| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
15 Feb 2006 12:27:05 AM |
| Object: |
Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
Further proof that virtue and decency is being embraced by a larger portion
of society's young, and growing stronger every day. Keep up the good work
kids!
http://www.christianpost.com/article/society/2257/section/teens.promote.purity.on.valentines.day/1.htm
Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day
Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2006 Posted: 12:08:23PM EST
Teens and youth will stand up for sexual purity today on Valentine's Day by
taking part in the third annual Day of Purity, organizing events to
encourage their churches, organizations or community to take part.
The national event, which will involve hundreds, was organized by the
Liberty Counsel, a conservative Christian legal firm based in Orlando, Fla.
Youths will participate in various outreach activities to spread the message
of abstinence before marriage
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 05:05:57 AM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> blabbered stupidly
Now stay out of others' sex lives. It's none of your damn business.
Stop demanding that men not kill their wives, that's family business.
Please keep your fantasies to yourself.
The fantasy here is your implication that abortion is a private matter. The
issue of abortion already transcends privacy, saying that it's a private
matter is untrue. It is regulated by law to various extents in every part of
the world.
Try to pay attention. And stop lying.
RECAP:
Others' sex lives are none of your damn business.
Falsehood and irrelevant.
Abortion is legal.
Irrelevant
Your non-sequiturs are bizarre.
Your non-comprehension is typical.
Your equating spousal abuse (non-consensual by definition) with sex
(consensual by definition) is the product of your sick, controlling,
christstain mind.
The issue of private, harmless sex is your strawman, I never addressed it.
Abortion is not harmless, it is epitomy of harmful.
Sex is always consensual. Rape, the antonym for sex
Rape and sex are not antonyms, learn some english grammar.
, is
non-consensual.
Talk about non-sequitors.
Glad I could help you again.
Your moral and intellectual superior --
Your over-inflated ego is irrelevant.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie *****, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
Sophomoric posturing is gratifying to someone like you no doubt, but it's
not impressive or constructive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 06:23:16 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 03:05:57 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> blabbered stupidly
Now stay out of others' sex lives. It's none of your damn business.
Stop demanding that men not kill their wives, that's family business.
Please keep your fantasies to yourself.
The fantasy here is
..... your unchecked spousal abuse musing.
Try to pay attention. And stop lying.
RECAP:
Others' sex lives are none of your damn business.
Falsehood and irrelevant.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Abortion is legal.
Irrelevant
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Your non-sequiturs are bizarre.
Your non-comprehension is typical.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Your equating spousal abuse (non-consensual by definition) with sex
(consensual by definition) is the product of your sick, controlling,
christstain mind.
The issue of private, harmless sex is your strawman, I never addressed it.
Except when you addressed it by denying the fact that others' sex
lives are none of your damn business.
Go ahead -- lie some more about that. LOL
Abortion is not harmless, it is epitomy of harmful.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Sex is always consensual. Rape, the antonym for sex
Rape and sex are not antonyms,
Except that they are antonyms.
Sex is consensual.
Rape is non-consensual.
Rape and sex are not antonyms, learn some english grammar.
You first, judging from what you just wrote. LOL
, is
non-consensual.
Talk about non-sequitors.
You just made one. Enough talk. LOL
Glad I could help you again.
Your moral and intellectual superior --
Your over-inflated ego is irrelevant.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie *****, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
Sophomoric posturing is gratifying to someone like you no doubt, but it's
not impressive or constructive.
Except for its being impressive and constructive, on many levels.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 08:07:11 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
The fantasy here is
.... your unchecked spousal abuse musing.
You acknowledge that spousal abuse is a moral issue.
Why do you condone interference in such a personal family affair?
Because you value human life?
RECAP:
Others' sex lives are none of your damn business.
Falsehood and irrelevant.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of innocent
human lives. Your attempt to shout and shut down all discussion on a valid
moral issue is itself immoral.
Abortion is legal.
Irrelevant
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
It's irrelevant, I never stated that it wasn't, or even that it shouldn't
be, and incidentally it isn't always legal.
Your non-sequiturs are bizarre.
Your non-comprehension is typical.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
Your broken record technique is not impressive.
Your equating spousal abuse (non-consensual by definition) with sex
(consensual by definition) is the product of your sick, controlling,
christstain mind.
The issue of private, harmless sex is your strawman, I never addressed it.
Except when you addressed it by denying the fact that others' sex
lives are none of your damn business.
Sex is an integral part of various important moral issues, especially
concerning teens, including STDs, loss of self-respect, and unwanted
pregnancy. Attempting to silence discussion by stupidly declaring it to be a
"private matter" is unconstructive and disingenuous. Did I mention stupid?
Go ahead -- lie some more about that. LOL
No lies, only hard, sometime uncomfortable truth. Fetuses are unique human
lives, don't lie about it.
Abortion is not harmless, it is epitomy of harmful.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
That *IS* the topic.
Sex is always consensual. Rape, the antonym for sex
Rape and sex are not antonyms,
Except that they are antonyms.
Sex is consensual.
Rape is non-consensual.
That doesn't make them antonyms. Consensual and non-consensual are antonyms,
but rape and sex are not.
Rape and sex are not antonyms, learn some english grammar.
You first, judging from what you just wrote. LOL
Nope, you need to stop imagining that you're the smartest cookie around and
start learning a few things.
, is
non-consensual.
Talk about non-sequitors.
You just made one. Enough talk. LOL
Yes, enough *****, stop now.
Glad I could help you again.
Your moral and intellectual superior --
Your over-inflated ego is irrelevant.
Another lie from another sicko christstain trying to absolve himself
from staying on topic.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie *****, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
Sophomoric posturing is gratifying to someone like you no doubt, but it's
not impressive or constructive.
Except for its being impressive and constructive, on many levels.
Your unwarranted self-gratification is not relevant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 08:46:30 PM |
|
|
In article <11vi92f5soe76@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of innocent
human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 08:53:12 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in
news:jgkeegan-5328D4.21463019022006@individual.net:
In article <11vi92f5soe76@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
As a teen myself, I was all for other people's purity. I wanted a pure,
wholesome girl to *****. I expect little's changed.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
"Gods always behave like the people who created them"
-- Zora Neale Hurston
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 02:20:18 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns976FC023CFECE255229@130.133.1.4>,
Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in
news:jgkeegan-5328D4.21463019022006@individual.net:
In article <11vi92f5soe76@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
As a teen myself, I was all for other people's purity. I wanted a pure,
wholesome girl to *****. I expect little's changed.
:-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
19 Feb 2006 09:01:35 PM |
|
|
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 02:25:16 AM |
|
|
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 02:17:15 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch, and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 04:17:41 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in
news:1140466635.546322.6850@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch, and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
.. . . but this does not answer the question "Why respond to someone
you've killfiled by any method?"
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
I'm an atheist, and that's it. I believe there's nothing we can know
except that we should be kind to each other and do what we can for other
people.
-- Katharine Hepburn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 04:44:45 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch, and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
The answer is obvious, he's not that smart (Occam's Razor), which further
validates my decision to killfile him.
. . . but this does not answer the question "Why respond to someone
you've killfiled by any method?"
Invalid question. Who the ***** cares?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
23 Feb 2006 01:12:20 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns9770916DBE5B9255229@130.133.1.4>,
Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in
news:1140466635.546322.6850@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch, and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
. . . but this does not answer the question "Why respond to someone
you've killfiled by any method?"
the answer is obvious: you lied when you said you killfiled the
person you claimed you killfiled if you then flame the alleged
resident of your killfile in your responses to others. it is the way
of a coward.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 03:23:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1140466635.546322.6850@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch, and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
i see you didn't catch his hypocrisy in responding to me through
another's post. maybe you're taking on too much? you usually don't
make such transparent mistakes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 02:32:41 PM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <11vic8dn4hj5k54@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
piggybacking...
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Sex is relevant when it leads to the destruction of millions of
innocent human lives.
just as birth is, and does. you imbecile.
Thanks for confirming the wisdom of killfiling you.
how could you see and respond to my post if i were killfiled, nitwit?
James, he saw your reply through someone else that replied that he has
not killfiles. That is why he said that he was piggybacking his reply.
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch,
I've paid no attention to anything "Dutch" has written, but I'd
challenge that assertion.
and you have been
on Usenet more than enough time to figure out this trick.
keegan only has one trick. He understands nothing else.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 03:24:58 PM |
|
|
In article <WGpKf.15289$qg.14290@news01.roc.ny>,
Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
Your should know this. You are smarter than Dutch,
I've paid no attention to anything "Dutch" has written, but I'd
challenge that assertion.
with exactly the same basis in fact as any of your assertions; you
admit you are ignorant of the facts of which you speak.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 12:58:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:07:11 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
The fantasy here is
.... your unchecked spousal abuse musing.
You acknowledge that spousal abuse is a moral issue.
That's all your doing.
Why do you condone interference in such a personal family affair?
Because you value human life?
Yes, I do, as I also value humans' inherent rights to privacy,
autonomy, and self-determination.
Another reason why others' sex lives are none of your damn business,
and why until you grow a uterus, you get no say on abortion.
<flush remainder of Duchess' crap>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 03:27:14 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> enamoured with her alleged "intelligence"
mused...
You acknowledge that spousal abuse is a moral issue.
That's all your doing.
No, it's not. Moral issues are defined by a culture over time through a
process of adaptive consensus. There are no votes on the issues, just a
steady stream of ideas being put forward and argued back and forth until a
consensus is reached. At some point later in this process lawmakers become
involved to codify those elements that are consistent with other moral
values and have reached a high level of agreement.
Why do you condone interference in such a personal family affair?
Because you value human life?
Yes, I do,
Of course you do, so do I. We have something in common.
as I also value humans' inherent rights to privacy,
autonomy, and self-determination.
So do I, this begs the question though.
Another reason why others' sex lives are none of your damn business,
Not only sex lives, NOTHING thing people do is my business, or yours, unless
it negatively impacts other rights holders. But against, this simply begs
the question.
and why until you grow a uterus, you get no say on abortion.
That's illogical, both sexes have input on every moral issue. I agree that
the opinion of a particular pregnant woman has the most weight by far
regarding the resolution a particular pregnancy event, however unless YOU
are pregnant and discussing YOUR pregnancy, YOU are a third party and have
no more right to express your opinion that I do.
Repeating weak arguments does not make them strong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 03:32:22 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:27:14 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> enamoured with her alleged "intelligence"
mused...
You acknowledge that spousal abuse is a moral issue.
That's all your doing.
No,
Then you should hire new writers post haste.
<flush unintelligible crap from Duchess>
Why do you condone interference in such a personal family affair?
Because you value human life?
Yes, I do,
Of course you do,
Your sincerity is lacking.
<flush more unintelligible crap from Duchess>
Another reason why others' sex lives are none of your damn business,
Not only sex lives,
Then shut the ***** up and stop bitching.
"What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Pope Leo X
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 04:30:33 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> blabbed meaninglessly
I had hoped that you had something more to contribute, sad...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 06:33:26 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:30:33 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
I had hoped that I had something more to contribute, sad...
You may hope all you want, dipshit.
"What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Pope Leo X
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
20 Feb 2006 11:44:53 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
You may hope all you want, dipshit.
Life without hope would be pretty bleak, life without life is even bleaker..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
21 Feb 2006 01:46:46 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:44:53 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
You may hope all you want, dipshit.
Life without hope would be
..... yours.
"What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Pope Leo X
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
21 Feb 2006 02:37:34 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:ngrmv1to1825rek3j93i4qop8aue561tav@fe04.buzzardnews.com...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:44:53 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
You may hope all you want, dipshit.
Life without hope would be
.... yours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
21 Feb 2006 02:40:44 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:37:34 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:ngrmv1to1825rek3j93i4qop8aue561tav@fe04.buzzardnews.com...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:44:53 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
You may hope all you want, dipshit.
Life without hope would be
.... yours.
Honey, when posting, it's best to include your response, lest you come
off looking like an inbred dipshit too stupid to form words. LOL
"What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Pope Leo X
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
21 Feb 2006 03:30:16 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
Honey
I'm not your honey, fascist cuntwad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
23 Feb 2006 02:21:40 PM |
|
|
In article <11vn1j5dpf5f014@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
Honey
I'm not your honey, fascist cuntwad.
you're heard of protesting too much, haven't you baby?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
21 Feb 2006 04:44:25 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:30:16 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dutch"
<no@email.com>
"Bonnie B" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote
Honey
I'm not your honey, fascist cuntwad.
Suit yourself, nazi douchebag.
"What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Pope Leo X
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
16 Feb 2006 01:21:49 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:43:57 GMT,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote
Why is it that you RRR always think about sex, see sex
everywhere?
Because it is everywhere.
But when engaged-in by other people, it is absolutely NONE of
their damn business. At all. Whatsoever.
What's your point?
If you hadn't OMITTED the *rest* of what I wrote, you'd
have seen it.
I didn't say I didn't see it, I asked what is your point.
Well -- let's see. Here's the REST of the post, restored.
(If you didn't keep *omitting* it, you'd probably GET the point.
UNLESS, of course, you happen to be one of the dumbest
clucks in Usenet -- as you've already demonstrated very well by
letting us know that you are bigoted against the valuable personal
liberties of millions of people. Or you're a mindless troll.
Oohhh... label label label
He made it out of clay
oh label label label
He applies them everyday
Ask him what the point of his mindless diatribes are and all of a sudden
you're "bigoted against the valuable personal liberties of millions of
people", or "a mindless troll".
You musn't question the great and mighty Craig Chilton. You must accept
everything he says as truth, no matter how childish and irrelevant it
is. If you should ever dare to even ask him for any elaboration of any
point whatsoever, you will be declared a hateful, mindless bigot who is
seeking to destroy the liberties of the entire planet. But he doesn't
label anyone. For Craig, he applies "descriptors", not labels. As for
what he thinks a label is, it has never been asked, for to question him
means you have become the anti-Christ in his eyes.
He will now respond to this post, snipping everything I've written and
labeling me a troll. He's so afraid of acknowledging his true self that
he feels compelled to respond to every piece of criticism about him with
a few labels and a cute little text graphic.
He's the epitome of insecurity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day |
16 Feb 2006 02:19:31 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:21:49 GMT,
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
He will now respond to this post, snipping everything I've
written and labeling me a troll.
<mindlessness and idiotic lies flushed>
Yep. Because that's all that you are. And you prove it over
and over and over again.
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\__ trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Urinary tract infection? |
15 Feb 2006 07:28:37 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message=0D=0A<q1l7v1lj6l0kduo6aju98in6iqtlbt2cra@4ax.com>...=
=0D=0A=0D=0A> I Shaved My *****. Will The Hair Grow Back!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
