LC wrote:

<rc022586@reinhardt.edu> wrote in message
news:1133720870.885180.285060@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

LC wrote:

<rc022586@reinhardt.edu> wrote in message
news:1133652095.778770.88740@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

LC wrote:

<rc022586@reinhardt.edu> wrote in message
news:1133566643.006970.97790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

LC wrote:

<rc022586@reinhardt.edu> wrote in message
news:1133545707.322919.172610@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

LC wrote:

<rc022586@reinhardt.edu> wrote in message
news:1133460283.306881.219360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

< a large amount of "rc's" redundant anti-women, anti-black bigotry
trimmed to save b/w>

Yet when I had to read the ancient Greek play Lysistrada in my
english class, all my professor could talk about was how great it
was that WOMEN could effect the turn out of a whole war and how
strong the WOMEN had to be to do it.

And the professor's *opinion* bothers you why?

It wasn't a very balanced opinion.

And your's are?
Should someone define "opinion" for you?

Now had we read the Illiad afterward
and she made comments about how great it was for Achilles, as a man, to
accomplish what he did, then it wouldn't have been so bad.

Gawd, you whine about the dumbest things.
Do yourself-and everyone exposed to you- a favor and grow up.

Now granted the events depicted in that play don't count as actual
history, but the history part fits in because somebody back then
actually had the nerve to think that WOMEN could do such a thing.
And now that I think about it, I seem to remember hearing about what
a great effect that WOMEN had on bringing about the Prohibition
because they didn't like their husbands bar-hopping every Saturday
night (of course why they'd be stupid enough to to marry such guys
is beyond me).

Never heard of Carrie Nation?

You mean the psycho with the hatchet? That woman was very violently
insane. Of course her mother thought she was Queen Victoria so the
insanity was obviously genetic.

And remember the statements of your mother? That she "hated you"? That
she disliked you so that she was going to "put you up for adoption"?
Perhaps now you see my point as to the origins of your current
disfunctional outlook, be it "genetic" or learned?
[...]

Steinam and NOW and all the rest of those whores would be crying
sexism.
There'd be law suits all over the place. It's a total double
standard.

What a lame argument.
Try harder.

You obviously know nothing about them. You should read up.

I know that their time was 30 years ago, and they're little more than
a historical footnote now.
Why you continue to be so obsessed is beyond me, other than it serves
your anti-women agenda.

NOW is very much active to this day.

And so is your Ku Klux Klan.
Neither seems to be accomplishing much lately.

Their president has been on Fox News more times than I can count.

On Faux News? Shocking!
Do you suppose it may be that NOW represents a diametrically opposed
viewpoint to the one Faux News and their viewers hold and, as such,
provides fodder that pumps up ratings?
I suspect reading up on interest groups, their methods, and how they and
the media use each other might smarten you up a bit.
Or not.

However, you are correct that Steinam

Y'know, since you've chosen to repeatedly use Ms. Steinem as your
scapegoat of choice for 'all things women', you really should learn to
spell her name right.
[...]

The equality thing is a total load. At my cousin's wedding his
new mother-in-law actually toasted to the fact that he would
never have the upper hand in anything again.

Add a complete lack of a sense of humor to your growing list of
deficiencies.
Sheesh! Lighten up, junior!

Yeah, that would explain why the bride decided not to change her
last name upon getting married.

Perish the thought!
This matters to *you* why?

It's an example to the point I was making.

No, it makes *my* point: You're so wrapped up in this "poor
discriminated-against white boy" strawman that you've manufactured, that
you've become *exactly* what you're ranting against: a bitter, humorless
idealogue that can't see the forest for the trees.
Oh, woe is you, hmmm?
[...]

And, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Exhibit One: "rc", a
racist, barely literate bigot masquerading as a "Christian".

When in this thread, or any other for that matter, did I admit to being
a Christian? None. A blanket statement.

Add 'lying' to your rapidly expanding list of shortcomings:
"Yes, I am a Christian. I grew up a methodist, went non-denominational
for a while and am now a southern baptist"

Message-ID:

Of course, we've already established that you're a hypocrite:
"I never could undterstand how you can save someone from being a sinner
without tellimg them that's what they were."

Message-ID:

[...]

To tell you the truth there are some Klan members, such as Hal
Turner, who haven't gone soft, but for the most part they have.

See, there you go steppin' on your ***** again.
The Klan has "gone soft"? Longing for some good old fashioned
lynchings, are you?

No, I've always considered lynchings as a tactic of last resort.

<snicker>
WWJD?

He'd probably go in and overturn the furniture. Granted no one dies
from that, but still.

But "still" what?
Your hypocrisies keeps piling up, rc.
That you can't see that only compounds your problems.
LC~ Wouldn't believe it if he hadn't seen it himself.
"Ignorance is an evil weed, which dictators may cultivate among their
dupes, but which no democracy can afford among its citizens."~ William H.
Beveridge.

LC wrote:

<

I don't know what he's thinking, but the logic stands if women don't
want to get raped then they should 1. not wear the mid-drift top with
the lowcut collar and a skirt that's so shirt it could actually pass
for a sash and 2. Stay off the freaking streets especially at night.

Besides, three forths of the women who charge men with rape are flat
out lying anyway. They go up to a guy acting all flirty and being all
consenual and when the guy finally touches the woman she up and
suddenly "changes her mind". That gives her the excuse she needs to
scream rape.

Oh my. Looks like we have a candidate for the <soc.men> whinefest.

Of course, a quick review of this loon's PH reveals the majority of it's
posts going to <rec.arts.comics.dc.universe>.

Yeah so? I also read paperbacks and watch Discovery. What's you're
point?

Go figure.

LC~ Looks like just another basement-dwelling, comic-collecting,
women-hating vidiot.

"There is no better measure of a person than what he does when he is
absolutely free to choose."~ Wilma Askinas

Exactly. Give a woman the right to vote and she votes for Clinton in
'96 just because she thinks he sexy. You laugh all you want, but that
actually happened. I still remember hearing it on the radio at the
time. And it was more than just one.

I don't know what he's thinking, but the logic stands if women don't
want to get raped then they should 1. not wear the mid-drift top with
the lowcut collar and a skirt that's so shirt it could actually pass
for a sash and 2. Stay off the freaking streets especially at night.

Besides, three forths of the women who charge men with rape are flat
out lying anyway. They go up to a guy acting all flirty and being all
consenual and when the guy finally touches the woman she up and
suddenly "changes her mind". That gives her the excuse she needs to
scream rape.

I don't know what he's thinking, but the logic stands if women don't
want to get raped then they should 1. not wear the mid-drift top with
the lowcut collar and a skirt that's so shirt it could actually pass
for a sash and 2. Stay off the freaking streets especially at night.

Spartakus wrote:

<

IAAH wrote:

"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote:

"Martin McPhillips" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote...

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote...

What's more, ethically, the woman is the only one that can
make the decision, and it is her decision that counts the
most.

And the only ethical time to make that decision is
before getting pregnant.

Is there a contest among anti-choicers to see who can post the
most

stupid

argument this week?

Was there a Christmas bonus for that and I didn't hear about it?

He's saying that if the woman doesn't want a baby she shouldn't be
stupid enough to get pregnant. Were you guys born this stupid?

Not stupid enough to make an arguement as dumb as McPhillips', that's
for sure.

Or don't women become pregnant from rape on your planet?

I don't know what he's thinking, but the logic stands if women don't
want to get raped then they should 1. not wear the mid-drift top with
the lowcut collar and a skirt that's so shirt it could actually pass
for a sash and 2. Stay off the freaking streets especially at night.

Besides, three forths of the women who charge men with rape are flat
out lying anyway. They go up to a guy acting all flirty and being all
consenual and when the guy finally touches the woman she up and
suddenly "changes her mind". That gives her the excuse she needs to
scream rape.

Spartakus wrote:

<

IAAH wrote:

"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote:

"Martin McPhillips" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote...

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote...

What's more, ethically, the woman is the only one that can
make the decision, and it is her decision that counts the most.

And the only ethical time to make that decision is
before getting pregnant.

Is there a contest among anti-choicers to see who can post the most

stupid

argument this week?

Was there a Christmas bonus for that and I didn't hear about it?

He's saying that if the woman doesn't want a baby she shouldn't be
stupid enough to get pregnant. Were you guys born this stupid?

Not stupid enough to make an arguement as dumb as McPhillips', that's for
sure.

Or don't women become pregnant from rape on your planet?

I don't know what he's thinking, but the logic stands if women don't
want to get raped then they should 1. not wear the mid-drift top with
the lowcut collar and a skirt that's so shirt it could actually pass
for a sash and 2. Stay off the freaking streets especially at night.

Besides, three forths of the women who charge men with rape are flat
out lying anyway. They go up to a guy acting all flirty and being all
consenual and when the guy finally touches the woman she up and
suddenly "changes her mind". That gives her the excuse she needs to
scream rape.