Science > Abortion > Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
19 Mar 2006 05:35:47 PM |
| Object: |
Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591405/posts
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Common Voice
03.06.06
Jim Kouri
While Americans continue to struggle with the moral and legal issues
surrounding partial-birth abortion, the Europeans have moved on to
legalizing euthanasia for fully born children. Call it
retroactive-abortion.
Child euthanasia is still illegal in Holland and doctors are terrified
of being prosecuted, but there is a growing number of physicians and
poltician who are advocating legalizing doctor-assisted euthanasia for
babies and very young children.
Each year in Holland at least 15 seriously ill babies, most of them
with chromosomal abnormalities, are helped to die by doctors acting
with the parents' consent. But only a fraction of those cases are
reported to the authorities because of the doctors' fears of being
charged with murder. Things are about to change, however, making it
much easier for parents and doctors to end the suffering of an infant,
according to news stories circulating in Western Europe.
A committee was set up in Holland to regulate the practice of child
euthanasia and will begin operating in the next few weeks, effectively
making Holland -- where adult euthanasia is legal -- the first nation
on the planet to allow "baby euthanasia" as well. This development
has enraged opponents of euthanasia who warn of a "slippery slope"
leading to abuses by doctors and parents, who will be making decisions
for individuals incapable of expressing their own preferences and
desires.
Others say they welcome more openness about a practice that, according
to doctors, goes on secretly anyway -- even in Britain -- regardless of
the law.
Part of this new committee's work will entail formulating guidelines
for doctors who will carry out euthanasia on babies. These guidelines
are expected to emphasize that life can be ended only in cases
involving "unbearable suffering", with parental consent and after
consultation with other physicians.
Now that they've succeeded in legalizing child euthanasia in Holland,
there are rumblings that the next step is euthanasia for the retarded,
Down's Syndrome chiildren and others. However, in this category it will
be difficult to use the "suffering" infant rationale. So advocates are
using the "rights of the parents" rationale or the "betterment of
society" rationale, as if killing innocent human beings makes for a
better society.
Other countries in Western Europe are expected to follow Holland's lead
in the doctor-assisted euthanasia industry and many on the left in the
US are also open to the idea.
But the Dutch aren't turning their backs on abortion. A new proposal
being bandied in Holland is mandatory abortion of so-called "unwanted
children." The left-wing in The Netherlands are intensifying the
discussion regarding this latest progressive construct. The most rabid
advocate is Marianne van den Anker, who is the head of Rotterdam's
health department.
She's targeting specific ethnic groups for this latest atrocity: she's
targeting the Antilleans and Arubans who now reside in Holland. She is
advocating forced abortions for teenaged mothers, drug addicts and the
mentally handicapped.
This latest extension of the "reproductive rights" has its own
advocates cloaking what appears to be a Nazi-like proposal with
compassionate reasons for her proposal, complete with their own "worst
case scenario" argument. These leftists are working on a strategy to
defend an obviously racist, fascist healthcare policy. As with the
Planned Parenthood icon Margaret Sanger, who advocated abortion for
"Negroes," these Dutch appear oblivious to the consequences of their
obsession with killing unborn and born babies. And you can bet the farm
our own left-wing "intellectuals" in American are watching the
progressive Europeans in the hopes of duplicating their madness.
According to Physicians for Life, it took the Dutch almost 30 years for
their medical practices to fall to the point that Dutch doctors are
able to engage in the kind of euthanasia activities that got some
German doctors hanged after the Nuremberg Nazi trials. For those who
object to this assertion by claiming that German doctors killed
disabled babies during World War II without consent of parents, so too
do many Dutch doctors: Approximately 21 percent of the infant
euthanasia deaths occurred without request or consent of parents.
.
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 01:58:56 PM |
|
|
For the rest of the world they just let them starve to death in
dumpters or club them to death because they are born without a penis.
Most of the American Christians I've seen on American TV make sure they
do it properly with a drowning in a bath or they put them in a car a
push them into a lake. Just so that they can get into heaven.
What's the difference? Not much.
Twenty years ago you would have been one of those jokers that would
have put anyone with AIDS on a island off shore because they swapped
fluids accidentally or otherwise. 50 years ago in would have been
cancer, yes there was that type of stigma to Cancer as well. But
somehow keeping a child with birth defect, that in theory, would be
passed on for next couple of hundreds of generations and continue to
bring misery to all effected is perfectly alright. Talk about double
standards.
I hope your kids are whammied with a nasty genetic disorder coming from
your "christ and life praising" spunk. Although I don't how it could
get any worse, from the mental retardation you appear to be suffering
from now I'm sure your children do/will suffer from the same.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 01:12:56 AM |
|
|
SpankyTClown wrote:
For the rest of the world they just let them starve to death in
dumpters or club them to death because they are born without a penis.
Most of the American Christians I've seen on American TV make sure they
do it properly with a drowning in a bath or they put them in a car a
push them into a lake. Just so that they can get into heaven.
What's the difference? Not much.
Twenty years ago you would have been one of those jokers that would
have put anyone with AIDS on a island off shore because they swapped
fluids accidentally or otherwise. 50 years ago in would have been
cancer, yes there was that type of stigma to Cancer as well. But
somehow keeping a child with birth defect, that in theory, would be
passed on for next couple of hundreds of generations and continue to
bring misery to all effected is perfectly alright. Talk about double
standards.
I hope your kids are whammied with a nasty genetic disorder coming from
your "christ and life praising" spunk. Although I don't how it could
get any worse, from the mental retardation you appear to be suffering
from now I'm sure your children do/will suffer from the same.
I'd sure vote for 'retroactive abortion' for you sorry nazi *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 02:29:08 PM |
|
|
SpankyTClown wrote:
For the rest of the world they just let them starve to death in
dumpters or club them to death because they are born without a penis.
Most of the American Christians I've seen on American TV make sure they
do it properly with a drowning in a bath or they put them in a car a
push them into a lake. Just so that they can get into heaven.
"Most"? And "American TeeVee" is your information source?
Much of your case explained thereby.
What's the difference? Not much.
Same with your grasp on the truth - Not much.
Twenty years ago you would have been one of those jokers that would
have put anyone with AIDS on a island off shore because they swapped
fluids accidentally or otherwise.
Without special status as political footballs, AIDS cases would be
treated as anyone else with a public health problem if they failed to
follow medical directions - they would be subject to forced quarantine.
If you had someone running around with smallpox refusing to follow
rules of public hygiene, enforced quarantine would be the next step.
TB was the same.
50 years ago in would have been
cancer, yes there was that type of stigma to Cancer as well.
You are mistaken. I was a medical student 50 years ago, and cancer had
no stigma. Cancer is not communicable, and was never thought to be
communicable in the US. There was no stigma.
But
somehow keeping a child with birth defect, that in theory, would be
passed on for next couple of hundreds of generations and continue to
bring misery to all effected is perfectly alright. Talk about double
standards.
We can tell you are a TeeVee post-graduate.
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 07:12:39 PM |
|
|
So the rest of the world doesn't dispose of female babies? Or was that
a deliberate attempt to avoid bringing up what the other 75% of the
human population has done and will continue doing? In either case, it
a good thing. It limits human population, too much wood and not enough
hole.
AND
The last, to my recollection (and Google news), brutal, savage,
mindless slayings of family on family members involving four little
girls and bath tub didn't happen because "momma wanted to save her
little girls for jesus"?
AND
Yet, TB isn't that big of a deal. In a standing WORLD population of
6.5 Billion people there are 23000 cases reported a year. It's less
than a percent of a percent of new cases. Versus the average developed
world hairless ape that will contract the extremely deadly and costly
"I have a fat *****"-osis. Eating out of any box you didn't pack
yourself seems to be far more endemic nowadays than TB does. SO before
worrying about TB or AIDS, I want your fat ***** off my bus, my seat on
the plane and out of the middle lane.
AND
With just typing in "stigma of cancer" in google, it's about 2 million
hits. Now "stigma of cancer year 1950" in google brings about 115,000
hits.
In fact it appears that it was quite common that people would lose
their jobs when sharing the fact they had cancer with their companies.
Just clicking randomly here, one study notes that the primary reason
why cancer wasn't a huge epidemic in the 1950's people quite a few
people chose the "do it yourself" method of a midnight special to the
temple.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 06:07:21 PM |
|
|
Terry Cross wrote:
....
I was a medical student 50 years ago
....
===============
Terry is at least 72 years old?
We should all start addressing her as "Ma'am" to show due respect.
(even though she admits that she used to matriculate in public)
.
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 06:40:43 PM |
|
|
Actually she wouldn't be 72, unless she was about 14 starting
university.
She would be 18 at HS grad, 22 after pre-med, 1 year for prepping for
exams unless she nailed them during her last year of premed. Then
there's the three years of medical studies, plus the four? or six?
years of catching doctor's farts.
Then there is the fact it's 2006, and somewhere between 22 - 30 she was
a med student.
Holy ***** Terry is eighty+ plus!!
And here I thought the golden girls, lawn bowling and filling depends
with bowel movements was the average past time of an 80 year old.
Obviously posting to newsgroups is something the younger of the
crucifix crew know and use, but I am quite surprised that she is spry
enough to get here. One could even say she's got "moxy".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 07:20:13 PM |
|
|
SpankyTClown wrote:
Actually she wouldn't be 72, unless she was about 14 starting
university.
She would be 18 at HS grad, 22 after pre-med, 1 year for prepping for
exams unless she nailed them during her last year of premed. Then
there's the three years of medical studies, plus the four? or six?
years of catching doctor's farts.
Then there is the fact it's 2006, and somewhere between 22 - 30 she was
a med student.
Holy ***** Terry is eighty+ plus!!
Not really. Undergraduate nursing covered many "medical" courses and
was often called "medicine" in 1957 - at least in my school.
My point is still - and you will not change the subject - cancer was
never the stigmatized disease you pretend. Not now, not then, not
among the laity, and not among the medical profession.
Also, societies have always found need and justification for isolating
highly contageous diseases to preserve the life of the greater numbers.
That was true in the time of leprosy, plague, smallpox, and TB.
Whenever a disease was found to be contageous and the individual would
not obey reasonable isolation precautions, quarantine was enforced.
Only recently, in the foolishness of the AIDS epidemic, society has
gone so soft in the head we cannot find the will to enforce quarantine
on those diagnosed with HIV. Instead, we encourage them to live
"normal" lives in the society of healthy people. As a consequence, in
parts of Africa, as much as 20% of the population is now infected with
the virus - and the proportion is increasing.
http://www.avert.org/aafrica.htm
Your flip attitude about a serious public health policy issue
("jokers," you say) gambles with the very existence of humanity by
refusing to confront and manage a deadly disease.
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 09:25:08 PM |
|
|
Ah,
So nursing is the trade. While in 1957 the majority of people in the
health community still were absolved to the fact that cancer was a
"possible" agent for their deaths it still wasn't fully resolved until
the eighties about what was cancer. Even today the cancer still is
very difficult to diagnose and even harder to pin down in a patient
that has it because it like to travel. What your Doctor said to your
employer then meant about jack *****, and jack left town. Same today,
same yesterday, same next week. Plus =E7a change, plus c'est la m=EAme
chose.
Health policy is quite terse and detailed all at the same time when
dealing with differences of all communicable diseases and the spread of
them. AIDS for example is a very nasty fucker, but it is not AIDS that
kills Africans it is the lack of infrastructure, access and education.
Without those three things the quality of care recieved and the
understanding of what is recieved is pretty much NIL. Now sticking the
problem on a leper island doesn't remove it either, in fact it only
exacerbates the situation, what you end up with is what happens in
Africa. People hide it. In Uganda people avoid the test like the
plague. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3243844.stm. Basically even
if your neighbour has it you shouldn't tell anyone out of pride and
uninformed ignorance. So if ignorance is a *****, everyone in Africa
is getting one.
Odd thing is in that huge mass of HIV infection, there are more
American companies learning more about how the human immune system
works than any other point in time. Heart, liver, kindey medications
have been developed en mass because of the outbreak, much to the
benefit of anyone over fifty with slight irregularity that wants
another 20 years on their lives. Because AIDS is really vicious with
those three organs, and the best way to develop a pill is to test it on
people that can show slight change without an immune system to combat
what you are feeding them in a pill format. It's amazing how the human
body really doesn't want a pill doing a job it wants to do. It's
easier to feed the pill to people that don't have an immune system and
make sure the results are promising for futher development (aka more
money).
It's the exact reason we have lab mice for specific conditions, rather
than fleets people in pick ups collecting field mice, we use mice that
die on time. Why, because the field mice would live longer. Why? So
the research and development policies of investment are met. Ask
yourself this question, have you ever heard of a medical research
project that WON'T take three to four years until a cure? No.
Financially it's impossible to keep investors tied any longer to a
project.
So going back to infection and ***** in mouth disease.
Like Uganda/AIDS what you end up with is something simlar to the VD of
the sixties except with deadlier effects. In the US of A the infection
rate of the clap was just as high as it was today. Strange that people
still don't listen, wrap it up or hand cream/porno for you.
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,873281,00.html
Odd thing is that most researchers have found that the rates DECREASED
by infected versus 100,000 pop. Something to do with the public
information about putting a rubber on had something to do with it.
What has changed are the identified types of VD now; it isn't just
Gon/Syp anymore, it's HPV, Gen Warts, Chyl, Herpes (varied),, etc.
What humanity over time has realised that we aren't the biggest bug on
the planet and primarily, recording infection rates of these newbies
that we are all sluts.
If anything the time archives give a good example that kids were just
as stupid then as they are now just not as informed of the salad bar of
*****/*****/***** disease available.
So which one did you have? It's like Pokemon, gotta collect them all!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 10:01:41 PM |
|
|
SpankyTClown wrote:
Ah,
So nursing is the trade. While in 1957 the majority of people in the
health community still were absolved to the fact
Gosh, what an illiterate.
that cancer was a
"possible" agent for their deaths it still wasn't fully resolved until
the eighties about what was cancer.
Cancer was known to the Greeks to be a cause of death.
Even today the cancer still is
very difficult to diagnose and even harder to pin down in a patient
that has it because it like to travel.
An autopsist who cannot detect when cancer is the cause of death is not
fit to don the gloves.
What your Doctor said to your
employer then meant about jack *****, and jack left town. Same today,
same yesterday, same next week. Plus =E7a change, plus c'est la m=EAme
chose.
In the 1950s, the doctor did not talk to the employer. That was a big
legal no-no. Doctor-patient privilege was still a strong principle of
law in the US.
Health policy is quite terse and detailed all at the same time when
dealing with differences of all communicable diseases and the spread of
them. AIDS for example is a very nasty fucker, but it is not AIDS that
kills Africans it is the lack of infrastructure, access and education.
The people are dying of illiteracy? Quick, teach them to read and AIDS
will go away.
Without those three things the quality of care recieved and the
understanding of what is recieved is pretty much NIL. Now sticking the
problem on a leper island doesn't remove it either, in fact it only
exacerbates the situation, what you end up with is what happens in
Africa. People hide it. In Uganda people avoid the test like the
plague. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3243844.stm. Basically even
if your neighbour has it you shouldn't tell anyone out of pride and
uninformed ignorance. So if ignorance is a *****, everyone in Africa
is getting one.
So they say. But isolation killed the smallpox. No antibiotic, no
education, no miracle drug - isolate the patient. And it worked.
Odd thing is in that huge mass of HIV infection, there are more
American companies learning more about how the human immune system
works than any other point in time.
Wonderful. So Africa is one great Tuskegee experiment. We would not
want to ruin that, would we?
Heart, liver, kindey medications
have been developed en mass because of the outbreak, much to the
benefit of anyone over fifty with slight irregularity that wants
another 20 years on their lives. Because AIDS is really vicious with
those three organs, and the best way to develop a pill is to test it on
people that can show slight change without an immune system to combat
what you are feeding them in a pill format. It's amazing how the human
body really doesn't want a pill doing a job it wants to do. It's
easier to feed the pill to people that don't have an immune system and
make sure the results are promising for futher development (aka more
money).
And what does it matter if a few million black children die in agony,
as long as Ted Kennedy can continue to drink like a fish and keep his
liver.
Don't say another word: you have convinced me.
It's the exact reason we have lab mice for specific conditions,
Oops, you said too much.
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 11:23:31 PM |
|
|
Isolation yes, during the 30's.
Until a vaccine was developed, that's what stepped on it's head.
Again, people lie. "I've got a cold". What you think would happen?
People are smarter than you thunk?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 10:38:50 PM |
|
|
It's odd that almost everything you're writing sounds close to
information. Almost.
You have a political lean obviously. You're not offering anything but
the experience of a nurse that can't spell.
And to serve your purpose I did not change the subject. I offered a
placement on how to search for the information as it is a little
overwhelming to post.
The world is short of asses that want to throw themselves in front of
others. You seem to be full of "love" for the universe, as of which I
say "you win". There is no debate here, no interesting dialogue, just
another person so perfectly reasoned in their abilites that no one call
different because the world is perfect.
Altruism is a belief, not a right. You somehow skipped that, the 60's
are over, Easy Rider was not anything but a expose on how to litter and
Beatles/Yoko Ono sucked ***** cute as they were.
The point now, is just trying to clean up the mess. The next 20 years
is a bull market in putting people in wooden boxes in the developed
world, accepting it and moving on. Africa aside, last I looked there's
enough ***** locally in the "developed world" than to start thinking
globally about if someone in Africa has AIDS or is eating right. At
last count we have 20% of the population that cannot read/write/do
math, another 15% that can't even get enough to eat. What do you
fucking care about Africa when you have other things to do locally
unless you are in Africa. The stats are not much better across the
"developed world" globally with the exceptions or nordic countries and
costa rica (cool!).
And if you're not already aware of the fact, you don't need an
imaginary sky friend to do it. Just get off your ***** and do it. Nurse
or not, there are other spaces locally that need to completed as
projects, part time or otherwise. People need you out there, not in
church. And I suggest you keep that ***** of the leper island to
yourself if you want to help.
My favorite phrase of all time in this type of situation is this:
"The only consistent feature in all of your dissatisfying relationships
is you"
BTW it apply's both ways.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 11:18:10 PM |
|
|
You mean this Greek Cancer cure?
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Greek_Cancer_Cure.asp?sitearea=ETO
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cancer.html
http://www.askdrsears.com/html/4/T040300.asp
I'm searching the DB and I'm not finding anything, out of 1200 greek
texts and I haven't hit one "cure" yet, although a man in Plato's
republic refused Aristotelians and Stoics treatment of how many leeches
he should eat along with what would be know as marijuana today, somehow
he got better. No one followed up on if he lived. It's a wonderful
thing about the past everyone gets to "edit" your work and make *****
up.
Somehow the average Xian refuses to believe changes in the bible, but
Plato is open game because the ***** tease Aristotle is the Xian *****.
Google brought up the "greek cancer" results above BTW. If I have to
read them you do to. ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 01:55:12 AM |
|
|
SpankyTClown wrote:
You mean this Greek Cancer cure?
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Greek_Cancer_Cure.asp?sitearea=ETO
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cancer.html
http://www.askdrsears.com/html/4/T040300.asp
I wrote, "Cancer was known to the Greeks to be a cause of death." That
is all I wrote on the subject. I did not mention any treatment or
cure.
I'm searching the DB and I'm not finding anything, out of 1200 greek
texts and I haven't hit one "cure" yet, although a man in Plato's
republic refused Aristotelians and Stoics treatment of how many leeches
he should eat along with what would be know as marijuana today, somehow
he got better. No one followed up on if he lived. It's a wonderful
thing about the past everyone gets to "edit" your work and make *****
up.
As you show here, you don't have to wait 2,500 years for the edited
version of the past. People like you can get inventive about the
"past" within a single day.
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 09:31:21 PM |
|
|
The cost that is it takes on nursing staff to decide on what happens
to what ends up in the bin. You know why? It has do with selection,
the rarity of selection. Not everyone is a doctor and so many are
nurses. You want to be a doctor, get off your ***** and study you dumb
*****.
it avoids that nasty ideal of "Xian, Muslim, Jew, Buddist", personally
I need to know the person in bed effect exacting the term "I'm dying",
but the term is ***** you. You joined the core to ***** a doctor,
especially in the 50's/60's. It's weird that a ***** sucker is all over
the idea of humanity/divorce until their second divorce. Even after
the first divorce you watch these cunts trip themselves until they (the
people talking) put it into their own mouths.
How long ago was it that you lost your "love" of a doctor
Otherwise Andrew is a PHd something....he's a dude, I'm sure he sucks
twat.
BTW I still haven't found anything on cancer in Greece. Could you
please cite reference? I'm just getting "and she died"
Or is this to close to your situation?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
20 Mar 2006 07:13:04 PM |
|
|
Actually she wouldn't be 72, unless she was about 14 starting
university.
She would be 18 at HS grad, 22 after pre-med, 1 year for prepping for
exams unless she nailed them during her last year of premed. Then
there's the three years of medical studies, plus the four? or six?
years of catching doctor's farts.
Then there is the fact it's 2006, and somewhere between 22 - 30 she was
a med student.
Holy ***** Terry is eighty+ plus!!
And here I thought the golden girls, lawn bowling and filling depends
with bowel movements was the average past time of an 80 year old.
Obviously posting to newsgroups is something the younger of the
crucifix crew know and use, but I am quite surprised that she is spry
enough to get here. One could even say she's got "moxy".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "erikc" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 12:11:01 AM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2006 15:35:47 -0800, "Sound of Trumpet"
<soundoftrumpet@mail2world.com> wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591405/posts
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Common Voice
Good idea. Especially applied to you.
Erikc (alt.atheist #002) | "An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil."
BAAWA Knight (retired) | "The Truth against the World."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
19 Mar 2006 10:04:46 PM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2006 15:35:47 -0800, "Sound of Trumpet"
<soundoftrumpet@mail2world.com> wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591405/posts
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
19 Mar 2006 10:44:28 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:04:46 GMT,
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
"Sound of Trumpet" <soundoftrumpet@mail2world.com> wrote:
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
LOL!!!
I second that!!
But the GOOD news is that before much longer, society will reach
the point where it has become SO fed up with the hatefulness and
mindlessness of the Anti-Choicers that they will REJECT their agenda
outright, and relegate it to extinction, where it will join the agenda of
the segregationists.
And these days, one has about as much chance of running across
a segregationist as he has of running across a live pterodactyl. Any
person who'd let it be known that he was a segregationist would be
laughed out of town. The same fate awaits the Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists/homophobes... as society OUTGROWS **all** remnants of
such ludicrous hatefulness and bigotry.
Among SENSIBLE people, those bigots already constitute America's
National Laughingstock.
North America WILL become Bigotry-Free Zone.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
---
RRR Cult lemmings.
Dumber than dirt. America's own version of the Taliban.
Selfishly, hatefully, and mindlessly supporting sociopathic
agendas that seek to destroy vital personal liberties of
millions of people. (That's as dumb as it GETS!!!)
And constantly proving that to everyone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 01:10:13 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!! wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:04:46 GMT,
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
"Sound of Trumpet" <soundoftrumpet@mail2world.com> wrote:
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
LOL!!!
I second that!!
But the GOOD news is that before much longer, society will reach
the point where it has become SO fed up with the hatefulness and
mindlessness of the Anti-Choicers that they will REJECT their agenda
outright, and relegate it to extinction, where it will join the agenda of
the segregationists.
And these days, one has about as much chance of running across
a segregationist as he has of running across a live pterodactyl. Any
person who'd let it be known that he was a segregationist would be
laughed out of town. The same fate awaits the Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists/homophobes... as society OUTGROWS **all** remnants of
such ludicrous hatefulness and bigotry.
Among SENSIBLE people, those bigots already constitute America's
National Laughingstock.
North America WILL become Bigotry-Free Zone.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
I'd sure vote for 'retroactive abortion' for your sorry nazi
*****.
---
RRR Cult lemmings.
Dumber than dirt. America's own version of the Taliban.
Selfishly, hatefully, and mindlessly supporting sociopathic
agendas that seek to destroy vital personal liberties of
millions of people. (That's as dumb as it GETS!!!)
And constantly proving that to everyone.
Projection is good.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Get us the hell OUT of Iraq -- NOW!!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 02:07:57 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:13 -0800,
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
["Screech of Buzzard"] moronically spewed:
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
LOL!!!
I second that!!
But the GOOD news is that before much longer, society will reach
the point where it has become SO fed up with the hatefulness and
mindlessness of the Anti-Choicers that they will REJECT their agenda
outright, and relegate it to extinction, where it will join the agenda of
the segregationists.
And these days, one has about as much chance of running across
a segregationist as he has of running across a live pterodactyl. Any
person who'd let it be known that he was a segregationist would be
laughed out of town. The same fate awaits the Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists/homophobes... as society OUTGROWS **all** remnants of
such ludicrous hatefulness and bigotry.
Among SENSIBLE people, those bigots already constitute America's
National Laughingstock.
North America WILL become Bigotry-Free Zone.
I'd sure vote for 'retroactive abortion' for your sorry nazi
*****.
So you regard sensible, intelligent, fair-minded, and compassionate
egalitarians who stand up of personal liberties and human/civil rights to
be Nazis?
You need professional help.
To see a REAL Nazi, just head for the nearest mirror.
---
RRR Cult lemmings.
Dumber than dirt. America's own version of the Taliban.
Selfishly, hatefully, and mindlessly supporting sociopathic
agendas that seek to destroy vital personal liberties of
millions of people. (That's as dumb as it GETS!!!)
And constantly proving that to everyone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
21 Mar 2006 10:22:56 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Get us the hell OUT of Iraq -- NOW!!! wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:13 -0800,
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
["Screech of Buzzard"] moronically spewed:
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
LOL!!!
I second that!!
But the GOOD news is that before much longer, society will reach
the point where it has become SO fed up with the hatefulness and
mindlessness of the Anti-Choicers that they will REJECT their agenda
outright, and relegate it to extinction, where it will join the agenda of
the segregationists.
And these days, one has about as much chance of running across
a segregationist as he has of running across a live pterodactyl. Any
person who'd let it be known that he was a segregationist would be
laughed out of town. The same fate awaits the Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists/homophobes... as society OUTGROWS **all** remnants of
such ludicrous hatefulness and bigotry.
Among SENSIBLE people, those bigots already constitute America's
National Laughingstock.
North America WILL become Bigotry-Free Zone.
I'd sure vote for 'retroactive abortion' for your sorry nazi
*****.
So you regard sensible, intelligent, fair-minded, and compassionate
egalitarians who stand up of personal liberties and human/civil rights to
be Nazis?
The only concept in the above that applies to you is "nazi".
You need professional help.
To see a REAL Nazi, just head for the nearest mirror.
Projection is good.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Get us the hell OUT of Iraq -- NOW!!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Last Triumph Of Liberal Europe |
22 Mar 2006 09:30:34 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:13 -0800,
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
["Screech of Buzzard"] moronically spewed:
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Is something that, in your case, I would most certainly advocate.
LOL!!!
I second that!!
But the GOOD news is that before much longer, society will reach
the point where it has become SO fed up with the hatefulness and
mindlessness of the Anti-Choicers that they will REJECT their agenda
outright, and relegate it to extinction, where it will join the agenda of
the segregationists.
And these days, one has about as much chance of running across
a segregationist as he has of running across a live pterodactyl. Any
person who'd let it be known that he was a segregationist would be
laughed out of town. The same fate awaits the Anti-Choicers/RRR
cultists/homophobes... as society OUTGROWS **all** remnants of
such ludicrous hatefulness and bigotry.
Among SENSIBLE people, those bigots already constitute America's
National Laughingstock.
North America WILL become Bigotry-Free Zone.
I'd sure vote for 'retroactive abortion' for your sorry nazi
*****.
So you regard sensible, intelligent, fair-minded, and compassionate
egalitarians who stand up of personal liberties and human/civil rights to
be Nazis?
You need professional help.
To see a REAL Nazi, just head for the nearest mirror.
---
RRR Cult lemmings.
Dumber than dirt. America's own version of the Taliban.
Selfishly, hatefully, and mindlessly supporting sociopathic
agendas that seek to destroy vital personal liberties of
millions of people. (That's as dumb as it GETS!!!)
And constantly proving that to everyone.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Retroactive Abortion: The Latest Lie of Control Freak Conservatives |
20 Mar 2006 12:11:11 AM |
|
|
Sound of Trumpet <soundoftrumpet@mail2world.com> wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591405/posts
RETROACTIVE ABORTION
Common Voice
03.06.06
Jim Kouri
While Americans continue to struggle with the moral and legal issues
surrounding partial-birth abortion, the Europeans have moved on to
legalizing euthanasia for fully born children. Call it
retroactive-abortion.
Which is, of course, a shameless and evil lie.
Child euthanasia is still illegal in Holland
What a moron.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
