| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"papa jack" |
| Date: |
11 Jun 2004 03:50:04 PM |
| Object: |
Saddam Shipped WMDs Before and After War Began |
On June 11, 2004, the World Tribune.com posted an article titled:
"UN Inspectors: Saddam Shipped Out WMD Before War and After."
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html
______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein
shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well
as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and
after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.
"The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commis-
sion briefed the Security Council on new findings that
could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile
and WMD program.
"The briefing contained satellite photographs that dem-
onstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his
missile and WMD sites before and during the war...
[...]
"'The removal of these materials from Iraq raises con-
cerns with regard to proliferation risks," Perricos
told the council. Perricos also reported that inspec-
tors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped
abroad that still contained UN inspection tags.
"He said the Iraqi facilities were dismantled and sent
both to Europe and around the Middle East. at the rate
of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. Destinations
included Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey.
[...]
"The UNMOVIC report said Iraqi missiles were dismantled
and exported to such countries as Jordan, the Nether-
lands and Turkey. In the Dutch city of Rotterdam, an
SA-2 surface-to-air missile, one of at least 12, was
discovered in a junk yard, replete with UN tags. In
Jordan, UN inspectors found 20 SA-2 engines as well as
components for solid-fuel for missiles.
[...]
"In April, International Atomic Energy Agency director-
general Mohammed El Baradei said material from Iraqi
nuclear facilities were being smuggled out of the
country."
______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
Now remember all the radical liberals, including Kerry,
who've accused President Bush of purposely lying about
the WMDs.
The Dim Dems are ONLY interested in dragging Bush down
so they can win the election. The very real possibility
that these fearful components will find their way to the
terrorists is the least of their concerns.
Immediate attention must be given to locating these
dangerous WMD components and making sure they are either
totally destroyed or moved to safe hands.
It's time to quit playing politics with the safety of
our nation.
.
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 01:19:44 PM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke
the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break
it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a
specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during
the
war,
how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting
or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for
any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative
of
the
iraqi
people and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted
as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to
torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged
as
you?
Where did
I say they could torture prisoners or that
the
US
government
has the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for
guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional
officers.
He never gets that.
Well, in his mind (such as it is), Bobby represents all
correctional
officers.
Which is a bloody insult, in itself.
Since when did I ever claim to represent all correctional
officers?
When David calls upon your stupidity, you respond as
correctional
officers as a whole.
Show any post that will prove your claim that I represent all
Correctional
Officers
Your reference to the fact that David's insulted all corrections
officer by pointing our your nonense is a post available in the
thread, "Continuing to Correct Barnes Lies."
This is not claiming I represent Correctional Officers.
I never said you claimed that - but you did represent yourself, as
such.
I am "a" Correctional Officer.
David's comments are directed at Correctional Officers
His comments were directed at one correctional officer (you),
Are you prepared to see the list of quotes or not?
who just
happens to be an idiot, and is a flagrant embarassment to the rest of
corrections officers who uphold their positions with dignity and
honesty.
Are you prepared to defend your claim that his comments were directed at me?
I have the list of quotes. Why are you afraid to view them and show us how
they were directed at me.
[...]
David's comments were insulting and every Correctional Officer...
His observations of your crapiness was directed to you.
Would you care to defend his statements?
I told you that he doesn't need defending by me, don't you read?
Why are you afraid to defend your claim that his statements were directed at
me?
[...]
I wonder how the rest of them would feel, knowing that
Bobby
thinks
he's speaking for them?
Not very happy. I'd imagine.
Would you care to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers
and
make any claims?
About you? I just have - in a world wide forum, no less.
So you are not willing to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers then.
My problem isn't with them, since they don't come in here and
apathetically and embarassingly represent a group of honest
officers,
like you do.
So you are unwilling to address a large group of Correctional
Officers
and
find out how they would feel about your failed strawman.
What strawman have I presented?
So you are not willing to stand forth in front of Correctional
Officers,
To the experts of logical fallacies, would Osprey's statement above
qualify as a Strawman?
Why are you afraid to go to Correctional Officers...
I'm waiting for the experts' answer.
You can't even answer that question either.
You can't even stand the fact that you are an imbecile.
Some tough woman you are...ROFL
Sexist.
You are a coward.
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
18 Jun 2004 12:56:19 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[snip for brevity]
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
When are you coming to see me? I've invited you several times for a
face-to-face debate and you've never shown up, *****.
You're just like the typical bully who runs at the mouth, but once you
stand toe-to-toe with him, he runs off wimpering. How pathetic.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
Look who wastes more time collecting snippings from David Barnes (and
even admits to it), but yet has the nerve to whine about someone else
spending "hours and hours in a news group".
Grow-up, you fucking hypocrite.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
18 Jun 2004 01:57:30 PM |
|
|
On 18 Jun 2004 10:56:19 -0700, (Pr0r3p) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[snip for brevity]
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
When are you coming to see me? I've invited you several times for a
face-to-face debate and you've never shown up, *****.
You're just like the typical bully who runs at the mouth, but once you
stand toe-to-toe with him, he runs off wimpering. How pathetic.
Yup. He's still not bothering to tell me what was 'bogus' about the
address that I gave him. He claims he went there and it was 'bogus'
but oddly enough he can't tell me why or even what was there.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
Look who wastes more time collecting snippings from David Barnes (and
even admits to it), but yet has the nerve to whine about someone else
spending "hours and hours in a news group".
Grow-up, you fucking hypocrite.
No, that would take something approaching maturity on his part.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
18 Jun 2004 02:27:33 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:57:30 -0400, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 10:56:19 -0700, (Pr0r3p) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[snip for brevity]
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
When are you coming to see me? I've invited you several times for a
face-to-face debate and you've never shown up, *****.
You're just like the typical bully who runs at the mouth, but once you
stand toe-to-toe with him, he runs off wimpering. How pathetic.
Yup. He's still not bothering to tell me what was 'bogus' about the
address that I gave him. He claims he went there and it was 'bogus'
but oddly enough he can't tell me why or even what was there.
LOL! Are you serious? I'll have to Google that.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
Look who wastes more time collecting snippings from David Barnes (and
even admits to it), but yet has the nerve to whine about someone else
spending "hours and hours in a news group".
Grow-up, you fucking hypocrite.
No, that would take something approaching maturity on his part.
Maturity? The guy outwardly lies about his educational situation.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
18 Jun 2004 02:33:15 PM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v9g6d0lqm59cph5ktsmakig2cnll4hp1to@4ax.com...
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:57:30 -0400, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 10:56:19 -0700, (Pr0r3p) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[snip for brevity]
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your
face.
When are you coming to see me? I've invited you several times for a
face-to-face debate and you've never shown up, *****.
You're just like the typical bully who runs at the mouth, but once you
stand toe-to-toe with him, he runs off wimpering. How pathetic.
Yup. He's still not bothering to tell me what was 'bogus' about the
address that I gave him. He claims he went there and it was 'bogus'
but oddly enough he can't tell me why or even what was there.
LOL! Are you serious? I'll have to Google that.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and
spend
hours and hours in a news group.
Look who wastes more time collecting snippings from David Barnes (and
even admits to it), but yet has the nerve to whine about someone else
spending "hours and hours in a news group".
Grow-up, you fucking hypocrite.
No, that would take something approaching maturity on his part.
Maturity? The guy outwardly lies about his educational situation.
Boy you idiots are so deseperate...you guys lie to each other now...ROFL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
27 Jun 2004 01:29:38 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:33:15 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v9g6d0lqm59cph5ktsmakig2cnll4hp1to@4ax.com...
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:57:30 -0400, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On 18 Jun 2004 10:56:19 -0700, (Pr0r3p) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[snip for brevity]
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your
face.
When are you coming to see me? I've invited you several times for a
face-to-face debate and you've never shown up, *****.
You're just like the typical bully who runs at the mouth, but once you
stand toe-to-toe with him, he runs off wimpering. How pathetic.
Yup. He's still not bothering to tell me what was 'bogus' about the
address that I gave him. He claims he went there and it was 'bogus'
but oddly enough he can't tell me why or even what was there.
LOL! Are you serious? I'll have to Google that.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and
spend
hours and hours in a news group.
Look who wastes more time collecting snippings from David Barnes (and
even admits to it), but yet has the nerve to whine about someone else
spending "hours and hours in a news group".
Grow-up, you fucking hypocrite.
No, that would take something approaching maturity on his part.
Maturity? The guy outwardly lies about his educational situation.
Boy you idiots...
Huh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Nicholson" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 11:07:53 PM |
|
|
In article <WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke
the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break
it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a
specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during
the
war,
how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting
or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for
any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative
of
the
iraqi
people and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted
as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to
torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged
as
you?
Where did
I say they could torture prisoners or that
the
US
government
has the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for
guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional
officers.
He never gets that.
Well, in his mind (such as it is), Bobby represents all
correctional
officers.
Which is a bloody insult, in itself.
Since when did I ever claim to represent all correctional
officers?
When David calls upon your stupidity, you respond as
correctional
officers as a whole.
Show any post that will prove your claim that I represent all
Correctional
Officers
Your reference to the fact that David's insulted all corrections
officer by pointing our your nonense is a post available in the
thread, "Continuing to Correct Barnes Lies."
This is not claiming I represent Correctional Officers.
I never said you claimed that - but you did represent yourself, as
such.
I am "a" Correctional Officer.
David's comments are directed at Correctional Officers
His comments were directed at one correctional officer (you),
Are you prepared to see the list of quotes or not?
who just
happens to be an idiot, and is a flagrant embarassment to the rest of
corrections officers who uphold their positions with dignity and
honesty.
Are you prepared to defend your claim that his comments were directed at me?
I have the list of quotes. Why are you afraid to view them and show us how
they were directed at me.
[...]
David's comments were insulting and every Correctional Officer...
His observations of your crapiness was directed to you.
Would you care to defend his statements?
I told you that he doesn't need defending by me, don't you read?
Why are you afraid to defend your claim that his statements were directed at
me?
[...]
I wonder how the rest of them would feel, knowing that
Bobby
thinks
he's speaking for them?
Not very happy. I'd imagine.
Would you care to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers
and
make any claims?
About you? I just have - in a world wide forum, no less.
So you are not willing to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers then.
My problem isn't with them, since they don't come in here and
apathetically and embarassingly represent a group of honest
officers,
like you do.
So you are unwilling to address a large group of Correctional
Officers
and
find out how they would feel about your failed strawman.
What strawman have I presented?
So you are not willing to stand forth in front of Correctional
Officers,
To the experts of logical fallacies, would Osprey's statement above
qualify as a Strawman?
Why are you afraid to go to Correctional Officers...
I'm waiting for the experts' answer.
You can't even answer that question either.
You can't even stand the fact that you are an imbecile.
Some tough woman you are...ROFL
Sexist.
You are a coward.
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
I hate reading about pissing contests. The drawbacks of testosterone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 11:35:29 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:07:53 GMT, Ron Nicholson <balie@rogers.com>
wrote:
In article <WNWdncFBcKrzfUzdRVn-tw@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke
the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break
it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a
specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during
the
war,
how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting
or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for
any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative
of
the
iraqi
people and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted
as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to
torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged
as
you?
Where did
I say they could torture prisoners or that
the
US
government
has the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for
guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional
officers.
He never gets that.
Well, in his mind (such as it is), Bobby represents all
correctional
officers.
Which is a bloody insult, in itself.
Since when did I ever claim to represent all correctional
officers?
When David calls upon your stupidity, you respond as
correctional
officers as a whole.
Show any post that will prove your claim that I represent all
Correctional
Officers
Your reference to the fact that David's insulted all corrections
officer by pointing our your nonense is a post available in the
thread, "Continuing to Correct Barnes Lies."
This is not claiming I represent Correctional Officers.
I never said you claimed that - but you did represent yourself, as
such.
I am "a" Correctional Officer.
David's comments are directed at Correctional Officers
His comments were directed at one correctional officer (you),
Are you prepared to see the list of quotes or not?
who just
happens to be an idiot, and is a flagrant embarassment to the rest of
corrections officers who uphold their positions with dignity and
honesty.
Are you prepared to defend your claim that his comments were directed at me?
I have the list of quotes. Why are you afraid to view them and show us how
they were directed at me.
[...]
David's comments were insulting and every Correctional Officer...
His observations of your crapiness was directed to you.
Would you care to defend his statements?
I told you that he doesn't need defending by me, don't you read?
Why are you afraid to defend your claim that his statements were directed at
me?
[...]
I wonder how the rest of them would feel, knowing that
Bobby
thinks
he's speaking for them?
Not very happy. I'd imagine.
Would you care to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers
and
make any claims?
About you? I just have - in a world wide forum, no less.
So you are not willing to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers then.
My problem isn't with them, since they don't come in here and
apathetically and embarassingly represent a group of honest
officers,
like you do.
So you are unwilling to address a large group of Correctional
Officers
and
find out how they would feel about your failed strawman.
What strawman have I presented?
So you are not willing to stand forth in front of Correctional
Officers,
To the experts of logical fallacies, would Osprey's statement above
qualify as a Strawman?
Why are you afraid to go to Correctional Officers...
I'm waiting for the experts' answer.
You can't even answer that question either.
You can't even stand the fact that you are an imbecile.
Some tough woman you are...ROFL
Sexist.
You are a coward.
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..I would laugh in your face.
You would do nothing but return to your sad lonely little house and spend
hours and hours in a news group.
I hate reading about pissing contests. The drawbacks of testosterone.
But I do love to watch Bobby make a fool of himself like that. It's
quite amusing, considering his record of promising to meet people and
then mysteriously failing to show.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
18 Jun 2004 07:24:52 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:35:29 -0400, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:07:53 GMT, Ron Nicholson <balie@rogers.com>
wrote:
[...]
I hate reading about pissing contests. The drawbacks of testosterone.
But I do love to watch Bobby make a fool of himself like that. It's
quite amusing, considering his record of promising to meet people and
then mysteriously failing to show.
He's promised to meet people, outside of Delaware? When?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 02:27:49 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:19:44 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal <thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction, not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
that
law based on a conflict of international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing to
invoke
the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing to
break
it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a
specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during
the
war,
how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting
or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for
any
regime,
government in exile, or as a represative
of
the
iraqi
people and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports as
twisted
as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to
torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged
as
you?
Where did
I say they could torture prisoners or that
the
US
government
has the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for
guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional
officers.
He never gets that.
Well, in his mind (such as it is), Bobby represents all
correctional
officers.
Which is a bloody insult, in itself.
Since when did I ever claim to represent all correctional
officers?
When David calls upon your stupidity, you respond as
correctional
officers as a whole.
Show any post that will prove your claim that I represent all
Correctional
Officers
Your reference to the fact that David's insulted all corrections
officer by pointing our your nonense is a post available in the
thread, "Continuing to Correct Barnes Lies."
This is not claiming I represent Correctional Officers.
I never said you claimed that - but you did represent yourself, as
such.
I am "a" Correctional Officer.
David's comments are directed at Correctional Officers
His comments were directed at one correctional officer (you),
Are you prepared to see the list of quotes or not?
who just
happens to be an idiot, and is a flagrant embarassment to the rest of
corrections officers who uphold their positions with dignity and
honesty.
Are you prepared to defend your claim that his comments were directed at me?
I have the list of quotes. Why are you afraid to view them and show us how
they were directed at me.
[...]
David's comments were insulting and every Correctional Officer...
His observations of your crapiness was directed to you.
Would you care to defend his statements?
I told you that he doesn't need defending by me, don't you read?
Why are you afraid to defend your claim that his statements were directed at
me?
[...]
I wonder how the rest of them would feel, knowing that
Bobby
thinks
he's speaking for them?
Not very happy. I'd imagine.
Would you care to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers
and
make any claims?
About you? I just have - in a world wide forum, no less.
So you are not willing to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers then.
My problem isn't with them, since they don't come in here and
apathetically and embarassingly represent a group of honest
officers,
like you do.
So you are unwilling to address a large group of Correctional
Officers
and
find out how they would feel about your failed strawman.
What strawman have I presented?
So you are not willing to stand forth in front of Correctional
Officers,
To the experts of logical fallacies, would Osprey's statement above
qualify as a Strawman?
Why are you afraid to go to Correctional Officers...
I'm waiting for the experts' answer.
You can't even answer that question either.
You can't even stand the fact that you are an imbecile.
Some tough woman you are...ROFL
Sexist.
You are a coward.
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..
Why would I want to "face" some scummy little filth in Delaware?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 04:06:45 PM |
|
|
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:h4s3d05s670buujabsbcirkbdem3ia3gk9@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:19:44 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W.
Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article
<-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine
or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US
is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to
comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction,
not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
that
law based on a conflict of
international
treaties.
It is a violation of international law.
including the Geneva Convention.
Isn't it odd how the US was willing
to
invoke
the
GC
against
Hussein's
regime, yet is also entirely willing
to
break
it?
The Geneva Convention applies to a
specific
regime.
And we violate it.
They violated the Geneva convention during
the
war,
how?
Saddam Hussein's
regime was defeated, and it ceased to
exist.
The
insurgents
aren't
representing the iraqi people in their
fighting
or
Hussein's
regime,
they are simply killing people
independently.
Therefore,
any
insurgents fighting in Iraq are not
fighting
for
any
regime,
government in exile, or as a
represative
of
the
iraqi
people and
are
not covered by the Geneva Convention.
What an *****. Are all Bush supports
as
twisted
as
you?
Apparently.
They seem to feel it is acceptable to
torture
prisoners.
Are all bushhaters as completely reality
challenged
as
you?
Where did
I say they could torture prisoners or that
the
US
government
has the
right to?
You are going to soon find out that left
extremist
liberals
like
Barnes
will
lie. They will put words in people's
mouths.
Heishman, the cowardly guard, sticks up for
guards
who
torture
prisoners. What a shock.
This is another lie by Barnes.
David Barnes has a true hatred towards
Correctional
Officers.
He was describing YOU not other correctional
officers.
He never gets that.
Well, in his mind (such as it is), Bobby represents
all
correctional
officers.
Which is a bloody insult, in itself.
Since when did I ever claim to represent all
correctional
officers?
When David calls upon your stupidity, you respond as
correctional
officers as a whole.
Show any post that will prove your claim that I represent
all
Correctional
Officers
Your reference to the fact that David's insulted all
corrections
officer by pointing our your nonense is a post available in
the
thread, "Continuing to Correct Barnes Lies."
This is not claiming I represent Correctional Officers.
I never said you claimed that - but you did represent yourself, as
such.
I am "a" Correctional Officer.
David's comments are directed at Correctional Officers
His comments were directed at one correctional officer (you),
Are you prepared to see the list of quotes or not?
who just
happens to be an idiot, and is a flagrant embarassment to the rest of
corrections officers who uphold their positions with dignity and
honesty.
Are you prepared to defend your claim that his comments were directed at
me?
I have the list of quotes. Why are you afraid to view them and show us
how
they were directed at me.
[...]
David's comments were insulting and every Correctional Officer...
His observations of your crapiness was directed to you.
Would you care to defend his statements?
I told you that he doesn't need defending by me, don't you read?
Why are you afraid to defend your claim that his statements were directed
at
me?
[...]
I wonder how the rest of them would feel, knowing
that
Bobby
thinks
he's speaking for them?
Not very happy. I'd imagine.
Would you care to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers
and
make any claims?
About you? I just have - in a world wide forum, no less.
So you are not willing to address a very large group of
Correctional
Officers then.
My problem isn't with them, since they don't come in here
and
apathetically and embarassingly represent a group of honest
officers,
like you do.
So you are unwilling to address a large group of Correctional
Officers
and
find out how they would feel about your failed strawman.
What strawman have I presented?
So you are not willing to stand forth in front of Correctional
Officers,
To the experts of logical fallacies, would Osprey's statement
above
qualify as a Strawman?
Why are you afraid to go to Correctional Officers...
I'm waiting for the experts' answer.
You can't even answer that question either.
You can't even stand the fact that you are an imbecile.
Some tough woman you are...ROFL
Sexist.
You are a coward.
Projection.
Too bad you are too much of a coward to face me..
Why would I want to "face" some scummy little filth in Delaware?
This is becoming a long thread and your cowardness is too obvious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblakes attempts to build strawman and fails |
17 Jun 2004 09:29:37 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:06:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:h4s3d05s670buujabsbcirkbdem3ia3gk9@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:19:44 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:7on3d05tk13mgiac8kr6d8b9q9afghojp1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:11:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:6en3d0994mplmeqd5kv1tt66mamdt6j3ok@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:05:57 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:oem3d05tfcr12sb2qenrvlpqha0130me95@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:49:06 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:kkl3d0pvtkq3fq93nssmpu46ebv0mtro7v@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:32:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:vuk3d0dokt90mnof7esj6c6k3tk87jifto@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:55:11 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:2ni3d0pmrvkf2peonl700ia073s5k9mp9u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:27 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Somesappywriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
message
news:q1h3d01fmle82l5cj5gtde0su4ia6r21j0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:56 -0400, Adam H.
<adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:43:27 -0700, "David W.
Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote:
In article
<bo43d0ls2l6k61oo43aljddsacb9mffr51@4ax.com>,
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:09:58 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:160620042206143060%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article
<-86dnWCPEbSCfU3dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The True AntiLiberal"
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:1f3b80af.0406161545.3b45d16d@posting.google.com...
"David W. Barnes"
<DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>
wrote
in
message
news:<160620040806028575%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
In article
<1f3b80af.0406160603.70d4038b@posting.google.com>,
The
True
AntiLiberal
<thetrueantiliberal@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
message
After 9/11, Bush said that he would
attack
preemptively
against
future
threats.
Do you disagree with his doctrine
or
do
you
feel
that
Iraq
wasn't a
future threat?
It wasn't, and Bush's doctrine is a
direct
violation
of
several
international treaties that the US
is a
signatory
of -
Hussein's regime was obligated to
comply
with
the
removal
of WMD.
NO which he didn't. He was supposed to not
only
remove
them,
he
was
supposed to document their destruction,
not
just
say,
their
destroyed.
Hussein was responsible for complying
with
that
order.
If
Hussien
HAD
complied with that decree, then the US
would
have
been
in
violation
for engaging in hostilities.
Is that the excuse this week? Besides,
that
is a
NATO
Issue.
How is it a NATO issue?
President Clinton signed into law the
removal
of
Hussein's
regime.
This has been US policy since 1998. I
don't
recall
any
objects to
| | | | |
