| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"papa jack" |
| Date: |
11 Jun 2004 03:50:04 PM |
| Object: |
Saddam Shipped WMDs Before and After War Began |
On June 11, 2004, the World Tribune.com posted an article titled:
"UN Inspectors: Saddam Shipped Out WMD Before War and After."
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html
______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein
shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well
as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and
after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.
"The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commis-
sion briefed the Security Council on new findings that
could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile
and WMD program.
"The briefing contained satellite photographs that dem-
onstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his
missile and WMD sites before and during the war...
[...]
"'The removal of these materials from Iraq raises con-
cerns with regard to proliferation risks," Perricos
told the council. Perricos also reported that inspec-
tors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped
abroad that still contained UN inspection tags.
"He said the Iraqi facilities were dismantled and sent
both to Europe and around the Middle East. at the rate
of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. Destinations
included Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey.
[...]
"The UNMOVIC report said Iraqi missiles were dismantled
and exported to such countries as Jordan, the Nether-
lands and Turkey. In the Dutch city of Rotterdam, an
SA-2 surface-to-air missile, one of at least 12, was
discovered in a junk yard, replete with UN tags. In
Jordan, UN inspectors found 20 SA-2 engines as well as
components for solid-fuel for missiles.
[...]
"In April, International Atomic Energy Agency director-
general Mohammed El Baradei said material from Iraqi
nuclear facilities were being smuggled out of the
country."
______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
Now remember all the radical liberals, including Kerry,
who've accused President Bush of purposely lying about
the WMDs.
The Dim Dems are ONLY interested in dragging Bush down
so they can win the election. The very real possibility
that these fearful components will find their way to the
terrorists is the least of their concerns.
Immediate attention must be given to locating these
dangerous WMD components and making sure they are either
totally destroyed or moved to safe hands.
It's time to quit playing politics with the safety of
our nation.
.
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
23 Jun 2004 11:24:48 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops in Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_ to die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
24 Jun 2004 06:21:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops in Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_ to die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
24 Jun 2004 11:12:41 AM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops in Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_ to die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed and that American soldiers volunteered
to die. Is he angry at his own stupidity? Is he trying to blame
everybody but himself?
Of course. ***** hasn't changed.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
24 Jun 2004 11:50:01 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_ to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al Qaeda
being killed?
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they would
have to give their life for their country.
They do this on a volunteer basis.
Go find me any soldier that would say he or she didn't volunteer to do their
duty for their country and not realize they might die.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somebodyspecial" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 05:57:19 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_ to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
Your negation of your duty renders you a coward.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 08:46:41 AM |
|
|
"Somebodyspecial" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2a64a6fd.0406250257.5abec542@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has
lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your
fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops
in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_
to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al
Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they
would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
10 years U.S.A.F.
DD Form 214 in public hall of records
Flew on C-5's
Flew on combat missions
Served during Desert Storm
Worked with explosives
What did you do in the military?
How did you serve your country?
Today...still serving except now I serve the citizens in Delaware.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The_Annoyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 11:36:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:46:41 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somebodyspecial" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2a64a6fd.0406250257.5abec542@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has
lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your
fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of troops
in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they _volunteered_
to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al
Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they
would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
10 years U.S.A.F.
And look where you are now. Pitiful.
[...]
How did you serve your country?
By serving people with disabilities; to being a mother, etc. Lots of
people do these jobs, too.
And after college, hopefully more. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 01:52:19 PM |
|
|
"The_Annoyer" <ospreyisanidiot@mail.com> wrote in message
news:l0lod09hnd3edrqud5lt976up28d64pt67@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:46:41 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somebodyspecial" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2a64a6fd.0406250257.5abec542@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has
lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your
fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of
troops
in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they
_volunteered_
to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al
Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they
would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
10 years U.S.A.F.
And look where you are now. Pitiful.
Oh? And why don't you tell me where I am now and what is pitiful.
[...]
How did you serve your country?
By serving people with disabilities; to being a mother, etc. Lots of
people do these jobs, too.
There is nothing wrong with that at all.
And after college, hopefully more. :-)
Good, that is a worthwhile investment.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SomeSappyWriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 09:56:03 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:52:19 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The_Annoyer" <ospreyisanidiot@mail.com> wrote in message
news:l0lod09hnd3edrqud5lt976up28d64pt67@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:46:41 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somebodyspecial" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2a64a6fd.0406250257.5abec542@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has
lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your
fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of
troops
in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they
_volunteered_
to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al
Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they
would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
10 years U.S.A.F.
And look where you are now. Pitiful.
Oh? And why don't you tell me where I am now and what is pitiful.
....in a pit of stupidity and self-hatred.
It's one of the pitfalls of not having an education.
[...]
How did you serve your country?
By serving people with disabilities; to being a mother, etc. Lots of
people do these jobs, too.
There is nothing wrong with that at all.
People serve others in LOTS of ways - none of which are easy. Not even
folks who serve in the military.
And after college, hopefully more. :-)
Good, that is a worthwhile investment.
A very exepnsive one, to boot. But worth it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SomeSappyWriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
25 Jun 2004 10:02:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:52:19 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The_Annoyer" <ospreyisanidiot@mail.com> wrote in message
news:l0lod09hnd3edrqud5lt976up28d64pt67@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:46:41 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somebodyspecial" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2a64a6fd.0406250257.5abec542@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<TuadnZhntqFPmEbdRVn-sw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbeuhp$94c$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:24:48 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdk9t$2ck$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cbdirt$n4$1@bolt.sonic.net...
David W. Barnes <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
Osprey
And that final answer is the proof that David Barnes has
lied.
You are very brave with exposing the private lives of your
fellow
employees. Just like you are brave with the lives of
troops
in
Iraq
while you sit back and watch television as they die.
But didn't you notice? Heishman says that they
_volunteered_
to
die.
Do you think they are told to join?
Are you illiterate, *****?
Are you incapable of answering the question *****?
Angry? :-)
In the past few days he's written that he wants all of the people
associated with al Qaeda killed
Why don't you explain why you would have a problem with members of Al
Qaeda
being killed?
Your hypocrisy is glaring, Osprey.
and that American soldiers volunteered
to die.
They volunteer to serve, KNOWING there is always a possibility they
would
have to give their life for their country.
It's alleged you had the opportunity and ducked it.
10 years U.S.A.F.
And look where you are now. Pitiful.
Oh? And why don't you tell me where I am now and what is pitiful.
....in a pit of stupidity and self-hatred.
It's one of the pitfalls of not having an education.
[...]
How did you serve your country?
By serving people with disabilities; to being a mother, etc. Lots of
people do these jobs, too.
There is nothing wrong with that at all.
People serve others in LOTS of ways - none of which are easy. Not even
for folks who serve in the military.
And after college, hopefully more. :-)
Good, that is a worthwhile investment.
A very exepnsive one, to boot. But worth it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
23 Jun 2004 02:14:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:04:06 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:230620040745454795%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <r-SdnbwLIOuIH0TdRVn-ug@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:cmvhd0di054ggmnerdi91htvthogbp2hq5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:19:11 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <j-mdnbyzBsQxqEXdRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:220620040553499548%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <hq9gd0980ahopdabftrmpqt3u27hhdafd5@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 05:25:10 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <5h4gd0p5o8s17vshc9da9obnl5mvvdr13q@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
So? That doesn't mean you like being
around
her, or
love
her,
or
respect her, for that matter.
The guy has always worked in a male
dominated
position.
So David Barnes is saying that men who work in
male
dominated
positions
don't like being around women.
This is classifying millions of men all over
the
U.S.
Actually, you are a rarity.
Where is your census report to back that up?
They don't do a census on men who are afraid of
women.
THOUSANDS of...
*****.
Once again, David pushed up against the wall to
support
another
one
of
his
***** claims...has run away again.
Do you really believe anyone buys this *****? David
seems to
view
you as a mouse.
No, I wouldn't say that. Bobby lacks a mouse's basic
honesty
of
purpose. His latest tactic is trying to claim that he
mistakenly
received a letter between David and Patrick all about
their
homosexual
fantasies, but I'll bet that he's never able to produce
said
'letter'
- he's so desperate he's reduced to making up even more
abject
lies
about others. The worst part is that he finds such lies
to be
a
source
of strength - he actually believes that making ***** like
that
up
lets
him 'win'.
I haven't seen that one! How did he "accidently" come by
this?
That's the jarring part. He's either just admitted to lying
by
his
actions or he's hacked (or hired somebody to hack) your
respective
ISPs, into your inboxes.
Then he is lying. The letter never existed, of course.
And he admitted so in his lies!
They guy is as scummy as they come. Which is fine, there are
many
scum
bags out there. But I ask you, how could on become a guard,
working
for the state, with his lack of honor or integrity? To be a
guard in
Delaware, you don't even need a high school education, but don't
you
think being a liar would be a BAD thing there? (And to think -
he
hopes to be a real police officer some day. It will never
happen...)
If you want an ear full about Heishman, give William Gosnell a
call
in
Delaware.
I just called Bill..:o)
We got a good laugh.
I'm sure he was laughing after you hung up.
Who is Mr. Gosnell, exactly?
Yes David, please go ahead and tell her who Gosnell is..:o)
An acquaintance of Heishman's.
And how all of the sudden you are backing off my request for you to
tell us in here everything you claim to know.
Backing off? I never agreed to it in the first place. You have been
begging me to tell you and I have told you to drop dead,
I have been given a list of questions that I was told I should ask you.
You are informed that your answers are being read by others, not just in
this news group.
So there will be no surprise to you.
This will settle your lie once and for all because you will refuse to
cooperate with these questions.
The reason you will refuse to cooperate is because you have lied the entire
time.
The refusals will be marked for the record and brought up each time you
continue to lie.
Here are the questions.
I have one for you:
Are you the real Robert Heishman who
works at the Department of Corrections?
Answer:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
23 Jun 2004 08:53:34 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:15:39 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:cmvhd0di054ggmnerdi91htvthogbp2hq5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:19:11 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <j-mdnbyzBsQxqEXdRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:220620040553499548%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <hq9gd0980ahopdabftrmpqt3u27hhdafd5@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 05:25:10 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <5h4gd0p5o8s17vshc9da9obnl5mvvdr13q@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
So? That doesn't mean you like being around
her, or
love
her,
or
respect her, for that matter.
The guy has always worked in a male dominated
position.
So David Barnes is saying that men who work in
male
dominated
positions
don't like being around women.
This is classifying millions of men all over the
U.S.
Actually, you are a rarity.
Where is your census report to back that up?
They don't do a census on men who are afraid of women.
THOUSANDS of...
*****.
Once again, David pushed up against the wall to support
another
one
of
his
***** claims...has run away again.
Do you really believe anyone buys this *****? David
seems to
view
you as a mouse.
No, I wouldn't say that. Bobby lacks a mouse's basic honesty
of
purpose. His latest tactic is trying to claim that he
mistakenly
received a letter between David and Patrick all about their
homosexual
fantasies, but I'll bet that he's never able to produce said
'letter'
- he's so desperate he's reduced to making up even more
abject
lies
about others. The worst part is that he finds such lies to be
a
source
of strength - he actually believes that making ***** like that
up
lets
him 'win'.
I haven't seen that one! How did he "accidently" come by this?
That's the jarring part. He's either just admitted to lying by
his
actions or he's hacked (or hired somebody to hack) your
respective
ISPs, into your inboxes.
Then he is lying. The letter never existed, of course.
And he admitted so in his lies!
They guy is as scummy as they come. Which is fine, there are many
scum
bags out there. But I ask you, how could on become a guard, working
for the state, with his lack of honor or integrity? To be a guard in
Delaware, you don't even need a high school education, but don't you
think being a liar would be a BAD thing there? (And to think - he
hopes to be a real police officer some day. It will never happen...)
If you want an ear full about Heishman, give William Gosnell a call
in
Delaware.
I just called Bill..:o)
We got a good laugh.
I'm sure he was laughing after you hung up.
Who is Mr. Gosnell, exactly?
Yes David,
I am not David. (But I'll note your total dismissal of women who think
you're nothing but a mindless jerk.)
[...]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
20 Jun 2004 11:02:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:50:03 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <us9bd0po8gs78vq7491h1sn4vg3rr3dd7b@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:55:50 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:190620042041521789%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <BOOdna1Jh-QDfkndRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Just because PapaJack is able to keep you from side tracking the issues
and
lying your way through is no need for
you to bring out your sexual preferences
You are the one who doesn't like being around women.
I am just married to one.
So? That doesn't mean you like being around her, or love her, or
respect her, for that matter.
The guy has always worked in a male dominated position. He , from what
he says, works tons of overtime, goes to school, is in a band, does
volunteer work, participates in a union, is a "webmaster" and as we
well know, spends a lot of time out here acting like a fool.
His wife and children must be so proud...
probably relieved.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
20 Jun 2004 11:13:08 AM |
|
|
In article <j8dbd056favc9og9q57b4qcales6icth4a@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:50:03 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article <us9bd0po8gs78vq7491h1sn4vg3rr3dd7b@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:55:50 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:190620042041521789%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <BOOdna1Jh-QDfkndRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Just because PapaJack is able to keep you from side tracking the
issues
and
lying your way through is no need for
you to bring out your sexual preferences
You are the one who doesn't like being around women.
I am just married to one.
So? That doesn't mean you like being around her, or love her, or
respect her, for that matter.
The guy has always worked in a male dominated position. He , from what
he says, works tons of overtime, goes to school, is in a band, does
volunteer work, participates in a union, is a "webmaster" and as we
well know, spends a lot of time out here acting like a fool.
His wife and children must be so proud...
probably relieved.
So true...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
19 Jun 2004 08:25:06 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:01:40 -0400, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:180620041928048679%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <8912d58d.0406181659.13a7eff5@posting.google.com>, osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<180620040753519220%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <rag5d01a67gl9l84uiltk7c1bfdl5v9k2d@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 02:48:00 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<170620042346158231%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <lK6dnd1Zb9h0L0zdRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:170620040743272035%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <xMednZCWgpvjCUzdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
< >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
< > wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or do you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply with
the
removal
of
WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not only
remove
them, he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides, that is
a NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I don't
recall
any
objects
to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during the war, how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not fighting
for any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative of
the
iraqi
people
and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged as
you?
Where
did
I say they could torture prisoners or that the US
government
has
the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for guards who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional officers.
You obviously don't know how to tell the difference when
someone
is
attacking a person or a group.
I have a HUGE collection of David Barnes comments about
"correctional
officers", NOT refering to me.
Would you like to see them? Or would you just like to
admit you
are
going
to snip them and come up with
some stupid remark?
The worst thing anyone could say about "corrections officers"
is
that
YOU are one of them. Other corrections officers are injured
on
the job
while YOU, the guard, plays on the computer at work. You
have
told us
so.
This is another lie by Barnes and it is his 19th lie in the
past
month.
I have never said any such thing.
If anyone wishes to provide evidence that will support Barnes
lying,
please
come forth and do so.
Go away.
Elmo,
You're responding to David.
He pretends he is responding to others but is really responding to me.
He does this often. It allows him to fool himself into believing his
is able to control himself.
No, I am not pretending.
I am fully prepared to take you on, but you continue to dodge and run.
So why waste the time.
What is that? Excuse number 187?
I am here,
Still there and not on your way to meeting AdamH.
if you are prepared to debate one of your claims let me know.
This is too funny. Watching you shift the burden of your
responsibility onto the shoulders of David is more amusing
than the Garfield movie.
By the way, June 30th...Legislative Hall...Dover De..you got your
opportunity to face not only De. Correctional Officers but many high
ranking supervisors with in the Department and Legislators. You have
your opportunity to speak and present your case.
Great. Have them send me an email and an agreement to pay my fee and
the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts or you don't.
We all have guts. Of course, your guts are more consistent of
beer and fast food than tenacity.
It appears you don't.
Well that shoots you down.
Hah.
I have made the arrangements, I will be expecting you. You said you
will come, here is your chance. More than 1,000 witnesses.
Than you can afford my fee and the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts to make the trip or you don't.
I can understand why you're immobolized, considering the present state
of your *guts.*
And just so we
are clear, you are a representative or agent of this organization who
has the authority to bind them into this agreement, correct?
There will be no agreement, you said you would come and state your claim
about me to
other Correctional Officers.
Now we see you are not capable of doing so.
Stop trying to talk "tough." Because you aren't.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
19 Jun 2004 08:22:45 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:01:40 -0400, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:180620041928048679%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <8912d58d.0406181659.13a7eff5@posting.google.com>, osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<180620040753519220%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <rag5d01a67gl9l84uiltk7c1bfdl5v9k2d@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 02:48:00 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<170620042346158231%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <lK6dnd1Zb9h0L0zdRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:170620040743272035%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <xMednZCWgpvjCUzdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
< >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
< > wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or do you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply with
the
removal
of
WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not only
remove
them, he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides, that is
a NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I don't
recall
any
objects
to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during the war, how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not fighting
for any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative of
the
iraqi
people
and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged as
you?
Where
did
I say they could torture prisoners or that the US
government
has
the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for guards who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional officers.
You obviously don't know how to tell the difference when
someone
is
attacking a person or a group.
I have a HUGE collection of David Barnes comments about
"correctional
officers", NOT refering to me.
Would you like to see them? Or would you just like to
admit you
are
going
to snip them and come up with
some stupid remark?
The worst thing anyone could say about "corrections officers"
is
that
YOU are one of them. Other corrections officers are injured
on
the job
while YOU, the guard, plays on the computer at work. You
have
told us
so.
This is another lie by Barnes and it is his 19th lie in the
past
month.
I have never said any such thing.
If anyone wishes to provide evidence that will support Barnes
lying,
please
come forth and do so.
Go away.
Elmo,
You're responding to David.
He pretends he is responding to others but is really responding to me.
He does this often. It allows him to fool himself into believing his
is able to control himself.
No, I am not pretending.
I am fully prepared to take you on, but you continue to dodge and run.
So why waste the time.
What is that? Excuse number 187?
I am here,
Still there and not on your way to meeting AdamH.
if you are prepared to debate one of your claims let me know.
This is too funny. Watching you shift the burden of your
responsibility onto the shoulders of David is more amusing
than the Garfield movie.
By the way, June 30th...Legislative Hall...Dover De..you got your
opportunity to face not only De. Correctional Officers but many high
ranking supervisors with in the Department and Legislators. You have
your opportunity to speak and present your case.
Great. Have them send me an email and an agreement to pay my fee and
the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts or you don't.
We all have guts. Of course, your guts is more consistent of
beer and fast food and not tenancity.
It appears you don't.
Well that shoots you down.
Hah.
I have made the arrangements, I will be expecting you. You said you
will come, here is your chance. More than 1,000 witnesses.
Than you can afford my fee and the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts to make the trip or you don't.
I can understand why you're immobolized, considering the present state
of your *guts.*
And just so we
are clear, you are a representative or agent of this organization who
has the authority to bind them into this agreement, correct?
There will be no agreement, you said you would come and state your claim
about me to
other Correctional Officers.
Now we see you are not capable of doing so.
Stop trying to talk "tough." Because you aren't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
19 Jun 2004 08:30:46 AM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:3bf8d0d56a3obokd20mofug4vqt1df71p3@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:01:40 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:180620041928048679%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <8912d58d.0406181659.13a7eff5@posting.google.com>, osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<180620040753519220%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <rag5d01a67gl9l84uiltk7c1bfdl5v9k2d@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 02:48:00 -0700, (osprey)
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<170620042346158231%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <lK6dnd1Zb9h0L0zdRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:170620040743272035%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <xMednZCWgpvjCUzdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
< >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
< > wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of
WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not only
remove
them, he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides, that
is
a NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I don't
recall
any
objects
to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during the war, how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative of
the
iraqi
people
and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged as
you?
Where
did
I say they could torture prisoners or that the
US
government
has
the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional officers.
You obviously don't know how to tell the difference when
someone
is
attacking a person or a group.
I have a HUGE collection of David Barnes comments about
"correctional
officers", NOT refering to me.
Would you like to see them? Or would you just like to
admit you
are
going
to snip them and come up with
some stupid remark?
The worst thing anyone could say about "corrections
officers"
is
that
YOU are one of them. Other corrections officers are
injured
on
the job
while YOU, the guard, plays on the computer at work. You
have
told us
so.
This is another lie by Barnes and it is his 19th lie in the
past
month.
I have never said any such thing.
If anyone wishes to provide evidence that will support
Barnes
lying,
please
come forth and do so.
Go away.
Elmo,
You're responding to David.
He pretends he is responding to others but is really responding to
me.
He does this often. It allows him to fool himself into believing
his
is able to control himself.
No, I am not pretending.
I am fully prepared to take you on, but you continue to dodge and
run.
So why waste the time.
What is that? Excuse number 187?
I am here,
Still there and not on your way to meeting AdamH.
Adam H. gave a false address and is afraid to give out his real name.
That is a dead issue now.
if you are prepared to debate one of your claims let me know.
This is too funny. Watching you shift the burden of your
responsibility onto the shoulders of David is more amusing
than the Garfield movie.
By the way, June 30th...Legislative Hall...Dover De..you got your
opportunity to face not only De. Correctional Officers but many high
ranking supervisors with in the Department and Legislators. You have
your opportunity to speak and present your case.
Great. Have them send me an email and an agreement to pay my fee and
the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts or you don't.
We all have guts.
You lie
Of course, your guts is more consistent of
beer and fast food and not tenancity.
It appears you don't.
Well that shoots you down.
Hah.
I have made the arrangements, I will be expecting you. You said you
will come, here is your chance. More than 1,000 witnesses.
Than you can afford my fee and the travel arrangements.
Nope, either you got the guts to make the trip or you don't.
I can understand why you're immobolized, considering the present state
of your *guts.*
And just so we
are clear, you are a representative or agent of this organization who
has the authority to bind them into this agreement, correct?
There will be no agreement, you said you would come and state your claim
about me to
other Correctional Officers.
Now we see you are not capable of doing so.
Stop trying to talk "tough." Because you aren't.
Too bad you don't have what it takes to find out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Continuing to correct Barnes lies |
19 Jun 2004 08:39:35 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:30:46 -0400, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:3bf8d0d56a3obokd20mofug4vqt1df71p3@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:01:40 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:180620041928048679%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <8912d58d.0406181659.13a7eff5@posting.google.com>, osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<180620040753519220%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <rag5d01a67gl9l84uiltk7c1bfdl5v9k2d@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 02:48:00 -0700, (osprey)
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:<170620042346158231%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article <lK6dnd1Zb9h0L0zdRVn-jA@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:170620040743272035%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <xMednZCWgpvjCUzdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
< >
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
< > wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of
WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not only
remove
them, he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides, that
is
a NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I don't
recall
any
objects
to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during the war, how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative of
the
iraqi
people
and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged as
you?
Where
did
I say they could torture prisoners or that the
US
government
has
the
right to?
| | | |
