| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Tyrone Nation" |
| Date: |
11 Jan 2006 09:22:05 PM |
| Object: |
Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
Do you ever read a Spartakus post and say to yourself, "Boy, Spartakus'
posts sure are rote! Maybe he actually had some passion for Leftist causes
when he was in his 20s, but nowadays he can't even muster the passion to
write something original, his fervor has yielded to smugness and
self-satisfaction, and the revolutionary pretensions of his namesake just
seem pathetic!"
Appropriating suitably authoritative-sounding chunks of text from other
people isn't as easy... Spartakus only makes it *look* easy! Now here's
your chance to see what goes into the making of a Spartakus post, and
hopefully get a deeper appreciation of his wonderous talent!
The following post has four paragraphs. One paragraph is a piece of
boilerplate authored by Spartakus and surreptitiously pasted into his
posts, Chilton-style. Yet another paragraph is a near-verbatim quote from
another talk.abortion participant. Can YOU find the quotation that occurs
several times in Spartakus' posts? Can YOU identify the original author of
the unattributed quote?
The first person to correctly identify posts containing these two
paragraphs will win a DREAM DATE with Spartakus, where you can enjoy
48-oz. Slurpees® and freshly microwaved cheese nachos with him on the curb
of a 7-11 (Spartakus gets panic attacks if he's more than a hundred yards
from the premises of his gated community of aging hippies in Ithica where
the scariest thing anyone can think of is a pro-lifer.)
Write down the message-IDs and mail them in! All entries must be postmarked by
January 13... don't delay! (Offer void in states where law prohibits. We
retain the right to exchange the prize for another prize of lesser value.
Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine. Soloflex woman isn't actually 50
years old, dumbass. Sorry Tennessee!)
t e a r a l o n g p e r f o r a t e d e d g e
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
m a i l t h i s p a r t
From: "sparta...@my-deja.com" <sparta...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Bill K's wonderful idea
Date: 10 Dec 2005 10:21:57 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1134238916.918794.163510@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
rhineston...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Scratch a rabid anti-choicer and find a violent psychopath. Every time.
Not necessarily. There are some who truly believe abortion is against
their fundamental feelings. Of course, when you're dealing with those
who think women are their property then I'm sure there is a chance of
finding a violent psychopath amongst them.
I understand that. That's why I qualified my statement with the
adjective "rabid".
There are all sorts of anti-choicers - many are soft-hearted folks who
are misled about crucial facts regarding reproductive rights, human
gestation and abortion itself. Some are control freaks who try with
amusing futility to lay down *their* law as to who calls the
reproductive shots. A few are what I call "fetus fetishists" - they
identify completely with the zygote/embryo/fetus and have no empathy or
regard for the woman. Some of the latter have real scary issues
regarding sex, birth and death.
When some regard women as their property then of course it's possible
that they may always wish to be in control of those women.
It's a battle over control, actually. Before abortion and artificial
birth control, women could be kept in line. If they dared to have
unlicensed sex, they were sure to be punished, either by having an
illegitimate baby to raise or give up for adoption, or having a
frightening, unsafe illegal abortion.
There are those who are essentially pro-choice but still personally
opposed - that means that it's okay for others to choose but they would
not choose it for themselves. Then there are those who are essentially
anti-choice because they have suffered at the hands of totalitarian
religious indoctrination. Amongst these there are some psychopaths -
those who blow up abortion clinics fall under that category. After all,
if one is pro-life, why would they bomb buildings and cause serious
injury and death to innocent people? If they are pro-life, why would
they interfere with the freedom of others? I am pro-life but also
pro-choice. If a person wants to do something in relation to their own
bodies (such as abortion, drug use, and even suicide) and they are
absolutely sure they want to do so then I doubt even the most insanely
restrictive laws would stop them - we see it with suicides, we see it
with drugs, and we used to see it with abortion too.
Thanks for your response. I have always hoped that abortion would
someday only be used for dire medical necessity, while remaining legal.
Prosperity, effective birth control and comprehensive sex education
can really bring down abortion rates. The rate of abortion in the
Netherlands is only a fraction of what it is in the U.S. At the same
time, abortion should remain legal, because there is a direct link
between women's standing in society and the legality of abortion.
--
Robert Caponi |
email |
T.W.I.D.N. | http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/
It's every child's right to be born healthy, rich, and white!
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
11 Jan 2006 09:59:46 PM |
|
|
Tyrone Nation <tagutcow@earthlink.net> wrote:
Do you ever read a Spartakus post and say to yourself, "Boy, Spartakus'
posts sure are rote! Maybe he actually had some passion for Leftist causes
Another neocon bigot attacking people because he has no ideas.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
12 Jan 2006 10:32:38 AM |
|
|
Tyrone Nation wrote:
Do you ever read a Spartakus post and say to yourself, "Boy, Spartakus'
posts sure are rote! Maybe he actually had some passion for Leftist causes
when he was in his 20s, but nowadays he can't even muster the passion to
write something original, his fervor has yielded to smugness and
self-satisfaction, and the revolutionary pretensions of his namesake just
seem pathetic!"
[...]
So, have you transferred your unrequited obsession with Malapert to me?
;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tyrone Nation" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
13 Jan 2006 08:29:50 PM |
|
|
In article <1137083558.128918.289000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"spartakus@my-deja.com" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote:
Tyrone Nation wrote:
Do you ever read a Spartakus post and say to yourself, "Boy, Spartakus'
posts sure are rote! Maybe he actually had some passion for Leftist causes
when he was in his 20s, but nowadays he can't even muster the passion to
write something original, his fervor has yielded to smugness and
self-satisfaction, and the revolutionary pretensions of his namesake just
seem pathetic!"
[...]
So, have you transferred your unrequited obsession with Malapert to me?
;-)
Neither you nor any other pro-choicer on t.a nowadays have the demons
necessary to be as interesting as Malapert. Since her absence,
talk.abortion pro-choicedom has been left in a suffocatingly dull
self-congratulatory tailspin.
Apparently she was the only pro-choicer on t.a with anything marginally
original to say, leaving the unimaginative sheep she left in her wake to
merely parrot her tropes ("Woman!?! What woman?", et. al.)
This is the paragraph ostensibly authored by you in December quoted at
the start of this thread:
:It's a battle over control, actually. Before abortion and artificial
:birth control, women could be kept in line. If they dared to have
:unlicensed sex, they were sure to be punished, either by having an
:illegitimate baby to raise or give up for adoption, or having a
:frightening, unsafe illegal abortion.
Now here's a paragraph by Malapert from 1999:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/93ecc8ad7fd56eb0?dmode=source&hl=en
:Oh, it's definitely an overall battle. 'Abortion' is just a symbol of it
:all. You see, before legal abortion and before effective contraception
:women could really be kept in line. If they dared to have unlicensed sex,
:they were sure to be punished one way or another, whether by having an
:illegitimate baby to raise or give up for adoption, or having a frightening,
:unsafe illegal abortion.
The similarities between the two are certainly more than accidental. So
did you intentionally create a minor variation, making necessary
adjustments so as not to be plagarism, did you commit it to faulty memory
as an article of faith, or did it it just kind of seep into your
subconscious?
This paragraph by you...
:There are all sorts of anti-choicers - many are soft-hearted folks who
:are misled about crucial facts regarding reproductive rights, human
:gestation and abortion itself. Some are control freaks who try with
:amusing futility to lay down *their* law as to who calls the
:reproductive shots. A few are what I call "fetus fetishists" - they
:identify completely with the zygote/embryo/fetus and have no empathy or
:regard for the woman. Some of the latter have real scary issues
:regarding sex, birth and death.
...can also be found *verbatim* in these articles:
Message-ID: <6ed74dfa.0312300724.600c46cf@posting.google.com>
Message-ID: <Xns96A990B4AA498keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>
Message-ID: <lK1i9.37967$S32.2398172@news2.west.cox.net>
Message-ID: <auifks$nsa$1@newsreader.mailgate.org>
Heh, "misled about crucial facts regarding reproductive rights"... it's
absolutely *precious* that you think like that!
Dare I ask... what *are* these "facts"? Are they by any chance Craig
Chilton's factually relevant relevant FACTS? Maybe you should redirect
your efforts towards convincing the other pro-choicers who believe the
only "fact" about rights in general is that they're societal constructs.
And again, please describe some pro-lifers you know personally who led
you to the conclusions in that paragraph? Surely you just weren't pulling
it out of your ***** or adding minor variations to pro-choice orthodoxies!
I notice that both in you paraphrasis of Malapert and in your "original"
writing, you chose simply to repeat something rather than actually give
*evidence* of it.
Do you believe either of these paragraphs will be at all persuasive to
pro-lifers, who know perfectly well what they believe or what they don't
believe? If your intention in writing/repeating these things was not to
persuade pro-lifers, what was it? To *shame* pro-lifers? To convince
yourself?
--
Robert Caponi |
email |
T.W.I.D.N. | http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/
It's every child's right to be born healthy, rich, and white!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
12 Jan 2006 11:26:47 AM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
Tyrone Nation wrote:
The first person to correctly identify posts containing these two
paragraphs will win a DREAM DATE with Spartakus...
Sir, you mention Ithaca as a possible residence for this pathetic,
aging Hippie. You may or may not be aware that Ithaca is also *home*
for Attica State Prison, an institution noted for its playful and
congenial inmates fond of a firm, liberal *****, especially of the male
variety. I'm sure most of them would love a date with Spartakus and
would even furnish the Vaseline. Should I alert them to your contest so
they can apply?
Come to think of it, Spartakus has likely already did this himself!
Nevermind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
13 Jan 2006 12:32:36 AM |
|
|
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> writes:
Tyrone Nation wrote:
The first person to correctly identify posts containing these two
paragraphs will win a DREAM DATE with Spartakus...
Sir, you mention Ithaca as a possible residence for this pathetic,
aging Hippie. You may or may not be aware that Ithaca is also *home*
for Attica State Prison, an institution noted for its playful and
congenial inmates fond of a firm, liberal *****, especially of the male
variety. I'm sure most of them would love a date with Spartakus and
would even furnish the Vaseline. Should I alert them to your contest so
they can apply?
Come to think of it, Spartakus has likely already did this himself!
Nevermind.
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given very
little evidence of that.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Iowa 1 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 13 vs. Iowa, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
13 Jan 2006 11:16:14 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you
than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given very
little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 05:00:59 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you
than you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given
very little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
'smatter, IBenStalkingKids? Still can't grow the backbone to ignore me?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 3, Houston 2 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, January 15 vs. San Antonio, 5:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 12:48:40 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzhz5b10.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
'smatter, IBenStalkingKids? Still can't grow the backbone to ignore me?
Not only can't he ignore you, but what IBenHavingNoRealSex says in his own
words would indicate a fawning admiration for you.
What he's written:
"Ms. "Young" picked her name as a tribute to me; she has a sexual thing for
me that she has difficulty expressing."
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.california,soc.culture.jewish,talk.politics.misc,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Catholics deny Nazi support
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 00:13:04 -0500
Message-ID: <Rd-dnRd4_Z90ovHeRVn-rA@giganews.com>
His 'tribute' to you (us?):
From: (Loose Cannon)
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.sex.bestiality,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.support.boy-lovers,alt.flame.niggers
Subject: Re: To all ye' perverts and sinners: REPENT
Date: 18 Mar 2004 20:55:28 -0800
Message-ID: <5a858a1e.0403182055.6f4468@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.208.105
LC~ Completely creeped out by "J's" admission of his sockpuppets being a
manifestation of a 'sexual thing' for those he forges.
"I ain't a Jesus freak... I love porn stars!God bless them."
From: (Jon Young), one kinky loon.
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0404240901.7eb55105@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 12:30:30 PM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
J Young wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you
than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given very
little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
Posting in here is like being the best boxer on the planet tap-dancing
around some washed-up pug who's been smacked in the head once too
often. He throws a wild right and you flick it off like some annoying
little fly buzzing around your head. You say to yourself, "Man, is that
all ya got, ya bum?
Then you start to feeling sorry for these pathetic stumblebums hanging
on to the ropes, but you have to guard against these nobler instincts
because if you don't deck 'em right out of the chute and put out the
lights they start getting the people at ringside to thinking they even
belong in the same ring with you.
Indeed, Young, these are pretty pathetic people. Personally, I'd be
pretty fucking embarrassed if all I could post was the same old inane
dogshit they tack up in here day after day after day. You'd think
they'd at least vary it a little bit, but like the pug who can't fight
a lick, they only have so many moves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 02:49:46 PM |
|
|
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137263430.672530.144900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
X-No-archive: yes
J Young wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid.
(I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to
you
than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given
very
little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
Posting in here is like being the best boxer on the planet tap-dancing
around some washed-up pug who's been smacked in the head once too
often. He throws a wild right and you flick it off like some annoying
little fly buzzing around your head. You say to yourself, "Man, is that
all ya got, ya bum?
Then you start to feeling sorry for these pathetic stumblebums hanging
on to the ropes, but you have to guard against these nobler instincts
because if you don't deck 'em right out of the chute and put out the
lights they start getting the people at ringside to thinking they even
belong in the same ring with you.
Indeed, Young, these are pretty pathetic people. Personally, I'd be
pretty fucking embarrassed if all I could post was the same old inane
dogshit they tack up in here day after day after day. You'd think
they'd at least vary it a little bit, but like the pug who can't fight
a lick, they only have so many moves.
Actually, there are a few who do have some bonafide opinions and can present
them correctly, but most of the cretins of which you refer to only know how
to attack instead of discuss. Some are outright stalkers with no opinions
about anything, only attacks. After hurling every insult imaginable your
way, some will wonder why you never respond to their posts; as if you should
lower yourself. That course of action, in turn, only deters more
participation by those who have a difference of opinion but desire to debate
in a civilized manner. This is the price we pay when posting to Usenet; a
small price at that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 02:56:50 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-14 12:49:46 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137263430.672530.144900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
X-No-archive: yes
J Young wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid.
(I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to
you
than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given
very
little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
Posting in here is like being the best boxer on the planet tap-dancing
around some washed-up pug who's been smacked in the head once too
often. He throws a wild right and you flick it off like some annoying
little fly buzzing around your head. You say to yourself, "Man, is that
all ya got, ya bum?
Then you start to feeling sorry for these pathetic stumblebums hanging
on to the ropes, but you have to guard against these nobler instincts
because if you don't deck 'em right out of the chute and put out the
lights they start getting the people at ringside to thinking they even
belong in the same ring with you.
Indeed, Young, these are pretty pathetic people. Personally, I'd be
pretty fucking embarrassed if all I could post was the same old inane
dogshit they tack up in here day after day after day. You'd think
they'd at least vary it a little bit, but like the pug who can't fight
a lick, they only have so many moves.
Actually, there are a few who do have some bonafide opinions and can present
them correctly, but most of the cretins of which you refer to only know how
to attack instead of discuss.
The problem with that is that you are basically someone who posts one
sided articles from questionable sources and then doesn't discuss them.
Some are outright stalkers with no opinions
about anything, only attacks.
Calling them "stalkers" sounds like an attack. How could someone be a
stalker out here? All you need to do is stop posting. Osprey is a
good example he got tired of being embarassed and, to his credit, has
given up the fight. That is all it takes.
After hurling every insult imaginable your
way, some will wonder why you never respond to their posts; as if you should
lower yourself. That course of action, in turn, only deters more
participation by those who have a difference of opinion but desire to debate
in a civilized manner. This is the price we pay when posting to Usenet; a
small price at that.
But you rarely debate - you only post propaganda.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 05:12:51 PM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2006011412565016807%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-14 12:49:46 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137263430.672530.144900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
X-No-archive: yes
J Young wrote:
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
Posting in here is like being the best boxer on the planet tap-dancing
around some washed-up pug who's been smacked in the head once too
often. He throws a wild right and you flick it off like some annoying
little fly buzzing around your head. You say to yourself, "Man, is that
all ya got, ya bum?
Then you start to feeling sorry for these pathetic stumblebums hanging
on to the ropes, but you have to guard against these nobler instincts
because if you don't deck 'em right out of the chute and put out the
lights they start getting the people at ringside to thinking they even
belong in the same ring with you.
Indeed, Young, these are pretty pathetic people. Personally, I'd be
pretty fucking embarrassed if all I could post was the same old inane
dogshit they tack up in here day after day after day. You'd think
they'd at least vary it a little bit, but like the pug who can't fight
a lick, they only have so many moves.
Actually, there are a few who do have some bonafide opinions and can
present them correctly, but most of the cretins of which you refer to
only know how to attack instead of discuss.
The problem with that is that you are basically someone who posts one
sided articles from questionable sources and then doesn't discuss them.
Isn't that what trolls do?
Consistency isn't one of J's" strong points.
Come to think of it, he has none.
Some are outright stalkers with no opinions
about anything, only attacks.
Calling them "stalkers" sounds like an attack. How could someone be a
stalker out here? All you need to do is stop posting. Osprey is a good
example he got tired of being embarassed and, to his credit, has given up
the fight. That is all it takes.
Indeed.
"J"s" whines are too funny.
He incessantly posts inflammatory material (usually stolen), crossposts
widly, then bitches when he gets negative attention?
After hurling every insult imaginable your
way, some will wonder why you never respond to their posts; as if you
should lower yourself. That course of action, in turn, only deters more
participation by those who have a difference of opinion but desire to
debate in a civilized manner. This is the price we pay when posting to
Usenet; a small price at that.
But you rarely debate - you only post propaganda.
He's clearly not bright enough to defend his 'opinions'.
He's all about the attention, no matter how humiliating.
LC~ Gee, it's a regular schizophrenics neo-Nazi lovefest when
Cleo/Deo/Marie/whatever gets together with J/IBen/simon!
"I take my hat off to the Nazis. What we need now is .... a solution. It can
be seen as a final one, if you like..."~ J "IBen" young.
Message-ID: <1129611930.510748.91890@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
You act like tha's a bad thing! Looking around I am beginning to think
maybe we'd be better off had the Germans won that war.
From: "Cleopatra" <Let_Em_Eat_Indictments@hotmail.com>, loving that oldtime
genicide.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: HOMOS, GET READY FOR A HOTFOOT!
Date: 6 Dec 2005 12:01:06 -0800
Message-ID: <1133899266.109515.16490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 12:44:40 PM |
|
|
On 14 Jan 2006 10:30:30 -0800, "Deopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
J Young wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzi04ozf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you
than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given very
little evidence of that.)
Another idiotic response from the usual source.
Posting in here is like being the best boxer on the planet tap-dancing
around some washed-up pug who's been smacked in the head once too
often. He throws a wild right and you flick it off like some annoying
little fly buzzing around your head. You say to yourself, "Man, is that
all ya got, ya bum?
Huh. Who knew that Deopatra knows what it's like to respond to her
posts?
Such empathy is commendable, Deopatra. Now, when will you be working
on not making us feel sorry for your lack of intelligence?
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
13 Jan 2006 04:47:52 PM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you than
you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given very
little evidence of that.)
Goofy, I could give a ***** less where this Yid lives, but if it's in
California his whacked-out leftist views are totally in keeping with
the white wine and brie crowd in northern California. I know his type
well, for *guyz* like Spartakus are constantly jogging around my
neighborhood with a fanny pack strapped to their 98 pound cadaverous
frame sucking on a bottle of water. Either that or riding their fancy
little mountain bikes with a backpack on pretending they're in training
for the Tour de France. Everyday I hope one of 'em gets nailed by a UPS
truck or school bus!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 04:59:59 AM |
|
|
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Too bad he lives nowhere near what you're fantasizing, Cleoputrid. (I've
visited him a few times in the last decade, and he's a bit closer to you
than you think. That's assuming you *can* think, of course. You've given
very little evidence of that.)
Goofy, I could give a ***** less where this Yid lives, but if it's in
California his whacked-out leftist views are totally in keeping with
the white wine and brie crowd in northern California. I know his type
well, for *guyz* like Spartakus are constantly jogging around my
neighborhood with a fanny pack strapped to their 98 pound cadaverous
frame sucking on a bottle of water. Either that or riding their fancy
little mountain bikes with a backpack on pretending they're in training
for the Tour de France. Everyday I hope one of 'em gets nailed by a UPS
truck or school bus!
Santa really left you the chocolate acid and you've been on a delusional high
ever since, Mariopatra...and you're more Yiddish than Spartakus is.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 3, Houston 2 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, January 15 vs. San Antonio, 5:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katherine OFlaherty" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
14 Jan 2006 05:15:10 AM |
|
|
Deopatra wrote:
Goofy, I could give a ***** less where this Yid lives, but if it's in
California his whacked-out leftist views are totally in keeping with
the white wine and brie crowd in northern California. I know his type
well, for *guyz* like Spartakus are constantly jogging around my
neighborhood with a fanny pack strapped to their 98 pound cadaverous
frame sucking on a bottle of water. Either that or riding their fancy
little mountain bikes with a backpack on pretending they're in training
for the Tour de France. Everyday I hope one of 'em gets nailed by a UPS
truck or school bus!
Did one of them squirt their Evian in your putrid face? I had no idea
that when they said you were a sour puss that they were referring to
the pustular cleft flesh for which you attempted to solicit their
money. You never had a chance.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Take the "I want to win a date with Spartakus" Quiz! |
13 Jan 2006 04:58:37 PM |
|
|
In article <1137192472.767215.82090@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Deopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote:
Goofy, I could give a ***** less where this Yid lives, but if it's in
California his whacked-out leftist views are totally in keeping with
the white wine and brie crowd in northern California. I know his type
well, for *guyz* like Spartakus are constantly jogging around my
neighborhood with a fanny pack strapped to their 98 pound cadaverous
frame sucking on a bottle of water. Either that or riding their fancy
little mountain bikes with a backpack on pretending they're in training
for the Tour de France. Everyday I hope one of 'em gets nailed by a UPS
truck or school bus!
sounds like not getting to give bill clinton that ***** you dreamed
of for so long has left you a bit daft, cleo/marie/sockpuppet.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
