Science > Abortion > Re: Why is birth a determinant if conception, implantation are not?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Hylander" |
| Date: |
14 Oct 2003 10:03:08 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Why is birth a determinant if conception, implantation are not? |
Pat Winstanley <wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:<MPG.19f141228ea25e8298b27d@News.CIS.DFN.DE>...
In article <a6947dd8.0310090428.2ba022b@posting.google.com>,
says...
Subject: Why is birth a determinant if conception, implantation are not?
From: (Hylander)
Newsgroups: alt.abortion
What makes an air breathing separated neonate more important than one
that doesn't?
One is alive, the other is dead.
You tried to be literal but assumed what "one" meant. ;) Still, not a
bad answer according to one common interpretation. Let me be more
specific for you.
What makes a human organism that breathes air outside the womb any
more a "person"* then a human organism of same age inside the womb?
What about living outside a womb gives it the virtues of being a
person or human being? Why is that a deciding factor? Do you agree
with the radicals who say being "wanted" a factor? Orphans are not
"wanted".....yet many orphans are great people.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=person
What are some traits of a person? ie: character, humanity,
individuality, human physique and appearance, living.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
