| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Osprey" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2004 08:33:54 AM |
| Object: |
Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132157,00.html
....WASHINGTON - A key source who was named to back up CBS News' claims about
the authenticity of documents used in a report on President Bush's Air
National Guard service has recanted his support, saying the network got the
information wrong.
--
.
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 11:37:01 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132157,00.html
...WASHINGTON - A key source who was named to back up CBS News' claims about
the authenticity of documents used in a report on President Bush's Air
National Guard service has recanted his support, saying the network got the
information wrong.
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 01:39:53 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about honesty.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their mind?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 02:21:51 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't. I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 02:50:02 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your character.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
Waiting for your next word game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 03:12:39 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie. If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Waiting for your next word game.
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 03:37:00 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 04:20:40 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
So, you're lying again.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 04:52:03 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 04:57:27 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:52:03 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
Uh huh. You were asked to show where I changed my opinion and you are
unable to. That makes your opinion false and you a liar. Document your
claim, Bobby (as you say below, it is up to you to do so).
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
See above.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
So, those who scream 'forgery' are *not* responsible for their claim?
Is that what you are saying? Because, if so, you are saying that some
claims don't have to be proven, in which case you're going to need to
explain why that is so.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
Funny how every time you're asked to back up that claim you suddenly
find yourself unable to...
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
13 Sep 2004 11:36:55 PM |
|
|
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<5n5ck0d8vm7989f168voap29oqtfd3n6tl@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:52:03 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
Uh huh. You were asked to show where I changed my opinion and you are
unable to.
Just as you were asked to show where I said that those memo's were a
forgery and you know I didn't say that. I said they "appeared" or they
"may be"
That makes your opinion false and you a liar.
Just like you are a liar for saying I said something I didn't.
Document your
claim, Bobby (as you say below, it is up to you to do so).
Crow a little more
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
See above.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
So, those who scream 'forgery' are *not* responsible for their claim?
Is that what you are saying? Because, if so, you are saying that some
claims don't have to be proven, in which case you're going to need to
explain why that is so.
So you completely are going to ignore the claims of the memo's and
that the sources can't prove they are authentic. Glad we got that
cleared up, now I know your position.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
Funny how every time you're asked to back up that claim you suddenly
find yourself unable to...
Crow for a few more post
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 01:33:09 AM |
|
|
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<5n5ck0d8vm7989f168voap29oqtfd3n6tl@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:52:03 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Otherwise simply confirm that your 'opinion' is uninformed and
worthless, since I've already told you what my claim has been all
along.
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
Uh huh. You were asked to show where I changed my opinion and you are
unable to.
Just as you were asked to show where I said that those memo's were a
forgery and you know I didn't say that. I said they "appeared" or they
"may be"
You quoted sources that claimed they *were* forgeries. Are you not
responsible for what you quote?
That makes your opinion false and you a liar.
Just like you are a liar for saying I said something I didn't.
See above.
Document your
claim, Bobby (as you say below, it is up to you to do so).
Crow a little more
So, you won't. As I thought.
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
See above.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
So, those who scream 'forgery' are *not* responsible for their claim?
Is that what you are saying? Because, if so, you are saying that some
claims don't have to be proven, in which case you're going to need to
explain why that is so.
So you completely are going to ignore the claims of the memo's and
that the sources can't prove they are authentic. Glad we got that
cleared up, now I know your position.
I have taken no position, Bobby - as I've stated more than once.
I have not once said the memos are authentic or not. This is only
confirming that your 'opinion' is a lie, since you can't back it up
and I've told you what I think.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
Funny how every time you're asked to back up that claim you suddenly
find yourself unable to...
Crow for a few more post
That would be how you admit that you're simply babbling and can't
admit that you're wrong *and* lying...
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 07:22:23 AM |
|
|
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<5n5ck0d8vm7989f168voap29oqtfd3n6tl@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:52:03 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Otherwise simply confirm that your 'opinion' is uninformed and
worthless, since I've already told you what my claim has been all
along.
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
Uh huh. You were asked to show where I changed my opinion and you are
unable to.
Just as you were asked to show where I said that those memo's were a
forgery and you know I didn't say that. I said they "appeared" or they
"may be"
You quoted sources that claimed they *were* forgeries. Are you not
responsible for what you quote?
That makes your opinion false and you a liar.
Just like you are a liar for saying I said something I didn't.
See above.
Document your
claim, Bobby (as you say below, it is up to you to do so).
Crow a little more
So, you won't. As I thought.
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
See above.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
So, those who scream 'forgery' are *not* responsible for their claim?
Is that what you are saying? Because, if so, you are saying that some
claims don't have to be proven, in which case you're going to need to
explain why that is so.
So you completely are going to ignore the claims of the memo's and
that the sources can't prove they are authentic. Glad we got that
cleared up, now I know your position.
I have taken no position, Bobby - as I've stated more than once.
I have not once said the memos are authentic or not. This is only
confirming that your 'opinion' is a lie, since you can't back it up
and I've told you what I think.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
Funny how every time you're asked to back up that claim you suddenly
find yourself unable to...
Crow for a few more post
That would be how you admit that you're simply babbling and can't
admit that you're wrong *and* lying...
He demands that others backup their claims, but when he's asked to do
it, he can only muster up "crow for a few more post" (which isn't even
grammatically correct).
But, what more did you expect from the newsgroup's most prolific liar,
hypocrite and moron?
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 06:20:16 AM |
|
|
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<5n5ck0d8vm7989f168voap29oqtfd3n6tl@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:52:03 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1l3ck09t3eqel3isab19k0itdsnuhkaus3@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:37:00 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vlvbk096gln9a67qk60f98hant2qqctgfb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:50:02 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:lnsbk0tnbae2l4rm5h4ijpfg47ehg19moh@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:39:53 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:boibk0hp5lpnbtb5l8n8t71k2omra6orfr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:33:54 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
Oh come on you Kerry ***** clown's...what are you going to do now????
Appears the sources that claimed the memo's were real, suddenly
changed
their mind.
Or, more properly, *ONE* source. You were never much for honest
summaries, Bobby.
Well seeing how you have lied many times..don't talk to me about
honesty.
Prove it, Bobby.
Adam, grow up. This has been proven, but you think you are so slick and
you
will try to grease up your words. You lie, period. It is your
character.
And yet you can't provide the proof, as usual.
There is no hope for you Adam. You keep playing your silly games, even
when
proof is provided, you run from it and still play your games.
I know that in most human beings, there is always hope. But in your case,
there is absolutley no hope for you.
Yeah, still no proof.
Yea, and still no hope for you.
You are just not an honest person.
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Otherwise simply confirm that your 'opinion' is uninformed and
worthless, since I've already told you what my claim has been all
along.
When are you going to learn you don't tell me what to do nor do you
decide?
It has been how many years now and you still don't get it?
Maybe if you tried to not act like a child and make false accusations
we could discuss issues in a better manner?
Since it is in my opinion that you are changing your opinion, it isn't a
lie.
Especially since you leave it so open for a person to determine his or her
own opinion simply because you are too cowardly to ever state what your
position actually is.
Uh huh. You were asked to show where I changed my opinion and you are
unable to.
Just as you were asked to show where I said that those memo's were a
forgery and you know I didn't say that. I said they "appeared" or they
"may be"
You quoted sources that claimed they *were* forgeries. Are you not
responsible for what you quote?
So I gave some quotes? That doesn't mean that "I" said that.
That makes your opinion false and you a liar.
Just like you are a liar for saying I said something I didn't.
See above.
Yea, show me where I said the memo's were forged.
Document your
claim, Bobby (as you say below, it is up to you to do so).
Crow a little more
So, you won't. As I thought.
Just like you haven't shown where I said the memo's are forged
So, you're lying again.
No, you are delusional again.
See above.
I have never said the memos are authentic. I've never
stated they were forged. I've pointed out the flaws in the 'evidence'
used to state that they are forged.
You don't find it odd that the person or persons have changed their
mind?
Happens all the time, but I still see no proof of authenticity (or
not) one way or the other.
Oh, so it happens all the time..so that makes it o.k.?
So now it's *not* okay for someone to change their mind?
Not when damage was done. When a person's character is attacked, and
damage
is done..no..it is not "o.k.".
Who ever is responsible will have to be held accountable.
I'm still waiting for the proof that these are forged or authentic.
It is not up to me to prove. It is up to the person or persons who made
the
allegation to prove they are authentic.
It's also up to those who scream 'forgery' to prove that.
No, it is up to the person or persons making the charge. And since this
person or persons are now suddenly backing off, it makes their case even
more weaker.
So, those who scream 'forgery' are *not* responsible for their claim?
Is that what you are saying? Because, if so, you are saying that some
claims don't have to be proven, in which case you're going to need to
explain why that is so.
So you completely are going to ignore the claims of the memo's and
that the sources can't prove they are authentic. Glad we got that
cleared up, now I know your position.
I have taken no position, Bobby - as I've stated more than once.
I have not once said the memos are authentic or not. This is only
confirming that your 'opinion' is a lie, since you can't back it up
and I've told you what I think.
Just like in the court system, it isn't up to the defendant, it is up to
the state.
You, on the other hand, are not, and as usual you can't be bothered to
wait for evidence.
Oh, now all of the sudden it is "wait for evidence"
Gee, how odd that is coming from you.
Oh? Why is that? Is it because you're so used to never providing
evidence for your claims?
I have provided evidence to many of my claims, but like most other cowards
in this newsgroup, each and every time I did, you looked the other way
because you couldn't ***** about it.
Kind of sad, being you are like that.
Funny how every time you're asked to back up that claim you suddenly
find yourself unable to...
Crow for a few more post
That would be how you admit that you're simply babbling and can't
admit that you're wrong *and* lying...
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 12:10:28 PM |
|
|
On 14 Sep 2004 04:20:16 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
[snip]
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie" means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Are you responsible for what you post or not? Answer the question. If
yes, you have claimed the memos are forged. If no, then anything you
quote is to be disregarded.
One or the other.
Oh, and in you posted a clear and
direct claim that the memos were forged.
Now, is this familiar?
"Show the readers where I ever said what you claimed, if you can't, it
will be your admittance you are a liar." That's YOU, Bobby.
Show the readers where my position changed. If you can't, it will be
your admittance that you are a liar.
While you're at it, show the readers your evidence that I'm
unemployed. If you can't, it will be your admittance that you are a
liar.
(your evidence goes below this line. Take all the space you need)
Just your own little game, biting you in the ***** again.
[snip the rest until Bobby handles this]
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 01:23:10 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7j8ek0lq6n137nd6c7qlm0o09qu2pd5n1n@4ax.com...
On 14 Sep 2004 04:20:16 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
[snip]
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the
memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to
use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping
their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even
though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie
there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my
position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie"
means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that
he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Are you responsible for what you post or not?
I am not responsible for what others say.
I never said they were forged, but they certainly are appearing to be more
and more, as more light is shed on this.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 01:51:23 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:23:10 -0400, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7j8ek0lq6n137nd6c7qlm0o09qu2pd5n1n@4ax.com...
On 14 Sep 2004 04:20:16 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
[snip]
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the
memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to
use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping
their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even
though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no lie
there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my
position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie"
means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something that
he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim, as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Are you responsible for what you post or not?
I am not responsible for what others say.
You are when you quote them as support for your post, Bobby.
I never said they were forged, but they certainly are appearing to be more
and more, as more light is shed on this.
Now, is this familiar?
"Show the readers where I ever said what you claimed, if you can't, it
will be your admittance you are a liar." That's YOU, Bobby.
Show the readers where my position changed. If you can't, it will be
your admittance that you are a liar.
While you're at it, show the readers your evidence that I'm
unemployed. If you can't, it will be your admittance that you are a
liar.
(your evidence goes below this line. Take all the space you need)
Just your own little game, biting you in the ***** again.
You get one more chance - I feel charitable today. Prove you're not a
liar. Let's see if you have the guts to do so instead of pulling your
usual dishonesty and snipping without marking.
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 02:56:53 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7afek0h17gqn1h3fd9nrknq8ugklf7f9am@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:23:10 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7j8ek0lq6n137nd6c7qlm0o09qu2pd5n1n@4ax.com...
On 14 Sep 2004 04:20:16 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
[snip]
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the
memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to
use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping
their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days
ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even
though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no
lie
there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my
position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where
I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie"
means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something
that
he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim,
as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your
position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Are you responsible for what you post or not?
I am not responsible for what others say.
You are when you quote them as support for your post, Bobby.
Wrong.
And I also made my position very clear in the post.
This is nothing but sheer desperation on your part Adam. It is a good thing
you and I never face each other in a court, I would have you in less than
half a day.
I never said they were forged, but they certainly are appearing to be more
and more, as more light is shed on this.
Now, is this familiar?
"Show the readers where I ever said what you claimed, if you can't, it
will be your admittance you are a liar." That's YOU, Bobby.
Show the readers where my position changed. If you can't, it will be
your admittance that you are a liar.
While you're at it, show the readers your evidence that I'm
unemployed. If you can't, it will be your admittance that you are a
liar.
It is very easy to prove.
There is absolutely no evidence what so ever that you are employed.
You are on here at all times during the day, seven days a week.
You refuse to correct me if I am wrong or answer any questions.
So therefore, logical conclusion, "inference", you are unemployed.
Very easy for you to prove me wrong, but yet you don't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Source Pulls Support for Memos on Bush Guard Service |
14 Sep 2004 03:01:16 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:56:53 -0400, "Osprey" <>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7afek0h17gqn1h3fd9nrknq8ugklf7f9am@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:23:10 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:7j8ek0lq6n137nd6c7qlm0o09qu2pd5n1n@4ax.com...
On 14 Sep 2004 04:20:16 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:<b14dk0poo2vl4tok9mb69l2kht0dvtvun4@4ax.com>...
On 13 Sep 2004 21:36:55 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
[snip]
I also don't understand how a guy who had never seen the
memos
became
a 'key source'. Also, the fact that Fox is still trying to
use the
superscript issue and the font as a blocker is not helping
their
credibility any, since those were knocked down two days
ago.
You've no doubt decided that these memos are fake even
though there
isn't evidence one way or the or the other, Bobby.
I see your position changing....:o)
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Lie.
How it that a lie? I see your position changing, there is no
lie
there.
You need to learn what the term "lie" means and stop abusing it.
If you want to prove that you're not lying, let's see you show
how what I've said about these memos has changed.
See, Bobby, it's a lie because I know I've never changed my
position
on these memos, and I've told you that, and you can't show where
I
did, as you claim.
No, it isn't a lie Adam and you need to learn what the term "lie"
means.
A lie is when someone intentionally, knowingly, says something
that
he or
she knows is not true.
You already know that I have not changed my opinion.
I stated it and you'll never find different. Document your claim,
as
you claim you have to.
You don't speak for me. In my opinion, you are changing your
position
as this goes along, and that isn't a lie..so sit over there with
keegan and whine.
He tried to lie about me earlier, but it didn't take long for him to
get embarrassed.
Yes, I saw that. What's that got to do with it? Back up how my
position on this has changed, liar.
Back up your claim that I said those memo's were forged, and get a job
so you can have a life.
Are you responsible for what you post or not?
I am not responsible for what others say.
You are when you quote them as support for your post, Bobby.
Wrong.
And I also made my position very clear in the post.
And yet you won't retract that post, so which are we to believe?
This is nothing but sheer desperation on your part Adam. It is a good thing
you and I never face each other in a court, I would have you in less than
half a day.
I never said they were forged, but they certainly are appearing to be more
and more, as more light is shed on this.
Now, is this familiar?
"Show the readers where I ever said what you claimed, if you can't, it
will be your admittance you are a liar." That's YOU, Bobby.
Show the readers where my position changed. If you can't, it will be
your admittance that you are a liar.
While you're at it, show the readers your evidence that I'm
unemployed. If you can't, it will be your admittance that you are a
liar.
It is very easy to prove.
There is absolutely no evidence what so ever that you are employed.
No evidence to back up your claim. Lack is not evidence.
You are on here at all times during the day, seven days a week.
Still no evidence to back up your claim. What if I work from home?
You refuse to correct me if I am wrong or answer any questions.
Still no evidence to back up your claim. I'm not the one with a claim
to prove here.
So therefore, logical conclusion, "inference", you are unemployed.
Still no evidence to back up your claim. I see you are a liar.
Very easy for you to prove me wrong, but yet you don't.
You are now a self-admitted liar. Thanks for confirming that.
See, you have to prove your claim, with evidence, not by pointing out
that there's nothing to say one way or the other.
You still can't address your other lie I included up there.
---
&quo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
