Science > Abortion > TBN's ***LYING*** Horse's Asses have done it AGAIN to Hal Lindsey!!!
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
04 Jan 2006 07:38:41 PM |
| Object: |
TBN's ***LYING*** Horse's Asses have done it AGAIN to Hal Lindsey!!! |
It's the New Year. January, 2006.
And it's 7:30 pm, CST, on Hal Lindsey's time slot
on TBN, on Wednesday evening.
TBN's despicable LIARS have once AGAIN proven
themselves to be loathsome and UN-Christian LOUTS!
They have AGAIN gutlessly *pre-empted* Lindsey's
show!
It's time for ALL of us to tell TBN that they can SING
for any further contributions. Such UN-Christian and
LYING schmucks deserve to receive **nothing**!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Thos hateful and intolerant lying liberals... |
04 Jan 2006 10:52:15 PM |
|
|
James Riske <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
James Riske <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
It's the New Year. January, 2006.
And it's 7:30 pm, CST, on Hal Lindsey's time slot
on TBN, on Wednesday evening.
TBN's despicable LIARS have once AGAIN proven
themselves to be loathsome and UN-Christian LOUTS!
They have AGAIN gutlessly *pre-empted* Lindsey's
show!
It's time for ALL of us to tell TBN that they can SING
for any further contributions. Such UN-Christian and
LYING schmucks deserve to receive **nothing**!!
I bet thoughts of murder are going through your mind this very second!
You probably fantasize about marching in to TNB offices with a loaded
weapon, how dare they not agree with Craig Chilton, HOW DARE THEY!!!
Liberals are so hateful.
You make up hateful fantasies about other people and you think that
it's them that are hateful?!?
Nothing is made up *****,
More of your hate.
Craig Chilton has proven himself to be a
You made ***** claims about his fantasies. The fantasies were
YOURS.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Thos hateful and intolerant lying liberals... |
04 Jan 2006 11:03:52 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43bca5ff$0$58059$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
James Riske <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
James Riske <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
It's the New Year. January, 2006.
And it's 7:30 pm, CST, on Hal Lindsey's time slot
on TBN, on Wednesday evening.
TBN's despicable LIARS have once AGAIN proven
themselves to be loathsome and UN-Christian LOUTS!
They have AGAIN gutlessly *pre-empted* Lindsey's
show!
It's time for ALL of us to tell TBN that they can SING
for any further contributions. Such UN-Christian and
LYING schmucks deserve to receive **nothing**!!
I bet thoughts of murder are going through your mind this very second!
You probably fantasize about marching in to TNB offices with a loaded
weapon, how dare they not agree with Craig Chilton, HOW DARE THEY!!!
Liberals are so hateful.
You make up hateful fantasies about other people and you think that
it's them that are hateful?!?
Nothing is made up *****,
More of your hate.
Yeah, and more of yours.
Craig Chilton has proven himself to be a
You made ***** claims about his fantasies. The fantasies were
YOURS.
So, it's ***** when someone else makes a claim about someone's fantasies,
but not when you do it?
BWAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Thanks for making my day, butt kiss!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Thos hateful and intolerant lying liberals... |
04 Jan 2006 08:45:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:05:15 GMT,
James Riske <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
We're minutes away from seeing whether or not TBN
was being HONEST when they said Hal's show would
resume tonight.
15 minutes, to be exact, as I sent this post.
His show is scheduled to come on at 7:30 pm, CST.
We're about to find out if we should add, "deceitful,"
to TBN's already-proven track record of being gutless
and hateful.
Will they continue to preempt Hal's show?
Will they bring it back... but *continue* to put their lame
and COWARDLY disclaimer on just beforehand?
Will they bring it back -- but only with a Hal Lindsey who
has been RESTRAINED and CENSORED by their gutless-
ness?
Or will Hal return in a few minutes -- UNconstrained -- and
with NO gutless disclaimer beforehand or after by TBN?
We're about to find out!
I don't know why you are so worried about it, the only person
I have seen on TNB that is worth watching is John Hagee.
WHEN Hagee is not proving himself to the world that he's an
Anti-Choice/homophobic/RRR Cult bigot, he can be interesting.
He accumulates a lot of "Attaboys" for his astuteness pertaining
to Bible prophecy. Only to make a complete horse's ***** of himself
by earning a himself a monumental "Ash*t!" that cancels them all
out when he reminds us that he's nothing but a mindless and hateful
bigot when it comes to women's and gays' rights and personal
liberties.
He CAN be quite humorous. That's the good news. The bad
news is that I doubt if he's learned a new joke in 15 years! Just a
couple of days ago, I was watching a tape I made in 1990 of one
of his broadcasts. SAME jokes! (It was really strange to see the
difference 15 years made in him. He had jet-black hair then, and
there must have been close to 100 lbs. less of him. He was THIN,
back then, by comparison!)
Oh, and I am sure you hate Hagee...
Naw. I don't even hate you. Or anyone else.
One thing I learned from opposing loathsome agendas by
losers just as extreme as you and your fellow ignorant RRR
Cultists -- the segregationists -- is that once the AGENDA(s)
has/have been relegated to EXTINCTION... bigots tend to
**outgrow** their bigotry, and become worthwhile people.
...just as you hate anyone who dares to disagree with you or
does thinks differently than you do...
ROTFL!!!!!!!!! I couldn't care less whether or not someone
disagrees with me. I care only whether or not people are STUPID
enough to fly in the face of all relevant FACTS in their desperation
to mindlessly seek to deny personal liberties and rights to others.
If women have legal abortions, and gays marry their same-sex
partners, NO harm is done, and it is NO one else's business.
Thus, the buttinskyish/busybodyish/control-freakish RRR Cult
lemmings are some of the most IDIOTIC people on the face of
the earth.
...liberals are so hateful.
Yeah. Right. THIS "hateful" ---
"What is a Liberal?"
Acceptance of the New York Liberal Party Nomination
by John F. Kennedy -- September 14, 1960
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label
"Liberal?" If by "Liberal" they mean, as they want people to believe,
someone who is soft in his policies abroad, who is against local
government, and who is unconcerned with the taxpayer's dollar,
then the record of this party and its members demonstrate that we
are not that kind of "Liberal." But if by a "Liberal" they mean
someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who wel-
comes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares
about the welfare of the people - their health, their housing, their
schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties --
someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and
suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they
mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."
But first, I would like to say what I understand the word "Liberal"
to mean and explain in the process why I consider myself to be
a "Liberal," and what it means in the presidential election of 1960.
In short, having set forth my view -- I hope for all time -- two nights
ago in Houston, on the proper relationship between church and
state, I want to take the opportunity to set forth my views on the
proper relationship between the state and the citizen. This is my
political credo:
I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in
human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart
as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as
the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith
in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the
heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party
creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind
and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his
reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men t
he amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all
human life deserves.
I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it
contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a
society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that
it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens, but serve equally
well as a beacon for all mankind. I do not believe in a superstate.
I see no magic in tax dollars which are sent to Washington and
then returned. I abhor the waste and incompetence of large-scale
federal bureaucracies in this administration as well as in others. I
do not favor state compulsion when voluntary individual effort can
do the job and do it well. But I believe in a government which acts,
which exercises its full powers and full responsibilities. Government
is an art and a precious obligation; and when it has a job to do, I
believe it should do it. And this requires not only great ends but
that we propose concrete means of achieving them.
Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous
ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social
invention, with political skill, and executive vigor. I believe for these
reasons that liberalism is our best and only hope in the world today.
For the liberal society is a free society, and it is at the same time
and for that reason a strong society. Its strength is drawn from the
will of free people committed to great ends and peacefully striving
to meet them. Only liberalism, in short, can repair our national power,
restore our national purpose, and liberate our national energies. And t
he only basic issue in the 1960 campaign is whether our government
will fall in a conservative rut and die there, or whether we will move
ahead in the liberal spirit of daring, of breaking new ground, of doing
in our generation what Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt
and Harry Truman and Adlai Stevenson did in their time of influence
and responsibility.
Our liberalism has its roots in our diverse origins. Most of us are
descended from that segment of the American population which
was once called an immigrant minority. Today, along with our
children and grandchildren, we do not feel minor. We feel proud
of our origins and we are not second to any group in our sense
of national purpose. For many years New York represented the
new frontier to all those who came from the ends of the earth to
find new opportunity and new freedom, generations of men and
women who fled from the despotism of the czars, the horrors of
the Nazis, the tyranny of hunger, who came here to the new
frontier in the State of New York. These men and women, a
living cross section of American history, indeed, a cross section
of the entire world's history of pain and hope, made of this city
not only a new world of opportunity, but a new world of the
spirit as well.
Tonight we salute Governor and Senator Herbert Lehman as a
symbol of that spirit, and as a reminder that the fight for full consti-
tutional rights for all Americans is a fight that must be carried on in
1961.
Many of these same immigrant families produced the pioneers and
builders of the American labor movement. They are the men who
sweated in our shops, who struggled to create a union, and who
were driven by longing for education for their children and for the
children's development. They went to night schools; they built their
own future, their union's future, and their country's future, brick by
brick, block by block, neighborhood by neighborhood, and now
in their children's time, suburb by suburb.
Tonight we salute George Meany as a symbol of that struggle and
as a reminder that the fight to eliminate poverty and human exploita-
tion is a fight that goes on in our day. But in 1960 the cause of
liberalism cannot content itself with carrying on the fight for human
justice and economic liberalism here at home. For here and around
the world the fear of war hangs over us every morning and every
night. It lies, expressed or silent, in the minds of every American.
We cannot banish it by repeating that we are economically first or
that we are militarily first, for saying so doesn't make it so. More will
be needed than goodwill missions or talking back to Soviet politic-
ians or increasing the tempo of the arms race. More will be needed
than good intentions, for we know where that paving leads.
In Winston Churchill's words, "We cannot escape our dangers by
recoiling from them. We dare not pretend such dangers do not exist."
And tonight we salute Adlai Stevenson as an eloquent spokesman
for the effort to achieve an intelligent foreign policy. Our opponents
would like the people to believe that in a time of danger it would be
hazardous to change the administration that has brought us to this
time of danger. I think it would be hazardous not to change. I think
it would be hazardous to continue four more years of stagnation
and indifference here at home and abroad, of starving the under-
pinnings of our national power, including not only our defense but
our image abroad as a friend.
This is an important election -- in many ways as important as any
this century -- and I think that the Democratic Party and the Liberal
Party here in New York, and those who believe in progress all over
the United States, should be associated with us in this great effort.
The reason that Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt and Harry
Truman and Adlai Stevenson had influence abroad, and the United
States in their time had it, was because they moved this country
here at home, because they stood for something here in the United
States, for expanding the benefits of our society to our own people,
and the people around the world looked to us as a symbol of hope.
I think it is our task to re-create the same atmosphere in our own
time. Our national elections have often proved to be the turning
point in the course of our country. I am proposing that 1960 be
another turning point in the history of the great Republic. Some
pundits are saying it's 1928 all over again. I say it's 1932 all over
again. I say this is the great opportunity that we will have in our
time to move our people and this country and the people of the
free world beyond the new frontiers of the 1960s.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Any neocon reading the speech above REALLY needs to
re-think his/her philosophy.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
