| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
01 Jun 2004 10:50:52 PM |
| Object: |
Ready For The Draft? |
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
.
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 07:39:15 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
The draft legislation was introduced by Democrats. IIRC, draft legislation
is traditionally introduced to Congress every year.
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
Any website that whines about a supposed "war for oil" has no credibility.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 10:17:55 AM |
|
|
In article <2i603iFjeionU2@uni-berlin.de>, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl>
wrote:
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
Any website that whines about a supposed "war for oil" has no credibility.
RIGHT. Ignore all those messy facts.... Fucking Republicans... Now
wonder you are so misinformed.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Corey Is Naked" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 01:08:06 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2i603iFjeionU2@uni-berlin.de>...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
The draft legislation was introduced by Democrats. IIRC, draft legislation
is traditionally introduced to Congress every year.
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
Any website that whines about a supposed "war for oil" has no credibility.
haha.. Like you ever had any credibility to begin with
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 02:05:35 PM |
|
|
(Corey Is Naked) wrote in
news:633ef77b.0406021008.6c03d956@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2i603iFjeionU2@uni-berlin.de>...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&con
te nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
The draft legislation was introduced by Democrats. IIRC, draft
legislation is traditionally introduced to Congress every year.
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
Any website that whines about a supposed "war for oil" has no
credibility.
haha.. Like you ever had any credibility to begin with
More than you ever did.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Godzilla" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 01:32:03 PM |
|
|
Corey Is Naked wrote:
haha.. Like you ever had any credibility to begin with
Look who's talking... :-/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 10:11:04 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
FYI, the two bills in Congress to re-introduce the draft that are cited
in this piece of crap article you posted, are sponsored by *DEMOCRATS*:
Charles Rangel has sponsored the bill in the House
Fritz Hollings has sponsored the bill in the Senate
Go blame them.
-- Steven L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Hayes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 05:50:34 AM |
|
|
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
FYI, the two bills in Congress to re-introduce the draft that are cited
in this piece of crap article you posted, are sponsored by *DEMOCRATS*:
Charles Rangel has sponsored the bill in the House
Fritz Hollings has sponsored the bill in the Senate
Go blame them.
Will that be the Fritz Hollings of "Fritz Chip" fame?
--
Peter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 10:04:56 AM |
|
|
Peter Hayes wrote:
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
FYI, the two bills in Congress to re-introduce the draft that are cited
in this piece of crap article you posted, are sponsored by *DEMOCRATS*:
Charles Rangel has sponsored the bill in the House
Fritz Hollings has sponsored the bill in the Senate
Go blame them.
Will that be the Fritz Hollings of "Fritz Chip" fame?
yes.
-- Steven L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charlie Maul" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
05 Jun 2004 06:49:49 PM |
|
|
I'm glad Star Wars is the new political forum, this makes my day.
check out this funny animated gif. It makes fun of George Bush, that's him
on the right with the lollipop. OMG I can't stop laughing.
http://dickcream.com/spin/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Timberwoof" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 12:49:46 AM |
|
|
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it, and thus the right wing radicals. Just wait for the patriotism
trumpets to blare the new tune.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 11:00:33 AM |
|
|
Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
news:timberwoof-C65F5C.22494701062004@typhoon.sonic.net:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it, and thus the right wing radicals.
No, it doesn't. Unless you consider the Democrats who sponsored the bill
to be right wing radicals.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 10:12:33 AM |
|
|
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it,
Bull.
AFAIK, the *only* bills to re-introduce the draft were sponsored by
Democrats. Including the bills mentioned in that piece of crap article
whose URL is given above.
go ahead, find a bill (either House or Senate) to re-introduce the dfaft
that is sponsored by the Republicans.
-- Steven L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Timberwoof" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
02 Jun 2004 08:40:18 PM |
|
|
In article <B7mvc.8949$Yd3.5753@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it,
Bull.
AFAIK, the *only* bills to re-introduce the draft were sponsored by
Democrats. Including the bills mentioned in that piece of crap article
whose URL is given above.
go ahead, find a bill (either House or Senate) to re-introduce the dfaft
that is sponsored by the Republicans.
The Pentagon is seeking people to work in state draft board offices.
Last time I looked, the Pentagon is under White House control.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 10:06:23 AM |
|
|
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <B7mvc.8949$Yd3.5753@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it,
Bull.
AFAIK, the *only* bills to re-introduce the draft were sponsored by
Democrats. Including the bills mentioned in that piece of crap article
whose URL is given above.
go ahead, find a bill (either House or Senate) to re-introduce the dfaft
that is sponsored by the Republicans.
The Pentagon is seeking people to work in state draft board offices.
Last time I looked, the Pentagon is under White House control.
The Pentagon has been hiring and training such people for decades. The
Selective Service Administration has existed for over 50 years.
Maybe you didn't know this, but draft registration has remained in
effect ever since Jimmy Carter reinstituted it in 1980.
What political party does Carter belong to?
-- Steven L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 10:10:49 AM |
|
|
In article <P7Hvc.36539$zO3.17901@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <B7mvc.8949$Yd3.5753@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&conte
nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic nutter
in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit the Bush
Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration is behind
it,
Bull.
AFAIK, the *only* bills to re-introduce the draft were sponsored by
Democrats. Including the bills mentioned in that piece of crap article
whose URL is given above.
go ahead, find a bill (either House or Senate) to re-introduce the dfaft
that is sponsored by the Republicans.
The Pentagon is seeking people to work in state draft board offices.
Last time I looked, the Pentagon is under White House control.
The Pentagon has been hiring and training such people for decades. The
Selective Service Administration has existed for over 50 years.
Maybe you didn't know this, but draft registration has remained in
effect ever since Jimmy Carter reinstituted it in 1980.
What political party does Carter belong to?
You are confused. No one that I am aware of suggests that the draft is
not needed. Republicans are notorious for advocating war but refusing
to serve their country, for example.
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
The point is twofold. First, Bush is getting us into another Vietnam,
and second, he is willing to place current US troops in danger when he
knows damn well they need more help but refuses to institute the draft
until after the election.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 10:24:08 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:030620040810496811%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <P7Hvc.36539$zO3.17901@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <B7mvc.8949$Yd3.5753@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven Litvintchouk <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <010620042050524281%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Well, it was only a matter of time. Now Bush is going to begin
drafting people to go to Vietnam, err, I mean Iraq.
<http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&c
onte nt_dir=ua_congressorg>
And you won't be able to pull the same tricks all those brave
Republicans pulled during Vietnam.
<http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html>
Until recently, this was the exclusive domain of this Democratic
nutter in the house of Representatives who was trying to discredit
the Bush Administration. Now it appears that the Bush Administration
is behind it,
Bull.
AFAIK, the *only* bills to re-introduce the draft were sponsored by
Democrats. Including the bills mentioned in that piece of crap
article whose URL is given above.
go ahead, find a bill (either House or Senate) to re-introduce the
dfaft that is sponsored by the Republicans.
The Pentagon is seeking people to work in state draft board offices.
Last time I looked, the Pentagon is under White House control.
The Pentagon has been hiring and training such people for decades. The
Selective Service Administration has existed for over 50 years.
Maybe you didn't know this, but draft registration has remained in
effect ever since Jimmy Carter reinstituted it in 1980.
What political party does Carter belong to?
You are confused. No one that I am aware of suggests that the draft is
not needed. Republicans are notorious for advocating war but refusing
to serve their country, for example.
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
The point is twofold. First, Bush is getting us into another Vietnam,
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Hayes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 04:25:24 AM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
<...>
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Will Bremer and his pals be airlifted off the roof of the US Compound in
Baghdad by Chinook?
--
Peter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 04:33:22 AM |
|
|
Peter Hayes wrote:
Xomicron
*plonk*
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo SMP Linux kernel 2.6.6 <-- rolled my own
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Philip Callan" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 01:41:55 PM |
|
|
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Timberwoof" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 09:37:34 PM |
|
|
In article <ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no>,
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
You just wait.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Bede" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 10:04:59 PM |
|
|
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in message
news:timberwoof-ECA69A.19373403062004@typhoon.sonic.net...
In article <ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no>,
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
You just wait.
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 12:11:02 PM |
|
|
"the Bede" <rspwsownthebede@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:uFRvc.4464$wS2.1075@okepread03:
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in message
news:timberwoof-ECA69A.19373403062004@typhoon.sonic.net...
In article <ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no>,
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
You just wait.
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL
RACIST!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "GreyCloud" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 04:16:50 PM |
|
|
Xomicron wrote:
"the Bede" <rspwsownthebede@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:uFRvc.4464$wS2.1075@okepread03:
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in message
news:timberwoof-ECA69A.19373403062004@typhoon.sonic.net...
In article <ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no>,
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
You just wait.
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL
RACIST!!!
Now I was told that there is really no such thing as a 'race'.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 01:58:39 PM |
|
|
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
03 Jun 2004 09:57:24 PM |
|
|
In article <c9nscu$2auu$6@news.louisville.edu>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
And, sadly, it isn't the people who advocate the war.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 12:08:53 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:030620041957240600%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <c9nscu$2auu$6@news.louisville.edu>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
And, sadly, it isn't the people who advocate the war.
Nobody is advacating war.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 10:03:22 PM |
|
|
In article <F02wc.3505$ri2.3411@charlie.risq.qc.ca>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:030620041957240600%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <c9nscu$2auu$6@news.louisville.edu>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
And, sadly, it isn't the people who advocate the war.
Nobody is advacating war.
1. ad·vo·cate
€ (noun) [ad·vo·cates]
one who argues or pleads for a cause or proposal
€ (verb) [ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ing; ad·vo·cates]
recommend
€ ad·vo·ca·cy (noun) [ad·vo·ca·cies]
That's you...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 10:28:28 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:040620042003223624%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <F02wc.3505$ri2.3411@charlie.risq.qc.ca>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:030620041957240600%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <c9nscu$2auu$6@news.louisville.edu>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:ThKvc.661089$Ig.218971@pd7tw2no:
Xomicron wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
And, sadly, it isn't the people who advocate the war.
Nobody is advacating war.
1. ad·vo·cate
€ (noun) [ad·vo·cates]
one who argues or pleads for a cause or proposal
€ (verb) [ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ing; ad·vo·cates]
recommend
€ ad·vo·ca·cy (noun) [ad·vo·ca·cies]
That's you...
Nobody is advocating war for the sake of war. Sometimes war is necessary.
Your side is too blind to see reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 10:49:05 PM |
|
|
In article <w5bwc.5548$ri2.5305@charlie.risq.qc.ca>, Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
This war is unlike Vietnam on almost all levels.
Except the getting your asses kicked part.
How so? Because troops have died?
FREE CLUE: People die in war. This is not a new concept.
And, sadly, it isn't the people who advocate the war.
Nobody is advacating war.
1. ad·vo·cate
€ (noun) [ad·vo·cates]
one who argues or pleads for a cause or proposal
€ (verb) [ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ed; ad·vo·cat·ing; ad·vo·cates]
recommend
€ ad·vo·ca·cy (noun) [ad·vo·ca·cies]
That's you...
Nobody is advocating war for the sake of war. Sometimes war is necessary.
Your side is too blind to see reality.
Advocating war was EXACTLY what Bush did. He obviously had no real
reason for war. Certainly no WMD's or terrorism.
War is always necessary for those who are blood thirsty, filled with
hate and fear, and don't actually have to do the fighting. People are
dying while you sit back and make up reasons for why it is "necessary."
.
|
|
|
| User: "ToolPackinMama" |
|
| Title: Re: Ready For The Draft? |
04 Jun 2004 11:09:22 PM |
|
|
/me yawns
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
