| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Papa Jack" |
| Date: |
04 May 2004 11:44:57 AM |
| Object: |
Reasons for Abortions |
_ABOUT_, Women's Issues, Abortion Statistics from Nikki Katz
http://womensissues.about.com/cs/abortionstats/a/aaabortionstats.htm
_________________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
* 47% of abortions are performed on women who have
already had one or more abortions
Abortion Statistics - Decision to Have an Abortion (U.S.)
* 25.5% of women deciding to have an abortion want
to postpone childbearing
* 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby<
* 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their
partner does not want a child
* 12.2% of women are too young (their parents or
others object to the pregnancy)
* 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their
education or career
* 7.9% of women want no (more) children
* 3.3% of women have an abortion due to a risk to
fetal health
* 2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to
maternal health
_________________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
At times, Pro-Aborts criticize my statement that many
abortions are done for the convenience of the pregnant
woman's lifestyle -- rather, than for reasons related
to actual emergencies.
That doesn't mean I am not sympathetic to how upsetting
an unwanted pregnancy can be to a woman. I do emphatize
with couples who have reasons not to get pregnant, but
we are talking about homicide and inconvenience is
simply not adequate defense.
Another related point is the fact that almost half of
the women having abortions have previously had one or
more abortions. That reduces my sympathy factor a
great deal.
Thanks for considering my point of view.
.
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 06:47:02 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9vil90hd11kf5bv7k63gulc6u5gelpse49@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:32:47 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kcil90hs6jnh7klrpa3c53hd4ehsqdtmug@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:22:17 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kphl90pdd4ce6511lfece7ca8g17ccmoj6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:13:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
...
You help donate I will seek adoption for a unwanted child
How much?
$1000.00 per month
That's what you consider "help"? How much do you plan to contribute?
If Flower Power wants to complain, saying that pro-lifers don't want to
adopt
Then she can help contribute to cover expenses and setting up a college
fund,
and I will adopt.
In other words, is she willing to put her money where her mouth is.
As it is right now, I take care of two families and that is enough for
one
to handle.
Thanks for your thoughts. Would you be kind enough to answer the
questions?
What do I contribute?
A home
Furniture
Clothes
education
Food
Loving family
Oh, and here's another, why is supporting only two families
enough?
I really don't think it is your business, but I will leave at this
It is all I can personally handle at this time.
I take care of my mother and my own family.
Thanks to our government lying to our vets, when my father died my mother
didn't get all that they were promised after his 21 years of faithful
service to our country.
So I help her out
Now add a new pregnancy to that, picture yourself without a job that
pays as well as CO, and you will start to understand why some people abort.
--
--sexkitten--Lead me not into temptation -- I can find the way myself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 09:29:38 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2g017cF32imcU4@uni-berlin.de...
Osprey wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9vil90hd11kf5bv7k63gulc6u5gelpse49@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:32:47 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kcil90hs6jnh7klrpa3c53hd4ehsqdtmug@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:22:17 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kphl90pdd4ce6511lfece7ca8g17ccmoj6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:13:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
...
You help donate I will seek adoption for a unwanted child
How much?
$1000.00 per month
That's what you consider "help"? How much do you plan to contribute?
If Flower Power wants to complain, saying that pro-lifers don't want to
adopt
Then she can help contribute to cover expenses and setting up a college
fund,
and I will adopt.
In other words, is she willing to put her money where her mouth is.
As it is right now, I take care of two families and that is enough for
one
to handle.
Thanks for your thoughts. Would you be kind enough to answer the
questions?
What do I contribute?
A home
Furniture
Clothes
education
Food
Loving family
Oh, and here's another, why is supporting only two families
enough?
I really don't think it is your business, but I will leave at this
It is all I can personally handle at this time.
I take care of my mother and my own family.
Thanks to our government lying to our vets, when my father died my
mother
didn't get all that they were promised after his 21 years of faithful
service to our country.
So I help her out
Now add a new pregnancy to that, picture yourself without a job that
pays as well as CO, and you will start to understand why some people
abort.
==========================
Oh, no. Osprey will claim he'd coerce his wife/girlfriend/lover to have the
child and they'd all go down the tubes together.
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:38:33 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <_Lmdnc4QZrtTLwTdRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Flower Power" <Freedom@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:T9GdnS2937b6LATdRVn-vg@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847546309%
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
=================
Children of "sin?* What looney still thinks in those terms? We're not
living in the dark ages anymore. :-) Ask anyone who works with these
unwanted children (Foster Care, special lawyers and Adoption Agencies) the
women/teenager was somehow forced or coerced to bear. Adopting families
want WHITE, healthy infants or very young children. They don't want
minority, disabled or disturbed children.
What about those who have made mistakes and are thrown into prison?
What about those who are forgotten about?
Do you realize that approximately 93% of all people who go to jail are
released back into society?
What do you do to make sure they are taken care of? What do you do to show
that you care for them and
are willing to give them another chance in life?
I pay taxes for that purpose. Quite a bit of them, actually.
Just because a judge has sentenced them to serve life, you just think it is
o.k. to forget all about them after they
go behind that wall.
What about all our vietnam vets who served this country and have no home?
What do you do to help them?
What about the starving children and families in the hills of Kentucky? Do
you help them?
Do you care?
This little game you play has a double edged sword. If you are going to
play this little game saying people who
oppose abortion don't care about children, then be prepared to show us how
much you care about the
millions of people who are starving, homeless, behind prison bars waiting to
come back to society.
I work around people who don't get a chance in life when they get out. Why?
Because people turn their backs on them.
They figure once a criminal, always a criminal. They end up coming right
back to jail, because people didn't care enough
to help them.
What do you do to help them? Nothing?
Note - Heishman has never adopted.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/05/malnourished.children.ap/index.html
--
--sexkitten--If it wasn't meant to be eaten, it wouldn't be shaped like
a taco.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lawrence E. McKnight" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 07:55:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 5 May 2004 23:37:15 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Flower Power" <Freedom@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:T9GdnS2937b6LATdRVn-vg@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847546309%
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
=================
Children of "sin?* What looney still thinks in those terms? We're not
living in the dark ages anymore. :-) Ask anyone who works with these
unwanted children (Foster Care, special lawyers and Adoption Agencies) the
women/teenager was somehow forced or coerced to bear. Adopting families
want WHITE, healthy infants or very young children. They don't want
minority, disabled or disturbed children.
What about those who have made mistakes and are thrown into prison?
What about those who are forgotten about?
Do you realize that approximately 93% of all people who go to jail are
released back into society?
What do you do to make sure they are taken care of? What do you do to show
that you care for them and
are willing to give them another chance in life?
Just because a judge has sentenced them to serve life, you just think it is
o.k. to forget all about them after they
go behind that wall.
What about all our vietnam vets who served this country and have no home?
What do you do to help them?
What about the starving children and families in the hills of Kentucky? Do
you help them?
Do you care?
Hey everybody, it looks like some liberal has forged Osprey's id!
This little game you play has a double edged sword. If you are going to
play this little game saying people who
oppose abortion don't care about children, then be prepared to show us how
much you care about the
millions of people who are starving, homeless, behind prison bars waiting to
come back to society.
I work around people who don't get a chance in life when they get out. Why?
Because people turn their backs on them.
They figure once a criminal, always a criminal. They end up coming right
back to jail, because people didn't care enough
to help them.
What do you do to help them? Nothing?
-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:32:32 PM |
|
|
Flower Power wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847546309%
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
=================
Children of "sin?* What looney still thinks in those terms? We're not
living in the dark ages anymore. :-) Ask anyone who works with these
unwanted children (Foster Care, special lawyers and Adoption Agencies) the
women/teenager was somehow forced or coerced to bear. Adopting families
want WHITE, healthy infants or very young children. They don't want
minority, disabled or disturbed children.
Or older children.
--
--sexkitten--Gone crazy, be back later, leave message.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:38:52 PM |
|
|
In article <T9GdnS2937b6LATdRVn-vg@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@spamless.net> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847546309%
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
=================
Children of "sin?* What looney still thinks in those terms? We're not
living in the dark ages anymore. :-) Ask anyone who works with these
unwanted children (Foster Care, special lawyers and Adoption Agencies) the
women/teenager was somehow forced or coerced to bear. Adopting families
want WHITE, healthy infants or very young children. They don't want
minority, disabled or disturbed children.
I am on your side. "Children of Sin" was being facetious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 09:59:35 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042038525807%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <T9GdnS2937b6LATdRVn-vg@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@spamless.net> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847546309%
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
=================
Children of "sin?* What looney still thinks in those terms? We're not
living in the dark ages anymore. :-) Ask anyone who works with these
unwanted children (Foster Care, special lawyers and Adoption Agencies)
the
women/teenager was somehow forced or coerced to bear. Adopting families
want WHITE, healthy infants or very young children. They don't want
minority, disabled or disturbed children.
I am on your side. "Children of Sin" was being facetious.
===========================
Sorry, I miss humor or sarcasm sometimes.... :-)
--
The Purple Flower....
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent
force for atheism ever conceived."
-= Isaac Asimov =-
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "EvilZak" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 08:54:24 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message news:<050520041847546309%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>...
In article <xn0dhy2gm4i7zl001@news.bri.connect.com.au>, Murdoc
She should carry the pregnancy to term. If, once the child is born, she
still doesn't want the child, then put it up for adoption. If, however,
her mind is changed and she does want the child, then she should be
glad she didn't destroy that chance.
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
Actually, there are a lot of people who would like to adopt a healthy
baby: there is a shortage of healthy babies for adoption. This does
not, however, justify forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies to
term.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 10:07:40 PM |
|
|
"EvilZak" <zak@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1e57ec88.0405060554.4c5bcfc1@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:<050520041847546309%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>...
In article <xn0dhy2gm4i7zl001@news.bri.connect.com.au>, Murdoc
She should carry the pregnancy to term. If, once the child is born,
she
still doesn't want the child, then put it up for adoption. If,
however,
her mind is changed and she does want the child, then she should be
glad she didn't destroy that chance.
Adoption doesn't work. People don't want these children of sin. How
many children have you adopted?
Actually, there are a lot of people who would like to adopt a healthy
baby: there is a shortage of healthy babies for adoption. This does
not, however, justify forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies to
term.
============================
The agencies are over loaded with minority, bi-racial, handicapped and
slightly older children - why aren't people adopting them? There's only a
shortage of healthy white infants.
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mizzyandrea" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 10:21:26 PM |
|
|
She should carry the pregnancy to term
******************
Only if that is what she wants to do.......if not, then abortion is an option
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 06:13:07 PM |
|
|
Murdoc wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <xn0dhx0b59gbc6000@news.bri.connect.com.au>, Murdoc
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <xn0dhwz247scgk000@news.bri.connect.com.au>, Murdoc
<murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
Papa Jack wrote:
ABOUT, Women's Issues, Abortion Statistics from Nikki Katz
http://womensissues.about.com/cs/abortionstats/a/aaabortionsta
ts.h tm
______________________________________________________________
____ ____ ___ Excerpts:
* 47% of abortions are performed on women who have
already had one or more abortions
Abortion Statistics - Decision to Have an Abortion (U.S.)
* 25.5% of women deciding to have an abortion want
to postpone childbearing
* 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby<
* 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their
partner does not want a child
* 12.2% of women are too young (their parents or
others object to the pregnancy)
* 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their
education or career
* 7.9% of women want no (more) children
* 3.3% of women have an abortion due to a risk to
fetal health
* 2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to
maternal health
Two things:
1) What about the other 2.1% (97.9% are listed in total above)?
2) According to the above statistics, 91.8% of all abortions
are for 'convenience'. That is, 91.8% of abortions have nothing
to do with the life of either the mother or foetus being in
immediate danger. Disgusting.
Why do you find that "disgusting?" Besides, I don't see the word
"convenience" on that list. That is just more pro-life
propaganda. The lies just never stop with you people, does it?
What are you afraid of?
Read the rest of my post. Notice this sentence:
"That is, 91.8% of abortions have nothing to do with the life of
either the mother or foetus being in immediate danger."
Which you distort into "convenience?" Don't you think that when
someone has to take the truth, and twist it into something else in
order to support their own reality, that indicates their version of
reality is weak?
For example, disruption of career.
Careers are disrupted by an unwanted child. If the person prefers an
career over an unwanted child, isn't she being responsible by having
an abortion?
She would have been more responsible by not getting pregnant in the
first place.
That's nice. But accidents still happen. Why should pregnancy be used as
a punishment for women having sex?
One thing I did notice, though, is that it says:
"12.2% of women are too young (parents or others object to the
pregnancy)"
Now, if a person is old (and mature) enough to have consentual sex,
then the person is old (and mature) enough to care for a child. If
the person is not old enough to care for the child, then that
person should not have sex. Simple.
Shoulda, woulda, coulda. What if someone has consensual sex, not
wanting a child, but gets pregnant due to he own "irresponsible
actions," and then wants, while pregnant, to abort the "child." That
is, she wants, as you people love to claim, to "murder" the child.
She wants to continue on her care-free life of sex, drugs, and rock
and roll. She has no interest in the child, no desire for the child.
But still, she finds herself pregnant with an unwanted child. What
does she do now?
She should carry the pregnancy to term. If, once the child is born, she
still doesn't want the child, then put it up for adoption.
Are you prepared to change the law and allow her to profit from this?
Pregnancy is extremely physically damaging, and the woman is never
compensated for that.
If, however,
her mind is changed and she does want the child, then she should be
glad she didn't destroy that chance.
--
--sexkitten--Next time you wave, use all your fingers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 08:07:21 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7bshr$252p8$1@ID-163025.news.uni-> Are you prepared to change the law
and allow her to profit from this?
Pregnancy is extremely physically damaging, and the woman is never
compensated for that.
# First of all, the "system" is already overloaded with unwanted children so
I don't know where Merdoc comes from making such a stupid statement as, "Put
them up for adoption." Please note the anti-choicers want nothing to do
with these unwanted babies once born. As for the teens/women's health or
mental state. They couldn't CARE less if they tried.
If, however,
her mind is changed and she does want the child, then she should be
glad she didn't destroy that chance.
# Few change their minds.
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 08:47:55 PM |
|
|
In article <7M2dnZ0NYoFNEgTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@womensfree.net> wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7bshr$252p8$1@ID-163025.news.uni-> Are you prepared to change the law
and allow her to profit from this?
Pregnancy is extremely physically damaging, and the woman is never
compensated for that.
# First of all, the "system" is already overloaded with unwanted children so
I don't know where Merdoc comes from making such a stupid statement as, "Put
them up for adoption." Please note the anti-choicers want nothing to do
with these unwanted babies once born. As for the teens/women's health or
mental state. They couldn't CARE less if they tried.
Pro-lifers swear adoption works. The facts be damned. It allows them
to believe they aren't really injuring anyone by their callous acts.
And God forbid we, the society which forced these children into the
world, should have our taxes raised to pay for the children and mothers
well-being.
If, however,
her mind is changed and she does want the child, then she should be
glad she didn't destroy that chance.
# Few change their minds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:25:18 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847556339%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <7M2dnZ0NYoFNEgTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@womensfree.net> wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7bshr$252p8$1@ID-163025.news.uni-> Are you prepared to change the
law
and allow her to profit from this?
Pregnancy is extremely physically damaging, and the woman is never
compensated for that.
# First of all, the "system" is already overloaded with unwanted
children so
I don't know where Merdoc comes from making such a stupid statement as,
"Put
them up for adoption." Please note the anti-choicers want nothing to
do
with these unwanted babies once born. As for the teens/women's health
or
mental state. They couldn't CARE less if they tried.
Pro-lifers swear adoption works.
$ Then why are there so many thousands of unwanted children in Foster Care?
Are you now claiming all these children in the NYTimes articles from last
year magically found adoptive families?
The facts be damned. It allows them
to believe they aren't really injuring anyone by their callous acts.
$ What callous acts? You mean how the anti-choicers ABANDON the women and
infant after coercing them to have the unwanted child?
And God forbid we, the society which forced these children into the
world, should have our taxes raised to pay for the children and mothers
well-being.
$ You must have a good income - look at those trying to exist on minimum
wage jobs. How much blood can you squeeze from a turnip?
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:34:37 PM |
|
|
In article <0tCdnYcj1cKyLQTdRVn-ug@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@spamless.net> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520041847556339%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <7M2dnZ0NYoFNEgTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net>, Flower Power
<Freedom@womensfree.net> wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7bshr$252p8$1@ID-163025.news.uni-> Are you prepared to change the
law
and allow her to profit from this?
Pregnancy is extremely physically damaging, and the woman is never
compensated for that.
# First of all, the "system" is already overloaded with unwanted
children so
I don't know where Merdoc comes from making such a stupid statement as,
"Put
them up for adoption." Please note the anti-choicers want nothing to
do
with these unwanted babies once born. As for the teens/women's health
or
mental state. They couldn't CARE less if they tried.
Pro-lifers swear adoption works.
$ Then why are there so many thousands of unwanted children in Foster Care?
I agree. It doesn't work.
Are you now claiming all these children in the NYTimes articles from last
year magically found adoptive families?
Not at all. I am Pro-Choice. I think adoption FAILS miserably.
Example:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/05/malnourished.children.ap/index.html
The facts be damned. It allows them
to believe they aren't really injuring anyone by their callous acts.
$ What callous acts? You mean how the anti-choicers ABANDON the women and
infant after coercing them to have the unwanted child?
YES.
And God forbid we, the society which forced these children into the
world, should have our taxes raised to pay for the children and mothers
well-being.
$ You must have a good income - look at those trying to exist on minimum
wage jobs. How much blood can you squeeze from a turnip?
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't. The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 05:51:38 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't. The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved, although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they die. We all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
This is a classic example of adoption failure. There are so many cases where
the child (or children) was abused, raped, neglected, beaten, treated like a
servant and/or outright murdered. You will notice the anti-choicers NEVER
but NEVER mention these cases. They make it all sound so rosy to the
pregnant women - how some wonderful family is just waiting to adopt their
unwanted baby..... bunch of hypocrites.
--
FP........
Wise men stare at the unknown, and boldly asks, WHY?
Others... fall on their hands and knees, and start mumbling...
(God did it! God did it!)
~ Thus Spake God's Creator ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~><> ><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 06:03:46 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:-t6dnezl__scXAfd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't.
We already know abortion doesn't work
The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved,
although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they die. We
all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
WHERE WERE YOU FLOWERPOWER
When all the people in prisons were released and FORGOTTEN about by society
and turned away and never given a 2nd chance?
Where were you when the children died in Kentucky because they live in poor
areas and can't afford to eat well?
Where were you in the ghetto when the young 6 year old had his head blown
away by a drive by shooting?
We can ask you flower power a lot of WHERE WHERE YOU questions and you know
what? You did NOTHING to help those people
This is a classic example of adoption failure. There are so many cases
where
the child (or children) was abused, raped, neglected, beaten, treated like
a
servant and/or outright murdered. You will notice the anti-choicers NEVER
but NEVER mention these cases. They make it all sound so rosy to the
pregnant women - how some wonderful family is just waiting to adopt their
unwanted baby..... bunch of hypocrites.
Yes, you are
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
06 May 2004 09:10:17 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3qWdncDZ3_WyWQfdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:-t6dnezl__scXAfd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't.
We already know abortion doesn't work
## On your planet maybe. It works fine here in the real world.
The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers
hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved,
although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they die. We
all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and
years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
WHERE WERE YOU FLOWERPOWER
# Where were YOU? I didn't coerce the mother of those abused starved kids
to bear them to punish her and them! Post your prison crap on a prison or
law NG. This NG is about abortion/choices.
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
07 May 2004 08:11:07 AM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:_9qdnY0WjoOPbQfdRVn-jA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3qWdncDZ3_WyWQfdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:-t6dnezl__scXAfd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't.
We already know abortion doesn't work
## On your planet maybe. It works fine here in the real world.
The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers
hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved,
although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they die.
We
all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and
years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
WHERE WERE YOU FLOWERPOWER
# Where were YOU? I didn't coerce the mother of those abused starved kids
to bear them to punish her and them! Post your prison crap on a prison or
law NG. This NG is about abortion/choices.
I don't coerce any mothers eitehr, nor do I punish women, nor abuse children
Fact is, you don't care about others at all. You are a hypocrite
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
07 May 2004 04:19:34 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:Ouudndoq5NpKFwbdRVn-ug@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:_9qdnY0WjoOPbQfdRVn-jA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3qWdncDZ3_WyWQfdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:-t6dnezl__scXAfd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim abortion
works. It doesn't.
We already know abortion doesn't work
## On your planet maybe. It works fine here in the real world.
The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions. Pro-lifers
hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared
for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved,
although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they die.
We
all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and
years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
WHERE WERE YOU FLOWERPOWER
# Where were YOU? I didn't coerce the mother of those abused starved
kids
to bear them to punish her and them! Post your prison crap on a prison
or
law NG. This NG is about abortion/choices.
=====================================
I don't coerce any mothers eitehr, nor do I punish women, nor abuse
children
Fact is, you don't care about others at all. You are a hypocrite
===================
You are the hypocrite here as YOU are the one to take a woman's CHOICE
away - not me.
--
Wise men stare at the unknown, and boldly asks, WHY?
Others... fall on their hands and knees, and start mumbling...
(God did it! God did it!)
~ Thus Spake God's Creator ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~><> ><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
07 May 2004 04:26:24 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:D-ednUbgZN32YAbdRVn-ug@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:Ouudndoq5NpKFwbdRVn-ug@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:_9qdnY0WjoOPbQfdRVn-jA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3qWdncDZ3_WyWQfdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <FlowersAreFree@womans.net> wrote in message
news:-t6dnezl__scXAfd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:050520042034370472%>
I don't endorse it. My point is this. Pro-lifers claim
abortion
works. It doesn't.
We already know abortion doesn't work
## On your planet maybe. It works fine here in the real world.
The reason they claim it works is it allows them,
the pro-lifers, to escape the result of their actions.
Pro-lifers
hope
to say that these children, forced into the world, will be cared
for
somehow. They won't be. Adoption does not work.
=============================
That family in NJ is a real nightmare - all the boys were starved,
although
they fed the girls. That couple should rot in jail until they
die.
We
all
know what hunger feels like. Those boys were hungry for years and
years.
WHERE WERE THE ANTI-CHOICERS????
WHERE WERE YOU FLOWERPOWER
# Where were YOU? I didn't coerce the mother of those abused starved
kids
to bear them to punish her and them! Post your prison crap on a
prison
or
law NG. This NG is about abortion/choices.
=====================================
I don't coerce any mothers eitehr, nor do I punish women, nor abuse
children
Fact is, you don't care about others at all. You are a hypocrite
===================
You are the hypocrite here as YOU are the one to take a woman's CHOICE
away - not me.
That is another lie
I never said I want to take anyones choice away.
Do you have any proof that shows I said that?
Of course you don't
Can I ask you a question?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends....I always
felt sorry for people like you.
It is a shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
07 May 2004 08:58:02 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends....I
always
felt sorry for people like you.
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends. I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you and other
narrow minded fundies.
It is a shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
* It is a real shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
08 May 2004 07:59:47 AM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:S-udnS1anKgtowHd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I am asking you...I was always taught go straight to the source
I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends....I
always
felt sorry for people like you.
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends. I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you and
other
narrow minded fundies.
You have friends????
Imagine that, I bet you don't act like this in front of them.
It is a shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
* It is a real shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it
feel?
I am going to the source...how does it feel?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
08 May 2004 11:25:05 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:7fqdnYGIor0zRAHdRVn-sA@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:S-udnS1anKgtowHd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I am asking you...I was always taught go straight to the source
## That's why I'm asking you. So just answer the question. I wasn't the
one stuck supporting 3 unwanted children.
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends. I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you and
other
narrow minded fundies.
You have friends????
## Do you?
Imagine that, I bet you don't act like this in front of them.
## Act like what? Like you? Calling all who disagree with you juvenile na
na na names?
It is a shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
* It is a real shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it
feel?
I am going to the source...how does it feel?
## And I am going to the source...YOU,....how does it feel?
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
08 May 2004 12:01:30 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <Liberation@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:DOidnTtxXPN6lADdRVn-gQ@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:7fqdnYGIor0zRAHdRVn-sA@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:S-udnS1anKgtowHd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I am asking you...I was always taught go straight to the source
## That's why I'm asking you. So just answer the question. I wasn't the
one stuck supporting 3 unwanted children.
What makes you think they are unwanted?
Your assumption?
That is so weak.
Actually pathetic that you must lie because you can't get anywhere else with
your *****
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends. I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you and
other
narrow minded fundies.
You have friends????
## Do you?
Many
Imagine that, I bet you don't act like this in front of them.
## Act like what?
Like an *****
Like you? Calling all who disagree with you juvenile na
na na names?
Oh look who is talking.
The one who makes up false claims that she can't back up.
I thought you were going to start acting like an adult????
It is a shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it feel?
* It is a real shame you need a NG to look for friends. How does it
feel?
I am going to the source...how does it feel?
## And I am going to the source...YOU,....how does it feel?
I wouldn't know, that is why I asked you
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
08 May 2004 06:04:15 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BfudnV7M1OnNjwDdRVn-jg@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Liberation@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:DOidnTtxXPN6lADdRVn-gQ@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:7fqdnYGIor0zRAHdRVn-sA@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:S-udnS1anKgtowHd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I am asking you...I was always taught go straight to the source
## That's why I'm asking you. So just answer the question. I wasn't
the
one stuck supporting 3 unwanted children.
What makes you think they are unwanted?
Your assumption?
That is so weak.
Actually pathetic that you must lie because you can't get anywhere else
with
your *****
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good friends.
I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you
and
other
narrow minded fundies.
You have friends????
## Do you?
Many
Imagine that, I bet you don't act like this in front of them.
## Act like what?
Like an *****
Like you? Calling all who disagree with you juvenile na
na na names?
Oh look who is talking.
==============
See? Same childish BS! = SNIP!
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." (Infanticide approved by god)
======================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
08 May 2004 06:10:12 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <Liberation@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:3uqdnf3eZ56Z9QDdRVn-ug@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BfudnV7M1OnNjwDdRVn-jg@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Liberation@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:DOidnTtxXPN6lADdRVn-gQ@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:7fqdnYGIor0zRAHdRVn-sA@comcast.com...
"Flower Power" <Petunias@spamless.net> wrote in message
news:S-udnS1anKgtowHd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:0pOdnR1NWeB-YwbdRVn-tw@comcast.com...
===================
Can I ask you a question?
* Why not?
How does it feel being a bitter nasty person?
* You can answer THAT better than I can. YOU tell us.
I am asking you...I was always taught go straight to the source
## That's why I'm asking you. So just answer the question. I wasn't
the
one stuck supporting 3 unwanted children.
What makes you think they are unwanted?
No answer
Your assumption?
No answer
That is so weak.
Actually pathetic that you must lie because you can't get anywhere else
with
your *****
* I mean I pride myself on being pleasant and having good
friends.
I
always
felt so sorry for ignorant, intolerant, judgmental people like you
and
other
narrow minded fundies.
You have friends????
## Do you?
Many
Imagine that, I bet you don't act like this in front of them.
## Act like what?
Like an *****
Like you? Calling all who disagree with you juvenile na
na na names?
Oh look who is talking.
==============
See? Same childish BS! = SNIP!
Once you realize you are a hypocrite you now want to turn it around
No answers to your claims above
Are you ready to grow up yet and stop the nonsense?
You made false accusations about me, unsupported.
You ready to drop it and discuss the issue without jumping to *****
claims and stupid accusations?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 05:19:18 AM |
|
|
On 5 May 2004 05:51:58 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
.....
2) According to the above statistics, 91.8% of all abortions are for
'convenience'. That is, 91.8% of abortions have nothing to do with the
life of either the mother or foetus being in immediate danger.
Disgusting.
What is disgusting is that Pro-Lifers *refuse* to acknolwdge that
pregnancy *is* an immediate danger to the woman. (www.m-w.com:
immediate: being without the intervention of another object, cause,
or agency) A full term pregnancy and childbirth, without medical
intervention, carries roughly a 1 in 10 death rate.
If a woman does not wish to bear a child, why should she suffer
injuries and risk her health and life?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons for Abortions |
05 May 2004 10:23:13 AM |
|
|
"Paul Anderson" <elcoyote@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:4098bb0d.134993583@news.la.sbcglobal.net...
On 5 May 2004 05:51:58 GMT, "Murdoc" <murdoc_0@hotmail.com> wrote:
....
2) According to the above statistics, 91.8% of all abortions are for
'convenience'. That is, 91.8% of abortions have nothing to do with the
life of either the mother or foetus being in immediate danger.
Disgusting.
What is disgusting is that Pro-Lifers *refuse* to acknolwdge that
pregnancy *is* an immediate danger to the woman. (www.m-w.com:
immediate: being without the intervention of another object, cause,
or agency) A full term pregnancy and childbirth, without medical
intervention, carries roughly a 1 in 10 death rate.
If a woman does not wish to bear a child, why should she suffer
injuries and risk her health and life?
================================
Because some anti-choicer said she should. You don't think for one moment
they CARE about the lives of women or the "already born" do you? If the
women dies they'll shriek, "It was god's will."
--
FPower.......
But look what your Jehovah god said in his bible:
Psalm 137:9
"Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones."
======================================
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|