|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:13:43 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids. There are *many* legal ways to have children beyond having
a heterosexual sex partner, and as soon as human cloning becomes
commonplace, as it surely WILL someday, that will simply ADD to
the list of ways.
Tell me -- what to you think you're gaining by being a bigot?
Aren't you aware that being one is evidence of *mindlessness*?
But they don't want to change, any more than gays do.
Expecting anyone to change his/her sexual orientation
would be as bone-stupid as it would be to expect a left-handed
person to become a right-hander, or vice-versa.
Most gays know that. So do most straights.
And then... there are those dumber-than-dead-rock RRR cultists.
Take the average IQ of all people who are gullible enough to
be RRR cult lemmings, and I'd be willing to bet that it's between
70 and 85, And they certainly keep right on providing all the
evidence that we need in order to think so.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
--
RRR cult lemmings... dumber than dirt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 10:37:01 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids.
Can they create children?
I'll answer that.
No.
Hence homosexuality is abnormal and no about of garnishing can change a
simple scientific fact.
Homosexuality is anti-propagation and anti-life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 10:43:26 PM |
|
|
In News Onukf.63$FX1.20645@news.uswest.net,, Richard Dawkins at
Dawkins@Hell.com, typed this:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids.
Can they create children?
I'll answer that.
No.
Irrelevant to the political issues. There are, in the country, according
to the 2000 census, over 600,000 same gender couples raising just over
1,000,000 children. Do these families deserve the same level of
protections under the law?
Hence homosexuality is abnormal and no about of garnishing can change
a simple scientific fact.
So your premise is that people that can not produce children are abnormal?
Mainstream science says otherwise.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 10:44:51 PM |
|
|
In article <Otukf.8833$N45.4131@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Andrealphus <NOREALEMAIL10@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News Onukf.63$FX1.20645@news.uswest.net,, Richard Dawkins at
Dawkins@Hell.com, typed this:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids.
Can they create children?
I'll answer that.
No.
Irrelevant to the political issues. There are, in the country, according
to the 2000 census, over 600,000 same gender couples raising just over
1,000,000 children. Do these families deserve the same level of
protections under the law?
Of course they do.
Hence homosexuality is abnormal and no about of garnishing can change
a simple scientific fact.
So your premise is that people that can not produce children are abnormal?
Mainstream science says otherwise.
Gays who raise child are more likely to raise wanted and loved children.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jenn" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 11:47:20 PM |
|
|
In article <Onukf.63$FX1.20645@news.uswest.net>,
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids.
Can they create children?
Yes, gay people can produce children.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 10:42:39 PM |
|
|
In article <Onukf.63$FX1.20645@news.uswest.net>, Richard Dawkins
<Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids.
Can they create children?
I'll answer that.
No.
Can YOU create a child? I'll answer that. No.
Hence homosexuality is abnormal and no about of garnishing can change a
simple scientific fact.
Lots of things are abnormal. YOU are abnormal.
Homosexuality is anti-propagation and anti-life.
So what is your solution. Hate them?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 11:43:07 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:37:01 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids. There are *many* legal ways to have children beyond having
a heterosexual sex partner, and as soon as human cloning becomes
commonplace, as it surely WILL someday, that will simply ADD to
the list of ways.
Can they create children?
What part of:
...There are *many* legal ways to have children beyond having
a heterosexual sex partner, and as soon as human cloning becomes
commonplace, as it surely WILL someday, that will simply ADD to
the list of ways.
...which you OMITTED from the paragraph above, in your abject
dishonesty, were you too comprehension-impaired to understand the
FIRST time?
So you asked, "Can they create children?" Via the methods open
to them today with modern medical science? Yes!! In a virtual heartbeat!!
I'll answer that. No.
Thanks for this further proof of your doltish ignorance.
Hence homosexuality is abnormal...
Wrong. It's merely another facet of NORMALCY, just as is the
case with handedness and eye color. And **every bit** as TRIVIAL.
A NON-issue, for all people who are intelligent and sensible.
...and no about of garnishing can change a simple scientific fact.
LOL!!! It doesn't need any more "garnishing" than heterosexuality
does. It's a NON-issue, like eye color. Being discussed ONLY because
people who are ignorant enough to be RRR cult lemmings have been
CONNED into it by their hate-filled, irrational, and bigoted leaders.
Homosexuality is anti-propagation and anti-life.
It is neither. But about your ignorance, there is no doubt at all.
THANKS for your contribution to helping society to become aware
of just HOW hateful and mindless the RRR Cult's agendas and
lemmings truly are.
One last thing. In another post in this thread, you repeated a
question to me, and asked me to answer it. And I did.
So let's see YOU answer *these* questions from my last post --
which you conveniently OMITTED from this one:
Tell me -- what to you think you're gaining by being a bigot?
And...
Aren't you aware that being one is evidence of *mindlessness*?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
--
RRR cult lemmings... dumber than dirt.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 04:03:57 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:37:01 -0700, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
|
| "Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
| news:65i4p1ld9le6sj8a81n2turan88jbb2jpu@4ax.com...
| > On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
| > Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
| >> Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
| >
| >
| >>> Straights can change if they want.
| >
| >> Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
| >> anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
| >> if everyone were [gay].
| >
| > And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
| > no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
| >
| > But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
| >
| > Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
| > idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
| > being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
| > kids.
|
| Can they create children?
Neither can sterile or post menopausal heterosexuals.
| I'll answer that.
| No.
| Hence homosexuality is abnormal and no about of garnishing can change a
| simple scientific fact.
| Homosexuality is anti-propagation and anti-life.
IOW any person who doesn't breed is an abomination - yes?
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorthau@yourpantsyahoo.com.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 09:02:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Richard
Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com>
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:evf3p1tb3rqf086d09ave4t22rd3ejtifd@4ax.com...
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an anti-propagation
agenda?
The Earth would go dark in 100 years if everyone were fags.
Ever hear of a turkey baster, sweetums?
Besides, the Earth went dark for much longer after your ignorant
christstain forebears tried to take over and make everyone
christstain. And now there's 6.5 billion of us. LOL!
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie *****, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 12:14:48 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an anti-propagation
agenda?
"Anti-propagation agenda"?
Why do you do the wrong thing by promoting hate and fear?
The Earth would go dark in 100 years if everyone were fags.
Like it would go "dark" immediately if everyone was black?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 04:59:34 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:evf3p1tb3rqf086d09ave4t22rd3ejtifd@4ax.com...
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an anti-propagation
agenda?
The Earth would go dark in 100 years if everyone were fags.
Ya, recently, Craig seems to be excited about:
* killing his own kids in the womb
* having no kids with his boyfriend
* claims about creatures making themselves
I detect a pattern there... a pattern God already stated
would happen with those rejecting him.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:09:35 PM |
|
|
John P. Boatwright wrote:
Ya, recently, Craig seems to be excited about:
* killing his own kids in the womb
Craig has a womb? Who knew?!?
* having no kids with his boyfriend
Surprise, surprise.
* claims about creatures making themselves
Careful, someone might begin to understand you.
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:15:45 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids. There are *many* legal ways to have children beyond having
a heterosexual sex partner, and as soon as human cloning becomes
commonplace, as it surely WILL someday, that will simply ADD to
the list of ways.
Tell me -- what to you think you're gaining by being a bigot?
Aren't you aware that being one is evidence of *mindlessness*?
But they don't want to change, any more than gays do.
Expecting anyone to change his/her sexual orientation
would be as bone-stupid as it would be to expect a left-handed
person to become a right-hander, or vice-versa.
Most gays know that. So do most straights.
And then... there are those dumber-than-dead-rock RRR cultists.
Take the average IQ of all people who are gullible enough to
be RRR cult lemmings, and I'd be willing to bet that it's between
70 and 85, And they certainly keep right on providing all the
evidence that we need in order to think so.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
--
RRR cult lemmings... dumber than dirt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:18:17 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:q4i4p1lhi0spk5dl1vo1ii0jmth63bv4m2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Slade" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 02:44:25 PM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net...
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
This is the silliest of questions...because it's not going to happen.
Everyone is NOT going to be gay. EVER. And it is definitely not a
justification for withholding the rights of a group of people in a so-called
'free society'. Keep this to mind: Anytime, you open the door to trampling
the rights of others that door swings both ways. The only way to protect
your rights and freedom is to protect others because it's only a matter of
time before yours become infringed upon, if they already haven't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 03:10:52 PM |
|
|
"David Slade" <turnleft@themountain.com> wrote in message
news:JyIkf.139999$S4.123615@edtnps84...
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net...
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
This is the silliest of questions...because it's not going to happen.
Everyone is NOT going to be gay. EVER. And it is definitely not a
justification for withholding the rights of a group of people in a
so-called
'free society'. Keep this to mind: Anytime, you open the door to trampling
the rights of others that door swings both ways. The only way to protect
your rights and freedom is to protect others because it's only a matter of
time before yours become infringed upon, if they already haven't.
You're the one that doesn't
have no original thoughts in your tired old brain. Your busy schedule
down at the Cork and the Eagle and the Falcon and the Cockpit and the
Ramrod and the Club Baths and the Encounter Room must really wear you
out. In Dayton, the hot places to go for queers is the YMCA on
Monument Ave. and Today's Adult Books on 3rd St. In Columbus there's
the Flex on East Livingston. Do you have cards for all three places
and then some?
.
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
07 Dec 2005 08:33:43 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"David Slade" <turnleft@themountain.com> wrote in message=20
news:JyIkf.139999$S4.123615@edtnps84...
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net...
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay=
=2E
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
This is the silliest of questions...because it's not going to happen.
Everyone is NOT going to be gay. EVER. And it is definitely not a
justification for withholding the rights of a group of people in a=20
so-called
'free society'. Keep this to mind: Anytime, you open the door to tramp=
ling
the rights of others that door swings both ways. The only way to prote=
ct
your rights and freedom is to protect others because it's only a matte=
r of
time before yours become infringed upon, if they already haven't.
You're the one that doesn't
have no original thoughts in your tired old brain. Your busy schedule
down at the Cork and the Eagle and the Falcon and the Cockpit and the
Ramrod and the Club Baths and the Encounter Room must really wear you
out. In Dayton, the hot places to go for queers is the YMCA on
Monument Ave. and Today's Adult Books on 3rd St. In Columbus there's
the Flex on East Livingston. Do you have cards for all three places
and then some?=20
=20
=20
You seem to be extremely familiar with all the hangouts. What's up with =
that?
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
07 Dec 2005 09:57:56 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:33:43 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
You seem to be extremely familiar with all the hangouts. What's up with
that?
You have them all posted on your web page, *****-WIT. <SNIGGER>
.
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
09 Dec 2005 08:13:48 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:33:43 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
=20
You seem to be extremely familiar with all the hangouts. What's up wi=
th=20
that?
=20
I have them all posted on my web page, *****-WIT. <SNIGGER>
So that is the answer. Thanks!
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 07:33:22 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
In Dayton, the hot places to go for queers is the YMCA on
Monument Ave. and Today's Adult Books on 3rd St. In Columbus there's
the Flex on East Livingston. Do you have cards for all three places
and then some?
Hmm... A man posting from Hell, who also knows all sorts of things
regarding various venues...
I'd mention The Club, but I'd have to plead the 5th Avenue... <insert
irony here>
(By the by, missed you at the Pride Parade.)
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 11:28:05 PM |
|
|
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:CNMkf.12417$lh.11073@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
In Dayton, the hot places to go for queers is the YMCA on
Monument Ave. and Today's Adult Books on 3rd St. In Columbus there's
the Flex on East Livingston. Do you have cards for all three places
and then some?
Hmm... A man posting from Hell, who also knows all sorts of things
regarding various venues...
I'd mention The Club, but I'd have to plead the 5th Avenue... <insert
irony here>
(By the by, missed you at the Pride Parade.)
yea I know...the gas stations were closed so I had nothing to dump on the
parade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
05 Dec 2005 07:57:50 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Dionisio" wrote:
(By the by, missed you at the Pride Parade.)
yea I know...the gas stations were closed so I had nothing to dump on the
parade.
Bah, the one by the Courthouse was merely being "remodeled."
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jenn" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:22:10 PM |
|
|
In article <Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net>,
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:q4i4p1lhi0spk5dl1vo1ii0jmth63bv4m2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
And if everyone were left-handed, the right-handed scissors people would
go out of business. But there is only a certain percentage of
left-handed people, and there is only a certain percentage of gay
people. You want the gay people to do what, exactly? Pretend that they
are not gay so that there will be more children? Your statements make
no sense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:29:39 PM |
|
|
In article
<jennconducts-348457.18222803122005@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, Jenn
<jennconducts@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net>,
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:q4i4p1lhi0spk5dl1vo1ii0jmth63bv4m2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
And if everyone were left-handed, the right-handed scissors people would
go out of business. But there is only a certain percentage of
left-handed people, and there is only a certain percentage of gay
people. You want the gay people to do what, exactly? Pretend that they
are not gay so that there will be more children? Your statements make
no sense.
The real question is, "Why would anyone care if someone were gay?"
Take gay marriage. If you are a straight Right Wing conservative, gay
marriage has NO impact on you whatsoever, but it DOES make others
happy. So naturally, Right Wing conservatives oppose gay marriage
because they are so hateful they hate to see someone happy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jenn" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:34:13 PM |
|
|
In article <031220051829392624%dbarnes@aol.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
In article
<jennconducts-348457.18222803122005@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, Jenn
<jennconducts@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net>,
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:q4i4p1lhi0spk5dl1vo1ii0jmth63bv4m2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
And if everyone were left-handed, the right-handed scissors people would
go out of business. But there is only a certain percentage of
left-handed people, and there is only a certain percentage of gay
people. You want the gay people to do what, exactly? Pretend that they
are not gay so that there will be more children? Your statements make
no sense.
The real question is, "Why would anyone care if someone were gay?"
Take gay marriage. If you are a straight Right Wing conservative, gay
marriage has NO impact on you whatsoever, but it DOES make others
happy. So naturally, Right Wing conservatives oppose gay marriage
because they are so hateful they hate to see someone happy.
Further, if they were really "conservative" they wouldn't want the
government controlling who gets married.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Slade" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
04 Dec 2005 02:18:40 PM |
|
|
"Jenn" <jennconducts@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:jennconducts-
Further, if they were really "conservative" they wouldn't want the
government controlling who gets married.
Actually, conservatives traditionally want less government control over
economy and more government control over morality.
Liberals are the opposite...less control over morality and more control over
economy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 08:42:07 PM |
|
|
In article
<jennconducts-561C1C.18343103122005@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, Jenn
<jennconducts@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <031220051829392624%dbarnes@aol.com>,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
In article
<jennconducts-348457.18222803122005@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, Jenn
<jennconducts@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <Ilskf.96$Eh6.5426@news.uswest.net>,
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:q4i4p1lhi0spk5dl1vo1ii0jmth63bv4m2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:59:34 GMT,
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then....if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
And if everyone were left-handed, the right-handed scissors people would
go out of business. But there is only a certain percentage of
left-handed people, and there is only a certain percentage of gay
people. You want the gay people to do what, exactly? Pretend that they
are not gay so that there will be more children? Your statements make
no sense.
The real question is, "Why would anyone care if someone were gay?"
Take gay marriage. If you are a straight Right Wing conservative, gay
marriage has NO impact on you whatsoever, but it DOES make others
happy. So naturally, Right Wing conservatives oppose gay marriage
because they are so hateful they hate to see someone happy.
Further, if they were really "conservative" they wouldn't want the
government controlling who gets married.
Too many Republicans these days vote Republican, not because of
traditional Republican positions, but out of the hate factor. The
Republicans tell the ignorant and uneducated their hate is a positive
thing. The Democrats won't let you hate, so hate is your thing, you
have to go Republican.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 09:35:51 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:18:17 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then.... if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
Tell me -- WHY did you OMIT the *rest* of the thought I was
expressing, in which I said THIS? ---
Around a million gay singles and couples (despite the prevailing
idiocy keeping most American ones outside of Massachusetts from
being able to marry their same-sex partners) HAVE and are raising
kids. There are *many* legal ways to have children beyond having
a heterosexual sex partner, and as soon as human cloning becomes
commonplace, as it surely WILL someday, that will simply ADD to
the list of ways.
Oh. Yeah. So that you could be DISHONEST, right?
Tough luck, fool. GOTCHA!!!! (Again. As usual.)
Thanks for this further proof of my statement in my sig ---
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
--
RRR cult lemmings... dumber than dirt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Straights can change if they want. |
03 Dec 2005 10:34:23 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:ekm4p1lg9521bph5anhpf5aj60achqgb1a@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:18:17 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
John P. Boatwright [<name@For-Satan.net>] wrote:
...NOTHING but his usual moronic LIES.
<Lying swill flushed. *My* response to Dawkins follows> ---
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:45:13 -0700,
Richard Dawkins <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Straights can change if they want.
Why would we want to do the wrong thing by promoting an
anti-propagation agenda? The Earth would go dark in 100 years
if everyone were [gay].
And the problem with that would be? 100 years from now, almost
no one alive today would give a flying rat's *****.
But in reality, there's nothing "anti-propagation" about being gay.
Really?
Ok then.... if everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
Tell me -- WHY did you OMIT the *rest* of the thought I was
expressing, in which I said THIS? ---
Answer the question.
If everyone were gay what would happen to civilization?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
