Science > Abortion > Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats)
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"The Revrndd" |
| Date: |
19 Sep 2006 12:36:19 AM |
| Object: |
Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues) the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
.
|
|
| User: "DoD" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 12:49:04 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan kimmel
***** off......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 04:13:06 AM |
|
|
"DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:kxLPg.8790$RN2.5287@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting
for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise
at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell
them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel ***** off......
Do it, doodoo. It pains me to admit it, but I agree with you on this score.
Kimmel is a total tonk.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 11:42:32 PM |
|
|
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 02:18:55 AM |
|
|
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:YE3Qg.6566$uj3.3847@trnddc08...
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
New Year is months away, you thick Irish *****. No lies in the above, by the
bye.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying
up.
I dunno about that. I can name quite a few.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 11:59:03 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 02:19:39 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510c9d2.3381832@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying
up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And possesses the biggest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 02:58:39 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:19:39 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510c9d2.3381832@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying
up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And possesses the biggest.
The very shadow is enough to keep all of Baltimore in the shade!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 05:08:32 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510f48f.14323255@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:19:39 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510c9d2.3381832@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish
*****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying
up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And possesses the biggest.
The very shadow is enough to keep all of Baltimore in the shade!
And all the while I supposed Baltimore ponged because it was just
......................well.....................Baltimore.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 06:25:29 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:08:32 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510f48f.14323255@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:19:39 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:4510c9d2.3381832@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish
*****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying
up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And possesses the biggest.
The very shadow is enough to keep all of Baltimore in the shade!
And all the while I supposed Baltimore ponged because it was just
.....................well.....................Baltimore.
It has the misfortune of being downwind of Silver Spring, MD.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Bernard" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 12:30:39 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
--
amicalement,
Daniel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 12:46:50 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:30:39 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
Presumably she has adapted to the practice!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
With the help of Messrs Cheeseborough-Ponds, makers of Vaseline®.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Bernard" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 01:53:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:46:50 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:30:39 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
Presumably she has adapted to the practice!
That's evolution for ya!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
With the help of Messrs Cheeseborough-Ponds, makers of Vaseline®.
Or failing that, Hellmans mayonnaise.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 02:09:32 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:53:45 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:46:50 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:30:39 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
Presumably she has adapted to the practice!
That's evolution for ya!
Darwin was right!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
With the help of Messrs Cheeseborough-Ponds, makers of Vaseline®.
Or failing that, Hellmans mayonnaise.
Kosher, of course. For Gary's sake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 05:07:33 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <> wrote in message
news:4510e904.11368166@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:53:45 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:46:50 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:30:39 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish
*****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
Presumably she has adapted to the practice!
That's evolution for ya!
Darwin was right!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that
dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are
cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
With the help of Messrs Cheeseborough-Ponds, makers of Vaseline®.
Or failing that, Hellmans mayonnaise.
Kosher, of course. For Gary's sake.
You mean he eats there as well? EEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
20 Sep 2006 06:22:16 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:07:33 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:4510e904.11368166@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:53:45 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:46:50 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:30:39 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifth.horseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:59:03 GMT, (The
Re'vr''ndd) wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:32 GMT, aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 19-Sep-2006, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" < > wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish
*****!
Wow, a QUADRUPLE lie!
Wow, Suzy's still in denial, even after getting porked up the ***** for
ten years or so!
In denial? After ten years of phisting she should be in intensive
care.
Presumably she has adapted to the practice!
That's evolution for ya!
Darwin was right!
This is a record for the phony rev.
Must be the approach of the New Year setting him off.
I'm as immune to the jew New Year as you are, you th*ck Irish *****.
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that
dan
kimmel
***** off......
No one could be a bigger ***** than the loser to whom you are
cozying up.
Suzy
You could, Suzy. In fact, you're the biggest ***** in all of
Maryland!
And the loosest?
With the help of Messrs Cheeseborough-Ponds, makers of Vaseline®.
Or failing that, Hellmans mayonnaise.
Kosher, of course. For Gary's sake.
You mean he eats there as well? EEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
It's Gary's sabbath dessert!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 01:21:50 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:49:04 GMT, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan kimmel
***** off......
Have you been schvartzlisted?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 04:14:26 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f8c64.9052346@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:49:04 GMT, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you
need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which
I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting
for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise
at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made
for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell
them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
Have you been schvartzlisted?
It appears that 'Cramer', in all its iterations, is persona non grata on the
moderated group. Sensitive little buggers, aren't they.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 04:55:14 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:26 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f8c64.9052346@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:49:04 GMT, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you
need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which
I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting
for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too imprecise
at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made
for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell
them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
Have you been schvartzlisted?
It appears that 'Cramer', in all its iterations, is persona non grata on the
moderated group. Sensitive little buggers, aren't they.
Either the moderation guidelines have been changed or the bastards are
bending the rules to exclude people such as ourselves regardless of
content.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Cramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 05:42:12 AM |
|
|
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450fbe42.21817992@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:26 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f8c64.9052346@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:49:04 GMT, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you
need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which
I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting
for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too
imprecise
at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made
for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision
issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my
family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to
society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or
believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell
them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
Have you been schvartzlisted?
It appears that 'Cramer', in all its iterations, is persona non grata on
the
moderated group. Sensitive little buggers, aren't they.
Either the moderation guidelines have been changed or the bastards are
bending the rules to exclude people such as ourselves regardless of
content.
Noooooooooooooooo!!!! They wouldn't stoop to such a level.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revrndd" |
|
| Title: Re: Suzy Cohen defends "gay marriage" (was Re: Jackie Mason on Jews vs Democrats) |
19 Sep 2006 07:07:17 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:42:12 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450fbe42.21817992@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:26 +1000, "Ben C'ramer"
<[REMOVETHIS]bencramer7@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f8c64.9052346@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:49:04 GMT, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:
"The Re'vr''ndd" <rennigade@anglikkkon.com.za> wrote in message
news:450f817d.6260702@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC), aka
Suzy Cohen the th*ck Irish ***** wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Abe Kohen" <akohen@xenon.stanford.edu> wrote:
<levin.jj@gmail.com> wrote
I would like to see greater control of assault type guns (do you
need
an AK-47 to shoot deer?),
Yes, I would need an AK-47 to shoot deer, if I were a hunter, which
I'm
not.
For Jewish reasons of tzaar baalei haim, I cannot see myself hunting
for
"sport." But if I did, I would need an AK-47. An Uzi is too
imprecise
at
hunting distance, and other rifles I've trained on are usually made
for
righties. As someone who is a righty but shoots lefty (vision
issues)
the
AK-47 is the best rifle for me. Even with the aging of my eyes, the
AK-47
ought to do it.
Interesting.
Seriously, as a city slicker, I'm all for gun control, but if I were
living
in Utah or Montana, I would surely want a rifle to protect my
family.
greater taxation of SUVs and Hummers (we're
already giving the Arabs too much money for oil)
Always willing to take the next guy's $$.
More like always willing to protect the environment.
Anyone who suggests taxing these things is not in it for the money
- they are in it to try to get people to not drive those things, and
for the reasons mentioned. DUH.
and I certainly would
not ban smoking.
V'nishmartem m'ode al nafshoteichem. And smoking costs more to
society
than
someone's Hummer.
I would ban public smoking, sure.
It's EVERYONE'S air, not just the smoker's.
Your right to give yourself cancer is borne by society.
Your right to give others cancer is not acceptable nor protected.
Um, what you said....
RESTRICT individual freedoms? Dictate what people think or
believe?
Never. I am for freedom of the press, allowing adults full
reproductive
choice,
Waht does that mean?
It means that Jews would use whatever birth control their rabbis tell
them
to do,
Catholics would do what the Pope says and atheists would do what they
want.
and I want to get the government out of any decisions regarding
homosexuality.
Most of those laws were created by Democrats, if it at all matters.
Not the ones being debated.
You want to shtup or be shtupped, gay gezinter heit. Who is stopping
you?
Gays are being stopped from getting married.
This is not something the government should be deciding.
Suzy
Nobody stopped your bent jew hubby marrying you, you th*ck Irish *****!
Reading through the moderated group.... I would love to tell that dan
kimmel
***** off......
Have you been schvartzlisted?
It appears that 'Cramer', in all its iterations, is persona non grata on
the
moderated group. Sensitive little buggers, aren't they.
Either the moderation guidelines have been changed or the bastards are
bending the rules to exclude people such as ourselves regardless of
content.
Noooooooooooooooo!!!! They wouldn't stoop to such a level.
As we both know, there is no level beneath which jews will not stoop.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
