| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"LC" |
| Date: |
22 Aug 2007 03:16:58 PM |
| Object: |
Sales soar for morning-after pill |
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer information: http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
.
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 03:33:57 PM |
|
|
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 04:41:09 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1187814837.952170.127980@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus
of bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and
all national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that
sales of Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the
total for 2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product
as a prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal
court in Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend
that the FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority
to approve the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Mark Sebree
The charge that the "FDA acted unwisely under political pressure" is
particularly ironic, in that Shrub's administration (and it's constituents)
had exerted considerable pressure on the FDA to *not* approve Plan B:
"The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Family
Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the
American Academy of Pediatrics, and other leading U.S. medical organizations
all supported OTC access.[120] An advisory committee to the FDA recommended
that Plan B be made available over the counter in 2003.[121] In 2004, the
FDA refused the advisory board's recommendation and prohibited
over-the-counter sale, citing insufficient evidence that ECPs could be used
safely by adolescents without medical supervision. Reproductive rights
supporters accused the FDA of basing the decision on political pressure from
the pro-life lobby. The Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit
regarding the approval process, which has not been resolved as of December
2006. In the legal proceedings, two senior FDA officials have alleged in
depositions that the decision to reject the OTC application was made on
political, rather than scientific, grounds to "appease the administration's
constituents."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraception
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 04:29:41 PM |
|
|
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Garbodello" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 05:54:43 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1187818181.475830.195310@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales
of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It can't be more harmful than a full term pregnancy or an abortion.
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
She may not want her parents to know.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 06:35:37 PM |
|
|
"Garbodello" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:46ccb2a2$0$16328$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1187818181.475830.195310@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November,
and all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales
of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It can't be more harmful than a full term pregnancy or an abortion.
O.k., but lets also consider working on reducing young girls from having
sex, who shouldn't be having sex..I'm talking about very young girls, not 16
or 18 year olds.
We need to work on ways to find solutions to deter young kids from having
sex, who are not ready. Then there wouldn't be a need for these young girls
from having to look for pills like this.
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
She may not want her parents to know.
Well, parents have a right to know.
I know as a parent, if I had a 14 year old child (using 14 years old as an
example), I certainly would want to know what she is doing, what she is
taking, ect...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
22 Aug 2007 04:34:19 PM |
|
|
In article <1187818181.475830.195310@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 09:18:17 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-C94DE8.17341922082007@individual.net...
In article <1187818181.475830.195310@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November,
and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that
sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Misogyny is what you accuse men of who don't want you 'doing' their underage
daughters or their girlfriends or wives, isn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 10:44:22 AM |
|
|
On Aug 23, 10:18 am, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:jgkeegan-C94DE8.17341922082007@individual.net...
In article <1187818181.475830.195...@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November,
and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that
sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Misogyny is what you accuse men of who don't want you 'doing' their underage
daughters or their girlfriends or wives, isn't it?
No, that's not what he meant. But then, you've shown time and time
again that you don't understand the words you use.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 01:27:30 PM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1187883862.350538.315800@x40g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 23, 10:18 am, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:jgkeegan-C94DE8.17341922082007@individual.net...
In article <1187818181.475830.195...@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for
its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and
older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last
November,
and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that
sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the
total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as
a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal
court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend
that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority
to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Misogyny is what you accuse men of who don't want you 'doing' their
underage
daughters or their girlfriends or wives, isn't it?
No, that's not what he meant. But then, you've shown time and time
again that you don't understand the words you use.
Oops.
So, you mean that misogyny is what he accuses persons of who don't want
people having sexual intercourse before they are ready to be parents?
Which is it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 10:13:55 PM |
|
|
On Aug 23, 2:27 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1187883862.350538.315800@x40g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 23, 10:18 am, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:jgkeegan-C94DE8.17341922082007@individual.net...
In article <1187818181.475830.195...@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter
sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for
its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't
deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the
focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and
Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and
older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last
November,
and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that
sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the
total
for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as
a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal
court
in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend
that
the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority
to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Misogyny is what you accuse men of who don't want you 'doing' their
underage
daughters or their girlfriends or wives, isn't it?
No, that's not what he meant. But then, you've shown time and time
again that you don't understand the words you use.
Oops.
So, you mean that misogyny is what he accuses persons of who don't want
people having sexual intercourse before they are ready to be parents?
Which is it?
Neither.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 10:56:07 AM |
|
|
On Aug 22, 5:34 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1187818181.475830.195...@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:33 pm, Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:16 pm, "LC" <LC__...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ah, the free market...
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - "In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales,
the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its
manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven't deterred
critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.
The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus
of
bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug
Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older
should
be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.
Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and
all
national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of
Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for
2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a
prescription-only drug."
[...]
Of course, the pro-liars are outraged:
"A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research
Council
and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in
Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the
FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to
approve
the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only
distribution
based on the user's age."
Plan B consumer
information:http://www.go2planb.com/ForConsumers/Index.aspx
Read more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070822/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Respecting parents rights is "misogyny"???
Are you that much of a loon?
If you wish to talk to someone about "misogyny", look no further than
your buddy Ray Fischer who has openly stated he doesn't give a *****
about women and that they should tend to their responsibilities at
home.
Of course you will deny this and you will cut this part out.
You are in serious need of medical help.
Here is more for you to snip out and run away from; however, other
viewers will see it regardless of your deletions.
From: (Ray Fischer)
Originator: (Ray Fischer)
Date: 29 Jun 2007 07:50:43 GMT
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <4684b9d3$0$14120$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
"I don't give a ***** about women"
From: (Ray Fischer)
Message-ID: <b8283v$jq...@bolt.sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:06:56 GMT
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
If in
the event that the female turns out to be pregnant, then the man is
SUPPOSED to stick around.
Why? Is she a little girl who can't take care of herself?
Your words, not mine.
You're not answering the question.
No, she's NOT a little girl. There, happy now?
Why is he supposed to stick around?
It's his responsibility to BE A MAN and help out
Spare us the sexist *****.
So now it's sexist to be RESPONSIBLE?
And you should shut-up and attend to your RESPONSIBILITIES
around the home.
You don't want a man.
I already HAVE one dearie.
Then why the hell aren't you taking care of him instead of wasting
your time blathering about things you don't understand?
Get back to work, woman. Make yourself useful.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 11:49:27 AM |
|
|
In article <1187884567.270024.265060@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 5:34 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Respecting parents rights is "misogyny"???
i knew you'd try to change the subject. heh. discussions of your
misogyny seem to discomfort you as much as discussions of your lies.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 11:53:40 AM |
|
|
On Aug 23, 12:49 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1187884567.270024.265...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 5:34 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Respecting parents rights is "misogyny"???
i knew you'd try to change the subject. heh. discussions of your
misogyny seem to discomfort you as much as discussions of your lies.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Nowhere did I try to change the subject.
I was discussing parents rights to know and the health and well being
of women.
YOU cut in with this misogyny crap.
Nowhere and at no time have you EVER been able to show where I am
guilty of misogyny; however, when I prove countless times over about
someone within your ilk who is guilty of misogyny, you cut and run
every single time. Just as you did in this very posting.
We both know that you are never going to prove any of your claims.
Run along now, no one is really interested in talking to you anyway.
You are all alone now.
Maybe Gwen will talk to you, she is desperate too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 01:11:21 PM |
|
|
In article <1187888020.867586.101570@l22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 12:49 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1187884567.270024.265...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 5:34 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
I also think parental notification and knowledge is an issue here as
well.
as someone else posted recently, your misogyny is showing again.
worse yet, you don't know why.
Respecting parents rights is "misogyny"???
i knew you'd try to change the subject. heh. discussions of your
misogyny seem to discomfort you as much as discussions of your lies.
Nowhere did I try to change the subject.
I was discussing parents rights to know and the health and well being
of women.
you were arguing one of your preferred methods of misogyny. your need
to control women is pathetic.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 01:14:13 PM |
|
|
In article <1187888020.867586.101570@l22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
We both know that you are never going to prove any of your claims.
what a silly lie for you to have posted, prison clerk, unless you
have been demoted.
here is proof you lied about your military service.
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about
his military service)
Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual
'combat';" message-d:
1120068324.873041.196810@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 12:12:32 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
Best make ALL over-the-counter drugs illegal without presription.
You really are the worst of flaming liberals with your nanny-state
idiocy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 12:22:49 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <> wrote in message
news:46cdc000$0$14139$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin, we are talking about a drug that has a
specific effect on the body causing a miscarriage.
It's dangerous when we start throwing out drugs to just anyone
regardless of age.
Best make ALL over-the-counter drugs illegal without presription.
Those are your words, not mine.
Then again, you are well known for publicly attacking women.
From: (Ray Fischer)
Message-ID: <b8283v$jq...@bolt.sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:06:56 GMT
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
If in
the event that the female turns out to be pregnant, then the man is
SUPPOSED to stick around.
Why? Is she a little girl who can't take care of herself?
Your words, not mine.
You're not answering the question.
No, she's NOT a little girl. There, happy now?
Why is he supposed to stick around?
It's his responsibility to BE A MAN and help out
Spare us the sexist *****.
So now it's sexist to be RESPONSIBLE?
And you should shut-up and attend to your RESPONSIBILITIES
around the home.
You don't want a man.
I already HAVE one dearie.
Then why the hell aren't you taking care of him instead of wasting
your time blathering about things you don't understand?
Get back to work, woman. Make yourself useful.
From: (Ray Fischer)
Originator: (Ray Fischer)
Date: 29 Jun 2007 07:50:43 GMT
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <4684b9d3$0$14120$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
"I don't give a ***** about women"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 09:19:30 PM |
|
|
Osprey <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
You just hate women and want to force childbirth upon girls. That's
why you want to make it hard for women to get contraception.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
23 Aug 2007 09:37:27 PM |
|
|
In article <46ce4032$0$14149$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
coward osprey is not at all uncomfortable about lying even though
proof that he is lying is contained in the same post where he osts
his lie. that's what he did here.
You just hate women and want to force childbirth upon girls. That's
why you want to make it hard for women to get contraception.
that's true --- osprey clearly hates women.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 12:02:00 AM |
|
|
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy. I also wrote about parental rights, something you seem to
care little about.
You just hate women and want to force childbirth upon girls.
Coming from someone who just said...
From: (Ray Fischer)
Date: 24 Aug 2007 02:25:15 GMT
Message-ID: <46ce418b$0$14143$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
Because everybody knows that women are not capable of being
responsible for their choices. Men must take care of women.
You want to talk about hating women???
Oh brother, where do we start. First you tell a woman in this
newsgroup her place is at home. You tell another woman to "shut up".
You have said you don't give a ***** about women. Now you're saying
men must take care of women.
I don't even have to say anything, just let your own words do the
talking for me.
I could ask you to prove your claims, but like Keegan..you'll just
snip and run away and never get around to proving them.
That's
why you want to make it hard for women to get contraception.
Nope, I have never said I want to make it hard for women to get
contraceptions.
You're just outright lying again, nothing unusual for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 05:35:58 AM |
|
|
In article <1187931720.215160.88060@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
you are lying again. what you wrote is included above and proves you
hate women.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 07:09:17 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-E256B7.06355824082007@individual.net...
In article <1187931720.215160.88060@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show
that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
you are lying again. what you wrote is included above and proves you
hate women.
Wrong
Let's see someone you support and how he hates women.
From: (Ray Fischer)
Date: 24 Aug 2007 02:25:15 GMT
Message-ID: <46ce418b$0$14143$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
Because everybody knows that women are not capable of being
responsible for their choices. Men must take care of women.
From: (Ray Fischer)
Originator: (Ray Fischer)
Date: 29 Jun 2007 07:50:43 GMT
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <4684b9d3$0$14120$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
"I don't give a ***** about women"
From: (Ray Fischer)
Message-ID: <b8283v$jq...@bolt.sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:06:56 GMT
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
DivaSycamore <notha...@none.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
If in
the event that the female turns out to be pregnant, then the man is
SUPPOSED to stick around.
Why? Is she a little girl who can't take care of herself?
Your words, not mine.
You're not answering the question.
No, she's NOT a little girl. There, happy now?
Why is he supposed to stick around?
It's his responsibility to BE A MAN and help out
Spare us the sexist *****.
So now it's sexist to be RESPONSIBLE?
And you should shut-up and attend to your RESPONSIBILITIES
around the home.
You don't want a man.
I already HAVE one dearie.
Then why the hell aren't you taking care of him instead of wasting
your time blathering about things you don't understand?
Get back to work, woman. Make yourself useful.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 08:48:41 AM |
|
|
In article <Os6dnTEEb-TyV1PbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-E256B7.06355824082007@individual.net...
In article <1187931720.215160.88060@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show
that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
you are lying again. what you wrote is included above and proves you
hate women.
Wrong
typical liar heishman denial after having been caught lying again.
prison clerk.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 12:17:56 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
I also wrote about parental rights,
So you argue that drugs like aspirin should not be sold over the
counter because girls might get at it without parental permission,
You just hate women and want to force childbirth upon girls.
Coming from someone who just said...
So it's time for out-of-context quotes, pervert?
Here's one of yours:
I am a child molester
"Osprey" in <I0qdnYyFwbY3veeiXTWJkA@comcast.com>
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 12:32:34 AM |
|
|
On Aug 24, 1:17 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
Once again, for the illiterate, I am not talking about aspirin. I'm
talking about a drug that is used that will cause a miscarriage and
I'm also concerned about parental notification and parents rights.
Something you care little to nothing about. You're strawman isn't
going to work because I'm not going to let it work.
I also wrote about parental rights,
So you argue that drugs like aspirin should not be sold over the
counter because girls might get at it without parental permission,
I would hope that a parent would actively take a role in knowing what
their children are taking, regardless of what drug it is.
You just hate women and want to force childbirth upon girls.
Coming from someone who just said...
So it's time for out-of-context quotes, pervert?
Here's one of yours:
I am a child molester
"Osprey" in <I0qdnYyFwbY3veeiXTW...@comcast.com>
Here is where I get to expose your dishonest tactics. Let's take a
look at this message. Thank you for providing the message ID by the
way.
Oh, what's this???
Not Found
The requested message, I0qdnYyFwbY3veeiXTW...@comcast.com, could not
be found.
Hmmm, could it be you're making this up?
Yep, you are making it up as well as altering text.
What you have done was taken a statement or a sentence that was
something like this...
"So you're saying I am a child molester?"
And you are taking out the words
"So you're saying"
That's just plain out dishonest and lower than even Keegan would go.
How would have imagined there was anyone lower than James G. Keegan
Jr.?
Now, do you wish to explain to all the women in this newsgroup why you
have degraded them so badly?
Or do you want to run and hide again?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 05:37:30 AM |
|
|
In article <1187933554.485804.313000@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 1:17 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show
that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
Once again, for the illiterate, I am not talking about aspirin.
according to what you wrote, you are talking about aspirin, you lying
scumball. your words are still included above.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 07:08:51 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-60C41D.06373024082007@individual.net...
In article <1187933554.485804.313000@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 1:17 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show
that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay
making
the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the
FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if
this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
Once again, for the illiterate, I am not talking about aspirin.
according to what you wrote, you are talking about aspirin, you lying
scumball. your words are still included above.
You're desperate.
Maybe you need to take a few aspirin.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 08:47:45 AM |
|
|
In article <0tqdnQD2KNbJV1PbnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-60C41D.06373024082007@individual.net...
In article <1187933554.485804.313000@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 1:17 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence
will show that undue political pressure was placed on
the agency to delay making the drug OTC, or avoid
doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA should
make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs
and/or medicines their underaged daughters might be
taking? What if this drug is harmful to a developing
young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or
medicines". Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking
and if it is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
Once again, for the illiterate, I am not talking about aspirin.
according to what you wrote, you are talking about aspirin, you
lying scumball. your words are still included above.
You're desperate.
typical coward heishman rebuttal after being caught lying again.
prison clerk.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Sales soar for morning-after pill |
24 Aug 2007 12:56:06 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 1:17 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 23, 10:19 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> wrote:
Hopefully, such a lawsuit will backfire, and evidence will show that
undue political pressure was placed on the agency to delay making the
drug OTC, or avoid doing so all together. And therefore, the FDA
should make the drug available for all ages of women OTC.
Why?
Don't you think parents have a right to know what drugs and/or
medicines their underaged daughters might be taking? What if this
drug is harmful to a developing young girl? Do we know for sure?
Drugs like aspirin?
We are not talking about aspirin,
Yes we are, you lying dumbshit. You wrote "drugs and/or medicines".
Aspirin is a drug and a medicine.
What I wrote was a concern about what young girls are taking and if it
is healthy.
Young girls don't take aspirin?
Once again, for the illiterate,
Trying to explain things to yourself, moron?
I am not talking about aspirin.
Because you're a woman-hating hypocrite. You're just trying to
justify denying young women access to contraception.
I also wrote about parental rights,
So you argue that drugs like aspirin should not be sold over the
counter because girls might get at it without parental permission,
I would hope that a parent would actively take a ro | | | | | | | | | |
