| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2005 12:30:43 PM |
| Object: |
Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 12:42:12 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
I see J Young sitting over there in his rowboat, testing all sorts of
bait.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 01:05:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:42:12 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
I see J Young sitting over there in his rowboat, testing all sorts of
bait.
But the big ones aren't biting. <G>
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 06:18:50 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:42:12 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
I see J Young sitting over there in his rowboat, testing all sorts of
bait.
You don't realize how true that is.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:30:39 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 10:38:17 PM |
|
|
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 05:37:09 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3psqmareb.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Well, technically Kennedy was only prosecuted for "leaving the scene", if
such evidence could be found to support a negligent homicide charge, or
manslaughter, he could still be prosecuted under those charges and not run
afoul of double jeopardy. There is no statute of limitations on homicide,
or murder.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 09:15:38 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3psqmareb.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Well, technically Kennedy was only prosecuted for "leaving the scene", if
such evidence could be found to support a negligent homicide charge, or
manslaughter, he could still be prosecuted under those charges and not run
afoul of double jeopardy. There is no statute of limitations on homicide,
or murder.
The only witness is six feet under. Maybe we could hold a seance. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 09:33:52 PM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bngrb25.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3psqmareb.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Well, technically Kennedy was only prosecuted for "leaving the scene", if
such evidence could be found to support a negligent homicide charge, or
manslaughter, he could still be prosecuted under those charges and not
run
afoul of double jeopardy. There is no statute of limitations on
homicide,
or murder.
The only witness is six feet under. Maybe we could hold a seance. :-)
I didn't say that the evidence would support the charge, just that you were
wrong as to the facts surrounding double jeopardy and the statute of
limitations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 09:41:42 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bngrb25.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3psqmareb.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Well, technically Kennedy was only prosecuted for "leaving the scene", if
such evidence could be found to support a negligent homicide charge, or
manslaughter, he could still be prosecuted under those charges and not
run
afoul of double jeopardy. There is no statute of limitations on
homicide,
or murder.
The only witness is six feet under. Maybe we could hold a seance. :-)
I didn't say that the evidence would support the charge, just that you were
wrong as to the facts surrounding double jeopardy and the statute of
limitations.
Did the guy I responded to (indirectly) suggest that Kennedy be
tried on any new charges?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 09:45:53 PM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3vf0c7ks9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bngrb25.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3psqmareb.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations
and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Well, technically Kennedy was only prosecuted for "leaving the scene",
if
such evidence could be found to support a negligent homicide charge,
or
manslaughter, he could still be prosecuted under those charges and not
run
afoul of double jeopardy. There is no statute of limitations on
homicide,
or murder.
The only witness is six feet under. Maybe we could hold a seance. :-)
I didn't say that the evidence would support the charge, just that you
were
wrong as to the facts surrounding double jeopardy and the statute of
limitations.
Did the guy I responded to (indirectly) suggest that Kennedy be
tried on any new charges?
Which has what to do with you being wrong about the facts surrounding double
jeopardy and the statute of limitations?
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 11:11:11 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3vf0c7ks9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bngrb25.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
I didn't say that the evidence would support the charge, just that you
were
wrong as to the facts surrounding double jeopardy and the statute of
limitations.
Did the guy I responded to (indirectly) suggest that Kennedy be
tried on any new charges?
Which has what to do with you being wrong about the facts surrounding double
jeopardy and the statute of limitations?
Plenty, since I simply stated that he needs to read up on it, along with
getting a life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
05 Oct 2005 04:46:12 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m364sck3r2.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3vf0c7ks9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bngrb25.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
I didn't say that the evidence would support the charge, just that you
were
wrong as to the facts surrounding double jeopardy and the statute of
limitations.
Did the guy I responded to (indirectly) suggest that Kennedy be
tried on any new charges?
Which has what to do with you being wrong about the facts surrounding
double
jeopardy and the statute of limitations?
Plenty, since I simply stated that he needs to read up on it, along with
getting a life.
So you were wrong. I don't really care about getting a life part.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
06 Oct 2005 02:26:53 AM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m364sck3r2.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
Which has what to do with you being wrong about the facts surrounding
double
jeopardy and the statute of limitations?
Plenty, since I simply stated that he needs to read up on it, along with
getting a life.
So you were wrong. I don't really care about getting a life part.
Wrong about what? I stated that he needed to learn about double jepardy
and the statute of limitations. He probably does.
Oh, and somoene else posted the "get a life" thing. I merely added to
it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
06 Oct 2005 05:13:25 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3zmpn2js3.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m364sck3r2.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
Which has what to do with you being wrong about the facts surrounding
double
jeopardy and the statute of limitations?
Plenty, since I simply stated that he needs to read up on it, along
with
getting a life.
So you were wrong. I don't really care about getting a life part.
Wrong about what?
About the facts surrounding Double Jeopardy and the Statute of Limitations.
Neither one applied to the Kennedy situation. Please stop acting stupid,
you're getting as bad as the fundies now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
06 Oct 2005 10:00:46 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3zmpn2js3.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
So you were wrong. I don't really care about getting a life part.
Wrong about what?
About the facts surrounding Double Jeopardy and the Statute of Limitations.
Neither one applied to the Kennedy situation. Please stop acting stupid,
you're getting as bad as the fundies now.
Oh come off it. I simply made a one-sentence comment about the rantings
of some random idiot. Go back and look at the original post.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 03:05:13 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Double jeopardy? That's one of those leftie moonbat things, right? ;-)
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Question with boldness even the existence of a *
* God; because, if there be one, he must approve *
* of the homage of reason, than that of *
* blindfolded fear." --Thomas Jefferson *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 05:37:12 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:ZIq0f.377$%W3.33@trnddc08...
No One wrote:
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Double jeopardy? That's one of those leftie moonbat things, right? ;-)
No moron. Double Jeopardy is a legal term with regards to not being able to
prosecute for the same crime twice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 05:51:47 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:ZIq0f.377$%W3.33@trnddc08...
No One wrote:
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Double jeopardy? That's one of those leftie moonbat things, right? ;-)
No moron. Double Jeopardy is a legal term with regards to not being able to
prosecute for the same crime twice.
Yes, I know that. Hence the winky at the end. :-)
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Question with boldness even the existence of a *
* God; because, if there be one, he must approve *
* of the homage of reason, than that of *
* blindfolded fear." --Thomas Jefferson *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
04 Oct 2005 06:15:25 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:79t0f.235$yN6.122@trnddc04...
Andrealphus wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:ZIq0f.377$%W3.33@trnddc08...
No One wrote:
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
Get a life.
And besides getting a life, read up on the statute of limitations and
part of the U.S. constitution prohibiting double jeopardy.
Double jeopardy? That's one of those leftie moonbat things, right? ;-)
No moron. Double Jeopardy is a legal term with regards to not being able
to prosecute for the same crime twice.
Yes, I know that. Hence the winky at the end. :-)
Oh, my bad then. There's so many morons out here it's hard to tell
sometimes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:43:20 PM |
|
|
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dhspgf$pjb$1@news.seed.net.tw...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"J Young's" troll snipped>
Get a life.
That prospect appears to be *well* down schizo-troll "J's" list of
priorities:
"I'm working on getting a grip."
From: (Jon Young)
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0404280727.6b3fc8df@posting.google.com>
LC~ "J" needs to get a psychoanalyst, then a functioning mind, then a job,
then some friends...etc.
"God doesn't want us to play God. love
Him,learn Him, live Him, but mind your own business or suffer the
wrath of God. thankyou."
From: (Jon Young)
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310101919.19a3c490@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 05:38:24 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted it to?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 05:44:24 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted it to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 06:05:23 PM |
|
|
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 07:57:57 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:TOi0f.9096$q1.4123@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
Don't tell me you're still reading 'J Young' spew.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:04:10 PM |
|
|
"Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org> wrote in message
news:psk0f.8590$oO2.4538@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:TOi0f.9096$q1.4123@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted
it to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
Don't tell me you're still reading 'J Young' spew.
Yeah, my bad. LOL!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:38:58 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
Yeah, my bad. LOL!
How is that post relevant to the newsgroups you posted to? Oh, wait -
that only applys to others, eh "Andrealphus". You fucking no name
trolls are all alike. Idjits one and all
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 06:15:10 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
It had revelance to the newsgroup I read it in. Your netcopping
***** had know. So, one rule for them - another for you. It's
Usenet. You decide what to read the author decides what to post. If you
don't know how to use your newsreader, learn. But you can ***** right
off if you try to censor what *I* get to read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 06:57:44 PM |
|
|
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128381310.698413.321650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case
been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted
it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
It had revelance to the newsgroup I read it in.
*****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:37:17 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128381310.698413.321650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case
been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted
it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
It had revelance to the newsgroup I read it in.
*****.
Actually, so far that's all I have heard from you, *****. Now go
play netcop someplace else. i will and always have posted what I
wanted and read what I wanted, if you don't like it - I suggest you
toss your computer out the window.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Buck" |
|
| Title: Re: Ted Kennedy should be in prison |
03 Oct 2005 09:34:46 PM |
|
|
On 3 Oct 2005 19:37:17 -0700, "Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com>
wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128381310.698413.321650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128379463.991417.78060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1128360643.248814.48830@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
July 1969, a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne was a passenger in a
vehicle driven by Sen. Edward Kennedy on Chappaquiddick Island. She
died as a direct result of Sen. Kennedy's actions. Had this case
been
properly investigated and prosecuted, Ted Kennedy would have been
there
to greet Michael Skakel when he arrived to begin his prison sentence
for murdering a young girl. It's now 2005; when will this case be
re-opened and let justice be served?
http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm
What in the hell has this to do with any of the newsgroups you posted
it
to?
that's for you to decide. you choose what you read.
Ummm.. no. Common courtesy says that we post topics relevant to the
newsgroups in which we are posting. This has no relevance to any of the
newsgroups he posted to.
It had revelance to the newsgroup I read it in.
*****.
Actually, so far that's all I have heard from you, *****. Now go
play netcop someplace else. i will and always have posted what I
wanted and read what I wanted, if you don't like it - I suggest you
toss your computer out the window.
But tossing _yours_ out the window (your computer I mean, you
PERVERT!!!) would be _so_ much more fun. ;-)
--
L8r,
Uncle Buck
_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=
Those first to step up and say,
"Now is not the time for placing blame"
...
...are quite often to blame....
_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=~_o-O=
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
