Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature)



 Science > Abortion > Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 7 of 8

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Date: 12 Jan 2006 01:17:03 AM
Object: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature)
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm
Web Posted: July 25, 1998
study in today's edition of the prestigious science journal "Nature"
reveals that members of the scientific community are "more likely than
ever to reject God and immortality," discloses Britain's Daily
Telegraph.
That claim is based on another study which repeats a historic
survey first made in 1916 by Dr. James Leuba of Bryn Mawr University.
It revealed that over eight decades ago, only about 40% of the
scientists surveyed expressed belief in any supreme being. Leuba
predicted that advances in education and technology would further
erode faith in religious claims.
In 1997, Edward Larson of the University of Georgia decided to
revisit Leuba's study and evaluate the prediction that religious
belief was disappearing, at least in the scientific community. Author
of the book "Summer for the God's" and a professor of science law and
history, Larson said that Leuba's original survey raised "good
questions."
"They provoke responses and give much more insight into how people
think than the vague Gallup poll question, 'Do you believe in God?'"
he told a writer from Research Reporter.
Larson closely followed Leuba's methodology, repeating the same
questions and attempting to find a representative sample which met the
original survey profile. "I had no idea how it would turn out," Larson
said.
60% responded, a figure considered high for any surveys. Of those,
40% expressed belief in a deity, while nearly 45% did not. Larson's
survey also discovered that physicists were less likely to have such
faith, while mathematicians were significantly more likely to believe
in a supreme being, as defined by Leuba.
"NATURE" SURVEY -- LESS AND LESS BELIEF
The follow-up study reported in "Nature" reveals that the rate of
belief is lower than eight decades ago. The latest survey involved 517
members of the National Academy of Sciences; half replied. When
queried about belief in "personal god," only 7% responded in the
affirmative, while 72.2% expressed "personal disbelief," and 20.8%
expressed "doubt or agnosticism." Belief in the concept of human
immortality, i.e. life after death declined from the 35.2% measured in
1914 to just 7.9%. 76.7% reject the "human immortality" tenet,
compared with 25.4% in 1914, and 23.2% claimed "doubt or agnosticism"
on the question, compared with 43.7% in Leuba's original measurement.
Again, though, the highest rate of belief in a god was found among
mathematicians (14.3%), while the lowest was found among those in the
life sciences fields -- only 5.5%.
THE GLASS IS EMPTIER...
Dr. Larson, in commenting on his 1997 replication of the 1916
study, noted that as with Leuba's report, his revelations elicited
wildly different accounts in the news media. "It's being spun in
different ways," Larson observed. "The Christian Science Monitor ran
an editorial exhorting the fact that scientists still do believe --
despite the fact that well less than half of the scientists in my
survey believed in God -- while the Journal of Humanism ran a piece
proclaiming that they do not."
"Is the glass half empty or half full?," Larson asked.
It would be difficult to interpret the figures reported in
"Nature," though, as suggesting that belief within the scientific
community is gaining popularity, or even holding its own. The "belief
in a person god" category suggests a precipitous drop, from about 40%
in Larson's survey to 7% in the "Nature" study.
CHANGING VIEWS OF SCIENCE, RELIGION, GOD
While Leuba and his study were historic curiosities when Dr.
Larson and co-researcher Larry Witham decided to revisit the findings,
during its time the 1916 survey ignited considerable controversy. Paul
Karr of Research Reporter noted that Leuba's findings "touched off an
anti-evolutionary movement that would culminate in the historic Scopes
trial where science and Darwinism faced off against Christianity and
creationism for the mind and soul of the American schoolchild."
Indeed, just nine years after the Leuba findings, high school biology
teacher John T. Scopes (1900-1970) was in the middle of a legal
controversy, accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act which forbade
the teaching of evolution in the state's public schools. The trial
drew worldwide publicity, and was soon dubbed the Monkey Trial due to
popular misconceptions about evolutionary findings -- that "people
came from monkeys."
Criminal attorney Clarence Darrow faced off against the
prosecution's most illustrious witness, former U.S. Secretary of State
William Jennings Bryan, a populist known for his famous "Cross of
Gold" oration. Darrow conceded "the facts of the case," that Scopes
had indeed violated the Butler Act -- but he also argued for the
scientific validity of evolution. Scopes was convicted and fined $100,
but the state supreme court later overturned the verdict on technical
grounds; meanwhile, the Butler Act remained on the books in Tennessee
until 1967.
But William Jennings Bryan, the consummate politician, also was
typical of the "amateur scientist" of the late nineteenth and early
twentieth century. He was a member of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, but as described by Edward Davis in a review
of "Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science (James
Gilbert, University of Chicago Press, 1997), was also "representative
of an older, less abstract, way of understanding scientific knowledge,
a common sense Baconianism that eschewed speculative hypotheses (such
as evolution) and saw both science and religion as ways of glorifying
God."
The paradigm exemplified by Bryan -- the practical, "amateur
scientist" who understood the scientific enterprise as a reaffirmation
of the sacred -- may be even less represented today within the
academic community than when John Scopes went to trial in Dayton,
Tennessee nearly three-quarters-of-a-century ago. Evolution, a core
tenet of modern life sciences such as biology, was not a major point
of contention even among professional academicians then. It reflected
the tension between the "common sense" position of the "amateur
scientists" and the more rigorously trained professionals. Davis
argues that "Bryan's 'greatest mistake' was to assume that this view
of science was still operative among professional scientists in the
1920s. Because it was still part of the popular conception of science,
however, his actions leading up to the Scopes trial 'revealed a fault
line between popular and professional science.'"
Today, the fault line appears between the scientific community
which increasingly doubts supernatural or religion-based explanations
of how the universe operates, and the wider popular culture which is
in the midst of both a fundamentalist revival, and a disturbing
popularity of new age and related pseudo science beliefs. One example
could be the recent article in Newsweek Magazine, which suggests a
convergence of scientific opinion and more traditional religious
doctrines. The agreement may exist more in the news rooms of popular
magazines, than in the libraries, labs and observatories where
scientists actually do their work.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2209 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke loves to play
with little girls' nipples:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.

User: "Gaia Barclay"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 16 Jan 2006 12:33:17 PM
=D0=BE =D1=85=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=88=D0=BE wrote:

Gaia Barclay wrote:

osprey wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cad993$0$58113$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to off=

er that

refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinio=

ns.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell=

a book

and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain d=

ead

can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anythin=

g=2E


Yet, there are cases that suggest you are wrong.


No, moron, there are not.


Yes, idiot, there are.

Nobody comes back from the dead.

Imagine that, the self thinking all knowing Fischer wrong.


Not usually and not this time, turd.

http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html


Not one single example of a person who was dead coming back to life.


You didn't even go to the cases then.

You are such a coward.


Your near-death experience (experience, silly--get it?) should be
interesting. It's said you feel everything--I mean everything--you've
done on this planet and how it affected everybody and everthing around
you and so on. Are you prepared for that, "coward?"


You do your best.

I suppose it's just like reviewing a file in a computer, no big deal.

Unless of course you've allowed a terrorist attack on your own soil,
and you've started an illegal war where over 100,000 innocents have
been killed.

Yes!

Days of reckoning.

Pay back's a *****.
.

User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:46:42 PM
osprey lied:

stupid
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en


"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en

.

User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 02:28:47 PM
Ray Fischer wrote:


osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see. If there is an after life, they
would see whatever people see in the after life.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 05:22:21 PM
Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.

THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:00:14 PM
In alt.atheism, Ray Fischer
<rfischer@sonic.net>
wrote
on 15 Jan 2006 23:22:21 GMT
<43cad92d$0$58113$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Pedant Point: Terry Schiavo did not rot, until her
feeding tube was removed (for the second time) and her
heart stopped ticking (for the second time). There
are also issues regarding cremation -- the meat is
burned before it has a chance to rot, presumably.
Otherwise, I'd have to agree that you're correct, though
it is an interesting question as to where one goes after
one dies. As Michael Valentine Smith [*] in the book
_Stranger In A Strange Land_ might have put it,
"They are not" -- and that's probably all we can ever say.
Near Death Experiences, however, are real enough -- as
are dreams. However, the reality thereof, like thought, is
mostly because the brain, in the altered state, is trying
to process what turns out to be meaningless nonsense --
and in the case of NDE may shut down while doing it, as
it runs out of fuel, in such a fashion as to create the
perception of a tunnel of light.
There are also some issues with respect to certain
operations where a person is literally chilled dead,
an aneurysm operated on, then the person brought back to
life by warming the body until the brain and heart start
to work again. The question of whether said person was
dead becomes a rather odd one in that case; we define
death as having to do with the brain but clearly that
may not be quite sufficient in this case. However, the
surgeon has at most an hour or so before toxins build up,
killing the cells.
[*] were he not otherwise steeped in the Martian duality,
which is strangely similar to the Christian one where
the Old ones flit about like ghosts, communicating with
the living via the Martian dialect -- but at least
they communicate. I liked his direct phrasing, even
if it did come out on occasion like pidgin English.
Of course the book can't be taken all that seriously;
there's been no evidence of any Martian "ships",
for example, and an FTL drive (the Lyle Drive, which
is mentioned in passing) is ridiculous -- more
on that below.
Star Wars and Star Trek have similar flaws; Star Trek
in particular postulates that one can swap spirits
(_Turnabout Intruder_) and touches on a variant of
Christianity (_Bread and Circuses_), and Star Wars is
practically dripping with the mysticism of The Force;
from an operational standpoint it is a crutch much
like Tom Baker's sonic screwdriver in Doctor Who, or
various Feinberger devices in Star Trek, or the
occasional tool in R2D2's chassis.
The Babylon 5 series had a mixture of weirdnesses,
as does Farscape, the Matrix trilogy, and Doctor Who.
Except for the Matrix that's partially explained by
the multitude of races/species each. The Matrix
is just ... weird. Ghostbusters doesn't even quite
count as science.
The only sci-fi film I can think of offhand without
this flaw is The Last Starfighter, and that's mostly
because they don't really explore it, and maybe Prince
of Space, which is so bad it's funny, when MST3k'ed.
Admittedly, I've not watched all that much sci-fi,
and Men in Black and Spaceballs are both parodies of
more serious works. Not that FTL/warpdrive travel can
be taken all that seriously anyway; to accelerate a
craft with matter-antimatter fuel to lightspeed would
take 63% of its fuel (v_f = v_i + v_e * log(M_i/M_f)
is the Tsiolkovsky Rocket Equation; in this case v_f
= v_e = lightspeed) in a Newtonian universe, and is
impossible in an Einsteinian one -- never mind that
jumping to Warp Eight would squash everyone against
the nearest bulkhead -- assuming the bulkhead didn't
detach itself from the spacecraft while doing so.
More hamburger, anyone? :-)
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.

User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 06:12:21 PM
Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "BOB"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 16 Jan 2006 12:14:05 PM
"Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')" <Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote in
news:43CAE572.1010281E@Il.Postino.it:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to
offer that refutes these experiences. All they have are their
own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell
a book and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain
dead can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see
anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.

Nothing more than wishful thinking by religious loons. You cannot even
prove the "potential" of an afterlife, much less the actuality on one.

.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:17:20 PM
Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.

Neither can you. All you can do is make up fairy tales.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:50:56 PM
Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to offer that
refutes these experiences. All they have are their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to sell a book
and none appear to have any independant verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically brain dead
can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.


Neither can you. All you can do is make up fairy tales.

I didn't claim that I could prove there was an after life.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "BOB"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 16 Jan 2006 12:16:03 PM
"Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')" <Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote in
news:43CB0AA1.D8BAB3D7@Il.Postino.it:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to
offer that refutes these experiences. All they have are
their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to
sell a book and none appear to have any independant
verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically
brain dead can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see
anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.


Neither can you. All you can do is make up fairy tales.

I didn't claim that I could prove there was an after life.

Because you cannot. You can't even prove the "potential" of an
"afterlife".


.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 16 Jan 2006 01:34:21 PM
BOB wrote:


"Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')" <Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote in
news:43CB0AA1.D8BAB3D7@Il.Postino.it:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to
offer that refutes these experiences. All they have are
their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to
sell a book and none appear to have any independant
verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically
brain dead can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see
anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.


Neither can you. All you can do is make up fairy tales.

I didn't claim that I could prove there was an after life.

Because you cannot. You can't even prove the "potential" of an
"afterlife".

Pretty much anything could be true. You might even have a brain.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "BOB"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 16 Jan 2006 04:57:11 PM
"Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')" <Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote in
news:43CBF5DA.989F9CE9@Il.Postino.it:



BOB wrote:


"Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')" <Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote in
news:43CB0AA1.D8BAB3D7@Il.Postino.it:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:



Ray Fischer wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') <John.Methuen@magersfontein.co.uk>
wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer wrote:

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Here are some links for you:

Take note: There has been nothing science has been able to
offer that refutes these experiences. All they have are
their own opinions.


People will notice that all of these start with a pitch to
sell a book and none appear to have any independant
verification.

Those who were brain dead and experienced NDE
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence01.html

People See Verified Events
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/evidence02.html

I found this next link interesting
Cases involving reincarnation
http://neardeath.home.comcast.net/reincarnation.html


People see what they want to see.


Oh, so you are suggesting that a person who is clinically
brain dead can control what they see.


A person is clinically brain dead is dead and doesn't see
anything.

They rot.

You really can't know what they see.


THEY ARE DEAD! A pile of rotting meat. The intellect of a
hamburger. Deceased. Pushing up daisies. Worm food.

Their corporeal essence is reduced to that, perhaps, but you cannot
address the potential of an after-life from your current state.


Neither can you. All you can do is make up fairy tales.

I didn't claim that I could prove there was an after life.

Because you cannot. You can't even prove the "potential" of an
"afterlife".

Pretty much anything could be true.

Coulda, woulda, shoulda.... It's true if you can prove it, Bondage. Can
you prove that there is an "afterlife" or even a "potential" of one?

You might even have a brain.

But I can prove I have a brain, Bondage.


.








User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:54:34 AM
osprey lied:

brain dead
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en


"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en

.

User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 09:22:23 PM
osprey lied:

I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en


"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en

.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 08:38:01 PM
In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C97BC9.DB45265A@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:




Of every NDE case in which the person reports seeing people on the
other
side, they always report seeing people that they knew in life that had
already passed on. If this was an "illusion", why don't they report
seeing
people still living?


Because they expect to see the dead. How tough is that?

That's not a theory though, that's just some supposition.


As is yours.

Really? What did I claim?

If you aren't claiming anything, what are we talking about.




Are you saying
that everyone who has a near death experience involving seeing people,
and then comes back and reports it, has in fact only claimed to see
those who have already died?


Absolutely. The first thing you need to remember is, they were never
dead. If you "come back" you were not dead.

But what does "dead" mean? If there is an after life, how do you know
that the process of going there doesn't occur while it is still possible
sometimes to bring the body and then your "spirit" back?

No brain activity.



I don't believe there has
ever been a case where someone was "clinically dead" where they "came
back." Yes- hearts stop. Breathing stops. But the brain continues.
As such, it can dream, hallucinate, etc.

How would you come back if your brain cells were destroyed?

You wouldn't. My point exactly.




When someone "dies," as you are calling it, their brain is deprived of
oxygen and nutrients. This can cause the brain to hallucinate. It is
only natural to "see," in your brain, what you expect to see.
Including the dead. It is part of the whole religious inculcation.

Why see people long dead and not people who are alive?

Because your EXPECT to see only dead people.

I remember that
in Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, they would have hallucinates in which the
other living members of the crew would tell them things. Why wouldn't
people who are alive tell you things in a similar way as you began the
process of dying and then you might come back and then would report
that? Why long dead people?

Because you think you have died and gone to "the other side." (Where
there are only dead people.)




And of all those people, how many have
really thought ahead of time about how they might see a tunnel and a
light and the people would only be already dead people?


Except that most don't see the tunnel. Some do - they expect it, or
the chemical reactions cause it.

More supposition?

Common sense. Besides, what are you saying? That since we don't know
for certain anything goes?





Or are their
brains making this all up in a way that is logical --after all how could
you talk to people beyond the grave who were not already beyond the
grave?-- while in the process of the rather traumatic experience of
dying?


The idea that these "people" are "beyond the grave" has never been
established, and there is no evidence whatsoever that they are there.
The most obvious explanation is the starving brain imagines it.

How about the starving brain hallucinates all that you see when you are
alive as well?

I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes

How do you know that you aren't the only being extant in
the universe and you are hooked up to some sort of matrix to facilitate
the rest?

So anything goes.




Wouldn't you be more likely to reach for more current memories at
this point than the image of someone long deceased that you can't hardly
remember the face of while you are alive and healthy and under no
pressure at all?


Not at all. I have dreams when I sleep. I am often amazed at how I
dream of things that happened long ago. Childhood memories, etc. The
human brain has all kinds of things going on in it. I suspect, we all
remember everything we have ever experienced, to one degree or another.
It just takes a trigger to set it free. Sometimes it is a comment from
someone, sometimes a smell, a visual image, etc.

But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?

Because you EXPECT to see the dead!
.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 10:24:37 PM
"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C97BC9.DB45265A@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:




Of every NDE case in which the person reports seeing people on the
other
side, they always report seeing people that they knew in life that had
already passed on. If this was an "illusion", why don't they report
seeing
people still living?


Because they expect to see the dead. How tough is that?

That's not a theory though, that's just some supposition.


As is yours.

Really? What did I claim?


If you aren't claiming anything, what are we talking about.

I've been discussing the means by which humans use defence mechanisms to
protect themselves from the feelings caused by knowing they will
eventually all die. One of those mechanisms is the Angry Atheist, Yang
being a prime example.




Are you saying
that everyone who has a near death experience involving seeing people,
and then comes back and reports it, has in fact only claimed to see
those who have already died?


Absolutely. The first thing you need to remember is, they were never
dead. If you "come back" you were not dead.

But what does "dead" mean? If there is an after life, how do you know
that the process of going there doesn't occur while it is still possible
sometimes to bring the body and then your "spirit" back?


No brain activity.

What happens in the brain if you freeze and greatly cool someone?
Doesn't brain activity stop in such cases?



I don't believe there has
ever been a case where someone was "clinically dead" where they "came
back." Yes- hearts stop. Breathing stops. But the brain continues.
As such, it can dream, hallucinate, etc.

How would you come back if your brain cells were destroyed?


You wouldn't. My point exactly.

Which means that it is possible that people imagine the tunnel and the
conversations with the dead people but that isn't evidence that they do.




When someone "dies," as you are calling it, their brain is deprived of
oxygen and nutrients. This can cause the brain to hallucinate. It is
only natural to "see," in your brain, what you expect to see.
Including the dead. It is part of the whole religious inculcation.

Why see people long dead and not people who are alive?


Because your EXPECT to see only dead people.

I never really thought of it.

I remember that
in Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, they would have hallucinates in which the
other living members of the crew would tell them things. Why wouldn't
people who are alive tell you things in a similar way as you began the
process of dying and then you might come back and then would report
that? Why long dead people?


Because you think you have died and gone to "the other side." (Where
there are only dead people.)

But that isn't what happens in dreams (or in those two TV shows when
people hallucinated). So I wonder if people really only think they can
talk to dead people when they die.




And of all those people, how many have
really thought ahead of time about how they might see a tunnel and a
light and the people would only be already dead people?


Except that most don't see the tunnel. Some do - they expect it, or
the chemical reactions cause it.

More supposition?


Common sense. Besides, what are you saying? That since we don't know
for certain anything goes?

No, just that it is possible and you haven't proved it not possible.





Or are their
brains making this all up in a way that is logical --after all how could
you talk to people beyond the grave who were not already beyond the
grave?-- while in the process of the rather traumatic experience of
dying?


The idea that these "people" are "beyond the grave" has never been
established, and there is no evidence whatsoever that they are there.
The most obvious explanation is the starving brain imagines it.

How about the starving brain hallucinates all that you see when you are
alive as well?


I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes

That's an insisted assumption. If you don't assume that you exist and
that there is a world around you that exists, you can't investigate it.

How do you know that you aren't the only being extant in
the universe and you are hooked up to some sort of matrix to facilitate
the rest?


So anything goes.

There is no evidence to disprove that matrix idea. We have to assume we
aren't in the perfect matrix. If it is a "perfect" matrix, does it even
matter whether we are in it or the "real" world or not?

Wouldn't you be more likely to reach for more current memories at
this point than the image of someone long deceased that you can't hardly
remember the face of while you are alive and healthy and under no
pressure at all?


Not at all. I have dreams when I sleep. I am often amazed at how I
dream of things that happened long ago. Childhood memories, etc. The
human brain has all kinds of things going on in it. I suspect, we all
remember everything we have ever experienced, to one degree or another.
It just takes a trigger to set it free. Sometimes it is a comment from
someone, sometimes a smell, a visual image, etc.

But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!

That's your supposition.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 10:37:36 PM
In article <43C9CEF7.2D2470F@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C97BC9.DB45265A@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:




Of every NDE case in which the person reports seeing people on the
other
side, they always report seeing people that they knew in life
that had
already passed on. If this was an "illusion", why don't they
report
seeing
people still living?


Because they expect to see the dead. How tough is that?

That's not a theory though, that's just some supposition.


As is yours.

Really? What did I claim?


If you aren't claiming anything, what are we talking about.

I've been discussing the means by which humans use defence mechanisms to
protect themselves from the feelings caused by knowing they will
eventually all die. One of those mechanisms is the Angry Atheist, Yang
being a prime example.

And you believe NDE is a defense mechanism?






Are you saying
that everyone who has a near death experience involving seeing people,
and then comes back and reports it, has in fact only claimed to see
those who have already died?


Absolutely. The first thing you need to remember is, they were never
dead. If you "come back" you were not dead.

But what does "dead" mean? If there is an after life, how do you know
that the process of going there doesn't occur while it is still possible
sometimes to bring the body and then your "spirit" back?


No brain activity.

What happens in the brain if you freeze and greatly cool someone?

Brain activity.

Doesn't brain activity stop in such cases?

Nope. Unless you die.






I don't believe there has
ever been a case where someone was "clinically dead" where they "came
back." Yes- hearts stop. Breathing stops. But the brain continues.
As such, it can dream, hallucinate, etc.

How would you come back if your brain cells were destroyed?


You wouldn't. My point exactly.

Which means that it is possible that people imagine the tunnel and the
conversations with the dead people but that isn't evidence that they do.

My point exactly. But which do you suppose is most likely? Oxygen
starvation causes hallucinations, which we know happens, or meeting
ghosts?







When someone "dies," as you are calling it, their brain is deprived of
oxygen and nutrients. This can cause the brain to hallucinate. It is
only natural to "see," in your brain, what you expect to see.
Including the dead. It is part of the whole religious inculcation.

Why see people long dead and not people who are alive?


Because your EXPECT to see only dead people.

I never really thought of it.

Of course you have. You are discussing it.



I remember that
in Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, they would have hallucinates in which the
other living members of the crew would tell them things. Why wouldn't
people who are alive tell you things in a similar way as you began the
process of dying and then you might come back and then would report
that? Why long dead people?


Because you think you have died and gone to "the other side." (Where
there are only dead people.)

But that isn't what happens in dreams (or in those two TV shows when
people hallucinated). So I wonder if people really only think they can
talk to dead people when they die.

Well, notwithstanding Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, many people believe
that when they die they go heaven, meet their dead parents, etc. What
a shock that when they believe they are dying, or believe they are
dead, they hallucinate these manifestations.







And of all those people, how many have
really thought ahead of time about how they might see a tunnel and a
light and the people would only be already dead people?


Except that most don't see the tunnel. Some do - they expect it, or
the chemical reactions cause it.

More supposition?


Common sense. Besides, what are you saying? That since we don't know
for certain anything goes?

No, just that it is possible and you haven't proved it not possible.

I never said it is not possible. It is also possible that we are all
martians who have been programmed to believe we are from earth, too.
But I'd say that is unlikely as well. The point is, the fact that
something is possible is no reason to believe it. We have evidence of
oxygen deprivation hallucinations. We have no evidence of life after
death, and the evidence, as well as common sense, tells us life after
death is unlikely.







Or are their
brains making this all up in a way that is logical --after all how
could
you talk to people beyond the grave who were not already beyond the
grave?-- while in the process of the rather traumatic experience of
dying?


The idea that these "people" are "beyond the grave" has never been
established, and there is no evidence whatsoever that they are there.
The most obvious explanation is the starving brain imagines it.

How about the starving brain hallucinates all that you see when you are
alive as well?


I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes

That's an insisted assumption. If you don't assume that you exist and
that there is a world around you that exists, you can't investigate it.



How do you know that you aren't the only being extant in
the universe and you are hooked up to some sort of matrix to facilitate
the rest?


So anything goes.

There is no evidence to disprove that matrix idea. We have to assume we
aren't in the perfect matrix. If it is a "perfect" matrix, does it even
matter whether we are in it or the "real" world or not?

Again, you are suggesting that anything goes. You suggestion is
unlikely.



Wouldn't you be more likely to reach for more current memories at
this point than the image of someone long deceased that you can't
hardly
remember the face of while you are alive and healthy and under no
pressure at all?


Not at all. I have dreams when I sleep. I am often amazed at how I
dream of things that happened long ago. Childhood memories, etc. The
human brain has all kinds of things going on in it. I suspect, we all
remember everything we have ever experienced, to one degree or another.
It just takes a trigger to set it free. Sometimes it is a comment from
someone, sometimes a smell, a visual image, etc.

But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!

That's your supposition.

Common sense vs. wild speculation? I'll take common sense any day.
.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 12:32:30 AM
"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C9CEF7.2D2470F@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:


In article <43C97BC9.DB45265A@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" wrote:




Of every NDE case in which the person reports seeing people on the
other
side, they always report seeing people that they knew in life
that had
already passed on. If this was an "illusion", why don't they
report
seeing
people still living?


Because they expect to see the dead. How tough is that?

That's not a theory though, that's just some supposition.


As is yours.

Really? What did I claim?


If you aren't claiming anything, what are we talking about.

I've been discussing the means by which humans use defence mechanisms to
protect themselves from the feelings caused by knowing they will
eventually all die. One of those mechanisms is the Angry Atheist, Yang
being a prime example.


And you believe NDE is a defense mechanism?

That's one possibility.

Are you saying
that everyone who has a near death experience involving seeing people,
and then comes back and reports it, has in fact only claimed to see
those who have already died?


Absolutely. The first thing you need to remember is, they were never
dead. If you "come back" you were not dead.

But what does "dead" mean? If there is an after life, how do you know
that the process of going there doesn't occur while it is still possible
sometimes to bring the body and then your "spirit" back?


No brain activity.

What happens in the brain if you freeze and greatly cool someone?


Brain activity.

Doesn't brain activity stop in such cases?


Nope. Unless you die.

So the new definition of "dead" is stopped brain activity? What happens
in animals that are frozen?

I don't believe there has
ever been a case where someone was "clinically dead" where they "came
back." Yes- hearts stop. Breathing stops. But the brain continues.
As such, it can dream, hallucinate, etc.

How would you come back if your brain cells were destroyed?


You wouldn't. My point exactly.

Which means that it is possible that people imagine the tunnel and the
conversations with the dead people but that isn't evidence that they do.


My point exactly. But which do you suppose is most likely? Oxygen
starvation causes hallucinations, which we know happens, or meeting
ghosts?

It doesn't really matter what is most likely when you are claiming you
are proving something.

Why see people long dead and not people who are alive?


Because your EXPECT to see only dead people.

I never really thought of it.


Of course you have. You are discussing it.

I'm discussing defence mechanisms. Someone said that people who "die"
and see dead people see dead people because that's what they expect to
see. I said I'd not really thought about it.



I remember that
in Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, they would have hallucinates in which the
other living members of the crew would tell them things. Why wouldn't
people who are alive tell you things in a similar way as you began the
process of dying and then you might come back and then would report
that? Why long dead people?


Because you think you have died and gone to "the other side." (Where
there are only dead people.)

But that isn't what happens in dreams (or in those two TV shows when
people hallucinated). So I wonder if people really only think they can
talk to dead people when they die.


Well, notwithstanding Babylon 5 and Deep Space 9, many people believe
that when they die they go heaven, meet their dead parents, etc. What
a shock that when they believe they are dying, or believe they are
dead, they hallucinate these manifestations.

What about the ones who think they go to purgatory or something?







And of all those people, how many have
really thought ahead of time about how they might see a tunnel and a
light and the people would only be already dead people?


Except that most don't see the tunnel. Some do - they expect it, or
the chemical reactions cause it.

More supposition?


Common sense. Besides, what are you saying? That since we don't know
for certain anything goes?

No, just that it is possible and you haven't proved it not possible.


I never said it is not possible. It is also possible that we are all
martians who have been programmed to believe we are from earth, too.
But I'd say that is unlikely as well. The point is, the fact that
something is possible is no reason to believe it.

I didn't say I believed it.

We have evidence of
oxygen deprivation hallucinations. We have no evidence of life after
death, and the evidence, as well as common sense, tells us life after
death is unlikely.

The evidence is supposed to be what you say is just hallucinations. What
sort of evidence would you accept?

Or are their
brains making this all up in a way that is logical --after all how
could
you talk to people beyond the grave who were not already beyond the
grave?-- while in the process of the rather traumatic experience of
dying?


The idea that these "people" are "beyond the grave" has never been
established, and there is no evidence whatsoever that they are there.
The most obvious explanation is the starving brain imagines it.

How about the starving brain hallucinates all that you see when you are
alive as well?


I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes

That's an insisted assumption. If you don't assume that you exist and
that there is a world around you that exists, you can't investigate it.



How do you know that you aren't the only being extant in
the universe and you are hooked up to some sort of matrix to facilitate
the rest?


So anything goes.

There is no evidence to disprove that matrix idea. We have to assume we
aren't in the perfect matrix. If it is a "perfect" matrix, does it even
matter whether we are in it or the "real" world or not?


Again, you are suggesting that anything goes. You suggestion is
unlikely.

I'm saying that in order to have a world view, you have to build it up
from the base. The first question you should ask is whether you exist.
Is there a way you can prove that you exist? Ich denke, also bin ich
doesn't exactly cut it.



Wouldn't you be more likely to reach for more current memories at
this point than the image of someone long deceased that you can't
hardly
remember the face of while you are alive and healthy and under no
pressure at all?


Not at all. I have dreams when I sleep. I am often amazed at how I
dream of things that happened long ago. Childhood memories, etc. The
human brain has all kinds of things going on in it. I suspect, we all
remember everything we have ever experienced, to one degree or another.
It just takes a trigger to set it free. Sometimes it is a comment from
someone, sometimes a smell, a visual image, etc.

But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!

That's your supposition.


Common sense vs. wild speculation? I'll take common sense any day.

Common sense isn't science.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.



User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 08:57:20 PM
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!

Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2214 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke loves to play
with little girls' nipples:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 14 Jan 2006 10:26:14 PM
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote:


On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!


Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!

I never claimed to have any faith. I'm discussing you. You are the Angry
Atheist. I'm not trying to take away your means of protecting yourself
from the realization that you will die, I'm just wondering why you are
trying to do that to people with religious faith.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 02:58:24 PM
Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote:


On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!


Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!

I never claimed to have any faith. I'm discussing you. You are the Angry
Atheist.

And you sound like the self-loathing theist because you feel powerless
to resist the need to believe.

I'm not trying to take away your means of protecting yourself
from the realization that you will die, I'm just wondering why you are
trying to do that to people with religious faith.



--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"

.
User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 04:40:50 PM
wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote:


On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!


Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!

I never claimed to have any faith. I'm discussing you. You are the Angry
Atheist.


And you sound like the self-loathing theist because you feel powerless
to resist the need to believe.

I didn't claim to believe anything. I'm discussing the defence
mechanisms of the Angry Atheist.

I'm not trying to take away your means of protecting yourself
from the realization that you will die, I'm just wondering why you are
trying to do that to people with religious faith.



--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"

--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 08:00:14 PM
In alt.atheism, Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it>
wrote
on 15 Jan 2006 23:40:50 +0100
<43CAD003.DA43AD7A@Il.Postino.it>:



liberalhere@yahoo.com wrote:


Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria') wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote:


On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!


Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!

I never claimed to have any faith. I'm discussing you. You are the Angry
Atheist.


And you sound like the self-loathing theist because you feel powerless
to resist the need to believe.

I didn't claim to believe anything. I'm discussing the defence
mechanisms of the Angry Atheist.

Considering some of the tender mercies of the Well Meaning Theist
in the past (the Crusades comes to mind), perhaps we have a right
to be suspicious, if not totally outraged at some of the sillier
statements which have been put into law.
[rest snipped]
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.



User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: Study: Really Smart People Reject Christianity (The Journal Nature) 15 Jan 2006 01:59:17 AM
On 15 Jan 2006 05:26:14 +0100, "Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')"
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:



"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote:


On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:38:01 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:

In article <43C9B15B.8109D1D1@Il.Postino.it>, 'Soli Deo Gloria'
<Pablo.Neruda@Il.Postino.it> wrote:


But why see these long dead people at the instant of death and not
someone seen more recently who might also be as important to you?


Because you EXPECT to see the dead!


Whiner Bill Bonde still at it? Talk about having an insecure faith!

I never claimed to have any faith. I'm discussing you. You are the Angry
Atheist.

And you're the whiny Christian who's insecure about his faith.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2214 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton O