Science > Abortion > Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Ubiquitous" |
| Date: |
15 Oct 2004 11:46:34 AM |
| Object: |
Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose? |
In rec.arts.tv shlemazeltov <gonif_mamzer@hotmail.com> wrote:
: would you be for the production of embryos solely for this purpose?
It's a Moot Point; Stemcells are a dead-end. You'd see companies
clamouring to fund it if it had any promise.
.
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose? |
15 Oct 2004 02:06:39 PM |
|
|
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:ckouta$gee$4@news.utelfla.com...
In rec.arts.tv shlemazeltov <gonif_mamzer@hotmail.com> wrote:
: would you be for the production of embryos solely for this purpose?
It's a Moot Point; Stemcells are a dead-end.
Yeah, dumbass, this really looks like a dead end....
Stem-cell advances in paralysis:
http://www.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/08/03/stemcell.research/index.html
....and....
growing new organs:
tiny url:
http://tinyurl.com/6gxvd
original:
http://www.theage.com.au/cgi-bin/common/printArticle.pl?path=/articles/2002/04/22/1019441222506.html
You'd see companies
clamouring to fund it if it had any promise.
*****, moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "magnulus" |
|
| Title: Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose? |
16 Oct 2004 04:25:44 AM |
|
|
What about the concern that stem cells might cause cancer? The body's
normal defenses usually ignore embryonic tissue, that's why there is concern
about cancer risk. Just because they can cure a parapalegic rat doesn't
mean the technique is safe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anthony Cerrato" |
|
| Title: Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose? |
16 Oct 2004 01:39:46 PM |
|
|
"magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:PN5cd.8100$pi7.7290@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
What about the concern that stem cells might cause
cancer? The body's
normal defenses usually ignore embryonic tissue, that's
why there is concern
about cancer risk. Just because they can cure a
parapalegic rat doesn't
mean the technique is safe.
You are the only one I know worried about such an unlikely
possibility! What are your credentials in biology...or
anything, for that matter? I am sure that anyone dying with
certainty from
ALS, kidney disease, heart disease, spinal cord injuries,
and many other debilitating diseases such as diabetes, would
be very happy to be experimented on with embryonic stem
cells--Chris Reeve would certainly have before he died, and
Steven Hawking would likely also, at some point! I would
too! ...tonyC
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Myron Rudolph" |
|
| Title: Re: would you be for stemcell research if embryos were created solely for research purpose? |
17 Nov 2004 08:12:43 PM |
|
|
In article <3dVbd.3063$rY1.575@fe2.texas.rr.com>,
posted twice:
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:ckouta$gee$4@news.utelfla.com...
It's a Moot Point; Stemcells are a dead-end.
Yeah, dumbass, this really looks like a dead end....
speaking dummies, great work double-posting.
You'd see companies clamouring to fund it if it had any promise.
*****, moron.
you exhibit quite a thorough lack of understanding on the topic; Run along
and let the grownups talk.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
