On Thu, 27 May 2004 13:23:55 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:l58cb05f29fe1h8nhc23feibks6a1s4ohl@4ax.com...

On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:11:19 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:38lbb05anspnefiftavt91nnhmmu1vhsjp@4ax.com...

On 27 May 2004 01:08:29 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:38:48 -0400, "Osprey"

wrote:

[...]

I do not expect Barnes or Krisblake to adit they were wrong...

Why not? I have already provided the evidence (you couldn't
compentently provide) that the base pay max for a midpoint is

dollars OVER my claim of what the cap is. That doesn't mean,

however,

that I am at liberty for proving Barnes' claim that you make only

$22K

or that I believe your claim that you make more than what somebody

the midpoint makes. Since it's public, I am sure you'll have no

qualms

posting the information that proves that what you make in base

exceeds what somebody at the midpoint level earns. You

(By the way...just how did you pass the literacy competency test?

And,

oh, one only needs a minimum high school diploma or equivalent to

considered for the position, as the job listing clearly states.)

There's the question I'd be interested in hearing his explanation

of...the

only "webmasters" I've seen with his execrable English proficiency

have,

so

far, had a high probability of being WebTVers. Like I've said, the

claims and

the displayed evidence just don't add up.

He won't answer it -- nor will he disclose just how he earned those
scores.

Why is it of any importance to you?

Why did you feel it was important to reveal it?

I didn't feel it was important at all.

So you didn't think it was important to reveal them, but revealed them
anyway?

Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:

On 27 May 2004 01:08:29 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:38:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[...]

I do not expect Barnes or Krisblake to adit they were wrong...

Why not? I have already provided the evidence (you couldn't
compentently provide) that the base pay max for a midpoint is 2,307
dollars OVER my claim of what the cap is. That doesn't mean, however,
that I am at liberty for proving Barnes' claim that you make only $22K
or that I believe your claim that you make more than what somebody at
the midpoint makes. Since it's public, I am sure you'll have no qualms
posting the information that proves that what you make in base salary
exceeds what somebody at the midpoint level earns. You specifically.

(By the way...just how did you pass the literacy competency test? And,
oh, one only needs a minimum high school diploma or equivalent to be
considered for the position, as the job listing clearly states.)

There's the question I'd be interested in hearing his explanation of...the
only "webmasters" I've seen with his execrable English proficiency have, so
far, had a high probability of being WebTVers. Like I've said, the claims
and the displayed evidence just don't add up.

He won't answer it -- nor will he disclose just how he earned those
scores.

Let's see -- how about

bribery
intimidation
disingenousness
lying
Raoul Mitgong (but he didn't help much) *

?

*Kudos to anyone who guesses which work that reference is from, and its
author.

On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:54:56 -0400, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:36:38 -0400, Somesappywriter
<sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 10:25:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[...]

This is yet another one of Barnes lies.

Not that it is anyones business as to what we make per year but Barnes

no clue.

Folks in your position can make no more than $30,000 per annum, even
with the proposed pay hikes you are supposed to receive.

Bobby's exposing his ignorance there, I see. It is, in fact, the
public's business what salary he receives since he is a public
employee - and so his salary is a matter of public record.

Why doesn't he just show where he makes more than $30,000 base pay
WITHOUT all of the additional overtime, etc.

"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>

This is the type of thinking that rationalized the torture of Iraqi
prisoners. "Normally, we treat them as we should under the Geneva
Convention, but this is different... They deserve what they get."
Guards all think alike.

When you get around to it, Mr. Great Thinker, perhaps you might care
to explain to the rest of us the mindset shared by an entire culture
that excuses and glorfies as heroic the butchering of a totally
innocent non-combatant by cutting off his head while still alive.

On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:54:51 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[...]

Well you know something Frank, I would prefer all together that Patrick

all of it all together and we all learn to talk with respect to each

I am still willing to do that.

People have a right to get disgusted and express their disgust when
they some ***** lying about this very serious issue of abortion. And
you just happen to be an all-round liar.

On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:54:51 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]

Well you know something Frank, I would prefer all together that Patrick stop
all of it all together and we all learn to talk with respect to each other.
I am still willing to do that.

People have a right to get disgusted and express their disgust when
they some ***** lying about this very serious issue of abortion. And
you just happen to be an all-round liar.

"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@citlink.net> wrote in message
news:40B35853.514410A9@citlink.net...

Osprey wrote:

"Jon Young" <jdyoung1@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:25e1e54f.0405250527.2f47cafe@posting.google.com...

Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message

news:<szklljhgsdx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...

jdyoung1@volcanomail.com (Jon Young) writes:

Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message

news:<szk65amauom.fsf@fnord.io.com>...

Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> writes:

My bet is no he wouldn't. Posting means more to him than anything
in the world. Now mind you, since Dale Ann is so ugly and fat,
there isn't anyone who would want to rape her in the first place.

I know Pat is a first class *****,but insulting his wife is
tantamount to the actions of Pat himself.Don't lower yourself to his
level.

...or yours, several miles down from where I am. How many people
have you accused of pedophilia lately, anonymous nutter?

If you didn't publish her name ,people wouldn't be insulting your
wife.You're a selfish,arrogant ***** with no regards for anyone but
yourself.If you cared about the poor woman,you wouldn't subject her to
such *****.No real man would ever put his wife in such a
position,but being a real man is something you wouldn't know about.You
are a lowdown scumbag who publishes family members info so that
they,not you,will take the brunt of people's wrath.You are the
definition of a COWARD.Please,don't run the ***** about how she
doesn't mind her name being made public.That excuse will make you more
of a yellow-belly coward than you already are.You are a Fag.

Patrick Humphrey deserves every insult that comes across his way, not only
to him personally but to his wife as well.

You don't think that's just a little out of line, Osprey? It isn't her
that insults you here. I could be mistaken, but I believe the insults
you receive those mentioned are directed at you, not your wife. Dragging
the names of those who don't post here through the mud, just because
they're affiliated with someone you disagree with, doesn't reflect well
on the one doing it.
Discretion is the better part of valor.

I'm here trying to exchange ideas on abortion and how to prevent teen
pregnancy, and he's accused me of prostituting underage girls and pushing
pedophilia. Totally off-topic and all lies. I have his post, all headers
included proving it. He will degrade, insult and tell lies about anyone who
disagrees with him. He will then try and silence the person by harassing
their ISP. Nothing is below this snake called Osprey, including insulting
an unfortunate women who doesn't even post here.