that supporting
a woman's right to end her pregnancy at any time and for any reason is
somehow forcing her to give birth.
In a bizarre attempt to ingratiate himself with pro-abortion extremists,
he has been attacking people who don't support his extremist position of
no restrictions whatever on abortion - even to the point of demanding
a right to kill a health, full-term fetus.
In his attacks he resorts to transparent lies what are even contradicted
by the very quotes he provides. When challenged he simply repeats the lies
and refuses to answer any questions. He mangles text and edits people
words whenever he cannot handle the facts.
The conclusion is that keegan is just a sorry control freak who can do
little but smear people. But that's hardly a surprise given that this
is some example of how he debates...
the thing is, you really enjoyed being pissed on,
didn't you?
keegan in <3jn1m2$jrh@usenet.rpi.edu>
did someone say that you were
jerking off in mcclatchie's pink footsie pajamas?
keegan in <3kdpke$8cd@usenet.rpi.edu>
masturbating as you watched?
keegan in <3l1uca$khu@usenet.rpi.edu>
watching a death is what turns you on, eh?
have you tried it with a plastic bag over your head?
keegan in <3lh31j$612@usenet.rpi.edu>
does that make you jealous? a bit sexually excited?
keegan in <D6Jn2H.1zI@news.wizvax.net>
do you jerk off when you defend ralph taite? do
you jerk off more when you read his posts about
slapping women around? do you like to slap women
around?
keegan in <3b8oi5$laj@usenet.rpi.edu>
do you jerk off when you think about dead mommies?
keegan in <jkeeganDD8Czs.ExJ@netcom.com>
do you get excited?
keegan in <jkeeganDCwn6z.G4r@netcom.com>
playing with yourself again, sonny?
keegan in <jkeeganDCzqBu.Asv@netcom.com>
do you jerk off when you think of mutilating someone?
keegan in <3jbb7a$i0i@usenet.rpi.edu>
did you get a hard on when you thought of violence?
keegan in <3jdn01$mmj@usenet.rpi.edu>
do you lick your lips and get a hard on when you think
about people whom you judge to be something or other
you don't like?
keegan in <3je1f2$s7j@usenet.rpi.edu>
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: We're 'pro-life' we send our kids to die in Iraq! |
07 Jan 2007 03:31:01 PM |
|
|
In article <45a1643e$0$80098$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <4588e120$0$80132$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
So, once more we see that you don't care at all what the truth might
be.
==begin restore unmarked deletion
"Ray, why do you figure it's a good thing to lie on
the net? Lots of people read here. It makes you look bad."
--Adrienne Regard <reg...@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
====end restore unmarked deletion
ray must have been projecting; behavior not uncommon for those who
===begin restore unmarked deletion
support abortion restrictions as ray does.
====end restore unmarked deletion
keegan is off
fischer is off on one of his obsessive smear campaigns and has been
repeatedly lying about my position, and about his own anti-choice
stance. proof of fischer's anti-choice positions is appended at the
conclusion of this post.
i am pro-choice. i always have been. there is a decade and a half
of posts from me to prove that fact. even words quoted by fischer
prove that fact.
in a bizarre example of insane dislogic, fischer claims that
supporting abortion restrictions is not forcing a woman to give
birth.
in a bizarre attempt to ingratiate himself with anti-choice
extremists, he has been attacking people who don't support his
abortion restrictions by lying and falsely claiming his adversaries
want the right to kill a health, full-term fetus, something
anti-choicers have wailed since the abortion newsgroups were formed.
In his attacks, fischer resorts to transparent lies what are even
contradicted by the very quotes he provides.
The conclusion is that fischer is just a misogynist control freak
who can do little but name-call.
restricting the methods of abortion has the same effect as
restricting abortion; even completely preventing it in some cases.
restricting the methods of abortion, once accepted as a concept, can
lead to any number of new and more restrictive abortion restrictions.
here is ray calling for restrictions on allowable methods of abortion:
abortion restrictions:
"What I proposed would allow a woman to end
her pregnancy at any time for any reason,
but would place restrictions on the methods."
<rayCJBvtr....@netcom.com>
here is ray defining the methods he would allow.
methods of restricting abortion:
"Any method that allows saving the life of the fetus without
placing the mother at significant additional risk."
<rayCJE1K1....@netcom.com>
and here is ray calling for the imprisonment of the women who will
not follow his orders.
prison:
"What punishment? I'd consider a deliberate killing of a fetus to be
manslaughter, with the penalties appropriate to that crime. And yes,
that does mean throwing the would-be mother in jail should she be so
convicted. While putting mothers in jail sounds nasty, I don't think
that women should be treated like children just because they are
pregnant. I expect _equal_ justice under the law."
Ray Fischer (r...@netcom.com) in
article1992Nov17.052121.2...@netcom.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
